Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"While Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who is following the Kentucky Constitution that prohibits same-sex marriage, was sent to jail by pro-homosexual U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning (enthusiastically supported by Mitch McConnell), President Obama was making up new laws and forcing us to pay for men wanting to become women and women wanting to become men:
“The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a planned new regulation Thursday that will require health insurers participating in Obamacare to cover more health procedures sought by the transgendered.
“The new rule applies to every health insurer offering plans through Healthcare.gov or any of the state-run Obamacare insurance exchanges. It declares that insurers are prohibited from engaging in discrimination not only on the basis of sex, but also on the basis of gender identity.
"In the past, several health insurance plans have categorically excluded health care related to transitioning between genders, often on the grounds that such procedures are often cosmetic, not medically necessary, and elective in nature. Now, such categorical bans will be disallowed, and insurers will have to cover many of the procedures.”
It’s not surprising that liberals have no problem making up laws and forcing us to pay for them while violating laws when it suits their agenda.
Lawlessness was the name of the game when California voters voted to outlaw same-sex marriage in the infamous Proposition 8 ballot measure:

“Davis’s arrest was met with cheers by same-sex marriage advocates who for some reason did not demand imprisonment of officials who lawlessly issued gay marriage licenses in clear contravention of state and federal laws. Take, for example, Democrat who is currently the California lieutenant governor. Back in 2004, when gay marriage was banned under California state law, Newsom openly defied the law and used his power as the mayor of San Francisco to force taxpayer-funded government clerks to issue gay marriage licenses.”
More than 3000 same-sex couples violated the law, and not one of them was fined or went to prison. This says nothing of the clerks who issued them marriage licenses. “Just like Kim Davis, who is an elected Democrat, Newsom justified his lawlessness by citing his own conscience and beliefs about right and wrong rather than deferring to the actual laws of his state.”
Most of today's judges and governors are afraid of the Gaystapo and their media minions. they bow before the political phallic symbol in order to keep their jobs, be accepted by the cocktail crowd, and stay in office long enough to get their fat pensions.
They never could have signed the Declaration of Independence because it included this line:
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

http://godfatherpolitics.com/24861/here ... BCqVY48.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"We knew Obama was evil, but we never thought he’d do something THIS bad…

If America had a real leader, the Islamic State (ISIS) would already be wiped off the map.
But we don’t. And as Yousef al-Salfi, an ISIS leader in Pakistan just admitted during interrogation, ISIS is being FUNDED by the Obama administration! What an incredible story, as it confirms our worst fears.
Salafi told the Pakistani government that America paid $600 per terrorist recruit if they joined the fight in Syria against the West.
The American military is opposed to what ISIS is up to, but hasn’t been able to stop the funding that is flowing through America. To try to kill these rumors, the Obama administration has supported military attacks in Iraq, but have avoided the issue of Syria entirely.
It is shameful to learn America’s leaders are involved in supporting the most oppressive regime in recent history. ISIS wants to destroy the West and Christianity, while murdering all non-believers. In Pakistan, Christians have already been slaughtered as ISIS fights to instill a Sharia regime. ISIS should be DESTROYED, not funded by tax dollars:

The Obama administration funding ISIS should not surprise us. Lets not forget that the Obama administration has refused to back Egypt in its destruction of ISIS, and is working with Turkey which [is] one of the main backers of ISIS. Let us also not forget that the USA supports the FSA and is working to continue to fund and train jihadists in Syria to overthrow the Assad regimen, an action that will only allow the Islamists, and ultimately Turkey, to dominate the Middle East."
http://patriotupdate.com/isis-terrorist ... -by-obama/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 12983

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Fiannan »

Now Elizabeth, there you go bringing up inconvenient truths when there are so many more important topics people would like to address, like coffee!

;)

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

:) ;)

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"History has shown that most of the brutal dictators of the past have share two or three mental illnesses. These illnesses include Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD) and Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Given the direction of the country, it is legitimate to ask whether or not this President is indeed mentally ill. In my professional opinion, any combination of two of these mental illnesses would prevent a President from discharging his duties as prescribed by the Constitution of the United States.

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment-Section Four
"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President…"
If the President could be shown to mentally ill, under the 25th Amendment he could be removed from office. With the publicly available information, and based upon my training and experience in mental health diagnostics, I have conducted a mental health status exam of this President.
The Mental Illnesses of Dictators
Before analyzing President Obama according to these criteria, based upon observed public behaviors, please allow me to make a few general observations with regard to three conditions. Narcissistic Personality Disorder
(NPD) sufferers believe that they are entitled to special privilege and that the rules of society apply to others but not to them. Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD) individuals are people who are unusually suspicious in situations in which most people would not be concerned. They frequently change allies and lack stable relationships in their lives. Finally, Anti-Social Personality Disorder (ASPD) people are a combination of what we used to call a sociopath and a psychopath. These people are capable of doing great harm to another human being without feeling any empathy and remorse. This is the central element in the personality structure of a person who would commit genocide against their own people.
The remainder of this article explores if the current President is indeed mentally ill based upon the universally agreed upon diagnostic criteria as set forth by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM).
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
In order for a person to be diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) they must meet five or more of the following symptoms:
Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
Believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
Requires excessive admiration
Has a very strong sense of entitlement, e.g., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
Is exploitative of others, e.g., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
Lacks empathy, e.g., is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
Regularly shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
Five out eight of these symptoms are sufficient cause to warrant a positive diagnosis. Obama is one of the most self-righteous people on the planet and we have numerous quotes which exemplify this point.
"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America." Very few Americans had any idea what Obama meant by that quote. Six years into his presidency, it is clear that Obama meant to turn this country into an impoverished nation devoid of civil liberties. This is the ultimate expression of the communist legacy that he is trying to build.
This president does not tolerate normal criticism which comes with the territory of being a president. He has consistently sponsored legislation which inhibits the constitutionally guaranteed rights of legitimate protest with his support of the NDAA. This is the ultimate in haughtiness.
Obama exhibits extreme signs of feeling a sense of entitlement. His incessant misuse of the power of executive orders provides prima fascia evidence that "his will be done" and that he is above the law with regard to violating the constitutional rights of the American people.
Obama is an extremely exploitative person. However, in the grand scheme of politics, it is a needed survival skill to take advantage of people in one's climb to the top of the political world. Therefore, is Obama exploitative by nature, or, do the political realities of his position dictate the emergence of this trait as a survival skill? The jury is out on this one.
"You did not build that business." Remember that insulting and impersonal slap in the face of every small business owner in America? This statement is reflective of Obama's view that nobody is bigger than "my" government.
The President's statement in which he bragged he was really good at killing people by using drones speaks to his extreme level of insensitivity.
Of the eight traits associated with this disorder, I see seven of the eight with the eighth trait not being supported due to a lack of evidence.
President Obama clearly suffers from NPD. People with NPD can indeed function to some degree in society. However, they often make very ineffective leaders because they almost always put their needs ahead of the needs of the people they purport to serve.
Paranoid Personality Disorder
To make a positive diagnosis for this disorder, I would have to possess intimate details about the life of Obama. Unfortunately, that information is not readily available."

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/12/obama ... v8ptZ3X.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"Lance Cpl. Gregory Buckley Jr. was fatally shot in 2012. He was a United States Marine. However, before he was killed, he told his father that at night, he and his fellow soldiers had to sit and listen to little boys scream from being raped by Afghan officers… and under Barack Obama's leadership, they were not allowed to interfere.
"At night we can hear them screaming, but we're not allowed to do anything about it," according to Gregory Buckley Sr., the young man's father, speaking of what his son told him. "My son said that his officers told him to look the other way because it's their culture."
This is not the first we have heard of this. In August of this year, Pamela Geller reported that Sgt. 1st Class Charles Martland, a highly decorated Green Beret, was being kicked out of the Army after he shoved an Afghan police commander, who was accused of raping a young boy and beating up his mother when she reported the incident.
image: http://cdn1.eaglerising.com/wp-content/ ... 00x157.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"He confessed to the crime and laughed about it, and said it wasn't a big deal," Daniel Quinn, a West Point graduate and the team leader of the detachment sent to Kunduz, told Fox News of the Afghan police commander's actions. "Even when we patiently explained how serious the charge was, he kept laughing. As a man, as a father of a young boy myself at the time, I felt obliged to step in to prevent further repeat occurrences.""We had been hearing for months about raping in our province, not just in Afghanistan," he added.
Congress at least showed some bit of concern in attempting to stand up for Mr. Martland. "I am once again dismayed by the Army's actions in this case," Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., wrote in a letter to Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter.
"It's sad to think that a child rapist is put above one of our elite military operators. Sergeant Martland was left with no other choice but to intervene in a bad situation. … The Army should stand up for what's right and should not side with a corrupt Afghan police officer," Hunter added.
However, as we have reported before, this is nothing new in Islam. To advance the jihad, anything is permissible, including sodomy. But Islam has a long history of sodomy and pedophilia, which Walid Shoebat has documented.
If Barack Obama will not be held accountable for how the men who serve in the US military are treated for seeking to be valiant on the behalf of young children, then Congress is of no good to us anymore. Frankly, I think they have become a joke as they are not interested in following the Constitution nor upholding their oath of office any more than the usurper-in-chief.
However, no US serviceman should face being ejected from the service for upholding a morally upright position when it comes to the protection of the innocent when he is able to do so."
http://eaglerising.com/24069/shocking-r ... FLiyC84.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"While the US Congress welcomed the socialist Pope Francis to speak before them, the Obama administration was quietly betraying the American people (again) and acting treasonously against the US Constitution.
Mad World News reports:
The Pope has been rubbing elbows with American leaders, schmoozing with Washington's elite, and espousing traditionally liberal talking points during highly politicized speeches, which has kept the media plenty busy covering his every move. As this has been happening, the Obama administration quietly released a man named Abdul Shalabi without anybody taking notice, until now.
Shalabi was being held at the infamous Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba, so you know that he's probably not the best person on the planet. That much is confirmed after you find out why he was put there to begin with.
Shalabi has a long resume in the world of terror, reports Derrick Wilburn for Allen West. Just how deep are his ties to terror? Well, you don't get much more terroristic than Osama bin Laden, who Shalabi served as a bodyguard for, but it goes even deeper than that.
Shalabi was also a bodyguard for Kalid Sheik Mohammed, one of the masterminds behind the 9-11 attacks.
The Bush administration said that Shalabi was "too dangerous to release." Well, if so, then the Bush administration should have proved their assertions, assertions I believe would have been clear and then removed Shalabi from the face of the earth.
Derrick Wilburn points out, "The very idea that this man who worked side-by-side with Osama bin Laden can somehow be "rehabilitated" to no longer want to kill infidels, and, be rehabbed by the Muslim government of an Islamic nation – is beyond laughable. What does Obama think he's going to do there now, train to become a valet? Take up needlepoint? Oh, I know, maybe open a bakery and make cakes for gay weddings."
Exactly right. However, instead of dealing with Salabi justly, finding him guilty of his crimes and administering proper justice, the criminal Obama administration has set him free, and you can be sure he will re-engage the jihad, just as the five jihadis did that Obama illegally released in a swap for deserter Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.
So, once again Barack Hussein Obama puts America in jeopardy so he can side with the Muslims, and at the same time, House Speaker John Boehner, who has engaged the fight at all since he's been in office, retreats to a life of retirement at tax expense. I say good riddance to Boehner, but when is Congress going to impeach the traitor-in-chief for giving aid and comfort to the enemy, including setting free a known jihadist, who will sure as the devil engage in the fight against the united States of America."

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/09/while ... icEksSi.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=240&v=tCAffMSWSzY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


"Obama admits that he is a Muslim. Obama bowing before a Muslim king. Obama talking about his Muslim family. Obama quoting from the Koran. Obama defending Islam. Obama visiting a Mosque. And many more clips of Obama and his Muslim connections. Legal Disclaimer: The writers, producers, and editors of this video are not claiming or implying that Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim, or that Obama said he was a Muslim, rather they are only examining the evidence surrounding the rumour that Barack Hussein Obama might be a secret Muslim."

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by freedomforall »

Elizabeth wrote:"While the US Congress welcomed the socialist Pope Francis to speak before them, the Obama administration was quietly betraying the American people (again) and acting treasonously against the US Constitution.
Mad World News reports:
The Pope has been rubbing elbows with American leaders, schmoozing with Washington's elite, and espousing traditionally liberal talking points during highly politicized speeches, which has kept the media plenty busy covering his every move. As this has been happening, the Obama administration quietly released a man named Abdul Shalabi without anybody taking notice, until now.
Shalabi was being held at the infamous Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba, so you know that he's probably not the best person on the planet. That much is confirmed after you find out why he was put there to begin with.
Shalabi has a long resume in the world of terror, reports Derrick Wilburn for Allen West. Just how deep are his ties to terror? Well, you don't get much more terroristic than Osama bin Laden, who Shalabi served as a bodyguard for, but it goes even deeper than that.
Shalabi was also a bodyguard for Kalid Sheik Mohammed, one of the masterminds behind the 9-11 attacks.
The Bush administration said that Shalabi was "too dangerous to release." Well, if so, then the Bush administration should have proved their assertions, assertions I believe would have been clear and then removed Shalabi from the face of the earth.
Derrick Wilburn points out, "The very idea that this man who worked side-by-side with Osama bin Laden can somehow be "rehabilitated" to no longer want to kill infidels, and, be rehabbed by the Muslim government of an Islamic nation – is beyond laughable. What does Obama think he's going to do there now, train to become a valet? Take up needlepoint? Oh, I know, maybe open a bakery and make cakes for gay weddings."
Exactly right. However, instead of dealing with Salabi justly, finding him guilty of his crimes and administering proper justice, the criminal Obama administration has set him free, and you can be sure he will re-engage the jihad, just as the five jihadis did that Obama illegally released in a swap for deserter Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.
So, once again Barack Hussein Obama puts America in jeopardy so he can side with the Muslims, and at the same time, House Speaker John Boehner, who has engaged the fight at all since he's been in office, retreats to a life of retirement at tax expense. I say good riddance to Boehner, but when is Congress going to impeach the traitor-in-chief for giving aid and comfort to the enemy, including setting free a known jihadist, who will sure as the devil engage in the fight against the united States of America."

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/09/while ... icEksSi.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
When HELL freezes over for the whole lot of them. Their time is coming when they will face God and have to explain themselves.

I find it hard to believe that people like Obama was ever in God's presence and fought for the side of Jesus Christ. God had to have known that so many of his children were going to go on the side of evil. History reveals some really bad people that once stood in white robes near Jehovah, right?

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"The Obama administration’s success in the Middle East has been nothing to write home about. Despite efforts to paint a rosy picture of strides made against ISIS, Al Qaeda and all of the off-shoots, from Iraq to Syria to Libya to Yemen and beyond– the truth remains clear for all to see: the Middle East is a roiling mess and it’s not getting any better.
In a recent appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Deb Fischer (R-NB) asked General Lloyd Austin of U.S. Central Command to confirm the number of U.S.-trained Syrian fighters that remained on the battlefield.
Gen. Austin answered that of the about 60 Syrian fighters that the U.S. spent $500 million to train,
“It’s a small number. The ones that are in the fight is… we’re talking four or five.”
In light of the fact that it has recently been revealed that the Obama administration has been ‘cooking the books’ when it comes to intel on ISIS and trying to paint a picture of greater American success, and now we find that the taxpayers have had to foot the bill for what could conservatively be called a roaring failure, when are the American people going to demand accountability for Obama’s failure to stem the tide of Islamic terrorism?”
http://rightwise.com/news/massive-fail- ... g-believe/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

http://survivalinstitute.com/isis-in-yo ... president/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Saudi Arabia has housing for three million people, they still won’t accept any refugees fleeing from ISIS terrorism and control. In fact, they are building200 mosques in Germany to help Germany deal with the relocation of so many people. Muslims call this “hijrah: a migration for the sake of Allah, to plant Islam in a new land.” And I’d be willing to talk about peaceful immigration except that we’re receiving reports that ISIS terrorists are planted among the refugees to give the terrorists easy access to new victims for their sick violence. To make it one step worse, the Obama administration has a history of targeting “red states” for refugee immigration. Read it how you want, but it seems pretty clear that Obama is trying to put jihadists in areas where they can shoot and blow up people who don’t vote for his collectivist policies.Sleep with one eye open and have your defensive measure handy. You don’t want to be caught unprepared.”

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"Obama:“We affirm that we cherish our religious freedom and are profoundly respectful of religious traditions. . . . But we also have to say clearly that our religious freedom doesn’t grant us the freedom to deny our fellow Americans their constitutional rights.”
No "fellow Americans" are being denied their rights, except those who who refuse to support same-sex events with their businesses. What many people object to is the sexual behavior of some of their "fellow Americans."
President Obama is a fraud. Prior to running for President he stated that he was against same-sex marriage. The ridicule he is leveling against today's opponents of same-sex marriage and homosexuality generally, he would have had to level the same criticism against himself and Bill and Hillary Clinton just a few short years ago and billions of people through thousands of years of history.
Read more: "If Obama is a Christian, then What About His Non-Christian Policies?"
Let's not forget that Obama opposed same-sex marriage when he was campaigning for President.

A new report has come out today showing a high incidence of diseases among people who engage in same-sex sexuality.
The Centers for Disease Control Fact Sheet notes:
“Trend data show that men who have sex with men (MSM)* account for three quarters (75 percent) of all primary and secondary syphilis cases. Primary and secondary syphilis are the most infectious stages of the disease, and if not adequately treated, can lead to visual impairment and stroke. Syphilis infection can also place a person at increased risk for acquiring or transmitting HIV infection. Surveillance data from several major cities throughout the country indicate that an average of four in 10 MSM with syphilis are also infected with HIV.”
How can sane people read these disease statistics and claim that same-sex sexuality is rational, normal, morally supportable, and anatomically and biologically agreeable?
You may remember Danny Pintauro from the TV show "Who's the Boss?" He was on Oprah over the weekend and said the following: "I'm HIV positive. I have been for 12 years, and it's just a big deal. . . . It's not something that people are talking about, really."
Of course they're not talking about it because has been to normalize homosexuality. GRIDS (Gay-Related Immune Deficiency), "the name first proposed in 1982 to describe an 'unexpected cluster of cases' of what is now known as AIDS," was a same-sex sexuality disease. AIDS was telling the world "don't do this."
We were told that "anyone could get AIDS." This was a lie. Homosexuals, drug users who shared needles, people with multiple sex partners, and people who received blood transfusions were the most likely victims.
President Obama is a tyrant that needs to be stopped. Maybe with John Boehner retiring the GOP establishment being put on notice, Congress may actually do its job and stop any more pro-same-sex sexuality legislation.”
http://godfatherpolitics.com/25380/obam ... kLUbHL2.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"Muslim invaders into the West is is all part of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees' "Transformative Agenda" via the influence of the Socialist International (SI). This agenda is nothing short of Balkanizing Europe and the united States and making our lands filled with chaos, terrorism, strife and wickedness.

The New American reports:
UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) executive director Anthony Lake are the UN point men working closely with the Obama State Department. The active leadership of both these individuals in the U.S. and EU refugee policies is cause for alarm. Even more alarming is the fact that they are not the only troubling participants; the ranks of the UN officials involved in formulating refugee "solutions" are filled with persons — including from Communist China — who have neither the interests of the refugees nor the security concerns of the West in mind. Guterres is the former Socialist Party prime minister of Portugal and former president of the European Council. Perhaps most notably, he was, from 1999-2005, president of the Socialist International, the radical Marxist organization that includes many "former" communist parties that have rebranded themselves as "socialist" or "social democrat" — without significantly changing their politics or personnel.
Although virtually unknown to most Americans, the Socialist International (SI) has been exerting enormous political influence worldwide since the 1950s, especially through its dominant influence at the United Nations.
SI "ultimate objective ... nothing less than world government"
The Socialist International membership includes more than 160 socialist parties from more than 100 countries, including from 54 nations where SI member parties are currently running the show or sharing power in a coalition government. At its 1962 Congress in Oslo, Norway, the Socialist International candidly proclaimed: "The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government.... Membership of the United Nations must be made universal." The SI has never deviated from that objective, and has used its growing influence to push greater empowerment of the UN and its agencies, to the point that the UN is now on the brink of becoming a world government.
SI called on the European Union to reach a speedy agreement to handle in a "fair and humane" way the flow of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East. The organization added, "While it is important to recognise that this is an issue of global dimension and requires that countries from all continents assume their fair share of responsibility, it is crucial for Europe today to act in line with the values, the spirit of solidarity and of common progress upon which the EU was founded with the participation of our movement, and in keeping with its moral and legal obligations."
First, how does SI claim anyone must "assume their fair share and responsibility"? Where did that idea come from? Second, what is this claim of "common progress"? Take a look at the Middle East and take a look at the West. There are light years of difference between the progress of one and the living in the Dark Ages of the other, and that has been the result of choosing to do so. The West has been based upon the Christian faith, teaching victory in Christ over the nations and subduing the enemies of Christ through the Gospel. The Middle East, for the most part, has been subdued by the teachings of Allah. We all see what that has resulted in.
SI continued their appeal to the world, "The Socialist International remains committed to promoting political solutions to this crisis, convinced that political action is the only way to achieve the conditions necessary for peace, democracy and equality. This position has been borne out at the numerous meetings of its Migrations Committee, its regional committees and its Councils, the most recent of which, held at the UN headquarters in New York, adopted unanimously a Charter for the Rights of Migrants, Refugees and Asylum Seekers to which all its member parties worldwide subscribe."
"At the SI Council meeting held at the UN in Geneva in December 2014 António Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees and former President of the Socialist International, warned that the humanitarian system was reaching breaking point," SI noted. "He also stressed the crucial need to tackle the root causes that create humanitarian problems, which urgently needed to be addressed from a political perspective."

Others on the UN's Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), who are behind the scenes and have been pushing this agenda include Helen Clark, Dr. Margaret Chan, and Anthony Lake.
The New American points out what these people and the State Department have been up to.
The collaborative relationship between the U.S. State Department and the UNHCR (including IASC, on which Antony Lake, Antonio Guterres, et al serve) is spelled out formally in the State Department document : "2014-2015 Framework for Cooperation Between the United States Department of State's Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees."
That document begins: "The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration at the United States Department of State (hereinafter referred to as PRM) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (hereinafter referred to as UNHCR) have been working in formal partnership through a Framework for Cooperation since the year 2000 to provide protection, humanitarian assistance, and durable solutions to UNHCR's beneficiaries."
It continues: "They have a unique relationship: PRM has long been UNHCR's top donor, while UNHCR has been PRM's largest multilateral partner. PRM and UNHCR renew their bilateral Framework for Cooperation biennially to advance shared objectives."
Ultimately, we can assume there is a greater end game than just being good "humanitarians," and once this is in place and the chaos ensues, the UN will be called on to invade and "keep the peace." This eventually seeks to be a predecessor to a one world government. If you are like me, you would like to see the complete defunding of the United Nations by the united States and the removal of that organization and all its tentacles from American soil."

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/09/obama ... dqcIL8c.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

http://conservativebyte.com/2015/09/oba ... ts-to-u-s/#" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"The Obama administration allowed 1,519 terror-stained foreign refugees into the U.S. last year because their crimes were allegedly committed “while under duress.”
The administration last year eased federal restrictions against terrorist activity for refugees and asylum seekers. Under the old rules, these 1,519 foreign nationals would have been banned from entering the country because they supported terrorist causes.
But under the new rules for vetting refugees, the secretary of Homeland Security has “discretionary authority” to waive certain cases of inadmissibility relating to terrorist activity.
A person could have provided shelter or sold a weapon to a terrorist, for instance, then claimed he did not know that the person being helped was a terrorist or that he was forced to provide the aid under duress.
“We’ve seen this discretionary authority abused in the last few years and, in fact, the administration has eliminated a zero-tolerance policy for granting asylum or residency to individuals who have provided any sort of terrorism-related support,” said a release from Judicial Watch Tuesday.
The watchdog agency said the federal government’s latest available figures for granting asylum or residency to foreigners participating in terrorist causes are “incredibly disturbing, especially since the agency charged with keeping the nation safe, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), appears to downplay the seriousness of the crimes.”
Judicial Watch obtained the numbers from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services annual report to Congress on the DHS secretary’s application of discretionary authority.
The biggest chunk of exemptions was processed for refugee applicants and lawful permanent resident status with 806 and 614, respectively.
The U.S. took in 70,000 foreign refugees in fiscal 2015, which ends Sept. 30, and Obama has decided to increase that number to 85,000 in 2016 and 100,000 in 2017. In addition to the refugees, the U.S. takes in about 25,000 asylees every year.
The remainder of the terror-connected persons were processed under other DHS programs such as temporary protected status, or TPS, which allows foreign persons here as students, tourists or other reasons to stay beyond their visa expirations due to natural disasters or wars in their homelands.
“The bottom line is that the U.S. government is allowing them all to stay in the country with rights and benefits afforded to legal residents despite their terrorist connections and associations,” said Judicial Watch.
More than half of the candidates rewarded by DHS last year provided material support to terrorist organizations, according to the DHS report. The others received military-type training from a terrorist organization, voluntarily provided medical care to members of a terrorist group and solicited funds or individuals for membership in a terrorist organization.
After a case-by-case review, Obama DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson determined that the recently admitted terrorists only participated in these activities “while under duress.”
This effort was officially launched last year when the administration quietly changed the Immigration and Nationality Act, or INS, implemented decades ago to govern immigration and citizenship in the United States.
The law includes a ban on admitting refugees and asylum seekers who may have provided terrorists with any sort of material support, even the kind that may be considered trivial by some.
In other words, the federal law rightfully had a zero tolerance for any kind of involvement with terrorist elements,” Judicial Watch reported. “But a joint effort by DHS and the State Department created an ‘Exercise of Authority’ that allows ‘an alien who provided limited material support’ to a terrorist organization to stay in the U.S. if the powers that be in our government believe they pose no threat.”
“The administration seems to have a soft spot for terrorists,” Judicial Watch concluded. “A few months after the INS change was exposed, a frustrated U.S. senator revealed that the administration appears to have a terrorist ‘hands off’ list that permits individuals with extremist ties to enter the country.
“The lawmaker obtained the information from internal DHS documents that include communication between U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) asking whether to admit an individual with ties to various terrorist groups. The suspect had scheduled an upcoming flight into the U.S. and was believed to be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and a close associate and supporter Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.”
http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/obama-brings ... qpWrEZh.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 12983

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Fiannan »

Didn't the pope meet with and express support to Kim Davis?

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

Yes, he did.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/09/pope- ... ay-strong/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Media is buzzing about the Pope’s comments in support of conscientious objection and whether he knows about the Rowan County, Kentucky, Clerk of Court who was jailed for six days for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses. The Pope met privately with Kim Davis and her husband, Joe, at the Vatican Embassy in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, September 24, which was the birthday of Kim’s father. Pope Francis spoke with Kim and Joe Davis in English.

During the meeting Pope Francis said, “Thank you for your courage.” Pope Francis also told Kim Davis to “Stay strong.” He held out his hands and asked Kim to pray for him. Kim held his hands and said, “I will. Please pray for me,” and the Pope said he would. The two embraced. The Pontiff presented Kim and Joe Davis each with a Rosary that he personally blessed. Kim’s mother and father are Catholic, and Kim and Joe will present the Rosaries to her parents. Kim’s mother was the elected Clerk of Court for Rowan County for 37 years until her retirement in 2014.
Kim Davis said, “I was humbled to meet Pope Francis. Of all people, why me?” Davis continued, “I never thought I would meet the Pope. Who am I to have this rare opportunity? I am just a County Clerk who loves Jesus and desires with all my heart to serve him.” Kim said, “Pope Francis was kind, genuinely caring, and very personable. He even asked me to pray for him. Pope Francis thanked me for my courage and told me to ‘stay strong.’”
“The challenges we face in America regarding the sanctity of human life, marriage, and religious freedom are the same universal challenges Christians face around the world. Religious freedom is a human right that comes from God. These values are shared in common by people of faith, and the threats to religious freedom are universal. Kim Davis has become a symbol of this worldwide conflict between Christian faith and recent cultural challenges regarding marriage,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel.

Speaking with reporters on board the Papal plane to Rome, Pope Francis told Terry Moran of ABC News that conscientious objection is a human right, even for government officials: “Conscientious objection is a right that is a part of every human right. It is a right. And if a person does not allow others to be a conscientious objector, he denies a right. Conscientious objection must enter into every juridical structure because it is a right, a human right. Otherwise we would end up in a situation where we select what is a right, saying ‘this right that has merit, this one does not.’ It (conscientious objection) is a human right. It always moved me when I read, and I read it many times, when I read the “Chanson de Roland” when the people were all in line and before them was the baptismal font and they had to choose between the baptismal font or the sword. They had to choose. They weren’t permitted conscientious objection. It is a right and if we want to make peace we have to respect all rights.”
The ABC News Chief Foreign Correspondent asked if that includes government officials as well, and the Pope reiterated that conscientious objection is a human right: “It is a human right and if a government official is a human person, he has that right,” Pope Francis affirmed.
After the above statement of Pope Francis was published, some in the media wondered if the Pontiff knew of Kim Davis. “Not only did Pope Francis know of Kim Davis, he personally met with her to express his support,” concluded Staver.”

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/09/pope- ... wkcmkGf.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Fiannan wrote:Didn't the pope meet with and express support to Kim Davis?

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kji6Jnuj1XY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://patriotupdate.com/video-damning- ... -go-viral/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Unbelievable! This idiot needs to lay off the crack pipe and get the hell out of America. He is a complete disaster all across the board. America has been destroyed by this impostor, this anti-American MARXIST failure.
The US is being humiliated on the world stage because of Obama and there is persistent talk of Obama being responsible for the creation of ISIS. We’ve supplied them, trained them and shipped them around the world. If it walks and talks like a terrorist… Obama has the freaking Muslim Brotherhood in his Administration and he is planting Islamists throughout the US with his refugee resettlement program. Just how long will America stand for this? The Founding Fathers wouldn’t have. There would have been definitive consequences for this kind of treason. A good part of America is in complete denial of what is happening in front of their very eyes. There’s tons of damning proof out there that Obama is a Marxist and a Muslim. He’s aiding and abetting the enemy – even the president should have to answer for that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2NkjNvwuaU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Obama is training and supporting ISIS, while claiming he is fighting them. It’s all pretend. Obama has been fighting proxy wars, trying to unseat Assad and do other bits of dirty work using ISIS. He also wants the Caliphate. Anyone that is a terrorist and an enemy of America, Obama is cool with. His treason is all around us and has been from the start. He does cute things like bombing empty buildings after the enemy is warned to flee. Or he hits deserted oil fields. Or he drops ammo after a battle has ended. It never ends. The man is a stone cold traitor and the worst thing to ever happen to this nation.

From America’s Freedom Fighters:

Take a look at the tents that these ISIS terrorists have in their compound. What do you see? Yeah, the tents are UNITED STATES tents supplied by none other than our Muslim-In-Chief, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA! Only a completely brain-dead idiot would want some D-Bag with that name in charge of AMERICA! Unbelievable…."

http://patriotupdate.com/video-damning- ... -go-viral/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by freedomforall »

Does anyone know Baracko Bin Lyin'?
Last edited by freedomforall on October 30th, 2015, 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"Anyone who wants to stand on a pedestal and say Islam is a religion of peace only needs to be reminded of a few key points.
First off, the progenitor of the faith was a pedophile and a madman who encouraged the wanton slayings of anyone who didn’t profess a faith in Allah.
Second, they’ll have to come to terms with taqiyah which is a principle in Islam that says it’s OK to lie to outsiders to protect Islam.
And third, they’ll have to accept the fact there are thousands, if not million of Muslims who are completely OK with treating women like sub-humans.
If they try and deny this then they’ll just need to recount the countless horror stories of women being doused with acid and murdered for bringing shame on the family.
Unfortunately these stories aren’t relegated to the past.
In fact it was only recently discovered a young 20-year-old girl was murdered by her father and brother after she was brutally raped by other Muslims.
Their justification for the atrocious crimes was she actively brought shame to the family for the sexual abuse she suffered at the hands of others.
Even more disturbing is the fact this young Syrian refugee has emigrated to Germany and was living in a shelter for battered women before she was found by her psychopathic family members.

The Daily Mail writes:
A woman whose family branded her ‘unclean’ after she was gang-raped in her Syrian homeland has been found murdered in Germany – allegedly on the orders of her own mother.
Police believe the victim, named only as Rokstan M, 20, was stabbed to death by her father and brothers in the twisted logic that she had brought disgrace on her family through the sex attack.
Shortly before she was found dead in an allotment garden in the eastern German city of Dessau, she apparently had a premonition of her fate.
Writing on her WhatsApp profile, she said: ‘I am awaiting death. But I am too young to die.’
Rokstan had been living in a house for single women before returning to her family a few days before she was murdered and buried in a shallow grave.

The killing has served to pull into sharp focus the cultural gulf between Germans and the more than one million refugees expected to arrive in the country this year.
Rokstan had arrived in Germany two years ago following her ordeal.
Authorities say she was well integrated into society and worked as a translator for asylum seekers navigating their way through German bureaucracy.

It’s absurd to think this religion is protected from ridicule in the U.S. and elsewhere.
You can be sure if Christians had a belief system which encouraged this kind of violent activity there would be literal hell to pay for believers.

But in this day and age where the US President quite content to stand up for Islam and Islamic belief we’re never going to hear official condemnation for their abhorrent behaviour.
Here’s what’s worse.
Under Obama’s leadership the US is going to be accepting thousands upon thousands of these brutes as part of measure to curb the severity of the migrant crisis in Europe.
Which means Americans will be sure to see this same kind of behaviour occur on U.S. soil more and more frequently."
http://teapartyupdate.com/muslim-father ... -daughter/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 12983

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Fiannan »

One must remember one interesting distinction. Obama supports the vile, hyper-fanatical Saudi regime which has a form of Islam that makes Iran look like a big hippie commune. The Saudi's made a pact with the USA in the early 1970s to support the petro-dollar in return the USA would protect their interests. The reason Saddam and Kadaffi were killed was not due to human rights or some other PR term that the USA does not believe in, it was due to their wanting to shift currencies and place the interests of their local economies above that of trans-national corporations.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... p_1JvRsCYE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"A video recently surfaced of an interview with a so-called “moderate” Muslim cleric on a Norwegian TV show. The video has gone viral because it shows an Islamic leader in the West being honest about what Islam teaches when it comes to non-Muslims. In response to questions about Muslim violence against non-Muslims, Mullah Krekar tells Norwegian TV that not only is it okay for Muslims to kill non-Muslims, it’s actually required by Qu’ranic law. Further the imam says that “Muslims have the right to Kill anyone who does not respect Islam.”

Host: For someone who burns the Koran, the punishment, according to Islam, is death, is that correct?

Mullah Krekar: If you burn the Koran, which is an insult, then the answer is clearly yes.

Host: But the man who has burned the Koran, would it be right that he loses his life even though he lives in Norway?

Mullah Krekar: I know absolutely that he has committed a criminal offense where the punishment is death. The responsibility for carrying out the punishment is on the Ummah, our Muslim brotherhood. Regardless if he lives in Norway, or if he is Barack Obama, I am not myself threatening the person. I am telling you what is stated in the law. I have told you what is in the Koran and in the Hadith. I have not pointed at one specific person and said “You, we must kill.”

Host: One of those who burned a Koran is afraid because somebody who listens to you might want to kill him, because you have said that is the punishment according to the Koran. Isn’t there the risk that somebody would listen to you?

Mullah Krekar: He must fear… anybody who follows the Koran… will have to fear the crime he has committed and fear that his punishment will be executed… Anybody who knows of this punishment can kill him. Anybody. We will defend out religion with our own blood. Our only limits are limits of blood, limits made of explosives. Those who insult our religion must know that one of us will die. Those who insult our religion and our honour must understand – that this is a matter of life and death.

Host: Would you be satisfied if this man gets killed?

Mullah Krekar: Yes. I would send a gift to the person who kills him. Why wouldn’t I be happy about that?

Host: How would you describe those who attacked Charlie Hebdo?

Mullah Krekar: They were defending their honor, they were defending their holiness… Yes, of course {they were heroes}. They were Jihadists.

Our leaders, especially the liberals, live in a fantasyland where Islam is as moral and upright as any other religion. It’s just not so. If you don’t believe me, listen to Mullah Krekar as he gives us some very clear insight into the mind of Islam… it ain’t pretty."

http://eaglerising.com/25594/muslim-rel ... ect-islam/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

"Yes, the grilling of Hillary proved little that wasn’t already known about Benghazi.
However, as everyone except liberal Obama and Hillary lovers know, this attack was never about some YouTube video.
Now, here’s hard evidence.
Judicial Watch released proof that The White House contacted YouTube within hours of the Benghazi attack to fix blame on a video:
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new State Department documents that raise more questions about the September 11, 2012, terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission at Benghazi, Libya. The documents show the White House contacted YouTube over an Internet video as one of its first moves after the initial attack.
The documents, from the agency’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security, were provided to Judicial Watch in response to a court order in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on October 16, 2014, (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01733)). The lawsuit seeks “any and all logs, reports, or other records” the Washington-based Diplomatic Security Command Center produced between September 10, 2012, and September 13, 2012, relating to the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya.”
The documents detail that only three hours after the initial attack on U.S. personnel in Benghazi, the White House contacted YouTube in an apparent effort to initially blame the assault on an obscure “Pastor John video,” rather than filmmaker Nakoula “Mark” Basseley Nakoula. The administration falsely claimed that Nakoula’s video, “Innocence of Muslims,” provoked the attack. The email also references the involvement of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Judicial Watch, through separate litigation, previously uncovered documents that show Obama White House officials set Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi response):
This evidence also provides the link between The White House and Hillary Clinton."

http://raisetheflagreport.com/the-bengh ... irst-move/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by Elizabeth »

http://patriotupdate.com/breaking-news- ... n-america/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"On the very same day that 129 were being massacred in Paris, Obama announced he would dramatically escalate and expand the refugee resettlement program here in the US, bringing in hundreds of thousands of potential terrorists to set free in America. The first two families of these refugees just arrived in New Orleans. The churches there expect many more and are catering to them. They could very well be enabling those who will kill thousands if not millions in the end. They are also an invading force that will change voting and religious demographics across the country. This is the refugee resettlement program that Americans don’t want, but which is being forced upon them by our leaders. We all reflexively cringe over this move… we know there will be terrorists in the mix and the FBI says it is a virtual certainty. Just to be clear, two of the gunmen in Paris had Syrian passports and were refugees. One attacker was a woman and one was as young as 15 as well. The atrocity in France certainly hasn’t halted Obama’s moves over this. It’s Obama’s figurative ‘Death to America!’
President Barack Hussein promised that he would be sending thousands of Syrian “refugees” to the US. Well, he is keeping that promise.
As the dead are still being counted in Paris — with one of the terrorists a “Syrian refugee” who entered Europe in October — the first transport of Muslim so-called “refugees” just arrived in New Orleans recently and will be resettled in Louisiana and 180 other American communities. See the list below to find a town close to you.
[…] The 10,000 Syrian refugees are first flown to the United States, according to the French news wire Agence France-Presse, with the State Department paying the International Organization for Migration (IOM) for the airfare.
Then, once the refugees arrive in the country, they could be dispersed across the 180 cities listed above, where they are to aided within the first 30 to 90 days in settling and finding employment in the area.
After approximately 90 days, refugees are no longer eligible for the State Department-funded support that they were receiving through migrant and refugee services. However, they are able to join support programs through the Department of Health and Human Services.
Additionally, it is unclear how much the screening process for the 10,000 Syrian refugees will cost American taxpayers.
The State Department spent $1.1 billion resettling people from around the world in the country last year. That’s about $16,000 per person. (read full article)
Another local New Orleans media outlet adds:
Fox8Live […] We turned to former New Orleans FBI chief and anti-terrorism expert Jim Bernazzani for insight on whether that’s a legitimate concern. Before coming to New Orleans, Bernazzani worked to ramp up the nation’s anti-terror strategies after 911.
“If I was in charge of ISIL, logistically I’d take advantage of this situation and put my people in, into the United States,” Bernazzani said.
“Now with that said, [the government] is on this, and we have what’s called a Terrorist Screening Center that these individuals will be run through.”
But make no mistake, not every refugee seeking admission to the U.S. would face such scrutiny.
“It’s going to be the 18- to 45-year-old male for the most part,” he said. “It’s a percentage game. It’s not fail-safe, but it’s a percentage game.”
In fact, our own DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson actually said “we don’t know a whole lot” about Syrian refugees coming into America, and that DHS has “no active protocol” for properly screening them.
And as Top Right News reported in September, Syrian ISIS operative claimed that more than 4,000 covert ISIS gunmen have already been smuggled into Western nations – “hidden among innocent refugees”.
So we can’t screen them, we have no idea if they are ISIS-trained fighters — but we’re bringing them in anyway?
How did that just work out for France?
And according to Secretary of State John Kerry, the Obama Administration plans on bringing in a staggering 200,000 so-called “refugees” in 2016..meaning these 10,000 in Louisiana are just a down-payment on future terror attacks in New York, L.A, Washington, and God know where else.
This is complete insanity.
There are approximately 180 cities in the country that are eligible to accept the 10,000 Syrian refugees. Is your city among them? A Syrian operative has bragged that more than 4,000 covert ISIS gunmen had been smuggled into Western nations. That should end well. We have no way of vetting these refugees, so they are literally ticking time bombs. The world is at war and doesn’t seem to realize it and we are right in the middle of it. I have no faith that our agencies will catch these terrorists. None at all. All it takes is one major attack to be successful. Just ask the French. Just ask those who survived 9/11 here in the States. Islamists have no problem lying to infidels and using them; then killing them in all sorts of horrific ways. When our children and families are dying in the streets like they did in Paris, you can thank Obama, if you are still alive that is."

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro

Post by freedomforall »

November 17, 2015 http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/ ... ad-Country" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

President Obama could momentarily crow on Tuesday that Special Forces had captured a leading suspect in the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans. But the glow didn’t last for long.

With seemingly relentless bad news from overseas washing over the president and his administration, Obama’s approval rating just hit the skids even more – with a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showing that only 41 percent of those interviewed approve of Obama’s performance as president.

That approval rating matched a previous all-time low for the president in the news organizations’ polling. More troubling than that, at a time of heightened alarm about the chaotic and collapsing situations in the Middle East, Obama’s approval rating on foreign policy plummeted to a new all-time low of 37 percent.

The survey comes on the heels of a political uproar over a prisoner swap approved by the administration that freed Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl -- a possible deserter -- in return for the release of five dangerous Taliban detainees who had been held in Guantanamo Bay. It also comes amid the outbreak of vicious sectarian warfare in Iraq that has led to the slaughter of Shiites and Sunnis alike and is threatening the Shiite-dominated government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

While Obama inherited the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan from Republican President George W. Bush, he is now being widely blamed for prematurely withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq and for signaling a 2016 deadline for withdrawal from Afghanistan, when it is clear that neither of those countries’ governments is capable of repelling insurgents on their own.

The president’s indecisiveness and super-caution in addressing other international crises – particularly the three-year old civil war in Syria between the regime of President Bashar al-Assad and rebels that has killed 150,000 people and displaced nine million others – is maddening to conservatives and liberals a like.

Former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter, Liz Cheney, writing in The Wall Street Journal today, declared that “Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many. Too many times to count, Mr. Obama has told us he is ‘ending’ the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – as though wishing made it so. His rhetoric has now come crashing into reality.”

Of course, it’s almost laughable that Dick Cheney – a major architect of the Bush administration’s misguided and ultimately disastrous policies in Iraq and Afghanistan – is now lecturing Obama on his efforts to extract the U.S. from more than two decades of largely fruitless fighting in the Middle East that led to the deaths of more than 6,800 American troops.

Many others on both sides of the political divide despair over what they view as a president overwhelmed by events and presiding over a collapsing foreign doctrine.

Ruth Marcus, a liberal columnist for The Washington Post, wrote today that Obama’s leadership has been hampered by two overarching and debilitating instincts: His tendency to “overlearn the lessons of history” and his frequent “audacity deficit.”

“On foreign policy, the signal episode of Obama’s overlearning the lessons of history is . . . pretty much the entirety of his foreign policy,” she wrote. “It has been a reaction, understandable enough, to the adventurism of George W. Bush, primarily the ill-advised, ill-fated venture in Iraq.”

As for the audacity deficit, she notes, Obama vowed realism and yet badly underplayed his hand on the world stage. “Hence the administration’s reluctance to intervene in Libya, the costly dillydallying over whether and how to help the rebels in Syria, the failure to push hard enough for a status of forces agreement that would have allowed U.S. troops to remain in Iraq,” according to Marcus.

This cross-aisle dismay over Obama’s faulty stewardship abroad appears to be widespread. According to the new Wall Street Journal-NBC poll, 54 percent of respondents said they don’t believe Obama “is able to lead the country and get the job done.” That compares with just 42 percent who think he is up to the job.

And the public’s sense of presidential drift and sub-par leadership has only gotten worse over the past year. Forty-one percent of those interviewed for the poll agreed that the president’s performance has deteriorated in that time.

“What we have here is an anomaly in a sense,” Norman Ornstein, a political expert with the American Enterprise Institute, said in an interview. “The economy is starting to improve and the policy initiatives that the president has put forward are pretty widely supported. But there’s a sense out there – even though people do not want to get more deeply involved in the Middle East – that the world is careening out of control, and we’re not in charge.”

There were a few rays of sunshine for Obama in the new poll. For instance, two-thirds of those surveyed said they support the recent Environmental Protection Agency regulations to cut emissions from coal-fired power plants. And only 14 percent of respondents blame the president for the scheduling scandal at the Veterans Affairs Department that may have contributed to the deaths of scores of vets.

Overall, however, the news is bleak. With the poll also showing Obama losing support of some core constituents, including Hispanics and younger Americans, it could all add up to bad news for the Democrats in the 2014 mid-term election.

“It all comes back to one word: leadership,” said Democratic pollster Peter Hart, who helped conduct the poll with Democratic pollster Fred Yang and Republican Bill McInturff. “He may be winning the issues debate, but he’s losing the political debate because they don’t see him as a leader,” Hart said.

Over the weekend, Obama took some heat for spending three days in the resort area of Rancho Mirage, Calif., while the crisis in Iraq continued to boil over. But with so much bad news from overseas – and so few good options from which to choose, who could blame him for wanting to escape from Washington?

Source: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/ ... ad-Country" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Post Reply