United NATIONS.

This forum is for discussion of Secret Combinations: who/what they are and how to overcome them. "A secret combination that seeks to overthrow the freedom of all lands...is increasing its evil influence and control over America and the entire world." (ETB / Ether 8:18-25.)
User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Fri Sep 23, 2016 11:02 pm

http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-new ... y-near-you" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


"With its “New Urban Agenda” set to be formally adopted by dictators and member governments next month, the United Nations is plotting its latest monumental assault on private property, the free enterprise system, national sovereignty, and human liberty. Taken as a whole, the UN's radical new plan outlines a vision of an Orwellian world order of centrally planned, “compact” mega-cities run and guided by UN dictates and under total surveillance. Despite all the nice-sounding rhetoric about “equality” and “prosperity,” the text of the document also demands policies that have been repeatedly proven to cause misery, inequality, poverty, and death. Humanity should resist.

The UN's “New Urban Agenda” seeks to hijack control from local voters and communities over the way cities and “human settlements” are “planned, designed, financed, developed, governed, and managed,” the document explains. The draft UN agreement, set to be “approved” at the UN Habitat III summit in Quito, Ecuador, next month, also purports to lay down “priorities and actions at the global, regional, national, sub-national, and local levels” that should be imposed on humanity. Why the dictator-dominated UN ought to be involved in local or even national policy in the first place is never adequately explained throughout the agenda's 24 pages.

What is clear, though, is that, if implemented, humanity will be subjected to unprecedented government controls on literally everything. That the UN envisions central economic planning, which has resulted in tens or even hundreds of millions of preventable deaths over the last century, is clear from the document itself. Consider, for example, the UN's demand that cities, in submission to the global agenda, “change to sustainable consumption and production patterns.” There is only one way for consumption and production patterns to be “changed” to fit the UN agenda, and that is through government control over consumption and production.

For evidence of how well the strategy works (or not), a quick trip to the enslaved nations of Cuba or North Korea that practice government control over consumption and production might be illuminating. The two are among the poorest nations on Earth. The former Soviet Union and other communist states also provide bountiful historical evidence of the brutality, terror, and death that is so often associated with central planning and government control. Yet the UN document gets even more explicit, using overtly Marxist rhetoric in calling on authorities to ensure “equal access for all to economic and productive resources and opportunities.”

In other words, private property rights need to be severely limited, if not quashed entirely. The rest of the document makes that clear, too, as do previous UN Habitat reports that explicitly call for ending private land ownership.

Redistribution is also key. “We will support the development of vertical and horizontal models of distribution of financial resources to decrease inequalities across sub-national territories, within urban centers, and between urban and rural areas,” the document states. Put in simpler-to-understand terms, wealth must be commandeered and redistributed by central planners to level out society. Wealth redistribution at the international level is also called for repeatedly throughout the document, with the UN agenda making repeated reference to UN schemes by billionaires and dictators aimed at allowing the UN to acquire its own taxing power.

The UN document is filled with blabbering about “inequality,” promising to redistribute the wealth of what remains of the Western middle class to the UN and its oftentimes brutal Third World member regimes that have impoverished billions. The word “inclusive” appears dozens of times in the document without definition as well. What the document does not explain is that the mysterious term was concocted and pushed by the wealthiest crony capitalists on the planet — including the Rothschild banking dynasty — who have absolutely no intention of surrendering their billions and trillions in ill-gotten wealth. Instead, it is an amorphous term serving mostly as cover for government control, much like the Orwellian phrase “sustainable development.” More on that later.

Under the UN's “New Urban Agenda,” every facet of human life even beyond economics will be under the purview of authorities. For example, the document directly calls for governments to ensure that everyone receives “education, food security and nutrition, health and well-being,” areas of human life that in the free world have traditionally been considered primarily the responsibility of individuals, families, and voluntary associations such as churches and charities — and occasionally local communities. Governments are even expected to provide “adequate and affordable housing,” the UN agenda states.

There are already a number of UN member regimes that purport to provide “housing” — Cuba and North Korea again come to mind. Free people, of course, can solve their own housing needs. Cattle, prisoners, and slaves, by contrast, rely on their masters to provide housing for them, along with food, healthcare, and more. Left unsaid in the UN document is the fact that free markets and the free enterprise system have already provided a massive surplus of housing and an abundance of housing choices. Centrally planned economies, by contrast, have produced nothing but grinding and often deadly shortages for everyone except the ruling classes and their minions.

The radical UN “Urban” vision also purports to commit UN member governments and dictatorships to adopting what is known as the “smart city approach.” The document describes it in a rather innocuous way, saying the scheme “makes use of opportunities from digitalization.” “We will strengthen the data and statistical capacities at national, sub-national, and local levels to effectively monitor progress achieved in the implementation of sustainable urban development policies and strategies,” the agenda says. The agreement also vows that governments will “support the role and enhanced capacity of national, sub-national, and local governments in data collection.”

What it does not say is that the “smart city” agenda and the massively expanded data-gathering the UN envisions involve total surveillance of every individual in a way that even George Orwell could never have imagined. Privacy, in short, will become a thing of the past.

Another component of the totalitarian vision involves “sustainable development.” Despite sounding rather harmless, even the definitions of the term given by top UN officials and government bureaucrats reveal the real agenda: less freedom, more government, less prosperity, more control, less people, more centralization of coercive power. The new UN agenda is a “critical step” in imposing the totalitarian “sustainable development” agenda “at global, regional, national, sub-national, and local levels,” the document says.

Everybody must submit. To make sure nobody escapes the emerging UN control grid, the declaration calls for ensuring that the “informal economy” — the economy that exists outside of government regulation, control, and direction — is subject to a “sustainable transition to the formal economy.” Indeed, one of the key “principles” upon which the UN plot is based is described as “leave no one behind,” also a theme of the equally draconian UN Agenda 2030.

Even culture will be guided by the supposedly wise and benevolent overlords who will be taking charge of all other aspects of life under the emerging UN plans for humanity. “We will include culture as a priority component of urban plans and strategies,” the document says. “We will support leveraging cultural heritage for sustainable urban development.” With UN control over education and even “values” of children, who are referred to as “key agents of change” in the New Urban Agenda document and other UN schemes, the future of human life will be easy for the would-be masters to engineer.

The nightmarish vision outlined in the UN document is completely alien to the American system of limited government and federalism. As just one example, the document purports to commit national governments and dictatorships to funneling “financial transfers from national government to sub-national and local governments.” That may work for totalitarian regimes, where local government works to implement the dictators' decrees. But in places such as the United States, sovereign state governments and independent local governments accountable to their communities are supposed to raise their own resources, rather than become administrative units of a centralized regime with no limits to its power.

Another red flag is that the New Urban Agenda is “grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” Of course, the UN's declaration of pseudo-human rights is incompatible with real human rights, granted by our Creator, as enshrined, for instance, in the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights. The UN declaration even explains explicitly that the privileges governments and treaties purport to grant can be revoked under virtually any pretext. In Article 29, the declaration is clear that the UN's bogus “human rights” may “in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” By contrast, God-given rights cannot be legitimately infringed upon by government — period — whether it upsets the UN or not.

The UN outfit behind the latest “agenda” has a long and controversial history of advocating totalitarianism. As Karl Marx and other totalitarians have understood, private land ownership and private property more broadly must give way if collectivist slavery is to succeed. The very first plank of the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto goes like this: “Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.” (Others include government education, progressive incomes taxes, government control of transportation and communication, and more.)

In its very first report on “Human Settlements” coming out of the 1976 UN Habitat I Conference, the dictator-dominated outfit made its agenda perfectly clear. “Land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market,” claimed the UN report, a predecessor of the latest agenda. “Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes.”

As has become typical in recent years, the mass-murdering communist dictatorship enslaving mainland China is blazing a trail on the totalitarian “urban” agenda. The New American reported in 2013 that the brutal regime is plotting to herd hundreds of millions of rural peasants into centrally planned Orwellian super-cities in the years ahead — at gunpoint if necessary. Similar outrages are regularly promoted to Americans by establishment voices. Obama has only been too eager to join in. In fact, just this week, in violation of every principle upon which the United States was founded, Obama called for surrendering more U.S. sovereignty and “binding ourselves to international rules” crafted by unelected, unaccountable, oftentimes murderous foreign regimes.

Indeed, one illegal Obama program to “diversify” American cities, known as the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing decree, is perfectly in line with the UN's “New Urban Agenda.” The Obama program uses federal bribes to break up higher income and ethnically homogeneous communities by encouraging and subsidizing the redistribution of people based on race, income levels, and other factors. So, for example, if your suburb is too wealthy, the federal government might seek to put government housing there to drop welfare recipients into it. The UN document outlines exactly such schemes, vowing, for instance, to “encourage mixed-income development to promote social inclusion and cohesion.”

In fairness to the UN, the economic model promoted in the latest “agenda” is not quite socialist or communist, but rather a hybrid of government-directed fascism and technocratic governance often described as “technocracy” by critics who have studied it. In many ways, it is similar to the horrifying “governance” (more accurately described as oppression) practiced today by the Chinese Communist Party — an outfit that has murdered more innocent people than any other group in human history, with conservative estimates starting around 60 million victims, not including those slaughtered in forced abortions.

Regardless of labels, though, the UN vision outlined in the “New Urban Agenda,” the Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the UN Paris Agreement, and other grandiose plots is deeply totalitarian. It is not compatible with human liberty or dignity. It replaces the choices of individuals with the choices of tyrants. Much of it is flatly unconstitutional when it comes to the United States. For the sake of humanity and prosperity, the UN's extremist agenda must be defeated. The surest way to do that is with an American exit, or Amexit, from the UN."
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Sponsored Links

Advertisements

Medical Cost Sharing - It's not insurance it's better!

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:15 am

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama- ... n-address/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"President Barack Obama used his final United Nations address on Tuesday to condemn Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and his brand of “crude populism.”

Speaking to the U.N. General Assembly, Obama essentially stumped for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who will carry his legacy for a third term, before world leaders during a 48-minute speech in New York.

Without naming Trump directly, Obama lashed out at the outsider’s candidacy while defending his own legacy."
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:58 am

"South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, long rumored to be in line for a position in the Trump administration, will become America’s ambassador to the United Nations, NBC News reported. They added that the two-term governor had accepted President-elect Donald Trump’s offer. While NBC added that “Haley’s limited foreign policy experience is likely to draw scrutiny during Senate confirmation hearings for the Cabinet-level position,” Haley’s consistent conservatism would be a step away from how the position was handled during the Obama years.

Gov. Haley, a popular Republican among the Tea Party ranks, had initially crossed swords with Trump during the billionaire’s candidacy. She had endorsed Florida Sen. Marco Rubio for the Republican nomination and had delivered several thinly veiled barbs at Trump during her televised response to Obama’s State of the Unionspeech back in January. However, during this summer’s Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Haley offered her endorsement of the nominee. According to Politico, Haley said that Trump was “a friend and supporter before he ran for president” after a meeting with the president-elect. “When I see something I am uncomfortable with, I say it,” she added. “When we met, it was friends who had known each other before.” Haley, 44, A child of Indian immigrants, elected governor of South Carolina twice, in 2010 and 2014. Her husband is a Army National Guardsman who was deployed in Afghanistan for a year during her gubernatorial term in 2013.”
http://conservativetribune.com/trump-na ... 2016-11-23" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
David13
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3036
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:43 pm
Location: Utah

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby David13 » Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:42 am

The United States should get out of the UN. It is nothing but an evil conspiracy.
dc

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Sun Dec 25, 2016 5:33 pm

http://conservativevideos.com/video-net ... ment-vote/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel will reassess its ties with the United Nations following the Security Council vote calling for an end to Israeli settlement building
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

lundbaek
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8191
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:48 pm
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby lundbaek » Sun Dec 25, 2016 7:42 pm

I wish more Americans would recognize the conspiracy to establish the United Nations as the world governing body.

Silver
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:31 pm

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Silver » Sun Dec 25, 2016 8:11 pm

lundbaek wrote:I wish more Americans would recognize the conspiracy to establish the United Nations as the world governing body.
Enough Americans know and write about the dangers of the UN for Trump and his advisers to know about the charges that are made against that world body. They also have the wherewithal to confirm the veracity of the charges. Now, what is Trump going to do about it? Anything less than full withdrawal is treasonous. Tough words, I know. However, the US is either in or out. A lady can't be just partly pregnant. Yes or no? In or out? Why delay the exit?

I could be convinced that Trump is a patriot and not a traitor if he uses Rick Perry to shut down the unconstitutional Department of Energy, or if he uses Betsy DaVos to end the Dept of Education, of if he immediately sends Nikki Haley to deliver the last speech by an American diplomat at the UN.

For the sake of clarity, I firmly believe that Trump and his cabinet will not appreciably change the status quo and thus the Constitution's precarious status will only worsen. Trump and Company are not the boys from the mountains you're looking for.
As a prophet reveals the truth it divides the people. (T)he worldly either want to close the mouth of the prophet, or else act as if the prophet didn’t exist, rather than repent of their sins. Popularity is never a test of truth. Ezra Taft Benson

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Mon Dec 26, 2016 5:07 am

"When Egypt was about to sponsor a resolution before the United Nations condemning Israel over settlements and the Obama administration wasn’t going to anything, President-elect Donald Trump sprung into action. And while the anti-Israel resolution still passed, Trump still managed to show that he was able to take care of the Jewish state in a way Obama never would. According to The Washington Post, while the resolution was eventually re-sponsored by other governments, Trump was able to convince the Egyptian government to withdraw their sponsorship of it. “On Friday, Egypt said its president had received a call from Trump in which they both agreed to give the incoming U.S. administration a chance to try and resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The call came hours after Egypt indefinitely postponed the U.N. vote,” The Washington Post said.A statement from Egypt said that after Trump spoke with the president, they agreed upon “the importance of giving a chance for the new American administration to deal in a comprehensive way with the different aspects of the Palestinian issue with the aim of achieving a comprehensive and a final resolution.” In spite of all that, Obama decided not to give the new administration a chance to deal with the Israeli-Palestinian issue, abstaining on the vote when the resolution came up and thus allowing it to pass, according to The New York Times. In other words, Egypt is apparently more willing to work with Donald Trump and Israel than the Obama administration is."

http://conservativetribune.com/trump-he ... 2016-12-25" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Wed Dec 28, 2016 11:48 am

http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... ard-truths" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday took aim at Israel’s government as he defended the administration's decision to allow the U.N. Security Council to pass resolution condemning the country's settlement activity.



http://thehill.com/policy/international ... -on-israel" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday blasted Secretary of State John Kerry’s speech on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as “skewed” against the Jewish state.
“Like the resolution that John Kerry advanced at the U.N., John Kerry gave a skewed speech against Israel,” his office said in a statement.
“For over an hour, Kerry dealt obsessively with the settlements and almost didn’t touch on the root of the conflict — the Palestinian opposition to a Jewish state in any boundaries.”
Netanyahu is reportedly preparing to deliver an in-person rebuttal to Kerry's speech later Wednesday from Israel.
Kerry speech ratcheted up criticismof Netanyahu’s government, including its commitment to settlement building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
It came after the U.S. angered its biggest Mideast last week ally by allowing the U.N. Security Council to pass a resolution condemning the activity as illegal.
After the U.S. abstained from the resolution, it passed the council by a vote of 14-0. "
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

lundbaek
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8191
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:48 pm
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby lundbaek » Wed Dec 28, 2016 1:46 pm

Speaking in the House of Representatives 29 April 2003, Congressman Paul stated, as reported on his thelibertycommittee.org web page: "...Perhaps it’s time to stop trying to manipulate the UN, and start asserting our national sovereignty. If we do not, rest assured that the UN will continue to interfere not only in our nation’s foreign policy matters, but in our domestic policies as well. UN globalists are not satisfied by meddling only in international disputes. They increasingly want to influence our domestic environmental, trade, labor, tax, and gun laws. UN global planners fully intend to expand the organization into a true world government, complete with taxes, courts, and possibly a standing army. This is not an alarmist statement; these goals are readily promoted on the UN’s own website. UN planners do not care about national sovereignty; in fact they are openly opposed to it. They correctly view it as an obstacle to their plans. They simply aren’t interested in our Constitution and republican form of government."

And at an event near Austin, Texas on August 30th, 2003, Congressman Paul was asked: "...If we can take a look at the big picture, could you tell us, the people in this room, any information that you may have of an international and deceptive conspiracy to overthrow the American Republic and its Constitution & Bill Of Rights in order to set up and usher in a totalitarian World Government likely espoused under the UN also.."? Congressman Paul replied: " He asked if there was an international conspiracy to overthrow our government. The answer is "Yes". I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!..."

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:49 pm

http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/e ... +Jan+11+17" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Under the direction of a known Communist Party operative from Bulgaria dogged by corruption charges, the scandal-plagued United Nations “education” agency released a new report demanding broad changes to school textbooks around the world. It is the latest shot across the bow aimed at parental rights, local control of education, and national sovereignty.
The goal of the “Global Education Monitoring Report” by the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is fairly transparent: accelerate the indoctrination of impressionable children worldwide with textbook propaganda promoting “global citizenship,” the discredited man-made global-warming theory, homosexuality, transgenderism, and outright totalitarianism. And according to the report itself, school textbooks are the best way to do that.
“Few instruments shape children’s and young people’s minds more powerfully than the teaching and learning materials used in schools,” begins the report, hitting on something understood by every mass-murdering tyrant from Chinese Communist Chairman Mao and Soviet Communist Joseph Stalin to National Socialist Adolph Hitler. “Textbooks convey not only knowledge but also social values and political identities.”

The UN report focuses on whether the UN's agenda for global totalitarian rule is being promoted vigorously enough in school books. The report seeks “to measure the extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development, … , are mainstreamed in national education policies, curricula, teacher education and student assessments,” reads the first page of the revealing document. A German library of school textbooks from around the world was used for the study.
The report, published by UNESCO in December, celebrates the fact that, around the world, more and more captive students are being bombarded with globalist propaganda through textbooks. The document is filled with graphs gleefully highlighting the rapid expansion of textbooks that promote the UN's controversial causes across a range of issues: globalism, pseudo-environmentalism, gender confusion, multiculturalism, and more.
However, the report, also dubbed “Policy Paper 28,” laments that students in some countries are still not receiving a satisfactory dose of UN-backed indoctrination. Education authorities in numerous countries, including the United States, came under fire in the UNESCO document for failing to promptly incorporate the UN's latest demands, as outlined in the Agenda 2030 “Sustainable Development Goals.”
Despite the “progress” in hijacking control of textbook content, the UN claims much more must be done. “As this policy paper shows, textbooks in many countries still fail to deal comprehensively, clearly and fairly with concepts that are crucial,” the report claims, citing the UN's bizarre version of “human rights” (the opposite of individual God-given rights as understood and protected in America by the Constitution), so-called “gender equality,” environmental activism, “social cohesion,” and more.
“All governments should urgently review and revise their textbooks to ensure that the content covers these ideas, which are integral to Target 4.7 of the Sustainable Development Goals,” the report continues, with the reference to the illegal pseudo-treaty signed by Obama aiming to “transform our world,” as the UN puts it in the agreement. Perhaps not surprisingly, the mass-murdering dictatorship in Communist China boasted openly of its “crucial role” in creating the dictator-backed Agenda 2030.
The relevant UN Agenda 2030 goal touted by UNESCO, which this magazine has cited on numerous occasions, focuses on “education” in particular. It calls on the UN and governments to “ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, ... global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity.”
In other words, it not enough to just learn to love the UN's totalitarian ideology of “sustainable development”; children must be so thoroughly indoctrinated that they actually promote it. UN Agenda 2030 is very clear in its plan to exploit and weaponize young children, too, turning them into what the UN document refers to as “critical agents of change.” The Agenda 2030 also says children “will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world.”
And throughout the new UNESCO report, the goal of exploiting and indoctrinating children to demand global tyranny is crystal clear. On environmentalism, for example, the UN's agenda for turning kids into globalist activists is transparent. “As well as ensuring that environmental problems are seen as global issues, it is critical for textbooks to develop students’ sense of agency,” the UNESCO report declares.
In other words, impressionable young children must be taught to believe that the UN must solve real and imagined “environmental problems” because they are “global issues.” And the students must be turned into activists demanding UN control over environmental issues, the report argues. Throughout the report, textbooks that teach children how to become pro-UN activists receive favorable coverage while those that do not encourage activism by the children are chastised for not doing enough.
In the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, UNESCO complains that “textbooks are primarily a medium for teaching children scientific facts and make little to no effort to contextualize environmental education.” Stated another way, schools books must not simply teach facts, but must be weaponized and politicized to advance the UN's agenda.
Global citizenship education is also a frequent topic in the report and all throughout the UN's global indoctrination efforts masquerading as education. Fortunately for readers, the UNESCO report even describes the real agenda. “Global citizenship education aims to inculcate students with a notion of belonging not just to their own country but to broader trans-national and global entities,” the document explains.
Do you “belong” to “trans-national and global entities”? Your children might think they do — at least if UNESCO gets its way. And indeed, Obama's Education Secretary Arne Duncan boasted that UNESCO was his “global partner” in creating “green” global citizensthoroughly indoctrinated in the UN's dangerous “sustainable development” ideology. Quoting a proud communist terrorist, Duncan spoke of “education” as a “weapon” to “change the world.”
Also coming under fire are school textbooks that show women and mothers in “traditional roles,” including the performance of “housework.” In some Turkish textbooks, UNESCO complains, “traditional roles among the females in the house (mother, daughter) are portrayed in the context of cooperation.” “Moreover, women are rarely depicted as working women,” the report complains. In other words, in the UN's view, women are for working and paying taxes, not for being mothers, and to suggest otherwise is to run afoul of the UN's anti-family, pro-abortion “gender equality” demands.
The report also complains that many textbooks around the world do not sufficiently promote homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, transgenderism, and more. “While textbooks call for tolerance of diversity, sexual diversity is repeatedly excluded,” the report complains. Unsurprisingly, the Swedish government is praised by the radical UN agency for promoting homosexuality and homosexual parenting in school textbooks.
Other UNESCO “education” documents also call for the sexualization of children. The “International Guidelines for Sexuality Education” released in 2009, for instance, call for teaching children starting at age five that masturbation is “pleasurable.” By age nine, children begin lessons on “aphrodisiacs,” “homophobia,” “transphobia,” the alleged safety and desirability of legal abortion, and various perversions. By age 15, the children learn how to “promote the right to and access to safe abortion.” Agents of change, indeed.
Some textbooks used in American schools come under fire in the new UNESCO report just for providing factual information — in this case, true facts about alleged man-made climate change that challenges the UN's discredited narrative. “The textbooks not only cast doubt on the causes of climate change but also emphasize its positive effects and describing [sic] its negative effects as uncertain,” fume the UNESCO authors, highlighting a textbook that points out the well-known fact that not all scientists agree with the UN's failed theory.
It also acts as if warming leading to increasing agricultural yields were a taboo subject that cannot be uttered in the presence of children, even while explicit sexual material is supposed to be not only appropriate but mandatory for children under five years old. “None of the textbooks analysed contained a call to action explicitly linking student behaviour or need to take mitigating actions,” the report added about some American textbooks that fail to call on students to become climate-justice warriors.
Ironically, despite the lip service given to non-violence, the UN's record in this area is sordid beyond belief. UN “peace” troops, for example, have rightly developed a reputation around the world as vicious predators, with UN forces implicated in systematic rape and sexual exploitation of children in virtually every country ever occupied by the UN. Killings of unarmed protesters and civilians by UN forces also occur regularly, going back generations.
Schools run by the UN, meanwhile, were exposed yet again last year training Arab children to wage constant “holy war” against their Jewish neighbors. By contrast, the UNESCO report criticizes some Western textbooks for highlighting Islamic military history, arguing that the facts might lead people to associate Islam with violence.
As The New American has highlighted on multiple occasions, textbooks are just one facet of the problem. The UN actually has a transparent agenda to re-shape the ethics, values, beliefs, attitudes, and even the spirituality of children — according to the UN's own top leaders. “We have the collective duty to empower every child and youth with the right foundations — knowledge, values and skills — to shape the future as responsible global citizens,” declared UNESCO boss Irina Bokova, a longtime senior operative with the mass-murdering Bulgarian Communist Party.
Just last week, a UN group of self-styled “human rights experts” slammed a local school district in Connecticut and demanded that it choose new textbooks. And this is just the beginning, as the UN becomes increasingly bold and vicious in attacking U.S. independence, liberties, and self-government.
The latest UNESCO report on textbooks concludes with the recommendation that textbooks around the world be revised as soon as national governments' curricula are updated to meet the UN's demands for the UN “sustainable development agenda.” “Guidelines explicitly related to environmental issues, peace and global citizenship, sustainable development, human rights and gender equality need to be integrated within textbook review processes,” the document demands.
The report never does explain why the tiny group of fringe globalists and communists running UNESCO and other radical UN bureaucracies should have any say at all in school standards and textbooks used by American children. Yet, the real agenda is clear: As every dictator of the 20th century has understood, to be sustainable, tyranny must be inculcated in the minds of the youth from an early age.
As of right now, U.S. law prohibits any American taxpayer funding for UNESCO. And the UN more broadly is skating on thin ice amid ongoing attacks on American freedoms and self-government. But that is not nearly enough. The U.S. government should totally withdraw from UNESCO, along with exiting and defunding the entire dictators club that is the UN. The minds of the youth, and therefore the future of freedom and self-government, literally depend on stopping the rogue global organization from achieving its goals."
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:54 pm

http://constitution.com/trump-sends-ste ... d-nations/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"For decades, American presidents have been letting the United Nations walk all over the United States. Sadly, that even includes Republican presidents. In fact, it seems the United Nations has been walking over and somewhat controlling America ever since its inception on October 24, 1945.
American forces fought in Korea in the early 1950s under UN control. American forces fought and lost in Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s, under UN control. As a matter fact, over 50,000 Americans were killed and many more wounded in Vietnam because of the United Nations controlling the war efforts.
Since the 1960s and 1970s, the United Nations has become more and more of a socialist organization with the sole purpose of establishing a one-world government with them in control. Every US action in Vietnam had to be approved by the UN Security Council on which sat 2 communist nations, 1 of which was aiding our enemies. How smart is it to send our men and women into battle when the enemy already knows everything you are going to do? We lost Vietnam before it ever got started, all because of the United Nations.
During the past eight years, the United Nations has exerted more influence and muscle in their efforts to gain control of America. They passed a number of resolutions that would have placed parts of American government, law and way of life under direct or indirect UN control. The ONLY thing that saved us was that there were enough Republicans in the US Senate to block ratification of these un-American resolutions.
Among those un-American resolutions is gun control, gun bans, and taking away more parental rights over their minor children. The United Nations pushed to legalize prostitution for girls as young as 12-years of age and give them rights that should belong to their parents. Some of the UN resolutions signed by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would have basically banned all handguns and most hunting, target and sport rifles and shotguns.
When Al Gore represented the United States at the first Earth Summit meeting in Rio de Janeiro, he whole heartedly agreed with all of the climate scares issues at the conference. He also signed all of the accords for the US that were presented at the summit including giving the UN complete ownership and jurisdiction of land in the US and the rest of the world. He also signed accords that would forcibly distribute much of America’s wealth and technology to third world countries. Fortunately, not enough other nations signed on to those particular accords and they were never ratified and put into place.
The United Nations is America’s Number One Enemy and needs to be expelled from US soil and treated as an enemy. Think about it! The current UN Secretary General is Antonio Guterres, former leader of the Socialist Party in Portugal and former President of Socialist International.
One of the main governing bodies in the United Nations is the Security Council. It is made up of 5 permanent and 10 non-permanent members. Among the five permanent members are China and the Russian Federation, both communist and enemies of the United States. Other than the US, the other two permanent members are France and the United Kingdom. Currently, the President of France is François Hollande, a member of France’s Socialist Party. That basically gives the communists and socialists a 3-2 advantage over the US.

The ten non-permanent member nations of the UN Security Council are:

• Bolivia (President Morales) – Movement of Socialism
• Egypt (President el-Sisi) – Independent Party, Muslim
• Ethiopia (President Teshome) – Ethiopian People’s Democratic Organization (socialist)
• Italy (President Mattarella) – Changed Party 5 times, currently listed as Independent but most of career as socialist)
• Japan (Prime Minister Abe) – appointed by Emperor Akihito (hereditary monarch)
• Kazakhstan (President Nazarbayev) – Communist Party
• Senegal (President Sall) – Alliance for the Republic (former socialist)
• Sweden (Prime Minister Löfven) – Social Democrats (socialist)
• Ukraine (President Poroshenko) – Petro-Poroshenko Bloc (socialist)
• Uruguay (President Vázquez) – Socialist Party
Eight of the ten non-permanent nations on the UN Security Council are run by a socialist, 1 run by a Muslim and the other is Japan run by a monarchy. Combined with the 5 permanent members, that places 11 socialist/communist to 2 free, 1 Muslim and historic monarchy in control of many of the military decisions made by the United Nations. If you break it down to allies versus hostile nations to the US, it is 12-2 against us.Perhaps that’s why President Donald Trump sent newly appointed American Ambassador to the United Nations Mikki Haley (former GOP Governor of South Carolina) with a stern warning message to the entire UN assembly. Haley told the assembly:
“You’re going to see a change in the way we do business. Our goal with the administration is to show value at the U.N., and the way we’ll show value is to show our strength, show our voice, have the backs of our allies and make sure our allies have our back as well.”
“For those who don’t have our back, we’re taking names; we will make points to respond to that accordingly.”
As much as I like Nikki Haley, I would love to see President Trump kick the UN out of the US and withdraw our membership from the one-world socialist organization. It would save America hundreds of millions of dollars each year and would also save the lives of many US military personnel. It would also be a huge step in preventing the UN from gaining any more control of the United States and the American people."
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Thu Feb 02, 2017 1:03 am

http://www.selfreliancecentral.com/2017 ... 1SRCAP2HP2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Plans by United Nations dictators to funnel American taxpayer cash to terrorists could be thwarted by a new Trump Executive Order.
The White House is currently drafting an Order terminating U.S. funding of multiple U.N. programs.
The New York Times reports:
Those criteria include organizations that give full membership to the Palestinian Authority or Palestine Liberation Organization, or support programs that fund abortion or any activity that circumvents sanctions against Iran or North Korea. The draft order also calls for terminating funding for any organization that “is controlled or substantially influenced by any state that sponsors terrorism” or is blamed for the persecution of marginalized groups or any other systematic violation of human rights.
The order calls for then enacting “at least a 40 percent overall decrease” in remaining United States funding toward international organizations.
While it’s not full defunding or withdrawal from the criminal organization, it does slow down efforts by Hamas and other terrorists groups to wage war against Israel and the United States.
And with the U.N. hemorrhaging money and reliant on American taxpayers for perpetual bailouts, it could cripple the One World Government schemers."
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Sat Feb 04, 2017 2:25 am

"The United Nations “human rights” apparatus is being accused of, among other abuses, handing to the Communist Chinese dictatorship the names of activists who were set to expose the regime's crimes at a UN review of China's record. One of the dissidents in question ultimately died in detention. At least several other Chinese dissidents whose identities were reportedly provided to the regime by UN officials were also detained ahead of their trips to Geneva, according to reports. And then, making matters worse, the UN “human rights” leadership appears to have retaliated against the UN whistleblower who finally exposed and stopped the whole sordid affair.

This is the third known scandal surrounding retaliation against whistleblowers from the UN “human rights” bureaucracy to rock the controversial organization in recent years. In what is arguably the most high-profile whistleblowing case to hit the UN in recent years, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UN OHCHR) persecuted Swedish UN official Anders Kompass for his role in attempting to stop the rape of children by “peacekeeping” forces on a UN mandate in the Central African Republic. Kompass eventually resigned following incredible abuse and humiliation, saying he was skeptical that ethics could ever return to the UN.

The latest scandal may prove to be just as damaging to the UN. Unsurprisingly, the UN office in question promptly put out a statement denying that it endangered the Chinese dissidents. But experts, UN whistleblowers, and sources close to the case are speaking out nonetheless, saying that the evidence suggests something is rotten at the UN human rights office. The UN statement denouncing its critics was also filled with factual inaccuracies.

While details of the case remain hazy thus far, what is known is extremely troubling, according to whistleblower advocates and sources. So far, the information that has emerged has come from the whistleblower advocacy group Government Accountability Project (GAP), the UN watchdog media outlet Inner City Press (ICP), as well as documents obtained and shared by UN whistleblower Peter Gallo, a former investigator at the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) who faced retaliation after trying to expose problems there.

The latest saga surrounds UN human-rights officer Emma Reilly. In early 2013, she reported to the top UN human-rights official at the time that another senior UN official, Eric Tistounet, had been giving the Beijing dictatorship the names of Chinese human-rights advocates who were planning to attend a session of the UN “Human Rights Council” in Geneva examining the Communist Chinese regime's human-rights record. Reilly believed that giving the names of those activists to the brutal dictatorship, which has a long history of mass murder and brutal persecution of dissidents, would put them in danger and potentially prevent them from appearing at the hearing. And it appears that her suspicions were well founded.

Six months after Reilly initially drew attention to the matter, Chinese human rights defender Cao Shunli “was disappeared from the Beijing airport on her way to attend a Council session in Geneva,” GAP reported on its website. The victim, charged by the regime with “picking quarrels and provoking troubles,” died while in the communist regime's custody. In addition to Shunli, a brief on the case by former UN official Gallo, citing a report by Chinese Human Rights Defenders, identifies at least two other Chinese human-rights activists, Chen Jianfang and Zhou Weilin, who were apparently detained by the regime while on their way to attend a UN human-rights training and the UN Human Rights Council's 24th session. The brutal dictatorship, along with many of its mass-murdering communist and Islamist allies, enjoy seats on the UN council, despite their long records of brutality and human rights violations.

Instead of expressing concerns about the disappearance of key activists, however, the UN bureaucracy was apparently more interested in retaliating against Reilly, experts monitoring the case explained. “It's a very good case study in how hard it is for a UN whistleblower to get protection,” explained Gallo, who published relevant documents in the Reilly case and has testified before the U.S. Congress on issues related to whistleblowing and UN reform.

Indeed, rather than addressing Reilly's concerns, the practice of giving Beijing the names of Chinese dissidents set to testify against the regime continued for years. Reilly continued to report it internally, but nothing was done. By 2015, Reilly reported her concerns to UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, an Islamic prince who has equated U.S. President Donald Trump and other Western political leaders with the Islamic State (ISIS). He reportedly did nothing, and neither did his deputy, Kate Gilmore.

Finally, Reilly, exasperated, turned to the Irish government, which intervened last year to halt the practice of identifying Chinese dissidents to their oppressors. And that, according to GAP and other sources, led to retaliation against the whistleblower, including harassment, exclusion, and other abuses of authority. “It became clear that Mr. Tistounet had been informed of Ms. Reilly’s report about his cooperation with the Chinese government,” reported Bea Edwards, who leads international programs for GAP.

To obtain protection from the growing abuses, Reilly turned to the UN Ethics Office for protection as a whistleblower. Instead of jumping in to defend her and protect her from retaliation, though, the office twisted itself into knots trying to claim that Reilly's concerns about what she witnessed were not a whistleblower disclosure. The entire bizarre reasoning from the Ethics Office, along with Gallo's commentary exposing the problems with it, is available here. “If she did not have grounds to report that, nobody has grounds to report anything,” Gallo said in a phone interview.

Edwards, with GAP, also expressed serious concerns. “This case has disturbing parallels with the Anders Kompass case, and shows the extent to which this High Commissioner’s motivation with respect to the protection of human rights is inconsistent,” she wrote on GAP's blog. “Zeid Ra’ad al Hussein, the High Commissioner, requested that Mr. Kompass be investigated for giving the names of human rights abuse victims to the French government for the purpose of protecting them. In Zeid’s view, apparently, this is misconduct. However, when Mr. Tistounet, another staff member, gave the names of dissidents to a government, potentially exposing them to abuse, Zeid did not react. This seems upside down to GAP, and we continue watching developments in this case.”

Another watchdog group, UN Watch, also expressed concerns about the case. “Top @UNHumanRights official informed #China of dissident planning to testify @UN,” the organization said in a statement posted on social media. “She was detained and died in prison.”

Of course, the retaliation against brave UN whistleblowers, and the total failure to protect them from it, is actually the norm at the UN. According to a study by the Government Accountability Project in 2012, more than 97 percent of all applications for whistleblower protection are dismissed by the UN. Said another way, just three in 100 people who blow the whistle on UN crimes and abuses end up receiving protection. That sends a clear and unmistakable message to all UN staffers aware of corruption, child abuse, crime, ethics violations, and other illegal activities: Speak out, and lose your job.

The original UN whistleblower, Paul Bang-Jensen, who sought to expose Soviet infiltration of the UN and protect the identity of witnesses to Soviet atrocities, ended up dead in a “suicide” that was almost certainly a murder. His death came after months of terrible abuse, persecution, and retaliation for his bravery.

In recent years, the situation has become so bad that the U.S. Congress finally felt the need to intervene, even threatening UN funding. Eventually, lawmakers passed a law requiring that some U.S. tax funding be withheld from any UN organization that did not implement and rely on proper whistleblower protections. Under the Obama administration, UN bureaucracies were able to flaunt the law with impunity. Finally, though, Congress, realizing that whistleblowers were still being viciously persecuted by UN bosses, held more hearings and made more threats.

But obviously, the scandalous problems continued, ensuring that UN bosses could perpetrate crimes with impunity and with little risk of even being publicly exposed — much less having their “immunity” waived so they could be brought to justice. Now, with Trump in the White House, UN officials realize that they had better shape up, or the U.S. funding will be slashed in accordance with U.S. law. And so, the new UN boss adopted some minor updates to UN whistleblower policies that have been widely criticized and ridiculed by experts, whistleblowers, and others.

After GAP's report, the UN OHCHR exploded, sending out a statement slamming its critics and alleging that their claims were false. “The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights strongly rejects the totally unsupported allegation by the Global Accountability Project (GAP) [sic] and the Inner City Press blog that it endangered four Chinese human rights defenders who attended the Human Rights Council in Geneva in March 2013,” the UN outfit said in a screed so filled with factual errors that it even misstated the name of the organization it was lashing out against.

The UN statement also claimed Reilly “has never faced reprisals,” despite the fact that an alleged “investigation” into that question is supposedly being conducted by the UN Ethics Office now — a “review” that has been ongoing for over 200 days. Ironically, even the deficient UN Ethics Office probe that has been completed found that Reilly's complaint was based on facts, and that the UN office did in fact identify the Chinese human-rights activists to a brutal regime infamous for murdering dissidents. The OHCHR has never denied that Shunli, who died in Chinese detention, was identified to the regime by the UN.

GAP's Edwards responded by pointing out multiple misrepresentations and errors of fact in UN OHCHR's statement. “In short, the UN spokesman’s account is inaccurate, defensive and self-serving,” Edwards wrote, noting that GAP stands by its account of the facts. “He did not even get GAP’s name right.”

Critics say it is time for UN human-rights boss Hussein to step down, for more than a few reasons. “The most recent intemperate and uninformed outburst of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling last Friday's Trump Executive Order excluding terrorists from the United States ´mean-spirited´ (noticeably far beyond the measured assessment of new UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres), just confirms his unfitness for the important high UN office he currently holds,” said Ed Flaherty, an international lawyer based in Geneva who has worked with and represented a number of prominent UN whistleblowers in recent years.

“Whether it be the retaliation against whistleblowers in his own office such as Anders Kompass or Miranda Brown (and now a third who revealed the apparent complicity of his office with the suspicious death of a Chinese human rights activist), or his undisciplined screeds against democratically elected presidential candidates and leaders of the developed world (a legitimacy he is himself sorely missing), Prince Zeid has become an abject embarrassment, and should have the decency to resign immediately before he does irreparable harm to the institution entrusted to his stewardship (and the world's most helpless and vulnerable he is being paid to protect), or before the US withdraws its funding from a rogue UN organ run by a loose-cannon,” Flaherty said in an e-mail. He has provided a list of recommendations on these issues to the Trump administration.

Former UN investigator Gallo, who also was unsuccessful in his bid to secure whistleblower protection, emphasized how important this case and whistleblowing more broadly are to the public. “Whistleblowers play an invaluable role in the system of accountability and prevention of fraud in all organizations, but it is particularly important in the UN,” he said, noting that the UN is immune from national laws, has its own “internal justice” system biased in favor of management, and spends billions of dollars with virtually no oversight.

He called for a tough line from Washington. “The UN will never reform itself,” Gallo explained in a statement sent via e-mail. “Reform has to be forced on the organization by the American taxpayers iron fist on its corporate windpipe, and that will not be done without whistleblowers like Ms. Reilly standing up to complain about what is obviously wrong.”

“The most shocking aspect here is the level of mismanagement in OHCHR and the fact they have still learned nothing after the Kompass case,” said Gallo, referring to the Swedish whistleblower who tried to stop the rape of African children by “peace” troops and, instead of being awarded a medal, was escorted out of his office under armed guard. “As if that were not bad enough, the Human Rights office was so keen to avoid any problems getting China on to the Human Rights Council that it seems they were happy to co-operate with the Chinese government detaining the human rights activists that wanted to turn up and point out how China is violating the human rights of its own people. That simply beggars belief.”

Gallo, who received the documents in Reilly's case in the mail and published them online, also blasted the UN's policies on whistleblowers. “The Whistleblower protection policy in the UN is not worth the paper it is printed on, because the Ethics Office will argue that black is white, that up is down and that the moon is, in fact made of green cheese if that is what it takes to ignore retaliation against the staff member who just tries to do their job and who reports something they believe to be illegal,” he said. “This is not just laziness on the part of the Ethics Office – this is deliberate because the culture in the UN is not to tolerate dissent.” Numerous other UN whistleblowers who have spoken to The New American in recent days also blasted the UN's latest whistleblower policy.

Gallo said it was time for serious changes and reforms at the UN, some of which he outlined in congressional testimony last year. “There is a culture of immunity and impunity in the UN; and it is the American taxpayer who finances it,” he concluded, calling for external and independent investigations. “The challenge may be enormous but I believe there is a solution. It involves admitting that ´self-regulation´ simply does not work in the UN.”

Trump is currently working on taking a sledgehammer to the UN, some of its dictator-dominated agencies, and its U.S. taxpayer funding. Meanwhile, legislation in Congress, dubbed the American Sovereignty Restoration Act, would see the U.S. government withdraw from the UN completely. How far policymakers in D.C. intend to go remains to be seen. What is clear, though, is that the UN status quo — corruption, crime, tyranny, abuse, globalism, and constant attacks on America — is set to face unprecedented resistance."
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-new ... s+Feb+3+17" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:48 pm

"America's Liberty Committee is a not-for-profit organization. Because America's Liberty Committee serves as a citizen's voice and lobbies on state and federal legislative activities, contributions are not tax-deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes or as business deductions under the Internal Revenue Code.

America's Liberty Committee
332 West Lee Highway, #316
Warrenton, VA 20186

For too long, the United Nations has been a tool of the powerful political establishment and globalist elite.
But the tide is turning against the powers that be across Europe and the United States.
Last summer, the United Kingdom shocked the world by voting to leave the European Union.
And a few short months later, Donald Trump was elected as President of the United States and proposed an executive order slashing funding for the U.N. within days of taking office.
This executive order would be a good start, but the Constitution restricts the President's ability to unilaterally extract America from the bureaucratic behemoth that is the U.N.
To fully complete an American exit from the U.N requires an act of Congress.
The American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017 (H.R. 193) -- which would end America's membership and financial support of the United Nations -- has been introduced in the House of Representatives.
And America's Liberty Committee is launching a grassroots program to ensure this bill passes through Congress and reaches President Trump's desk.
The first phase of our program begins with collecting thousands of signatures from patriots like you, demanding your U.S. Representative support this legislation.
The United Nations seeks to reshape lives and freedoms to suit themselves and their goals.
The United Nations receives billions of tax dollars every year.
United States taxpayers are on the hook for $3.3 billion dollars -- or almost 25% -- of the United Nations annual budget.
Speaking at a U.N. conference last year, former President Barack Obama tried to argue that "binding ourselves" to "international rules" and surrendering control of who enters our country would somehow make us safer.
Among the most egregious examples are the potential violations of our Second Amendment within the U.N. Small Arms Treaty and the draconian economic restrictions of the U.N. climate change agenda, which is simply a bid for economic control disguised as environmentalism.
Even a former Assistant Secretary General and 30-year U.N. veteran declared it to be "a failure" and "a black hole" for tax dollars and human effort in a recent New York Times op-ed.
The influence wielded by the United Nations entrenched Big Government backers in Washington, D.C. runs deep.
And they're hooked on the cushy lifestyle afforded by fat taxpayer-funded salaries.
So you can bet they'll fight tooth-and-nail to keep every penny currently earmarked for the U.N.
I'm counting on patriots like you to help your America's Liberty Committee break through the D.C. bubble that surrounds Congress.
My staff and I have drawn up a hard-hitting grassroots campaign that combines tried-and-true political tactics and traditional media with the latest in Internet targeting and social media.
Between direct mail, email, constituent petitions and phone calls, you and I can reach millions of like-minded Americans to turn up the heat on Congress.
And when you add in the years of experience in the political trenches held by the staff here at Committee headquarters, I'm confident you and I can finally free America from the shackles of the United Nations.
It is critical to mobilise as many patriotic Americans as possible before the United Nations cronies in D.C. can bog down this bill with attacks in the liberal media and backroom dealings.
When President Trump tweeted that the United Nations has become "a club for people to get together, talk and have a good time," he was 100% correct.
The United Nations is a failed, bloated bureaucracy.
The American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017 (H.R. 193) -- which would end America's membership and financial support of the United Nations -- has been introduced in the House of Representatives.
America's Liberty Committee is launching a grassroots program to ensure this bill passes through Congress and reaches President Trump's desk.

John Tate, Executive Director
America's Liberty Committee "
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

lundbaek
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8191
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:48 pm
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby lundbaek » Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:14 am

I read in the 6 March 2017 edition of "The New American", "...a group of liberty-minded lawmakers is working to have the U.S. government completely withdraw from the UN. The legislation, known as the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 193), would also evict the UN from U.S. soil while ending American support for the global outfit and all of its agencies."

I hope you will contact your congressional representative and urge him/her to support this action. A few lines later I read "Many critics of the UN - very much including The John Birch Society, the parent organization of The New American - argue that the United Nations should be abolished and replaced with nothing."

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:02 pm

http://freedomoutpost.com/the-un-has-al ... t-leaders/
"Here is a list of the men who were named as the UN's top official from its inception in 1945 to the present.

• Alger Hiss - American Communist served as acting Secretary-General in 1945
• Trygve Lie (1946-1952) - Leader of Norway's Social Democratic Labor Party, a known offshoot of the Communist International
• Dag Hammarskjold (1953-1961) - Swede who claimed that Communist China mass murderer Chou En-lai was his hero
• U Thant (1961-1971) - This leader from Burma expressed admiration for Vladimir Lenin and approved of his goals because they were "in line with the aims of the UN Charter."
• Kurt Waldheim (1972-1981) - This Austrian served as an officer in the Nazi army during World War II. He also engineered the campaign to oust the Republica of China on Taiwan from the UN in favor of Communist China.
• Javier Perez de Cuellar (1982-1991) - The Marxist from Peru set as his major goal the redistribution of wealth.
• Boutros Boutros-Ghali (1991-1996) - This Egyptian served just one five-year term, but was best known for his open call to end the "absolute and exclusive sovereignty" of individual nations.
• Kofi Annan (1997-2006) - The man from Ghana turned out to be very slick but an even more aggressive enemy of national sovereignty.
• Ban Ki-moon (2007-2016) - This South Korean pushed for measures ties to the highly fraudulent climate change claims, including advancing many of the goals listed in Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
On January 1, 2017, the United Nations appointed Portugal's Antonio Guterres as the new Secretary-General. he served as president of the Socialist International (SI), which named Karl Marx s their organization's Honourary Secretary in 1864, from 1999 until 2005.
"The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government.”
After leaving SI in 2005, Guterres became the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. According to Alex Newman, Guterres, along with his staff, brought a "tidal wave of Islamic immigration into the West."
Seeing that the UN is an anti-American and anti-Christian organisation, we can count on Mr. Guterres to continue his advancement of Islamic immigration into the West to diminish the influence of Christianity and destroy Western culture and society, thus making it ripe for the tyranny the UN wishes to impose.
Every year, the united States pays 22 percent of the UN's operating budget. Additionally, we pay as much as $3 billion for "peacekeeping" operations. The other four permanent members on the Security Council (Russia, China, Britain, and France) all pay a combined total of $2.5 billion for peacekeeping! Something is clearly wrong with this picture.
US contributions to the UN total more than the amounts given by 185 countries!
People have said President Donald Trump is against globalism. The United Nations is the root of globalism.
A resolution in the House, HR193, has already been introduced to get us out of the United Nations. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has followed in his father's footsteps and introduced legislation in the Senate to do the same thing, but those have all failed. Let's encourage him to do it again with a similar measure to HR193. Then let's encourage President Trump to follow through and rip the anti-American albatross from around our necks and let it disintegrate into history as an utter and complete failure."
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Sat May 20, 2017 10:48 pm

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-ne ... t-one-road

"The United Nations and its top leaders have openly embraced the Communist Chinese dictatorship's widely criticized “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative, which analysts have warned is an effort to further expand Beijing's totalitarian influence far outside of China's borders. Other globalist organizations such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank praised the scheme, too. Brutal dictatorships and tyrants around the world are also lining up to join the party. And unfortunately for opponents of communism, globalism, and tyranny, even some Western governments and companies are hopping on the OBOR bandwagon. But the truth is trickling out.
At a gathering this week in Beijing, representatives from some 100 governments and dictatorships gathered to learn about the OBOR and how they might benefit from it. Officially, the Chinese scheme, formally known as the “Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-century Maritime Silk Road,” is a “win-win” plan to expand trade across Eurasia and into Africa by building new infrastructure such as roads, rail, and ports. “We have no intention to intervene in the affairs of other countries or to export our social system,” the mass-murdering communist dictator of mainland China, Xi Jinping, told attendees. Xi (shown above with UN boss Antonio Guterres) called the OBOR the “project of the century” during a round-table with the leaders of the UN, the World Bank, and the IMF.
But in reality, more than a few analysts have pointed out that it is a dangerous plot to export Communist Chinese influence around the world. Of course, Beijing's “New Silk Road” and the new “Maritime Silk Road” being developed will also be used to peddle the regime's goods, manufactured by China's vast armies of practically slave laborers in regime-controlled “companies” using technology stolen from Western firms and taxpayers. But the real agenda is much deeper than hawking Chinese-made junk — it is exporting the deadly “ideology” of communism with “Chinese characteristics” that globalists and tyrants everywhere, from the late David Rockefeller and George Soros to Raul Castro and Vladimir Putin, are so fond of praising.
Aside from the fact that numerous important UN agencies are now led by Communist Chinese agents and their allies, it seems the UN's affection for the regime's Belt and Road scheme stems, at least in part, from its links to the UN Agenda 2030. That scheme, also known as the “Sustainable Development Goals,” or SDGs, represents a road-map to global totalitarianism and unlimited government powers. And as The New American and other sources have documented extensively, the totalitarian regime in Beijing boasted through its propaganda organs that it played a “crucial role” in developing the UN agenda.
Speaking at the OBOR summit in Beijing on May 14, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres showered praise on the Communist Chinese scheme and its nexus with the UN Agenda 2030. “While the Belt and Road Initiative and the 2030 Agenda are different in their nature and scope, both have sustainable development as the overarching objective,” explained Guterres, with “sustainable development” serving as code words for centralising and expanding coercive controls over humanity. “Both aim to deepen connectivity across countries and regions: connectivity in infrastructure, trade, finance, policies and, perhaps most important of all, among peoples.”
The “connectivity” theme is crucial, with “connectivity” in policy, as touted by Guterres, representing the harmonisation and globalisation of governance. Basically, Guterres and the globalist establishment behind him hope to see policy making migrating away from local self-government and even nation states, and toward global institutions such as the UN where dictators and the establishment reign supreme. The UN Agenda 2030 and its 17 “Sustainable Development Goals” make that clear, too, demanding everything from national and international socialism to wealth redistribution and globalist indoctrination of all children masquerading as “education.”
Guterres was proud of it all. “Those 17 Goals can guide the policies and actions under the Belt and Road towards true sustainable development,” said Guterres, the former head of the Socialist International global alliance of totalitarian political parties collectively responsible for millions of murders. “The Belt and road Initiative is rooted in a shared vision for global development. Indeed, China is a central pillar of multilateralism.” Multilateralism is simply another term for globalism — the replacing of self-government and national sovereignty with rule by globalist, unaccountable institutions.
The UN boss, a proud socialist, even praised the mass-murdering Chinese dictatorship, which continues to harvest body organs from political and religious dissidents, for its role in creating the UN Agenda 2030 and pushing global governance. “China played a key role in shaping the 2030 Agenda,” he admitted, calling the scheme one of the past decade's “signal achievements” in international diplomacy. “China has also launched several major initiatives, from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and increased support for United Nations peacekeeping, to a combination of new funds aiming at strengthening both peace and prosperity.”
Guterres, who helped oversee the influx of millions of Third World Islamic migrants to the West at the UN “refugee” bureaucracy before taking on his current post, also hit on the “multi-polar” world order theme, signaling an end to U.S. dominance of global governance and the shift to more international power for Third World dictatorships. “This wide-ranging engagement is more necessary than ever today,” he said. “Our world is multipolar. But that by itself is no guarantee of prosperity and peace. A multipolar world needs multilateral cooperation to face common threats and seize shared opportunities.”
And despite the fact that the regime enslaving mainland China has murdered more human beings than any other government in all of recorded history, the UN is more than willing to help further expand Communist Chinese power across Asia, Africa, and Europe. “The United Nations system stands ready to travel this road with you in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and to fulfill our promise to leave no one behind,” Guterres declared, with the reference to “leave no one behind” coming straight from the radical UN Agenda 2030 scheme for global governance.
Outside the UN, Chinese propaganda and espionage services were hard at work for weeks trumpeting global support for the regime's Belt and Road scheme. “Breathless state-run coverage portrayed the Belt and Road Initiative as having near limitless potential to remake the world, with China — and Xi — at its center,” reported Bloomberg. “State television showed Xi and his celebrity wife, Peng Liyuan, receiving Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and other heads of state, while top diplomats such as U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond paraded on stage to praise the president’s program.”
However, beyond totalitarian-minded foreign rulers, there were plenty of crony “capitalists” and “useful idiots,” as Lenin referred to them, willing to embrace the scheme as well. So desperate for finding more endorsements was the regime's propaganda ministry that Xinhua, a state-run propaganda megaphone that doubles as an intelligence front, even touted the backing of the controversial Marxist-linked La Rouche movement. “The Belt and Road Initiative is the most important strategic initiative on the planet,” Helga Zepp-LaRouche, president of La Rouche's Schiller Institute, told the regime's mouthpiece. “It not only brings economic prosperity to all participating countries, but also serves as a true basis for a peace order for the 21st century.”
Leading Communist Chinese functionaries also touted the scheme in the Western media. “The plan is to lead the new globalization 2.0,” Director General Cao Wenlian with the International Cooperation Center of the National Development and Reform Commission was quoted as saying by the New York Times, which misleadingly called the center “a group dedicated to the initiative” instead of properly identifying it as an arm of the communist regime. The Times, which has a long history of shilling for communist autocrats, called OBOR a Chinese program for “creating new markets for the country’s [regime-owned] construction companies and exporting its model of state-led development.” State-led development is how globalists and socialists now refer to government control of the economy.
Aside from the New York Times, which famously touted mass-murdering communist dictator Fidel Castro as a freedom fighter before he took over, and infamously attempted to conceal the horrific Soviet genocide of millions of Ukrainians, numerous other propaganda mouthpieces for the Western globalist establishment have also been shamelessly touting OBOR. Writing in the globalist Financial Times, for example, Beijing's ambassador to Britain was allowed to unabashedly promote the scheme as if it were just a harmless plan to help everybody succeed. “It is a public product for the good of the whole world,” he said.
In a troubling sign of things to come, the regime has even recruited Western “journalists” to make pro-OBOR propaganda, aimed at young children. Already, the dictatorship operates a comprehensive communist indoctrination program for Chinese children under the guise of providing “education.” But increasingly, even Western children and other foreigners are being targeted with Beijing's propaganda. In a series produced by state-owned communist mouthpiece China Daily, American journalist Erik Nilsson, who works for the regime, explains to his young daughter why OBOR will be so wonderful, in a skit playfully made to seem like a bed-time story.
Despite campaigning to rein in the brutal regime and its economic scheming, not to mention globalism more broadly, even Trump sent a senior official to the OBOR festivities in Beijing over the weekend. At first, a lower-level bureaucrat from the U.S. Commerce Department was supposed to go, according to media reports. However, that was later changed, with the Trump administration sending National Security Council senior director for Asia Matthew Pottinger instead. Establishment-minded analysts said the decision was a sign that the White House was seeking warm relations with China's brutal dictator by honoring his scheme to remake global trade.
As this magazine has documented for years, the brutal regime in China is being groomed by Western globalists to play a much more significant role on the world stage. In fact, it will hold a key role in the anticipated “New World Order” being promoted by bigwigs from Beijing and Havana to Washington, D.C., and London. Indeed, the dictatorship not only no longer conceals its globalist ambitions for world leadership, it openly proclaims them. Just recently, for example, Chinese state-run propaganda organs made a big splash about the regime's new “School of Global Governance” in Beijing to train legions of communist agents for jobs in the UN and other globalist organs of “global governance.”
Beijing is hoping to secure much of the funding for its OBOR scheme from Western taxpayers via the World Bank, the IMF, the UN, the Asian Development Bank, and other sources funded by Americans. The senior leaders of those globalist entities, which include multiple Communist Chinese agents, seem more than willing to hand over your money for the project, estimated to cost $1 trillion or more. And unfortunately, Western governments, including the Trump administration, have shown signs of being willing to embrace the scheme. The American people should insist that no U.S. tax money be spent helping the most murderous regime to ever curse the planet in its bid to export its totalitarian rule outside its borders."
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Silver
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:31 pm

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Silver » Sun May 21, 2017 6:49 am

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat May 20, 2017 10:48 pm
https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-ne ... t-one-road

"The United Nations and its top leaders have openly embraced the Communist Chinese dictatorship's widely criticized “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative, which analysts have warned is an effort to further expand Beijing's totalitarian influence far outside of China's borders. Other globalist organizations such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank praised the scheme, too. Brutal dictatorships and tyrants around the world are also lining up to join the party. And unfortunately for opponents of communism, globalism, and tyranny, even some Western governments and companies are hopping on the OBOR bandwagon. But the truth is trickling out.
At a gathering this week in Beijing, representatives from some 100 governments and dictatorships gathered to learn about the OBOR and how they might benefit from it. Officially, the Chinese scheme, formally known as the “Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-century Maritime Silk Road,” is a “win-win” plan to expand trade across Eurasia and into Africa by building new infrastructure such as roads, rail, and ports. “We have no intention to intervene in the affairs of other countries or to export our social system,” the mass-murdering communist dictator of mainland China, Xi Jinping, told attendees. Xi (shown above with UN boss Antonio Guterres) called the OBOR the “project of the century” during a round-table with the leaders of the UN, the World Bank, and the IMF.
But in reality, more than a few analysts have pointed out that it is a dangerous plot to export Communist Chinese influence around the world. Of course, Beijing's “New Silk Road” and the new “Maritime Silk Road” being developed will also be used to peddle the regime's goods, manufactured by China's vast armies of practically slave laborers in regime-controlled “companies” using technology stolen from Western firms and taxpayers. But the real agenda is much deeper than hawking Chinese-made junk — it is exporting the deadly “ideology” of communism with “Chinese characteristics” that globalists and tyrants everywhere, from the late David Rockefeller and George Soros to Raul Castro and Vladimir Putin, are so fond of praising.
Aside from the fact that numerous important UN agencies are now led by Communist Chinese agents and their allies, it seems the UN's affection for the regime's Belt and Road scheme stems, at least in part, from its links to the UN Agenda 2030. That scheme, also known as the “Sustainable Development Goals,” or SDGs, represents a road-map to global totalitarianism and unlimited government powers. And as The New American and other sources have documented extensively, the totalitarian regime in Beijing boasted through its propaganda organs that it played a “crucial role” in developing the UN agenda.
Speaking at the OBOR summit in Beijing on May 14, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres showered praise on the Communist Chinese scheme and its nexus with the UN Agenda 2030. “While the Belt and Road Initiative and the 2030 Agenda are different in their nature and scope, both have sustainable development as the overarching objective,” explained Guterres, with “sustainable development” serving as code words for centralising and expanding coercive controls over humanity. “Both aim to deepen connectivity across countries and regions: connectivity in infrastructure, trade, finance, policies and, perhaps most important of all, among peoples.”
The “connectivity” theme is crucial, with “connectivity” in policy, as touted by Guterres, representing the harmonisation and globalisation of governance. Basically, Guterres and the globalist establishment behind him hope to see policy making migrating away from local self-government and even nation states, and toward global institutions such as the UN where dictators and the establishment reign supreme. The UN Agenda 2030 and its 17 “Sustainable Development Goals” make that clear, too, demanding everything from national and international socialism to wealth redistribution and globalist indoctrination of all children masquerading as “education.”
Guterres was proud of it all. “Those 17 Goals can guide the policies and actions under the Belt and Road towards true sustainable development,” said Guterres, the former head of the Socialist International global alliance of totalitarian political parties collectively responsible for millions of murders. “The Belt and road Initiative is rooted in a shared vision for global development. Indeed, China is a central pillar of multilateralism.” Multilateralism is simply another term for globalism — the replacing of self-government and national sovereignty with rule by globalist, unaccountable institutions.
The UN boss, a proud socialist, even praised the mass-murdering Chinese dictatorship, which continues to harvest body organs from political and religious dissidents, for its role in creating the UN Agenda 2030 and pushing global governance. “China played a key role in shaping the 2030 Agenda,” he admitted, calling the scheme one of the past decade's “signal achievements” in international diplomacy. “China has also launched several major initiatives, from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and increased support for United Nations peacekeeping, to a combination of new funds aiming at strengthening both peace and prosperity.”
Guterres, who helped oversee the influx of millions of Third World Islamic migrants to the West at the UN “refugee” bureaucracy before taking on his current post, also hit on the “multi-polar” world order theme, signaling an end to U.S. dominance of global governance and the shift to more international power for Third World dictatorships. “This wide-ranging engagement is more necessary than ever today,” he said. “Our world is multipolar. But that by itself is no guarantee of prosperity and peace. A multipolar world needs multilateral cooperation to face common threats and seize shared opportunities.”
And despite the fact that the regime enslaving mainland China has murdered more human beings than any other government in all of recorded history, the UN is more than willing to help further expand Communist Chinese power across Asia, Africa, and Europe. “The United Nations system stands ready to travel this road with you in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and to fulfill our promise to leave no one behind,” Guterres declared, with the reference to “leave no one behind” coming straight from the radical UN Agenda 2030 scheme for global governance.
Outside the UN, Chinese propaganda and espionage services were hard at work for weeks trumpeting global support for the regime's Belt and Road scheme. “Breathless state-run coverage portrayed the Belt and Road Initiative as having near limitless potential to remake the world, with China — and Xi — at its center,” reported Bloomberg. “State television showed Xi and his celebrity wife, Peng Liyuan, receiving Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and other heads of state, while top diplomats such as U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond paraded on stage to praise the president’s program.”
However, beyond totalitarian-minded foreign rulers, there were plenty of crony “capitalists” and “useful idiots,” as Lenin referred to them, willing to embrace the scheme as well. So desperate for finding more endorsements was the regime's propaganda ministry that Xinhua, a state-run propaganda megaphone that doubles as an intelligence front, even touted the backing of the controversial Marxist-linked La Rouche movement. “The Belt and Road Initiative is the most important strategic initiative on the planet,” Helga Zepp-LaRouche, president of La Rouche's Schiller Institute, told the regime's mouthpiece. “It not only brings economic prosperity to all participating countries, but also serves as a true basis for a peace order for the 21st century.”
Leading Communist Chinese functionaries also touted the scheme in the Western media. “The plan is to lead the new globalization 2.0,” Director General Cao Wenlian with the International Cooperation Center of the National Development and Reform Commission was quoted as saying by the New York Times, which misleadingly called the center “a group dedicated to the initiative” instead of properly identifying it as an arm of the communist regime. The Times, which has a long history of shilling for communist autocrats, called OBOR a Chinese program for “creating new markets for the country’s [regime-owned] construction companies and exporting its model of state-led development.” State-led development is how globalists and socialists now refer to government control of the economy.
Aside from the New York Times, which famously touted mass-murdering communist dictator Fidel Castro as a freedom fighter before he took over, and infamously attempted to conceal the horrific Soviet genocide of millions of Ukrainians, numerous other propaganda mouthpieces for the Western globalist establishment have also been shamelessly touting OBOR. Writing in the globalist Financial Times, for example, Beijing's ambassador to Britain was allowed to unabashedly promote the scheme as if it were just a harmless plan to help everybody succeed. “It is a public product for the good of the whole world,” he said.
In a troubling sign of things to come, the regime has even recruited Western “journalists” to make pro-OBOR propaganda, aimed at young children. Already, the dictatorship operates a comprehensive communist indoctrination program for Chinese children under the guise of providing “education.” But increasingly, even Western children and other foreigners are being targeted with Beijing's propaganda. In a series produced by state-owned communist mouthpiece China Daily, American journalist Erik Nilsson, who works for the regime, explains to his young daughter why OBOR will be so wonderful, in a skit playfully made to seem like a bed-time story.
Despite campaigning to rein in the brutal regime and its economic scheming, not to mention globalism more broadly, even Trump sent a senior official to the OBOR festivities in Beijing over the weekend. At first, a lower-level bureaucrat from the U.S. Commerce Department was supposed to go, according to media reports. However, that was later changed, with the Trump administration sending National Security Council senior director for Asia Matthew Pottinger instead. Establishment-minded analysts said the decision was a sign that the White House was seeking warm relations with China's brutal dictator by honoring his scheme to remake global trade.
As this magazine has documented for years, the brutal regime in China is being groomed by Western globalists to play a much more significant role on the world stage. In fact, it will hold a key role in the anticipated “New World Order” being promoted by bigwigs from Beijing and Havana to Washington, D.C., and London. Indeed, the dictatorship not only no longer conceals its globalist ambitions for world leadership, it openly proclaims them. Just recently, for example, Chinese state-run propaganda organs made a big splash about the regime's new “School of Global Governance” in Beijing to train legions of communist agents for jobs in the UN and other globalist organs of “global governance.”
Beijing is hoping to secure much of the funding for its OBOR scheme from Western taxpayers via the World Bank, the IMF, the UN, the Asian Development Bank, and other sources funded by Americans. The senior leaders of those globalist entities, which include multiple Communist Chinese agents, seem more than willing to hand over your money for the project, estimated to cost $1 trillion or more. And unfortunately, Western governments, including the Trump administration, have shown signs of being willing to embrace the scheme. The American people should insist that no U.S. tax money be spent helping the most murderous regime to ever curse the planet in its bid to export its totalitarian rule outside its borders."
Look at the gift Elizabeth bestowed on all who read to the end of the article! Seems the Trump Administration isn't so concerned about making america great again as it is in furthering the globalist agenda. You would think the Marmalade's supporters would start deserting him with all the evidence they've been presented.

If it has anything to do with trade then Wilbur Ross, Secy of Commerce, is all over it. Let's review again, kids, Wilbur's background and ties to Trump.
Wilbur worked at Rothschild for 24 years and it was while he was there that he packaged a loan to save one of Trump's bogus casinos in NJ otherwise the guy would have been shirtless.

I don't know why some people keep arguing with me. Just look at the evidence. Is The New American now "fake news?" How will this article be rationalized away?
As a prophet reveals the truth it divides the people. (T)he worldly either want to close the mouth of the prophet, or else act as if the prophet didn’t exist, rather than repent of their sins. Popularity is never a test of truth. Ezra Taft Benson

User avatar
Z2100
captain of 100
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 7:58 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Z2100 » Sun May 21, 2017 7:08 am

David13 wrote:
Thu Apr 07, 2016 9:30 am
It is amazing how few people recognize what an evil the "United Nations" is.
dc

Wait, im sorry. Why is the UN evil??
We live in the 6920th year since the Fall of Man.

Silver
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:31 pm

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Silver » Sun May 21, 2017 7:26 am

Z2100 wrote:
Sun May 21, 2017 7:08 am
David13 wrote:
Thu Apr 07, 2016 9:30 am
It is amazing how few people recognize what an evil the "United Nations" is.
dc

Wait, im sorry. Why is the UN evil??
You forgot the sarcasm tag.
As a prophet reveals the truth it divides the people. (T)he worldly either want to close the mouth of the prophet, or else act as if the prophet didn’t exist, rather than repent of their sins. Popularity is never a test of truth. Ezra Taft Benson

User avatar
Z2100
captain of 100
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 7:58 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Z2100 » Sun May 21, 2017 7:58 am

Silver wrote:
Sun May 21, 2017 7:26 am
Z2100 wrote:
Sun May 21, 2017 7:08 am
David13 wrote:
Thu Apr 07, 2016 9:30 am
It is amazing how few people recognize what an evil the "United Nations" is.
dc

Wait, im sorry. Why is the UN evil??
You forgot the sarcasm tag.
No, seriously. Why is the UN so evil? I thought they want world peace.
We live in the 6920th year since the Fall of Man.

Silver
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:31 pm

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Silver » Sun May 21, 2017 8:18 am

Z2100 wrote:
Sun May 21, 2017 7:58 am
Silver wrote:
Sun May 21, 2017 7:26 am
Z2100 wrote:
Sun May 21, 2017 7:08 am
David13 wrote:
Thu Apr 07, 2016 9:30 am
It is amazing how few people recognize what an evil the "United Nations" is.
dc

Wait, im sorry. Why is the UN evil??
You forgot the sarcasm tag.
No, seriously. Why is the UN so evil? I thought they want world peace.
This will get you started:
https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-ne ... s-an-order

Then read everything by Ezra Taft Benson, for example.
As a prophet reveals the truth it divides the people. (T)he worldly either want to close the mouth of the prophet, or else act as if the prophet didn’t exist, rather than repent of their sins. Popularity is never a test of truth. Ezra Taft Benson

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6614
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:28 am

Re: United NATIONS.

Postby Elizabeth » Mon May 22, 2017 6:19 pm

"Before he left office, Barack Obama... without the consent or approval of Congress... committed to this giant United Nations scheme which, according to Bloomberg.com, is NOW going to cost at least 12 TRILLION DOLLARS... and that price tag is almost certain to go up.

The Paris Climate Change Agreement is a ruse. It has almost nothing to do with so-called Climate Change, because the trillions that find their way into the coffers of the crooks and thieves at the United Nations will go straight into the pockets of corporate interests and America-hating tin-pot dictators around the world... and American taxpayers are PERSONALLY on the hook for this multi-trillion dollar wealth redistribution scheme.”
Center for Individual Freedom
815 King Street
Suite 303
Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: 703-535-5836
Fax: 703-535-5838
Doctrines of the Gospel are revealed through the Spirit to Prophets... not through the intellect to scholars.

JST Matt 10:30
Think not, that I am come to send peace on earth;
I came not to send peace, but a sword.


Return to “Political/Economic Secret Combinations”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests