Andrew52,Andrew52 wrote:
George is here to push buttons. May I suggest we ignore him?
Jesus came to push a few buttons, should we ignore him?
George
Post by George Alabaster »
Andrew52,Andrew52 wrote:
George is here to push buttons. May I suggest we ignore him?
Decide for yourself, because Jesus never forced anything on anybody.George Alabaster wrote:Andrew52,Andrew52 wrote:
George is here to push buttons. May I suggest we ignore him?
Jesus came to push a few buttons, should we ignore him?
George
Post by George Alabaster »
I wonder which was worse, hell or the gulag?Andrew52 wrote:Decide for yourself, because Jesus never forced anything on anybody.
Post by Original_Intent »
I'll meet you at the judgement bar, lady. Hopefully you will have learned something by then.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
Post by A Random Phrase »
The trouble is, if he had done things to mess up the country more than it is, well - I suspect people would have fewer qualms about blaming "Mormons" and deciding to kill them. No one is going to blame black people for what Obama does (probably because it is not an ideology), let alone have murderous rage.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
Post by A Random Phrase »
)Thomas wrote:Yes Janadale, it is the fault of the 20 or 30 LDS people who didn't support Romney.
Oh please! Mitt Romney get blown out in electoral college 303 to 203 and your going to blame the Latter-day Saints who voted for Obama for the loss? Come on now.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
Ron Paul fanatics are in the Matrix just as much as Obama fanatics and possibly Romney fanatics (I don't think the whole story jives there and was hoping to see what the bottom line was). But I imagine we'll see Ron Paul again in 4 years as well as Obama's replacement....and perhaps even Mitt will shoot for a 3rd round. Long story short we can pick this back up in 4 years....Original_Intent wrote:I'll meet you at the judgement bar, lady. Hopefully you will have learned something by then.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
We effectively have a one-party system in this country that masquerades as a two party system to keep half of the country hating the other half, and to give everyont the illusion every couple of years that they have some say in what goes on. Whose chauffer gets to drive the bus off the cliff and at what speed. Wake up. The Matrix has you.
What an exaggeration Thomas! )Thomas wrote:Yes Janadale, it is the fault of the 20 or 30 LDS people who didn't support Romney.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
Post by Original_Intent »
Not to tread on sacred ground, but I would ask a simple yes or no question - have you had a spiritual witness to that effect, or are you promoting your arm of flesh understanding (which you are entitled to, certainly, I just want to know.)Legion wrote:Ron Paul fanatics are in the Matrix just as much as Obama fanatics and possibly Romney fanatics (I don't think the whole story jives there and was hoping to see what the bottom line was). But I imagine we'll see Ron Paul again in 4 years as well as Obama's replacement....and perhaps even Mitt will shoot for a 3rd round. Long story short we can pick this back up in 4 years....Original_Intent wrote:I'll meet you at the judgement bar, lady. Hopefully you will have learned something by then.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
We effectively have a one-party system in this country that masquerades as a two party system to keep half of the country hating the other half, and to give everyont the illusion every couple of years that they have some say in what goes on. Whose chauffer gets to drive the bus off the cliff and at what speed. Wake up. The Matrix has you.
Humility Opens DoorsOriginal_Intent wrote:I'll meet you at the judgement bar, lady. Hopefully you will have learned something by then.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
We effectively have a one-party system in this country that masquerades as a two party system to keep half of the country hating the other half, and to give everyont the illusion every couple of years that they have some say in what goes on. Whose chauffer gets to drive the bus off the cliff and at what speed. Wake up. The Matrix has you.
Post by Original_Intent »
Everyone considers themselves "pretty humble" I suppose, I guess we will have to wait and see who the heirs are.Andrew52 wrote:Humility Opens DoorsOriginal_Intent wrote:I'll meet you at the judgement bar, lady. Hopefully you will have learned something by then.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
We effectively have a one-party system in this country that masquerades as a two party system to keep half of the country hating the other half, and to give everyont the illusion every couple of years that they have some say in what goes on. Whose chauffer gets to drive the bus off the cliff and at what speed. Wake up. The Matrix has you.
(Why the Meek Shall Inherit the Earth)
Original_Intent wrote:I'll meet you at the judgement bar, lady. Hopefully you will have learned something by then.SARAH Ward wrote:Shame on all Latter-day Saints who worked against Mitt. Dark days ahead can be lain at your door.
We effectively have a one-party system in this country that masquerades as a two party system to keep half of the country hating the other half, and to give everyont the illusion every couple of years that they have some say in what goes on. Whose chauffer gets to drive the bus off the cliff and at what speed. Wake up. The Matrix has you.
With regard to Ron Paul? Mitt? Obama?Original_Intent wrote:Not to tread on sacred ground, but I would ask a simple yes or no question - have you had a spiritual witness to that effect, or are you promoting your arm of flesh understanding (which you are entitled to, certainly, I just want to know.)Legion wrote:Ron Paul fanatics are in the Matrix just as much as Obama fanatics and possibly Romney fanatics (I don't think the whole story jives there and was hoping to see what the bottom line was). But I imagine we'll see Ron Paul again in 4 years as well as Obama's replacement....and perhaps even Mitt will shoot for a 3rd round. Long story short we can pick this back up in 4 years....
Rob wrote:That's so exciting! Romney gets to be the one to lose to Obama! :ymapplause:
Post by HeirofNumenor »
Post by HeirofNumenor »
You are gutsy! I am pleased that you are allowed to express your opinion here.SARAH Ward wrote:If it were not for Libertarians and people voting third-party on some mutation of a principle, then there would not currently be as big a perception that conservatism and Libertarianism is so wildly unpopular when the other option is socialism.
At this point I would like to extend a hearty congratulations to Libertarians and non-voting conservatives: my friends, you’ve contributed to your Libertarian and conservative dreams now having no chance of ever being realized.
http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/11/how ... z2BwhfpTL5" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think this is the biggest hang up we have. I can see both sides. On the one side, he was the best choice--the conservative choice. On the other, he supports the NDAA, preemptive war without congressional approval, Patriot Act, federal reserve, etc, etc, etc. Is it a matter of compromising principles or is it a difference of principles? I wanted to vote for Mitt. I did. But I just couldn't do it. So in the end I will be judged either for choosing the wrong candidate or voting on principle. It's a choice that I can live with. I am at peace.Andrew52 wrote:I considered him the best choice and the only choice. In the end, I don't think this Nation deserved him.
Coach, I've been reading your posts since you were new here. I always listen to what you say.coachmarc wrote:I think this is the biggest hang up we have. I can see both sides. On the one side, he was the best choice--the conservative choice. On the other, he supports the NDAA, preemptive war without congressional approval, Patriot Act, federal reserve, etc, etc, etc. Is it a matter of compromising principles or is it a difference of principles? I wanted to vote for Mitt. I did. But I just couldn't do it. So in the end I will be judged either for choosing the wrong candidate or voting on principle. It's a choice that I can live with. I am at peace.Andrew52 wrote:I considered him the best choice and the only choice. In the end, I don't think this Nation deserved him.
LDSFreedomForum.com and its admin / moderators do not necessarily agree with all content posted by users of this forum.
The views and content on this site reflect only the opinions and teachings of the authors of the respective content contained herein.