"China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

This is the place where you can discuss things completely Off Topic.
Post Reply
sushi_chef
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3693
Location: tokyo, jpn

"China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

Post by sushi_chef »

president hinckley - - - >> around 5:00
~
~
"2017/12/08 Just so you know China has the Legal Right to Force Americans off of their Land! You can thank the Clinton & Obama Administration's for this! China is taking Back it's assets of California! They are also transforming California into Smart Cities! So the fires are about Forcing Americans Out of California! Note: If your short on time go to the 7:30 mark! This explains China's Legal Right to Force you off your Land!
"
:arrow:

Matchmaker
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2266

Re: "China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

Post by Matchmaker »

sushi_chef wrote: December 14th, 2017, 6:45 pm president hinckley - - - >> around 5:00
~
~
"2017/12/08 Just so you know China has the Legal Right to Force Americans off of their Land! You can thank the Clinton & Obama Administration's for this! China is taking Back it's assets of California! They are also transforming California into Smart Cities! So the fires are about Forcing Americans Out of California! Note: If your short on time go to the 7:30 mark! This explains China's Legal Right to Force you off your Land!
"
:arrow:
Are you saying the powers that be are trying to force the population off the private land (suburbs) and back into the cities?

sushi_chef
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3693
Location: tokyo, jpn

Re: "China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

Post by sushi_chef »

what sushi_ understands is she is trying to say chinese ptb became a partner of depopulation agenda.

"The Depopulation Bomb. - By Jim Keith (An excerpt from Jim Keith's Casebook on Alternative 3: UFOs, Secret Societies and World Control). There is a solution other than what the elite consider excess population. Why not prevent the poor - for .... The secret (now declassified) paper NSSM 200, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests," also known as the Scowcroft Document (authored by the CFR's Brent Scowcroft), gives insight into U.S. ..."

scowcroft (national security advisor, lds high priest from ogden utah) depopulation
https://search.yahoo.co.jp/image/search ... population

as to tech transfer, kinda recalls a book "weather warfare" by jerry smith(co author jim keith) reads haarp tech was from russia to usa, and for instance 1976 tangshan quake(655000 death) was caused by russian experiment...
:arrow:

User avatar
kittycat51
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1793
Location: Looking for Zion

Re: "China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

Post by kittycat51 »

Here's the thing, I don't doubt much of what she says, but when she tries to say that the Mormon church or President Hinckley is tangled in this malicious web, I turn off. President Hinckley was a Prophet of God and would not have done anything to prosper, aid, or encourage China in taking over the U.S.

sushi_chef
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3693
Location: tokyo, jpn

Re: "China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

Post by sushi_chef »

yes, very unlikely for any lds president to do so, but, in a more bigger picture, what if usa is the beast out of the earth, then national interest matches beasts?!

besides, says,

"When Samuel Smith of Brigham City visited <Charles> Card on 21 January 1887, Card discussed his northern <Canadian> venture, arguing that "the land of refuge is the north." To his surprise, Smith related that he had been present at an 1843 priesthood meeting in the basement of the Nauvoo Temple when Joseph Smith prophesied that:

"England or the nation of Great Britain, would be the last nation to go to pieces. She would be instrumental in aiding to crush other nations, even this nation of the United States, and she would only be overthrown by the Ten Tribes from the north. She would never persecute the Saints as a nation. She would gather up great treasures of gold and yet we should seek refuge in her dominion." (Charles Ora Card Journal, 21 Jan. 1887)
"
so, perhaps safe to say will not know exactly whats been going on until then...

"the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live"(13:14), would that be nazi germany??

Image
`
Image
:arrow:

sushi_chef
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3693
Location: tokyo, jpn

Re: "China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

Post by sushi_chef »

as to president hinckley, tends to think the aim of his life long general authority mission was geared toward accomplishing a role of the bridge between lds brethren and freemasonry brethren.

Image
https://www.deseretnews.com/article/695 ... s-LDS.html
:arrow:

gardener4life
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1690

Re: "China Owns California: that's why the Fires are Happening!" (president hinckley mentioned)

Post by gardener4life »

I would suggest instead that the role of the prophet insomuch as the scope of who he reaches out to is to the 'meek, humble, and broken hearted, and those seeking Christ. I kind of worry about when we pigeon hole this idea that we're trying to win over people successful of the world. Remember that we have a limit to time, resources, life...so if we're going after one group we're neglecting another. So the focus should be on those that 'want' to spend time with Christ.

I wanted to also point out that any sale of our land to a foreign power without the backing of the people, (and also from corrupt turncoat polticians) is not legal, not lawful. A backdoor deal like this of people selling California to China cannot in any way shape or form be thought of as legitimate. Particularly any such deal would HAVE to public knowledge to be legal, and people would have to have a say.

However, the disappearance of affordable housing is very real right now. Its very scary. This worries me a lot. The homeless population right now in big cities is skyrocketing right now. It's growing by hundreds of percentages over its previous numbers. What's more, in the past homeless were usually mentally ill or on drugs. Now there's a whole new cluster of normal people that just have been totally left behind by others. A lot of young people face the threat of being in this group very soon, when their parents or grandparents aren't around. And one of the reasons for this isn't just the export of jobs and manufacturing leaving America sterile, but also the fact that this country failed to transition wealth from the baby boomers to the younger generations. You could say this was partly selfishness. Every other generation in America previously there was a transition of wealth and assets from the parents and grandparents to their children, as they were growing up so that they could start having their own families. The baby boomer generation neglected and FAILED in this. (See proclamation to the world about the family...specifically the line of those that neglect this responsibility...)

The idea that we would neglect giving and growing family businesses, family trades, and give jobs to outsiders but not groom family into business has contributed to these failures. This isn't just an opinion but is basic common sense. Think about it. We were selling the idea for years that going to college would give your kids jobs. But if you think about it that doesn't make sense. Why would a college or corporation love your kids more than you would? Why would someone that doesn't love your family or children have a vested interest in making sure your children have a future? Do you really think they would just hand out opportunities to those that they don't love or care about more than their parents? Only parents really care if their children are clothed, fed, and have a way of supporting themselves. Yet we've been selling the idea for years that there would be no consequences of parents giving that responsibility to a society that doesn't love their kids.

Is this the most backward generation that has ever lived?

Post Reply