Reading anything much about the fires this week in California will probably lead to the understanding that they weren’t natural. Jim goes into the scientific part of the situation involving technology, chemtrails, the physics of electricity, etc. It’s definitely not natural to see “spontaneous combustion” in so many places simultaneously. And who knew chemtrails had so many purposes?!
Oddly enough, Thomas Williams reported yesterday that the cabal’s vineyards remained untouched by fire. Go figure.
Fires in California were not “wild”, they were caused
Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist
At first I was skeptical, but I went over numerous social media posts several videos, and a few messages and it appears the fires were set by an atmospheric weapon.
First to clear something up – the manner in which the cars burned was normal. But there are some instances with what went on that prove a weather weapon did this.
Weather weapons work by using multiple transmitters to create a collision zone where differently phased EM waves cancel each other out, and drop their electrical potential into the air (which is a semiconductor) where they cancel. This is the equivalent of biasing a transistor. Semiconductors won’t simply break down and start conducting just because a bias field is applied, in order for them to conduct in a controlled fashion they need a doping agent. In silicon the doping agents are arsenic and boron. In air, the doping agent is most likely whatever is in the chem trails.
If enough voltage is applied to a semiconductor, it will suddenly discharge it in one big burst. This is seen in the air as lightning. The weather/geoengineering systems try to avoid this. But this time around, in California, the effects of excess....
http://www.starshipearththebigpicture.c ... ngineered/