Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2266
Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Joel Skousen is changing his timeline for WW3. Instead of 5 to 10 years from now, he thinks it could happen any day. He said that people need to get up to date on their prepping. Any thoughts on this?
- SouEu
- captain of 50
- Posts: 96
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
It's kind of scary, with two huge hot spots right now, either one can blow up at any minute.
You have crazy North Korea, with China behind the scenes.
You have Syria and the issue with chemical weapons, with Russia behind the scenes.
Any bets on which one goes down first, or if neither do?
You have crazy North Korea, with China behind the scenes.
You have Syria and the issue with chemical weapons, with Russia behind the scenes.
Any bets on which one goes down first, or if neither do?
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 374
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 800
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
The risks of going after Assad are still the same in regards to the Russia component, and we WILL be forced to act if it's apparent NK is close to being able to deliver a nuclear warhead to the US. That throws China into the mix as well.
These are significant challenges and I hope our leaders have the intestinal fortitude to make the hard decisions.
These are significant challenges and I hope our leaders have the intestinal fortitude to make the hard decisions.
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 748
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Same. Where's the proof?paulrobots wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 6:17 pm What did he actually say? Have a quote or link to his talk?
- SouEu
- captain of 50
- Posts: 96
- SouEu
- captain of 50
- Posts: 96
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2266
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
He was on Alex Jones yesterday. Of course, he was right. The War just started about an hour ago.paulrobots wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 6:17 pm What did he actually say? Have a quote or link to his talk?
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2266
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
I feel inside like your avatar's eyes look outside. I expect retaliation from Russia. I guess this is it, though I am still in denial.SouEu wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 7:24 pm Well, Guess what just happened, folks!
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s ... n_20170406
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 800
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
This is not it. The U.S. told Russia of the attacks prior to their launch, which means it's likely no Russian troops were based there. Don't get me wrong, this has the potential to turn out badly, but this is not WWIII going hot as some might think.Matchmaker wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:28 pmI feel inside like your avatar's eyes look outside. I expect retaliation from Russia. I guess this is it, though I am still in denial.SouEu wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 7:24 pm Well, Guess what just happened, folks!
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s ... n_20170406
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 800
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Well I take back part of my previous comment. CNN is reporting Russian's WERE on the base that was hit.
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 5247
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
If the US told the Russians, what would prevent them from telling the Syrians? If the Syrians knew why wouldn't they move their assets?I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:38 pmThis is not it. The U.S. told Russia of the attacks prior to their launch, which means it's likely no Russian troops were based there. Don't get me wrong, this has the potential to turn out badly, but this is not WWIII going hot as some might think.Matchmaker wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:28 pmI feel inside like your avatar's eyes look outside. I expect retaliation from Russia. I guess this is it, though I am still in denial.SouEu wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 7:24 pm Well, Guess what just happened, folks!
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s ... n_20170406
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 800
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Good point. Who knows which news reports are true anymore. One news site said we spoke with them multiple times about the strikes that were going to take place, and another news site is saying we did not talk to them at all. Ridiculous.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:14 pmIf the US told the Russians, what would prevent them from telling the Syrians? If the Syrians knew why wouldn't they move their assets?I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:38 pmThis is not it. The U.S. told Russia of the attacks prior to their launch, which means it's likely no Russian troops were based there. Don't get me wrong, this has the potential to turn out badly, but this is not WWIII going hot as some might think.Matchmaker wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:28 pmI feel inside like your avatar's eyes look outside. I expect retaliation from Russia. I guess this is it, though I am still in denial.SouEu wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 7:24 pm Well, Guess what just happened, folks!
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s ... n_20170406
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 5247
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
It is truly ridiculous that just a week ago Secretary Tillerson was saying that it was not the goal of the Trump administration to remove Assad from power in Syria. Now with no proof we're killing the citizens of that sovereign country. The United States and its people will deserve all the cursing and buffeting and plagues and death we receive one day.I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:16 pmGood point. Who knows which news reports are true anymore. One news site said we spoke with them multiple times about the strikes that were going to take place, and another news site is saying we did not talk to them at all. Ridiculous.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:14 pmIf the US told the Russians, what would prevent them from telling the Syrians? If the Syrians knew why wouldn't they move their assets?I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:38 pmThis is not it. The U.S. told Russia of the attacks prior to their launch, which means it's likely no Russian troops were based there. Don't get me wrong, this has the potential to turn out badly, but this is not WWIII going hot as some might think.Matchmaker wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:28 pm
I feel inside like your avatar's eyes look outside. I expect retaliation from Russia. I guess this is it, though I am still in denial.
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 800
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
There's already talk of this being a false flag event to use as justification for escalation. I'm not one for most conspiracy theories, but when you have an event like this and not only are the perpetrators identified right off the bat, but we knew immediately what the chemical agent was. Too many details too fast is always suspect.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:28 pmIt is truly ridiculous that just a week ago Secretary Tillerson was saying that it was not the goal of the Trump administration to remove Assad from power in Syria. Now with no proof we're killing the citizens of that sovereign country. The United States and its people will deserve all the cursing and buffeting and plagues and death we receive one day.I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:16 pmGood point. Who knows which news reports are true anymore. One news site said we spoke with them multiple times about the strikes that were going to take place, and another news site is saying we did not talk to them at all. Ridiculous.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:14 pmIf the US told the Russians, what would prevent them from telling the Syrians? If the Syrians knew why wouldn't they move their assets?I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:38 pm
This is not it. The U.S. told Russia of the attacks prior to their launch, which means it's likely no Russian troops were based there. Don't get me wrong, this has the potential to turn out badly, but this is not WWIII going hot as some might think.
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 5247
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Let's look at this from another angle:
1. Does the United States have unlimited wealth? Does the United States have a high debt balance of $20Trillion? Can we afford yet another war?
2. Even if Assad did use chemical weapons on his own people, is launching missile attacks the only, the absolute only reasonable response from the US?
3. Are the supporters of Trump, and I think the number should be falling now, willing to buckle on a helmet and go fight in Syria and leave my children out of this mess?
4. I live in San Antonio where the military has facilities for treating our wounded warriors. It is sad to see so many maimed and scarred for life. It's real, people.
President Kimball (a true president, not a traitor like Trump) said that Americans are a warlike people. He's right, to our everlasting shame.
1. Does the United States have unlimited wealth? Does the United States have a high debt balance of $20Trillion? Can we afford yet another war?
2. Even if Assad did use chemical weapons on his own people, is launching missile attacks the only, the absolute only reasonable response from the US?
3. Are the supporters of Trump, and I think the number should be falling now, willing to buckle on a helmet and go fight in Syria and leave my children out of this mess?
4. I live in San Antonio where the military has facilities for treating our wounded warriors. It is sad to see so many maimed and scarred for life. It's real, people.
President Kimball (a true president, not a traitor like Trump) said that Americans are a warlike people. He's right, to our everlasting shame.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2266
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Silver, how do you know for a fact that the President has "no proof?"Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:28 pmIt is truly ridiculous that just a week ago Secretary Tillerson was saying that it was not the goal of the Trump administration to remove Assad from power in Syria. Now with no proof we're killing the citizens of that sovereign country. The United States and its people will deserve all the cursing and buffeting and plagues and death we receive one day.I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:16 pmGood point. Who knows which news reports are true anymore. One news site said we spoke with them multiple times about the strikes that were going to take place, and another news site is saying we did not talk to them at all. Ridiculous.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:14 pmIf the US told the Russians, what would prevent them from telling the Syrians? If the Syrians knew why wouldn't they move their assets?I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:38 pm
This is not it. The U.S. told Russia of the attacks prior to their launch, which means it's likely no Russian troops were based there. Don't get me wrong, this has the potential to turn out badly, but this is not WWIII going hot as some might think.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2266
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
This is all happening too fast. I don't think any of us have enough information to judge the President's decision. Perhaps praying for all the people involved on both sides of this situation is a better choice than saying the Americans deserve to be cursed or calling our President a traitor.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:44 pm Let's look at this from another angle:
1. Does the United States have unlimited wealth? Does the United States have a high debt balance of $20Trillion? Can we afford yet another war?
2. Even if Assad did use chemical weapons on his own people, is launching missile attacks the only, the absolute only reasonable response from the US?
3. Are the supporters of Trump, and I think the number should be falling now, willing to buckle on a helmet and go fight in Syria and leave my children out of this mess?
4. I live in San Antonio where the military has facilities for treating our wounded warriors. It is sad to see so many maimed and scarred for life. It's real, people.
President Kimball (a true president, not a traitor like Trump) said that Americans are a warlike people. He's right, to our everlasting shame.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2266
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Isaiah 17 does come to mind here. For the sake of his people, I wish Assad would just retire quietly and let this whole thing come to an end.
- BeNotDeceived
- Agent38
- Posts: 9078
- Location: Tralfamadore
- Contact:
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Nope, not gonna happen ,, 7 years of prosperity first that are just now getting underway.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1795
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Give them 5 minute notice to evacuate not enough time to remove planes, they targeted the runway, fuel storage, radar and hangars and other infrastructure I am sure 69 missiles on one air base is virtually total destruction. Where can the infrastructure and plans be moved to unless you get them in the air, at that time in the morning will not happen in 5 minutes. Just my conjecture....I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:16 pmGood point. Who knows which news reports are true anymore. One news site said we spoke with them multiple times about the strikes that were going to take place, and another news site is saying we did not talk to them at all. Ridiculous.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:14 pmIf the US told the Russians, what would prevent them from telling the Syrians? If the Syrians knew why wouldn't they move their assets?I'LLMAKEYAFAMOUS wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:38 pmThis is not it. The U.S. told Russia of the attacks prior to their launch, which means it's likely no Russian troops were based there. Don't get me wrong, this has the potential to turn out badly, but this is not WWIII going hot as some might think.Matchmaker wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 8:28 pm
I feel inside like your avatar's eyes look outside. I expect retaliation from Russia. I guess this is it, though I am still in denial.
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 5247
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
See the Book of Mormon as well as the fall of the Roman & British Empires for historical precedents.Matchmaker wrote: ↑April 7th, 2017, 2:50 amThis is all happening too fast. I don't think any of us have enough information to judge the President's decision. Perhaps praying for all the people involved on both sides of this situation is a better choice than saying the Americans deserve to be cursed or calling our President a traitor.Silver wrote: ↑April 6th, 2017, 9:44 pm Let's look at this from another angle:
1. Does the United States have unlimited wealth? Does the United States have a high debt balance of $20Trillion? Can we afford yet another war?
2. Even if Assad did use chemical weapons on his own people, is launching missile attacks the only, the absolute only reasonable response from the US?
3. Are the supporters of Trump, and I think the number should be falling now, willing to buckle on a helmet and go fight in Syria and leave my children out of this mess?
4. I live in San Antonio where the military has facilities for treating our wounded warriors. It is sad to see so many maimed and scarred for life. It's real, people.
President Kimball (a true president, not a traitor like Trump) said that Americans are a warlike people. He's right, to our everlasting shame.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2724
- Location: Canada
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
Russia and China still aren't strong enough to take on the rest of the world. Trump is currently trying to strengthen the USA militarily unlike Obama.
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 5247
Re: Skousen Changes Timeline for WW3
If you call $20 Trillion in admitted sovereign debt, plus all the unfunded liabilities such as Social Security and Medicare, plus all the State and municipality debt, plus bankrupt government pension plans, plus private mortgages, plus private auto loans, plus student loans, "prosperity," I'd hate to see your definition of financial crisis.BeNotDeceived wrote: ↑April 7th, 2017, 3:26 am Nope, not gonna happen ,, 7 years of prosperity first that are just now getting underway.