Indeed.Jason wrote:LOL...hard to have truth when you ignore truth.
I spelled out the application in perfect detail. You didn't.Jason wrote:As I said it's easy to spout off the word Justice all while ignoring the application.
It is justice to let people transact with their own property in any way they please, as long as they do not violate the property of anyone.
That is justice: non-violation of private property.
Jason wrote:Or promoting a lying politician and his ideas all while claiming he's spouting truth but refusing to examine the merits of what he says.
About 98% of what Ron Paul says about Liberty is correct. It is much more than your 30% So yes, I promote Ron Paul's ideas of Liberty, because they are true.
I have good enough idea to make correct conclusions.Jason wrote:Ranting about the debt to China and you don't even know what it consists of.
Yes. Because it is your sly tactic to argue about obscure details and avoid, or flat out contradict, gigantic, unchangeable, and eternal truths.Jason wrote:In just a couple of posts you've gone from promoting Ron and his ideas to stating you don't care about the details. Fascinating.
So yes, I don't care about window dressings when you are denying the very foundations of Liberty and Justice (contradicting the prophets in the process). It is only wise for me to do so.
I concentrate on fundamental principles first and foremost, and draw my conclusions from them. You do not. So you are like the one rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, ignoring the gaping holes in your foundations. Not wise of you.
Ditto.Jason wrote:I'll let you apply the rest of the "useful....
Not everything Hazlitt or Ron Paul, or you say, is 100% correct all the time. It doesn't mean however that Ron Paul and Hazlitt are not profoundly correct on many very important points of Liberty.Jason wrote:Did you know one of the dimwits Ron chose to write a forward in that book you recommended (Henry Hazlitt) has actually recommended that everything in the Constitution after "We The People" be done away with...
It is the height of stupidity to discard the fundamental truth because someone you do not like said it. You one of the "dimwits" (quoting you), who if the devil should say "2+2=4" will assert that 2+2=5. Only an idiot would do that. And you are doing it.
Indeed.Jason wrote:...for all the idiots out there that don't do their homework...