Show us what that Mean Amonhies said.Finrock wrote:Oh, I know that. That is why I don't just assert things. That is why you've seen me make several reasoned posts supporting my assertions. I just wanted to be sure that you weren't delusional thinking that your proclamations are the measure of what is truth and error.rewcox wrote:And just because you assert something, does not make it right or truth.Finrock wrote:I haven't read the blog, so I'm not speaking about its truth value, but you do recognize that just because you assert that something is false does not make it so? Right?
-Finrock
For example, the Amonhies asserted that all who have the testimony of Christ are prophets, and other scriptures to back it up. Because George did not agree, they concluded Jesus would not know George, and that George would go to the Telestial Kingdom.
Denver Snuffer gave 10 talks over a year, complete with explanations on scriptures, yet at each talk he always said something negative about the church and leaders. At the 10th talk, the wheels came off his bus and went bizarrow.
The Adversary also uses the spirit. Whispers in the ears, etc. Jesus knows this, so he said you would know false prophets by their fruit.
Whenever the fruit appears, you can tell if it has been consistent with the communication of the Spirit.
You've made a false statement which I can demonstrate factually because we have the record available. It is false that Amonhi concluded that Jesus would not know George because George did not agree with Amonhi. You can disagree without mischaracterizing what others have said.
This is irrelevant to the point at hand, but you are obsessed with Denver Snuffer and the guilt by association fallacy. I'm guessing that you have been hurt by this man. I'm sorry for your pain and suffering in regards to him, because you project a lot. There truly are false prophets. But, because a false prophet did something or said something is not a good reason to discount what others are saying.
Also, your claim that the adversary also uses "the" spirit makes absolute no sense to me. It seems that you are claiming that we can't rely on the Holy Ghost, but then you come back later and state that we can measure if the fruit is consistent with the communication of the Spirit. What are you saying here? What does that mean to you?
-Finrock
I only discount false ones, there are a bunch running round here.
Here is a good one for you. Oh How Great the Plan of Our God