JFK files bush connected

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
Ezra
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4357
Location: Not telling

JFK files bush connected

Post by Ezra »

Interesting vid. I would like to research this in more detail.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj6IsJ_oUeI

Silver
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5247

Re: JFK files bush connected

Post by Silver »

The info on Prescott Bush in the video ought to make everyone here immediately withdraw all support from the Republican Party and almost all of the politicians in it. They never repudiated that man, nor his son, nor his grandsons. Traitors all.

Lizzy60
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8533

Re: JFK files bush connected

Post by Lizzy60 »

I agree. I just watched "JFK to 911 - Everything is a Rich Man's Trick" on YouTube. It's done by historian Francis Richard Conolly and is excellent.

i highly recommend it, unless you're queasy about knowing just how bad the Gadiantons are, and have been for over a century.

Ezra
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4357
Location: Not telling

Re: JFK files bush connected

Post by Ezra »

JFK jr researched his fathers death relentlessly. His plan was to expose his fathers murders. He started a magazine with the intent to expose his findings in that magazine since he had come to the realization that the media was part of the cover up.

He started his magazine titled “George” and then met a untimely mysterious death.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hnQd9Jfr31U

User avatar
captainfearnot
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1975

Re: JFK files bush connected

Post by captainfearnot »

Lizzy60 wrote: January 19th, 2018, 9:31 pm I agree. I just watched "JFK to 911 - Everything is a Rich Man's Trick" on YouTube. It's done by historian Francis Richard Conolly and is excellent.

i highly recommend it, unless you're queasy about knowing just how bad the Gadiantons are, and have been for over a century.
He was a history teacher (most coaches and PE teachers are) but that hardly qualifies him as a historian.

Ezra
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4357
Location: Not telling

Re: JFK files bush connected

Post by Ezra »

captainfearnot wrote: January 22nd, 2018, 11:38 am
Lizzy60 wrote: January 19th, 2018, 9:31 pm I agree. I just watched "JFK to 911 - Everything is a Rich Man's Trick" on YouTube. It's done by historian Francis Richard Conolly and is excellent.

i highly recommend it, unless you're queasy about knowing just how bad the Gadiantons are, and have been for over a century.
He was a history teacher (most coaches and p.e. teachers are) but that hardly qualifies him as a historian.
what authority would qualify a person as a historian?
The one that is run by and controled by great and abominable Church of the devil?



H Verlan Andersen The Great and Abominable Church of the Devil p. 121, 122
Instead of using government to finance and compel the worship of a Supreme Being, they use it to compel and subsidize the worship of the state and its evil leaders; rather than advocating that compulsion be used to satisfy spiritual needs, they advocate that compulsion be used to satisfy material needs; in place of the doctrine that man is a child of God who is answerable to his creator for his sins, they teach that he is merely an animal with no higher goal than to satisfy the lusts of the flesh; instead of imposing their abominable creed merely on adults on the Sabbath, they take the children from their parents at an early age and place them under the tutelage of a priestly class hired to corrupt their tender minds all throughout the week. But whether priestcraft is enforced by communists or religionists, the central evil is the same: the power of government is used to abolish freedom and compel the people to finance their own enslavement by supporting teachers who are paid to deceive them into believing that the particular brand of priestcraft they are subsidizing is the only true religion. It is veritably true that there is no principle of the communist manifesto more essential to the success of Satan’s plan than that of socialized education. If all children can be forcibly taken from their homes where the Lord intended they be trained, and during the innocence of youth their unsuspecting and defenseless minds are indoctrinated with a belief in organic evolution, atheism, materialism, and socialism the perpetuation of these satanic doctrines is systematized and imposed uniformly upon each succeeding generation.


H Verlan Andersen The Great and Abominable Church of the Devil p. 148
Using the force of government, the devil compels all parents to send their children to his church for training. There he permits nothing to be taught except the precepts of men and the wisdom of the world. His doctrines of organic evolution, atheism, materialism, and socialism are thus forced upon all children. No one is permitted to teach in his church until they have first been to college and there been indoctrinated with his philosophies. By reason of this learning and their own vainness, frailty, and foolishness, they tend to become proud of their degrees and status, and consequently refuse to hearken unto the counsel of God, or to be guided by the Holy Ghost. (2 N 9:28) ….parents are compelled by the devils’ church to finance with their tax money the corruption of their own children.


Is that what would qualify a person to be a historian. To go through the schools of indoctrination to receive a degree in indoctrination?

I don’t agree with that authority. Authority comes from god. And any individual can obtain knowledge by study and asking him and have more authority then any person who has been to the schools of indoctrination Satan has set up for his purposes of deceiving mankind.

User avatar
captainfearnot
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1975

Re: JFK files bush connected

Post by captainfearnot »

Ezra wrote: January 22nd, 2018, 12:19 pm What authority would qualify a person as a historian?
The one that is run by and controled by great and abominable Church of the devil?

Is that what would qualify a person to be a historian. To go through the schools of indoctrination to receive a degree in indoctrination?
Yeah, pretty much.

"Historian" is a worldly title and denotes certain worldly accomplishments. Just because you don't recognize the value or "authority" of such titles doesn't mean they can be applied to anyone. It's more an issue of language and meaning than credibility.

Your friend who sells energy crystals and essential oils may know more about healing the human body than professional doctors. But that doesn't mean the title "doctor" applies to your friend. That title suggests that a person has certain professional credentials, even if you personally believe that those credentials are worthless. "Historian" conveys something similar.

I'm not saying anything about the quality or veracity of the man's YouTube video. All I'm saying is that the man's background and credentials are far less than what most people consider those of a "historian."

Ezra
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4357
Location: Not telling

Re: JFK files bush connected

Post by Ezra »

captainfearnot wrote: January 22nd, 2018, 12:37 pm
Ezra wrote: January 22nd, 2018, 12:19 pm What authority would qualify a person as a historian?
The one that is run by and controled by great and abominable Church of the devil?

Is that what would qualify a person to be a historian. To go through the schools of indoctrination to receive a degree in indoctrination?
Yeah, pretty much.

"Historian" is a worldly title and denotes certain worldly accomplishments. Just because you don't recognize the value or "authority" of such titles doesn't mean they can be applied to anyone. It's more an issue of language and meaning than credibility.

Your friend who sells energy crystals and essential oils may know more about healing the human body than professional doctors. But that doesn't mean the title "doctor" applies to your friend. That title suggests that a person has certain professional credentials, even if you personally believe that those credentials are worthless. "Historian" conveys something similar.

I'm not saying anything about the quality or veracity of the man's YouTube video. All I'm saying is that the man's background and credentials are far less than what most people consider those of a "historian."
Going with what is popular and or worldly is not a very good argument. Sure people will agree with but who cares. It has to be right.

Post Reply