Wow. You support a woman's RIGHT to MURDER her child.Arenera wrote: ↑December 6th, 2017, 9:21 amSo, you don't believe in agency? The one thing each of us has, the right to make a choice. A right given to us from God. It seems a woman's right to choose is part of agency.lundbaek wrote: ↑December 6th, 2017, 9:04 am In writing Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, (under the guidance of whom?) the the Founders made it clear that it was the responsibility of Congress "to coin money" and "to declare war", among other things. Congress was not given the right to abrogate those responsibilities. Congress has, in fact, abrogated those responsibilities, claiming that in voting for the Fed they could allow it to "print" money, and that in "honouring" a UN mandate they could allow the US President to send US forces into battle. Both of those acts are wrong - unconstitutional.
A priesthood holder who would say that God has not spoken to man since Moses and the bush, who would say that he supports "a woman's right to choose", and who does not honour the principles of the US Constitution (especially after all that the Lord, prophets and apostles have said about it) will not get my vote regardless of how many other voters vote for him.
You prefer to take Lucifer's approach and force a woman so she can't choose. Haven't you twisted things up?
Do you support a man's right to rape a child?
I see no difference. Except that the raped child is still alive, although extremely damaged.