Neo-feminism is an act of war

For discussion of political issues in general.
Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:40 am

You cannot understand radical feminism unless you understand the occult behind it. If you cannot watch all of this presentation (you should) then at least listen at the 20 minute mark. Many of the gender fights on this forum would end if people understood what this speaker is exposing.

Oh, and as for the princess programming check at 56:45
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

Sponsored Links

Advertisements

Medical Cost Sharing - It's not insurance it's better!

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:09 am

No commentary? Wow. I guess the Satanists will cut through the religious population like a hot butter-knife through warm butter. People don't seem to realize the war that is taking place.
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

User avatar
Sarah
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:16 am

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Sarah » Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:36 pm

Fiannan wrote:
Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:09 am
No commentary? Wow. I guess the Satanists will cut through the religious population like a hot butter-knife through warm butter. People don't seem to realize the war that is taking place.
I think many people would agree that there is a war going on between good and evil, and that there are evil, rich men and women, involved in these types of conspiracies and satanic worship who have an agenda, but it seems to me that the devil is getting really good at stirring up anger, not only on the left, but on the right (the good guys), and throwing in a lot of distortions along with some truth to lead people along, wanting them to get angry and blame others for their problems rather than look at themselves and start repenting.

I decided to tackle my pile of ironing and watched the whole thing, but was not very impressed. He threw out multiple hard swear words, talked in an angry voice almost the whole time (reminded me of Alex Jones), and presented no real evidence to back up his claims. He says he can be trusted because he is a former priest in this Satanic cult? That makes me trust him even less. And at no time does he describe the conversations within this inner circle that confirm the exact tactics they are using. But what was a red-flag to me were all his examples of "neo-feminism." At first he describes neo-feminism as something different from traditional feminism of the past (and that he agrees with) that simply fight for equal rights. He says the neos now are demanding special rights, claim that there are no differences between men and women, and want to elevate matriarchy above patriarchy. This is all well and fine to claim and I'm sure is true to some extent, but the remainder of the lecture, he gives us not one example that demonstrates these three points. He claims that the satanists are mind-controlling the women so that they will only want to mate with men that will provide (duh), that are more feminine etc. But then he complains that women are taught and have ingrained in them to only want tall men. (Aren't tall men more masculine?) He complains that women are taught that sex is bad, complains that they are not sexual enough, and that they shame each other for being slutty. It's obvious to me that this guy is equating every instance of male-rejection to women being mine-controlled with neo-feminisim which definition he cannot define clearly. His examples of neo-feminism have nothing to do with the first three points - wanting special rights, wanting to be the same, or wanting matriarchy to trump - rather it's obvious that his main complaint is that women are not having more sex with men. He complains that over 50% of women have never had an orgasm. And now men are supposed to blame this on women listening to mass media? I bet ya the number was a lot higher before mass media.

The other funny thing in there is that video he shows of the guy dressed like a slacker going up to a woman (who looks like Barbie dressed as a prostitute), and gets rejected, but then the classy guy with the nice car pulls up and she prefers him. The message being of course, that women are just gold-diggers, but what is so hypocritical about this is that this "beautiful" woman is sitting next to a table of women who are overweight and dressed normally, and do the guys go up to these women? Of course not! So I guess the obvious lesson women can gain from that is that men are only concerned about looks. (And the video looks staged to me anyway)

And then this wild idea he threw out there that we were all ruled thousands of years ago by some race of giants, and that is why we all like tall people. At least now I know where you get your ideas from. Maybe I need to watch the lecture he does about how they are controlling men to get a more balanced view.

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:08 pm

Sarah, you are ripping on him in the same way people attack Trump or how anti-Mormons attack the Church. For instance, the gold-digger video. The point was that when the lady is approached by a guy who looks unimpressive she brushes him off, but later when she thinks he is super-wealthy she quickly changes her mind and begs him to pay attention to her. So that changes the context, doesn't it?

Yes, we live in a society that is both pro-sex and anti-sex. However, it is never taken to a level that is actually genuine. For instance, there is the fake morality of our culture that is symbolized in much of the US social media platforms. You can show near-naked women in sexually suggestive poses as long as the most vital parts are covered, but if someone were to share a picture of an herbal gal at a hippie festival without a top that is wrong. You can get arrested for walking topless in many cities but as long as one pays money they can go into a nudie bar and see women flying around a pole and that is fine. You also have the idea that all sex is great but if it is meant to result in reproduction then that is akin to catching an STD, at least how kids are taught in public school health classes.

The original Proclamation on the Family came out when social engineers started the war on traditional families and reproduction. And it is not all blatant propaganda aimed at people but often quite subtle. In fact, as he states occult knowledge merely means hidden knowledge that can be employed for good or bad. Psychology is a form of occult knowledge and that is why the public has been fed the fake psychology they see on daytime talk shows to not realize just how powerful it is. It is complex and yet quite simple. The birthrate of Latin America has been more than sliced in half due in large part to soap operas containing the hidden agenda of portraying small families as fantastic and large families as bad. In America look at how programs aimed at women portray men -- be it fashion or modeling programs or reality TV you would think that all men in the USA are feminine and gay. This may be the reason some people on the forum have claimed that most women in their ward hate the Church stance on homosexuality. Can you provide any other reason? And also, the only movies that portray masculine male characters are generally R-rated. In most of the movies that are PG the men are usually weak or not all that interested in forming relationships. In this sense it is probably a good thing that many young men and women in Church do not care about the idea that R-rated movies should be avoided.

As for his statement on tall people we do know that the ruling elite of Noah's time who were quite tall tried to assassinate him quite frequently. Some believe (based on the Dead Sea Scrolls) that Noah too was a Nephilim due to his pale complexion. So whether the speaker is correct or not about ancient bloodlines he is not coming from a tradition that is contrary to Christianity.
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:23 pm

If you listen to the part at 1:18 for just a couple of minutes he explains why the elite refer to regular people as "the dead."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAU6ZjovmT8&t=4203s
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

User avatar
Sarah
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:16 am

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Sarah » Tue Nov 28, 2017 9:57 am

Fiannan wrote:
Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:08 pm
Sarah, you are ripping on him in the same way people attack Trump or how anti-Mormons attack the Church. For instance, the gold-digger video. The point was that when the lady is approached by a guy who looks unimpressive she brushes him off, but later when she thinks he is super-wealthy she quickly changes her mind and begs him to pay attention to her. So that changes the context, doesn't it?

Yes, we live in a society that is both pro-sex and anti-sex. However, it is never taken to a level that is actually genuine. For instance, there is the fake morality of our culture that is symbolized in much of the US social media platforms. You can show near-naked women in sexually suggestive poses as long as the most vital parts are covered, but if someone were to share a picture of an herbal gal at a hippie festival without a top that is wrong. You can get arrested for walking topless in many cities but as long as one pays money they can go into a nudie bar and see women flying around a pole and that is fine. You also have the idea that all sex is great but if it is meant to result in reproduction then that is akin to catching an STD, at least how kids are taught in public school health classes.

The original Proclamation on the Family came out when social engineers started the war on traditional families and reproduction. And it is not all blatant propaganda aimed at people but often quite subtle. In fact, as he states occult knowledge merely means hidden knowledge that can be employed for good or bad. Psychology is a form of occult knowledge and that is why the public has been fed the fake psychology they see on daytime talk shows to not realize just how powerful it is. It is complex and yet quite simple. The birthrate of Latin America has been more than sliced in half due in large part to soap operas containing the hidden agenda of portraying small families as fantastic and large families as bad. In America look at how programs aimed at women portray men -- be it fashion or modeling programs or reality TV you would think that all men in the USA are feminine and gay. This may be the reason some people on the forum have claimed that most women in their ward hate the Church stance on homosexuality. Can you provide any other reason? And also, the only movies that portray masculine male characters are generally R-rated. In most of the movies that are PG the men are usually weak or not all that interested in forming relationships. In this sense it is probably a good thing that many young men and women in Church do not care about the idea that R-rated movies should be avoided.

As for his statement on tall people we do know that the ruling elite of Noah's time who were quite tall tried to assassinate him quite frequently. Some believe (based on the Dead Sea Scrolls) that Noah too was a Nephilim due to his pale complexion. So whether the speaker is correct or not about ancient bloodlines he is not coming from a tradition that is contrary to Christianity.
No doubt forces are at work to destroy the traditional family, but I have a hard time believing that part of that indoctrination includes teaching teenagers that they will get pregnant if they have sex, and outlawing nude photos no matter how natural. It's easy to see how they would use porn and violence to distract the men, but this presenter is trying to appeal to the "authentic" man who likes sex and violence, and so what I see is that there is this movement to convince men that part of the indoctrination is that women are rejecting sex and aggressive men as part of a conspiracy. I just don't buy it. There are just as many women out there who enjoy those R-rated movies, and just because they show "real men" doesn't make them okay to watch. Jesus is a real, authentic man, and he was the ideal. Gentle, but firm and confident. Obviously attracting women was not his focus while he was on the earth.

I also agree that forces are at work to get the entire population to sympathize and admire the feminine gay guy. The gay man can not produce a family, so yes, I'm sure that is part of Satan's agenda. But is that message just so the women will not flock to "real men?" I would be more apt to believe that Satan's main tactic towards women is simply taking advantage of the new-found freedom that women have been given, and are tempting them to forgo child-bearing in order to make more money. That is the biggest temptation for women these days, because child-bearing and caring is a monumental job and sacrifice, and in general men and women just don't want to sacrifice anymore to have children.

I'm pretty open to ideas if I can be convinced, but I found a lack of evidence in his presentation, and the way he came across, and his bad language, does not win my respect.

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:50 am

No doubt forces are at work to destroy the traditional family, but I have a hard time believing that part of that indoctrination includes teaching teenagers that they will get pregnant if they have sex...
If that is all that was taught it could be covered in biology class. No, most sex-ed curriculum teaches that children are a bother, an inconvenience, and to be avoided just like any other sexually transmitted disease.
...but this presenter is trying to appeal to the "authentic" man who likes sex and violence, and so what I see is that there is this movement to convince men that part of the indoctrination is that women are rejecting sex and aggressive men as part of a conspiracy
Look at mainstream TV today, how many shows that are designed for women feature men who speak with a stereotypical gay speech pattern? Plenty. Real men are a threat to the system. The only alpha males who seem to make it nowadays are psychopathic men who learn how to manipulate their way through the conditioned herd.
I just don't buy it. There are just as many women out there who enjoy those R-rated movies, and just because they show "real men" doesn't make them okay to watch.
My daughters loved Jurassic World and one must admit it was one of those movies that made it clear that career and money aren't everything. And again, just because a film has a G or PG rating, or it is on TV, doesn't make it any better than an R movie.
Jesus is a real, authentic man, and he was the ideal. Gentle, but firm and confident.
And He was certainly not shy in using violence to make a righteous point.
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

User avatar
Sirocco
Praise Me!
Posts: 3542
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:27 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Sirocco » Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:29 pm

I think a family would be wonderful, I don't trust any women running around these days to have one with me though.
She'll get bored in a few years and leave, taking the kids and everything valuable with her and pretend singlemotherhood in her 30s is fun.
I know single mothers, they are sad, desperate people most of the time, which even I refuse to date them lol.
Not that I am a catch but I'll be damned if I be some beta cuck provide for one of those.
Super Inpachi Sardonyx Shura Sirocco;
Specific, intelligent, accurate, faultless, elegant, controlled, surgical, graceful, and powerful!
Adonai wrote:[Arrr, matey] my feet be dusted for now no more pearls be given.

utez
Hi, I'm new.
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:19 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby utez » Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:56 pm

I've seen this and enjoyed it I like Passio's lectures. I also really enjoyed his lecture on De-mystifying the Occult. I've got a question for you. The past few years I've been following the music industry pretty closely especially music videos and it is undeniable that they push occult symbolism in nearly every single top music video. My question is why? I used to be so obsessed that everytime I saw a triangle or all-seeing eye I thought it was satanic...which caused a problem for me with some of the temple symbols in the SLC temple. After watching Passio's lecture on the Occult I realized that these symbols can be used for good or evil. But why are all these music videos filled with these symbols? Passio mentioned that there is a vibration that is sent out by these symbols that is picked up by our subconscious...do you buy that? Makes sense to me. Every time I watch one of those videos I feel my carnal self taking over. What are your thoughts?

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:31 pm

Passio mentioned that there is a vibration that is sent out by these symbols that is picked up by our subconscious...do you buy that? Makes sense to me. Every time I watch one of those videos I feel my carnal self taking over. What are your thoughts?
Jung discussed the power of symbols and how they communicate to us at the level of the collective unconsciousness. Symbols do resonate. Ironically, the pentagram was not associated with Satanism until recent years. I think that these symbols have been stolen and associated with Satanism, thus preventing Christians from connecting to any powers they had for good.
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

MMbelieve
captain of 100
Posts: 495
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:45 am

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby MMbelieve » Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:13 am

Sirocco wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:29 pm
I think a family would be wonderful, I don't trust any women running around these days to have one with me though.
She'll get bored in a few years and leave, taking the kids and everything valuable with her and pretend singlemotherhood in her 30s is fun.
I know single mothers, they are sad, desperate people most of the time, which even I refuse to date them lol.
Not that I am a catch but I'll be damned if I be some beta cuck provide for one of those.
wow

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:55 am

I know single mothers, they are sad, desperate people most of the time, which even I refuse to date them lol.
Not that I am a catch but I'll be damned if I be some beta cuck provide for one of those.
I understand what you are saying, but there are plenty of women, yes even in the USA, who are intelligent, good-looking and loyal. You just need one. Real women are not into beta cucks anyway - most are merely kept friend-zoned.
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

User avatar
Sirocco
Praise Me!
Posts: 3542
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:27 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Sirocco » Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:59 pm

MMbelieve wrote:
Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:13 am
Sirocco wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:29 pm
I think a family would be wonderful, I don't trust any women running around these days to have one with me though.
She'll get bored in a few years and leave, taking the kids and everything valuable with her and pretend singlemotherhood in her 30s is fun.
I know single mothers, they are sad, desperate people most of the time, which even I refuse to date them lol.
Not that I am a catch but I'll be damned if I be some beta cuck provide for one of those.
wow
Well I don't, divorce is everywhere, I'm mentally ill, it's almost a guarantee with that.
Super Inpachi Sardonyx Shura Sirocco;
Specific, intelligent, accurate, faultless, elegant, controlled, surgical, graceful, and powerful!
Adonai wrote:[Arrr, matey] my feet be dusted for now no more pearls be given.

User avatar
Sirocco
Praise Me!
Posts: 3542
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:27 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Sirocco » Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:00 pm

Fiannan wrote:
Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:55 am
I know single mothers, they are sad, desperate people most of the time, which even I refuse to date them lol.
Not that I am a catch but I'll be damned if I be some beta cuck provide for one of those.
I understand what you are saying, but there are plenty of women, yes even in the USA, who are intelligent, good-looking and loyal. You just need one. Real women are not into beta cucks anyway - most are merely kept friend-zoned.
Just because they exist doesn't mean someone will meet them, or even if they do, not mess it up.
All it takes is one wrong thing said, one wrong faux pas and she's gone.
Super Inpachi Sardonyx Shura Sirocco;
Specific, intelligent, accurate, faultless, elegant, controlled, surgical, graceful, and powerful!
Adonai wrote:[Arrr, matey] my feet be dusted for now no more pearls be given.

Fiannan
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9075
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Fiannan » Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:06 pm

Sirocco wrote:
Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:00 pm
Fiannan wrote:
Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:55 am
I know single mothers, they are sad, desperate people most of the time, which even I refuse to date them lol.
Not that I am a catch but I'll be damned if I be some beta cuck provide for one of those.
I understand what you are saying, but there are plenty of women, yes even in the USA, who are intelligent, good-looking and loyal. You just need one. Real women are not into beta cucks anyway - most are merely kept friend-zoned.
Just because they exist doesn't mean someone will meet them, or even if they do, not mess it up.
All it takes is one wrong thing said, one wrong faux pas and she's gone.
Fear is the opposite of faith. There is probably a nice Mormon gal out there lamenting that she cannot find a man who wants to have a family and is able to discuss issues in an intelligent manner. Just search and you will find. Not all women are fat and ugly social justice warriors or money-seeking manipulators.
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
Plato

User avatar
Sirocco
Praise Me!
Posts: 3542
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:27 pm

Re: Neo-feminism is an act of war

Postby Sirocco » Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:12 pm

Fiannan wrote:
Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:06 pm
Sirocco wrote:
Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:00 pm
Fiannan wrote:
Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:55 am
I know single mothers, they are sad, desperate people most of the time, which even I refuse to date them lol.
Not that I am a catch but I'll be damned if I be some beta cuck provide for one of those.
I understand what you are saying, but there are plenty of women, yes even in the USA, who are intelligent, good-looking and loyal. You just need one. Real women are not into beta cucks anyway - most are merely kept friend-zoned.
Just because they exist doesn't mean someone will meet them, or even if they do, not mess it up.
All it takes is one wrong thing said, one wrong faux pas and she's gone.
Fear is the opposite of faith. There is probably a nice Mormon gal out there lamenting that she cannot find a man who wants to have a family and is able to discuss issues in an intelligent manner. Just search and you will find. Not all women are fat and ugly social justice warriors or money-seeking manipulators.
I'd be kind of weary of someone good wanting me lol
Its unrealistic
You don't have social problems and all that and meet someone good and it clicks and it works, life isn't like that.
I certainly don't think they are all sjws or money grubbing people, but people have standards, as they should.
I mean I am not terrible but, there are things wrong with me.
Can't ignore that.
Super Inpachi Sardonyx Shura Sirocco;
Specific, intelligent, accurate, faultless, elegant, controlled, surgical, graceful, and powerful!
Adonai wrote:[Arrr, matey] my feet be dusted for now no more pearls be given.


Return to “General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cappaccio, CelestialAngel, cyclOps, dafty, Finrock, gclayjr, Mindfields, paid2play, silk and 151 guests