freedomforall wrote: ↑September 17th, 2017, 4:07 pmIt has been proven, time and again, it's just that some people will argue against the proof until their last breath which doesn't prove anything but a lack of common sense and a denial of what scripture actually states. The JOD and sermons given by early leaders are not scripture, but treated as such because these people having nothing else to use as viable sources will not in any way, shape or form, relent or acknowledge being overtaken with fact or actual truth coming straight from God through prophets in scripture. Their preassigned idols do all the speaking for them, idols that did not teach from scripture, but only spoke what they thought they knew but was never entered into scripture for all to read and decide for themselves. What was taught outside of canon was so contradictory that arguments and varying doctrine ensued causing discord and contention, no less than today, caused by those who think what was taught is fact and worth more than a plug nickle. Weird!Hidingbehindmyhandle wrote: ↑September 16th, 2017, 8:29 pmIt has never been proven to me. All my many years trying to prove that to myself has failed. So you have not one chance in hell to prove it to me,
Therefore, there is no reason, whatsoever, to believe the Adam-God theory/doctrine because it is too controversial and out of order to internalize as something viable. So there we have it, folks.
And people will continue to stone the prophets.
The documentation of these doctrines were compiled, preserved, and publisher by the Church approved by the First Presidency.
It is recorded history that these were believed and taught by the First Presidency and The Quorum of Apostles.
While some individual General Authorities have spoken against them, the majority of the First Presidency and The Quorum of Apostles have not.
And that issues has never been brought before the body of the Church for sustaining vote.