Sorry to rain on your parade, LoveisTruth, I appreciate you genuine desire to better the condition of mankind, but you are overlooking a fundamental premise.To preserve liberty and prosperity of the people, The only sources of revenue allowed to government are these: public property user fees, and voluntary contributions
In order for a person to become an owner of a piece of land, that person should either homestead an un-owned piece of land or buy one from the previous owner. In order to homestead, a person has to mix his sweat/labor with that piece of land.
Now, you are using a term "public property". Does it belong to the governmental officials? Did they mix their sweats with it? Or does it belong to a certain individual who cedes his ownership of that land in favour of the government?
I am afraid that none of the two. In most cases when government claims a piece of land to be public property, it commits an immoral act of claiming something to itself that is not actually its.
It is immoral to say "all the land stretching from hither to thither is now ours". By the same token Columbus could have claimed both North and South America. Or Adam, Abel or Cain could have claimed all of the planet to be theirs and extract a user fee from all future inhabitants. Can you see where the logic of immorally-claimed public property is leading?
So, no, your draft is not there yet. Strike the public property fees out and I will take another look at it.
Cheers.