bobBY
Your home for discussing politics, the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and the principles of liberty.
DrJones wrote:I would like to know if I have a right to bear a gun on my own property IN UTAH. If so, does it have to be in the open like in a holster on my belt or in my hands? or what conditions make it OK?
How about while driving my car or truck?
Also, does a police officer have a right now to enter my home OR MY PROPERTY without having a search warrant? The Constitution says something about protection of citizens against "unlawful searches and seizures" -- does this really apply today?
one4freedom wrote:The LDS church has banned carry in their houses of worship. It is an infraction (like a speeding ticket) if you get caught and reported carrying in a church.
Stella Solaris wrote:one4freedom wrote:The LDS church has banned carry in their houses of worship. It is an infraction (like a speeding ticket) if you get caught and reported carrying in a church.
Steve, does this apply to all LDS Church buildings worldwide, or just in the U.S., or just in Utah? Thanks!
DrJones wrote:Very helpful -- thank you OneforFreedom!
DrJones wrote:I would like to know if I have a right to bear a gun on my own property IN UTAH. If so, does it have to be in the open like in a holster on my belt or in my hands? or what conditions make it OK?
How about while driving my car or truck?
Also, does a police officer have a right now to enter my home OR MY PROPERTY without having a search warrant? The Constitution says something about protection of citizens against "unlawful searches and seizures" -- does this really apply today?

DrJones wrote:Thanks, Freedomfighter.
I also came across this --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsoY9Vx ... ure=relmfu
-- advice from a lawyer -- exercise your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT. He explains that the officer may lie to you and trick you into a confession... Hmmmmm.... I can see why the Founders put the fifth amendment into the Bill of Rights!
Tribunal wrote:Also, please everyone, don't use the word RIGHT. Government does not give RIGHTS, only POWERS. Confusing the two can cause a lot of problems. The police do not have a RIGHT to enter your home, only the POWER under certain conditions.
There was supposed to be legislation making Utah a universal conceal carry state. Utah also has a couple of castle laws but you should educate yourself on them because they don't exactly work together. There's was also supposed to be legislation to fix the problem and I'll need to check if its been done or not.
Now go shoot a gun!!! Hoo-ra!
one4freedom wrote:DrJones wrote:Very helpful -- thank you OneforFreedom!
My pleasure!
I had an interested experience yesterday and thought I would share this.
I had 2 very friendly cops stop by my home and spoke to my wife. I just happened to be at home that day. So luckily she got me to talk to them. I have left out some details for obvious reasons. But the basic facts are presented below.
The conversation went something like this:
LEOs: Hi - we received some information that we want to verify. Will you give us permission to search your home?
Me: (stepping outside and closed the door) - Why?
LEOs: We are just looking out for you and want to be able to clear up this statement. We have received some information that makes us believe that _______. Will you give us permission? It won't take long.
Me: I don't this this would be a good idea.
LEOs: Are you sure - we are really looking out for you and want to put some closure to this?
Me: No - but thank you for your concern. Goodbye - have a nice day.
JerL wrote:Dr. Jones I know that your question has been answered, but I thought that I would cross post an attempted entering by two police officers recently. The original post can be found here.I had an interested experience yesterday and thought I would share this.
I had 2 very friendly cops stop by my home and spoke to my wife. I just happened to be at home that day. So luckily she got me to talk to them. I have left out some details for obvious reasons. But the basic facts are presented below.
The conversation went something like this:
LEOs: Hi - we received some information that we want to verify. Will you give us permission to search your home?
Me: (stepping outside and closed the door) - Why?
LEOs: We are just looking out for you and want to be able to clear up this statement. We have received some information that makes us believe that _______. Will you give us permission? It won't take long.
Me: I don't this this would be a good idea.
LEOs: Are you sure - we are really looking out for you and want to put some closure to this?
Me: No - but thank you for your concern. Goodbye - have a nice day.
Me:No, I don't this this would be a good idea.
DrJones wrote:Very well done -- polite but firm in resisting a search. I like the way Tribunal put it -- we have rights (God-given and protected via the Constitution), police have "powers"-- but often their "powers" come only as we give up our rights voluntarily.
Tribunal wrote:DrJones wrote:Very well done -- polite but firm in resisting a search. I like the way Tribunal put it -- we have rights (God-given and protected via the Constitution), police have "powers"-- but often their "powers" come only as we give up our rights voluntarily.
So true and I really wish more people realized this. There's a saying that I use and it goes like this: "Those who do not know their Rights, have no Rights."
jonesde wrote:Tribunal wrote:DrJones wrote:Very well done -- polite but firm in resisting a search. I like the way Tribunal put it -- we have rights (God-given and protected via the Constitution), police have "powers"-- but often their "powers" come only as we give up our rights voluntarily.
So true and I really wish more people realized this. There's a saying that I use and it goes like this: "Those who do not know their Rights, have no Rights."
The trick with our Constitutional rights is that they are quite complex and it is very difficult for even intelligent people to understand them, and unfortunately officers often misunderstand them. There is no education if rights in public school, even though there is constant propaganda about the workings and the virtue of the system.
For example, one confusing area is lawful orders. During a car stop, as I understand it an officer can order you to step out of your car, but he cannot order you to unlock your car. He can order you to spread your arms and legs up against the car and be frisked, but he cannot order you to turn out your pockets.
How is any reasonable person supposed to understand the distinctions there? To make it more fun, try making the distinction when multiple men with guns, sometimes drawn are surrounding you and shouting lies at you to get you "voluntarily" give up your rights.
patriotsaint wrote:You gentlemen may like this web site:
http://www.thearmedcitizen.com
Anyone that wants to talk gun control with me gets directed to that site. It may be a little monotonous for daily reading, but it's a great reference for self-defense news stories.
Bobby Lee Swagger wrote:Silver Shadow Gilboa Snake Double Barreled AR-15 from Israel
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012 ... rm+Blog%29
DSG Technology/PNW Arms Super-Sniper Ammunition (SSA) Enhanced-Range Rifle Ammo Being Made in the USA
http://www.defensereview.com/dsg-techno ... arters-ba/
bobhenstra wrote:Bobby Lee Swagger wrote:Silver Shadow Gilboa Snake Double Barreled AR-15 from Israel
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012 ... rm+Blog%29
DSG Technology/PNW Arms Super-Sniper Ammunition (SSA) Enhanced-Range Rifle Ammo Being Made in the USA
http://www.defensereview.com/dsg-techno ... arters-ba/
Interesting! The double barreled rifle is a waste of time. Part of the reason the military went to the AR15 was so a soldier could carry more ammunition. A 9lb rifle defeats that purpose.
The new cartridge is interesting, but my old eyes has trouble seeing a thousand yards, my .06 will be sufficient.
bob
Legion wrote:bobhenstra wrote:Bobby Lee Swagger wrote:Silver Shadow Gilboa Snake Double Barreled AR-15 from Israel
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012 ... rm+Blog%29
DSG Technology/PNW Arms Super-Sniper Ammunition (SSA) Enhanced-Range Rifle Ammo Being Made in the USA
http://www.defensereview.com/dsg-techno ... arters-ba/
Interesting! The double barreled rifle is a waste of time. Part of the reason the military went to the AR15 was so a soldier could carry more ammunition. A 9lb rifle defeats that purpose.
The new cartridge is interesting, but my old eyes has trouble seeing a thousand yards, my .06 will be sufficient.
bob
LOL....yeah for whatever crazy reason double barrels (whether its a .45 or an AR) seem to be the rage right now.
Had a friend I used to work with in repairing large presses and brakes that was into long range shooting. He used to turn his own bullets out of brass. Pretty cool but not something I'm in a position to play with right now either.

bobhenstra wrote:Lol, would rather have the Browning-------![]()
Bob
freedomfighter wrote:If one really wants to get an officer ticked off, just mention the word "profiling." This happened to me. When I mentioned it to a retired police officer he got defensive and asked me "do you really believe officers profile people?" I said "yes, I've seen it happen." I've actually heard people talk about their experiences from this kind of thing when I was actively attending Pre-Paid Legal conferences. Now they call it Legal Shield.
Now if I get stopped by an officer, I can pull out my ID card that states on the back "If it is your intention to question, detain or arrest me, please allow me to call an attorney immediately." And the good thing about it is...I can. On the card is a telephone number for this purpose and I can have an attorney talk to the officer on the spot explaining why I'm being detained. This is a very good way to exercise, defend and keep ones rights without having to say anything that could be used against me.
bobhenstra wrote:Lol, would rather have the Browning-------![]()
Bob
DrJones wrote:freedomfighter wrote:If one really wants to get an officer ticked off, just mention the word "profiling." This happened to me. When I mentioned it to a retired police officer he got defensive and asked me "do you really believe officers profile people?" I said "yes, I've seen it happen." I've actually heard people talk about their experiences from this kind of thing when I was actively attending Pre-Paid Legal conferences. Now they call it Legal Shield.
Now if I get stopped by an officer, I can pull out my ID card that states on the back "If it is your intention to question, detain or arrest me, please allow me to call an attorney immediately." And the good thing about it is...I can. On the card is a telephone number for this purpose and I can have an attorney talk to the officer on the spot explaining why I'm being detained. This is a very good way to exercise, defend and keep ones rights without having to say anything that could be used against me.
This attorney -- is he/she with Legal Shield? or how did you select your attorney? just in case...
freedomfighter wrote:True or false. Why?
Do not use hand loaded or re-loads for self defense CC.
See: http://www.carduccitactical.com/-P_Ammo.html
. I have only loaded them up to about 1325 fps).Return to Emergency Preparedness & Self-sufficiency
Users browsing this forum: cindyb and 14 guests