John Lear affidavit on 9/11 planes

[uglypitbullcaptain of 1,000]

This was rather interesting....

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1935/777 ... entor.html

download a .pdf of the full affidavit http://www.stevequayle.com/News.alert/1 ... adavit.pdf

[HeirofNumenorthe Heir Of Numenor]

Hmmmm very interesting

[7cylon7captain of 1,000]

8. No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors. Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted for the following reasons:

A. In the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun 'telescoping' when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center. The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

B. The engines when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building. One alleged engine part was found on Murray Street but there should be three other engine cores weighing over 9000 pounds each. Normal operating temperatures for these engines are 650°C so they could not possibly have burned up. This is a photo of a similar sized engine from a McDonnell-Douglas MD-11 which impacted the ocean at a high rate of speed. You can see that the engine remains generally intact.(photo, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/ ... main546355. shtml)





I saw a great documentary about this exact fact. It showed how all 5 networks were controlled by one yes ONE central point. They used Disney type animation or CGI to mask the true Tamahawk missles that really hit the WTC 1 and 2 and the Pentagon. All planes that we say on supposed "live" TV was a masterful stroke of deception. It was not perfect yet 99% of Americans still believe planes hit the WCT. The documentary went on to show how the backgrounds all changed to a grey brown background instead of the normal blue skies. It also showed that the planes where in fact video CGI animation. One of the best examples is a shot on the second plan as it THE NOSE OF THE PLANE GOES THROUGH THE ENTIRE BUILDING AND OUT THE OTHER SIDE AND THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT STILL LOOKS LIKE A NORMAL NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT. (i will try and find that video for you as well.)



The real truth should you choose to accept it is in fact you were watching a CGI plane hit the WCT. The WCT were hit by tomahawk missles. They look like small planes. Hinse the 100s of reports by eye witnesses that the plane that hit the towers was "small". One lady even said that was no AA liner. She said that was no airplane she ever saw. Plus the hundreds of reports that the second plane had no markings at all was small and grey, no windows on it at all. This from eye witnesses who saw it in real life. The rest of us only saw what TPTB wanted us to see. A "supposed unaltered" live feed. It was a live feed but it was not unaltered. They own ALL the media that covered the event. A masterful stroke yet not without its major problems. When looked at it objectively anyone that will open the eyes and ears can call into question the actual event verses what really happened.



This next video is crazy.... the nose comes out the other side... intact ... then the video editing folks see the mistake and quickly get rid of the image.

It was a show people, fake CGI to make you believe in their make believe world.



There is plenty more where this came from.

[uglypitbullcaptain of 1,000]

Thanks for sharing those vids 7cylon7, those are both new to me. I always wondered why there was no wreckage in PA or by the 'Pentagram' in the early shots......they only showed pieces of stuff in the later shots. My first thought on 911 was that the buildings were rigged since they had attempted to blow them in 93....when I heard the official story come out I was physically ill.