Your home for discussing politics, the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and the principles of liberty.
iWriteStuff wrote:interesting.... one vote for Democrats.
What's your reasoning, anonymous voter?
gkearney wrote:Here is what I think will happen. The vote will be very close, perhaps a tie. If a tie then the Vice President acting as President of the Senate breaks the tie and as Joe Biden is a Democrat he carries the Senate for the Democrats. Even if it come down to one or two senators the Democrats still carry the senate as the swing vote in such a senate would fall to Independent Senator Angus King, (I Maine) who has traditionally decided to caucus with the Democrats. The other "independent" senator Bernie Sanders (I Vermont) the Senate's only socialist member always caucuses with the Democrats.
No matter what happens in the election Angus King will likely be the most powerful member of the Senate following the election given that he is not tied to either party, nor is he like Sanders predictable in his political leanings, can swing his vote one way or another in a closely divided Senate which would seem likely to happen in any event.
I think smart money is always on the incumbents to hold on, In this case even if it is very very close the Democrats still have a built in advantage. One thing is sure, the political pork is going to flow into Maine.
iWriteStuff wrote:Globalists: you're in the lead! What's your reasoning?
Desert Roses wrote:iWriteStuff wrote:Globalists: you're in the lead! What's your reasoning?
History...I've studied ancient and modern history, as well as observed the trends for the last 35 years, particularly in the US. We have been moving ever closer to a global political world, though the 3rd world nations will be much harder to pull on board. There is already economic globalism, and certainly communications globalism. It's really only a matter of time. The Republicans move us that way with wars and increasingly intrusive controls on our civil rights; the Democrats move us closer with social programs and economic "reforms."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests