Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

For discussion of secret combinations (political, economic, spiritual, religious, etc.) (Ether 8:18-25.)
Post Reply

Was 9/11 an inside job?

Yes
21
68%
No
4
13%
I'm not sure
6
19%
 
Total votes: 31
User avatar
iamse7en
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1440

Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by iamse7en »

Curious to know what all LDSFF users believe on this issue.

Like
Member
Posts: 2358

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by Like »

I voted yes. There is not a doubt in my mind.

User avatar
Mahonri
Master
Posts: 3949
Location: Where you want to be when crap hits the fan, but I'm not telling.

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by Mahonri »

what's your definition?

User avatar
iamse7en
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1440

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by iamse7en »

I guess "inside" would infer that there was major American participation, i.e. Americans with power (either in the government or military-industrial complex) either helped or orchestrated the attack.

User avatar
Jason
Master of Puppets
Posts: 18296

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by Jason »

iamse7en wrote:I guess "inside" would infer that there was major American participation, i.e. Americans with power (either in the government or military-industrial complex) either helped or orchestrated the attack.
I would add....and covered it up! As in no investigation and promotion of nearly every individual who dropped the ball that day and didn't respond according to training and policy.

User avatar
Original_Intent
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13100

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by Original_Intent »

What I would consider the bare minimum U.S. gov't involvement.

Allowed it to happen.
Orchestrated the investigation so that ll the right people were blamed.

I suspect that it was a lot more than that, but I don't see any way that both of the above didn't happen.

I suspect and believe that it was much more than that.

Rob
the Sunbeam
Posts: 1242

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by Rob »

Another good poll would be: Which theory do you subscribe to
  • Incompetence
    LIHOP (let it happen on purpose)
    MIHOP (made it happen on purpose)

User avatar
BroJones
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8247
Location: Varies.
Contact:

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by BroJones »

Mahonri wrote:what's your definition?

That's the problem with "an inside job" -- just not well defined. I'd like to see a poll along the lines of the Ohio University poll of August 2006 -- the same wording would be great:
Federal officials either allowed the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon to happen, or somehow participated in those events, because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East.

Very likely:
Somewhat likely:
Unlikely

I think those were the responses -- should check the precise wording but have a missionary prep meeting now... ciao!

(can someone set up that poll?)
Last edited by BroJones on January 17th, 2011, 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

wolfman
captain of 100
Posts: 264

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by wolfman »

The 9-11 commission in and of itself shows massive complacency/cover-up so just on that basis alone shows the government exploited the opportunity at very the least. I'm not sure what all the pieces are or how they fit together but I'm personally convinced flight 93 was intended for WTC 7 and NOT the White House. Now If the White House happened to collapse for no apparent reason on that day then yes I would believe flight 93 was intended for the White House. Even though "inside job" is not well defined, I'll lean more towards "inside job" than the official lie.

User avatar
BroJones
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8247
Location: Varies.
Contact:

Re: Poll: Was 9/11 an inside job?

Post by BroJones »

wolfman wrote: Even though "inside job" is not well defined, I'll lean more towards "inside job" than the official lie.
Agreed!

Another Ohio Univ poll question in 2006 was this:

# The collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings.

16% said "very likely" back then... I wonder what the number would be today?
http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Third of Americans suspect 9-11 government conspiracy
Submitted by Thomas Hargrove on Tue, 08/01/2006 - 14:33

* National News
* News
* Politics

ShareThis

By THOMAS HARGROVE
Scripps Howard News Service

More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.

The national survey of 1,010 adults also found that anger against the federal government is at record levels, with 54 percent saying they "personally are more angry" at the government than they used to be.

Widespread resentment and alienation toward the national government appears to be fueling a growing acceptance of conspiracy theories about the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Suspicions that the 9/11 attacks were "an inside job" _ the common phrase used by conspiracy theorists on the Internet _ quickly have become nearly as popular as decades-old conspiracy theories that the federal government was responsible for President John F. Kennedy's assassination and that it has covered up proof of space aliens.




Seventy percent of people who give credence to these theories also say they've become angrier with the federal government than they used to be.

Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them "because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East."

"One out of three sounds high, but that may very well be right," said Lee Hamilton, former vice chairman of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also called the 9/11 commission.)
"What has amazed me is not that there are conspiracy theories, but that they didn't seem to be getting any purchase among the American public until the last year or so," Fenster said. "Although the Iraq war was not directly related to the 9/11 attacks, people are now looking back at 9/11 with much more skepticism than they used to."

Conspiracy-believing participants in the poll agree their suspicions are recent.

"I certainly didn't think of conspiracies when 9/11 first happened," said Elaine Tripp, 62, of Tabernacle, N.J. "I don't know if President Bush was aware of the exact time it was going to happen. But he certainly didn't do enough to stop it. Bush was so intent on having his own little war."

Garrett Johnson, 19, of Manassas, Va., said it was "well after the fact" before he started questioning the official explanation of the attacks. "But then people I know started talking about it. And the Internet had a lot to do with this. After reading all of the different articles there, I started to think we weren't being told the truth."

The Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University has tracked the level of resentment people feel toward the federal government since 1995, starting shortly after Timothy McVeigh bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City. Forty-seven percent then said they, personally, feel "more angry at the federal government" than they used to. That percentage dropped to 42 percent in 1997, 34 percent in 1998 and only 12 percent shortly after 9/11 during the groundswell of patriotism and support for the government after the attacks.

But the new survey found that 77 percent say their friends and acquaintances have become angrier with government recently and 54 percent say they, themselves, have become angrier _ both record levels.

The survey also found that people who regularly use the Internet but who do not regularly use so-called "mainstream" media are significantly more likely to believe in 9/11 conspiracies. People who regularly read daily newspapers or listen to radio newscasts were especially unlikely to believe in the conspiracies.

"We know that there are a lot of people now asking questions," said Janice Matthews, executive director of 911Truth.org, one of the most sophisticated Internet sites raising doubts about official explanations of the attacks. "We didn't have the Internet after Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin or the Kennedy assassination. But we live in different times now."

Matthews' Web site averaged 4,000 "hits" a day last year, but currently has at least 12,000 visits every 24 hours. The site, according to its online policy statement, is dedicated to showing the public that "elements within the U.S. government must have orchestrated or participated in the execution of the attacks for these to have happened the way in which they did."

Participants in the poll were asked to respond to "several serious accusations that some people have made against the federal government in recent years." Five conspiracy theories were described and participants were asked if each was "very likely, somewhat likely or unlikely."

The level of suspicion of U.S. official involvement in a 9/11 conspiracy was only slightly behind the 40 percent who suspect "officials in the federal government were directly responsible for the assassination of President Kennedy" and the 38 percent who believe "the federal government is withholding proof of the existence of intelligent life from other planets."

The poll found that a majority of young adults give at least some credence to a 9/11 conspiracy compared to less than a fourth of people 65 or older. Members of racial and ethnic minorities, people with only a high school education and Democrats were especially likely to suspect federal involvement in 9/11.

The survey was conducted by telephone from July 6-24 at the Scripps Survey Research Center at the University of Ohio under a grant from the Scripps Howard Foundation. The poll has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.

Post Reply