Mark, the whole thrust of what Richard Gage, Kevin Ryan, Dr. Jones and so many others are doing and have done in investigating 9/11, is to force an independent investigation, to not only clarify what brought the WTC buildings, but to find out who did it, why they did it, and how they planned and brought it off. This has always been their goal.Mark wrote:Col. Flagg wrote:Mark, if you're still lurking...
I'm baaaaack. I watched the video here Col. and Mr Gage even admits that his group does not have the whole THEORY as to how it happened, who did it, and why. That is why they are calling for a new investigation of the evidence that has been uncovered. So Mr Gage himself is admitting that they do not have all the answers on who to place responsibility for in the downing of the buildings.
That is what I have contended all along yet I continue to get condescending remarks and slurs from the likes of Rob and Love and even you my good buddy about my intelligence because I don't come out and agree this was a false flag conducted inside job operation. Yet not one comment from anyone about anything I posted explaining alternative theories to reports of the molten metal which was one of the items discussed.
I am convinced that it is you guys who are not interested in finding the truth about what really happened on 9-11. You are only interested in re-emphasizing and agreeing on what you already believe to be the on;y answers in this case. There is not any alternative explanations for any of these questions in your eyes. Only those answers with which you already are totally invested in and know to be the truth.
Yet even your own spokesman admits that all the answers are not yet available as to who to assign total culpability. This is too funny. Its a shame you and your buddies don't see the irony here.
Why would they go to this great and largely unappreciated trouble? They aren't getting rich doing so and they've incurred a great deal of grief. It's simply because the official explanations are soooo inadequate, and even scientifically fraudulent. To get a good handle on this, you really need to read some of the detailed analyses of why this is so. Dr. David Ray Griffin's books, particulary his book on the collapse of WTC 7 fill the bill. This was suggested to you ages ago. Have you done this yet?
The good thing is you don't HAVE to have very good scientific chops to understand the arguments, evidence, testimony, conflicting testimony that Griffin presents, to realize something is drastically wrong with the official hypothesis and subsequent investigations.
Now if the official explanation and investigations are wrong in so many essential ways, you have to wonder why the government sticks to their story. The fact they do so, raises realistic suspicions as to whether certains persons in government had some direct or indirect involvement. It really LOOKS like an inside job, to one degree or another.
Mark, following is an excellent analysis of the foreknowledge of the collapse of Bldg 7, presented by Dr. Graeme MacQeen. He goes into exhaustive detail in analyzing why the apparent collapse of Bldg 7 was based on action-based foreknowledge. I really think you will find this illuminating, especially if you bring an open mind to it and listen to and follow his arguments as close as you can.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... cF4flr2dYs
This is really excellent. Let me know what you think.