The Strongest Public Domain Evidence of 9-11 Fraud

[LoveIsTruth]

Yep. Both Hiltler, Lenin, and Stalin were bankrolled from, and brought into power by, Wall Street.
As the wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild said: “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.”

[larsenb]

Recently Niels Harrit, the first author of the the very important 9/11 scientific truth paper titled: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 WTC Catastrophe, sued a Danish Newspaper for libel, and actually lost. He is appealing the decision and needs our help. I would encourage anyone who can to avail themselves of the opportunity to do something concrete and real and compassionate for the 9/11 truth movement and for Dr. Harrit personally, by helping him mount a good legal offense.

His loss of the first round of his libel suit is just one more egregious travesty of justice, of which many, many more exist in relation to the attempts to get justice for victims of the events of 9/11, the people of Afghanistan and Iraq, etc., and to get the truth of that day revealed and established.

The following is from an A&E for 9/11 Truth newsletter that I receive:

February 26, 2015

Niels Harrit Sues Danish Newspaper for Libel Will Present Video of WTC in Court Help Raise $15K by Next Week to Cover His Legal Fees!

Two weeks from today, Dr. Niels Harrit, the distinguished co-author of the landmark nano-thermite paper, will appear in Danish High Court to bring an appeal in his libel suit against the Danish newspaper Weekendavisen.

In a December 2012 article titled “Madness in the Royal Library,” Weekendavisen writer Søren K. Villemoes referred to Dr. Harrit and his fellow 9/11 activists as “crackpots,” while also comparing them to creationists and Holocaust deniers.

“. . . Is the library soon going to open its doors to an exhibition showing us 'alternative' theories about evolution? . . . Why not just invite in Niels Harrit and the other crackpots from the 9/11 skeptics movement while we are at it? What about the holocaust denial movement?”

Søren K. Villemoes, Weekendavisen, December 7, 2012

For Dr. Harrit, a scientist who taught chemistry for 40 years at the University of Copenhagan, this amounted to an allegation of scientific misconduct and a baseless attempt to damage his hard-earned reputation. So he decided to seek recourse under Denmark’s strong libel law — and give himself the opportunity to prove in a court of law the scientific legitimacy of his 9/11 research.

Now Dr. Harrit Needs Our Help

The lower City Court ruled against Dr. Harrit in 2013, basing its decision on politics rather than the law. Dr. Harrit, of course, appealed.

This time around, he’ll be allowed to submit more evidence, and he is now receiving assistance from attorney Mads Krøger Pramming, chairman of the Danish whistleblower organization Veron. Although Mr. Pramming is providing his services at a greatly reduced rate, he still needs to be compensated for his indispensible assistance to Dr. Harrit.

And so we are asking you to make a modest donation to Niels Harrit’s legal fund, and help raise us $15,000 by next week!


Support Niels Harrit NOW


Of course, this is about much more than undoing baseless insults. It’s an opportunity for a leader in the 9/11 Truth Movement to show in a court of law that the science behind controlled demolition is not just legitimate, but overwhelming.

Moreover, because Dr. Harrit has been a national figure ever since his 2009 appearance on TV2NEWS, the case is likely to be widely covered in the Danish media — especially if he wins!

What the Case Comes Down To

Under Danish libel law, Villemoes has the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim. As a journalist, he must also demonstrate that his reporting meets the standards of good journalism. At the first trial, he did neither. Still, the judge egregiously ruled in his favor.

In the High Court, Villemoes will have a much harder time, because Dr. Harrit is being allowed to submit more evidence — namely, the video of WTC 7’s destruction, as well as an actual sample of the WTC dust, which Dr. Harrit will use to demonstrate the dust’s authenticity, and therefore his good scientific conduct.

Dr. Harrit will also call two witnesses. One, Jan Utzon, is a world-renowned architect and AE911Truth petition signer who testified previously. The other, Dr. Per Hedegård, is a physics professor from the University of Copenhagan’s Niels Bohr Institute. His statement to a newspaper in 2010 dismissing Dr. Harrit was the only evidence used by Villemoes at trial. Today, Dr. Hedegård has completely reversed his position and insists on testifying in support of Dr. Harrit!

Thanks to Dr. Harrit’s relentless pursuit of the truth, we now have an incredible opportunity to achieve some symbolic justice for all 9/11 researchers and activists.

You can learn more about the case by reading our recently published article.

We thank you for helping us support Niels Harrit.

Sincerely yours,

Richard Gage, AIA and the AE911Truth Team

Dr. Niels Harrit on TV2NEWS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25l ... e=youtu.be" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit at Danish City Court https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIl4hKh ... e=youtu.be" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

9/11 Free Fall Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTDcyYX ... e=youtu.be" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Support Dr. Niels Harrit CLICK NOW https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/websc ... 0d60b23a7c" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You can learn more about the case by reading our recently published article. http://www.ae911truth.org/news/201-news ... -suit.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


We Exist Only With Your Support

TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION

We are a non–partisan association of architects, engineers, and affiliates.

Our work at AE911Truth is dedicated to the victims, families and all others throughout the world affected by the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and its aftermath.

Our mission is to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the 3 WTC skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice.

Learn more about us. Contact us if you have questions or comments. Please forward and distribute widely!

Thank you, Richard Gage, AIA

Copyright © 2014 AE911Truth.org, All rights reserved.

AE911Truth is a 501(c)3 organization. Donations are deductible per codes and regulations.

You are receiving this email because you opted in with AE911Truth.org for special email news. Remember, your email is confidential to us and will not be misused in any way.

Our mailing address is:

AE911Truth.org
2342 Shattuck Ave.
Suite 189
Berkeley, CA 94704
Click here to unsubscribe from future AE911Truth emails

[larsenb]

New video footage of onset of the collapse of WTC Bldg 7 picked up from Chris Bollyn's web site. Explosions clearly visible.

The web site: http://www.bollyn.com/home/#article_15200" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Here's what Chris says about it:

WTC-7: Visible Evidence of Explosions

September 1, 2015

It was fairly obvious to most people that the Twin Towers were demolished with explosives on the morning of 9-11. Then, at about 5:20 p.m. in the afternoon, a third tower - one block away from WTC 1 - fell straight into its footprint. The evidence that this tower, the 47-story WTC 7 - owned and built by Larry Silverstein - was demolished with explosives is very obvious. The following 47-second video clearly shows explosions going off seconds before the building fell. . . . . . . . .

[freedomforall]

New 911 Truth Video Can Not Be Debunked

[freedomforall]

911-Conspiracy Finally Solved!: Names, Connections, Motives, 911Matrix of Details Exposed!

[larsenb]

New video footage of onset of the collapse of WTC Bldg 7 picked up from Chris Bollyn's web site. Explosions clearly visible.

The web site: http://www.bollyn.com/home/#article_15200" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Here's what Chris says about it:

WTC-7: Visible Evidence of Explosions

September 1, 2015

It was fairly obvious to most people that the Twin Towers were demolished with explosives on the morning of 9-11. Then, at about 5:20 p.m. in the afternoon, a third tower - one block away from WTC 1 - fell straight into its footprint. The evidence that this tower, the 47-story WTC 7 - owned and built by Larry Silverstein - was demolished with explosives is very obvious. The following 47-second video clearly shows explosions going off seconds before the building fell. . . . . . . . .

I want to bump this in order to point something out about this video. Could be an exceedingly important video in my strongly held opinion. Here is why.

The first few seconds pan almost the entire upper, north face of WTC7. You will notice that there are no 'dark' windows visible. The first very noticeable flash in the lower right-hand portion of screen leaves a dark rectangle. Obviously, the window where the explosion was seen was blown out. This was broad daylight, and there were no interior lights in the building under the circumstances, so interior space would show up as being relatively dark.

Then notice how more dark rectangles start showing up, clustering somewhat and moving vertically up the building. This means that explosions are progressively moving vertically up the floors and collect along a vertical plain. However, for what ever reason, we don't necessarily see the flash from the explosion at every floor and window, but we do see the result of blown out windows.

This is especially noticeable with the explosions on the left side of the building image. When you realize that the dark rectangles are blown out windows, you get a clearer idea of how the building is being blown, bottom to top, and along key vertical plains.

Now here's a caveat. I don't know where the video came from. Posters on the YouTube site for this video claim it is a fake; even talking about a 'flying saucer' being seen a 31 seconds into it, apparently on the top of the 'pent house' on the roof. However, the 'pent house' started going down before the actual roof-line started falling; and you would have to stretch and do violence to your imagination to think you are seeing an image of a 'flying saucer'. It is a mirror image of the north face.

So easy to sow doubt about what may be an authentic video.

[durangout]

Because the "evidence" that I'be seen on this site and others about 911 is well... let me just say weak. If you have some proof, I'd lvoe to see it. It's not that I don't think they WOULD do it; it's that I don't think they they COULD do it.

Please in all incerity list the strongest evidences that you know of.

The strongest evidence showing that the official story of 9/11 is false are the laws of physics that had to be suspended to make the official story true, plus eyewitness testimony of numerous firefighters and first responders.

Let's list the strongest evidence:

1) The two towers, WTC1 and WTC2, fell in under 10 seconds each, which happens to be the time of free fall for objects dropped from this height meeting no resistance except empty air, (hence the name "free fall"). Building WTC7, the third tower that collapsed on that day, and that was not struck by a plane, also experienced free fall for over 100 feet! It is a physical impossibility for the upper floors of the building to fall through thousands of tons of structural steel, and steel-reinforced concrete as easily and as quickly as through empty air, unless explosives were used to remove lower floors before they had a chance to slow down the upper floors. So the Free Fall time of the towers is one of the strongest and indisputable evidence that explosives were used.

2) Particles on nano-thermite and thermate were found in abundance in the dust of the ruin of the towers. Nano-thermite and thermate are used by the military to cut through structural steel as a hot knife through butter.

3) Pools of molten steel were found in the basements of all three towers that fell on that day. And according to the official accounts, there was nothing in those three towers to produce fire hot enough to liquify steel, not even close! Nano-Thermite and thermate, on the other hand, do produce molten iron as a byproduct, and are hot enough not only to liquify, but to vaporize steel!

All three of these "proofs" are false / incorrect. (sigh)

[Army Of Truth]

All three of these "proofs" are false / incorrect. (sigh)

Care to elaborate a little more on how these dozens of proofs are "false/incorrect"? I have a whole gang of proof that I can show you if you really want to open up this can of worms. I have yet to see any proof from these "9/11 government story" theorists. Not one.

Building 7 to me is the biggest smoking gun since no airplane hit this building, nor was it significantly damaged like building 5 or 6 was. Never before 9/11, nor after 9/11, has a steel-framed building collapsed symmetrically into their own footprint, DUE TO FIRES. On 9/11, this happened 3 TIMES! Go ahead and google it up. That is a fact, not a theory. :ymsmug:

[David13]

On Building 7 it is possible that those windows were not blown out, but were broken out due to distortion of the building resulting from the imminent collapse of the building. But why the building would collapse in a free fall cannot be explained due to jet fuel burning, as there was no jet fuel in the building to burn, as was the case in the tower 1 & 2.
dc

[LoveIsTruth]

All three of these "proofs" are false / incorrect. (sigh)

Really? Prove it.

You just said, in a way, that the Moon is made of blue cheese. But you gave no proof.

(sigh)

[LoveIsTruth]

On Building 7 it is possible that those windows were not blown out, but were broken out due to distortion of the building resulting from the imminent collapse of the building. But why the building would collapse in a free fall cannot be explained due to jet fuel burning, as there was no jet fuel in the building to burn, as was the case in the tower 1 & 2.
dc

Yes. Even if there were jet fuel (which there was not), still it would not explain the free fall of the building for over 100 feet. Free fall, (32 feet/sec*sec) that was observed, can only occur if there was EXACTLY ZERO resistance to the falling body. (Hence the name "Free Fall"). Objects cannot fall through hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and steel reinforced concrete, as easily and as quickly as through EMPTY AIR.

The fact that we witnessed FREE FALL, as finally admitted even by the NIST, and almost perfectly symmetrical FREE FALL, means that ALL structural supports of the building were removed COMPLETELY, and almost SIMULTANEOUSLY.

The only thing that accomplishes this is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, not RANDOM office fires that CANNOT melt steel. Yet large quantities of molten metal (and molten concrete!) were found in the ruins of all three towers. This is byproduct of thermite, thermate, and nano-thermate, which were found in the dust.

The case cannot be refuted. The truth is as unconquerable as God.

And those who lie for the "good" of the state, will receive their reward in the day of judgment, from which the devil, the father of all lies, cannot save them, because he cannot save even himself.

[freedomforall]

All the idiots that went along with the official story given by the government should be ashamed of themselves. They even attempted to make all the very intelligent and knowledgeable experts look like imbeciles.
Just how gullible are we supposed to be before we can believe the government in anything they say? Our prophets have warned us time and time again about Secret Combinations, and to study the Book of Mormon and learn of them so we do not let them get above us.
Americans, including LDS's have fallen for government tactics and coverups hook, line and sinker, AND this includes myself until six years ago. Then I started doing as counseled and woke up to what is bringing down my country and home. I don't want to be one of the slothful souls spoken of in the following:

From April 1965, General Conference:
The devil knows that if the elders of Israel should ever wake up, they could step forth and help preserve freedom and extend the gospel. Therefore the devil has concentrated, and to a large extent successfully, in neutralizing much of the priesthood. He has reduced them to sleeping giants. His arguments are clever….
[Says the devil]: “Don’t do anything in the fight for freedom until the Church sets up its own specific program to save the Constitution.” This brings us right back to the scripture…to those slothful servants who will not do anything until they are “compelled in all things” [D&C 58:26]. Maybe the Lord will never set up a specific church program for the purpose of saving the Constitution. Perhaps if he set one up at this time it might split the Church asunder, and perhaps he does not want that to happen yet for not all the wheat and tares are fully ripe….
[H]ave we elders been warned? Yes, we have. And have we elders been given the guidelines? Yes indeed, we have. And besides, if the Church should ever inaugurate a program [to save the Constitution], who do you think would be in the forefront to get it moving? It would not be those who were sitting on the sidelines prior to that time or those who were appeasing the enemy. It would be those choice spirits who, not waiting to be “commanded in all things,” used their own free will, the counsel of the prophets, and the Spirit of the Lord as guidelines and who entered the battle “in a good cause” and brought to pass much righteousness in freedom’s cause….
Brethren, if we had done our homework and were faithful, we could step forward at this time and help save this country. The fact that most of us are unprepared to do it is an indictment we will have to bear. The longer we wait, the heavier the chains, the deeper the blood, the more the persecution, and the less we can carry out our God-given mandate and worldwide mission. The war in heaven is raging on the earth today. Are you being neutralized in the battle? (April 1965, General Conference)

David O. McKay
Latter-day Saints should have nothing to do with secret combinations and groups antagonistic to the Constitutional law of the land….
Next to being one in worshiping God, there is nothing in this world upon which this Church should be more united than in upholding and defending the Constitution of the United States. (October 1939, General Conference)

We…warn our people in America of the constantly increasing threat against our inspired Constitution…. The proponents thereof are seeking to undermine our own form of government and to set up instead one of the forms of dictatorships [which] is now flourishing in other lands. These revolutionists are using a technique that is as old as the human race,—a fervid but false solicitude for the unfortunate over whom they thus gain mastery, and then enslave them. (April 1942, General Conference)

I think we owe at least the consideration to be loyal to this country and to spurn with all the soul that is within us the scheming disloyal citizens who would undermine our Constitution, or who would deprive the individual of his liberty vouchsafed by that great document, and some of our men who have come up through the public schools are doing just that. Let every loyal member of the Church look down with scorn upon any man or woman who would undermine that Constitution. (address delivered on May 24, 1954, published May 29, 1954, Church News, 3)

[Above] all else, strive to support good and conscientious candidates of either party who are aware of the great dangers inherent in communism, and who are truly dedicated to the Constitution in the tradition of our founding fathers. (October 1962, General Conference)

Church members are at perfect liberty to act according to their own consciences in the matter of safeguarding our way of life. They are, of course, encouraged to honor the highest standards of the gospel and to work to preserve their own freedoms. They are free to participate in non-church meetings that are held to warn people of the threat of Communism or any other theory or principle that will deprive us of our free agency or individual liberties vouchsafed by the Constitution of the United States….
We therefore commend and encourage every person and every group who is sincerely seeking to study Constitutional principles and awaken a sleeping and apathetic people to the alarming conditions that are rapidly advancing about us. (April 1966, General Conference “Statement Concerning the Position of the Church on
Communism”)

False flag operations and conspiratory acts are part of this danger we face. I believe it is all inclusive. They are geared to bring down the populace, weaken our resolve, direct us toward acceptance of enslavement by tyrannical leaders and to destroy freedom and liberty; that which God provided for us through the Founding Fathers. In blue above. Upon voting remember the counsel in red above.

Had we, the LDS's, done what we were warned of and told to do obeyed that counsel, would we now be in such a mess as we are now?

From: https://www.lds.org/ensign/1992/05/seek ... 1?lang=eng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Seeking the Good
Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin

The last part of the thirteenth article states, “If there is anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.” (A of F 1:13.)

The word seek means to go in search of, try to discover, try to acquire. It requires an active, assertive approach to life. We should be very selective and choose only those things that meet the test of being virtuous, lovely, of good report, or praiseworthy. If it is questionable, we should avoid it.

Especially in an election year, as we have in the United States this year, we should seek to support those we believe will act with integrity and carry out our ideas of good government. The Lord has said: “When the wicked rule the people mourn.

“Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men ye should observe to uphold.” (D&C 98:9–10.)

The Church maintains a policy of strict political neutrality, favoring no party or candidate, but every member should take an active part in the political process. We should study the issues and the candidates to be sure our votes are based on knowledge rather than hearsay. We need to pray for our public officials and ask the Lord to help them in making momentous decisions that affect us. Our beliefs regarding earthly governments and laws are summarized in section 134 of the Doctrine and Covenants and the twelfth article of faith. We should support public policy that coincides with these moral beliefs.

[David13]

durangout

All three of these "proofs" are false / incorrect. (sigh)

D
Have you not watched the videos? How do you explain that 3 buildings collapse in exactly the same manner, totally inconsistent with any other building I have ever seen collapse in a fire, from two different causes?
Have you ever watched a building on fire collapse?
Because it does not look anything like those 3 building collapses.
dc

[durangout]

All three of these "proofs" are false / incorrect. (sigh)

Really? Prove it.

You just said, in a way, that the Moon is made of blue cheese. But you gave no proof.

(sigh)

huh???

[larsenb]

14th Anniversary of 9/11 - Rethink September 11

rethink911.jpg (40.04 KiB) Viewed 4392 times

Schedule for Friday, September 11th, 2015
6:00 pm Toronto / 3:00 pm California – Introduction by Bev Collins
6:05 pm Toronto / 3:05 pm California / 12:05 AM Switzerland – Daniel Ganser
6:45 pm Toronto / 3:45 pm California – Anthony Hall: “9/11, Canada, and the Geopolitics of the World”
7:25 pm Toronto / 4:45 pm California – Barrie Zwicker: “Real Politik: Next Month’s Canadian Federal Election & 9/11”
8:05 pm Toronto / 5:25 pm California – Graeme MacQueen: “The War on Terror and the Intimidation of Legislatures in Canada and the U.S.”
8:45 pm Toronto / 6:05 pm California – Graeme MacQueen, Anthony Hall, & Barrie Zwicker Group Dialogue
9:25 pm Toronto / 6:45 pm California – Closing remarks by Bev Collins
14 Year Anniversary of 9/11

Rethink September 11

Schedule for Saturday, September 12th, 2015
Part 1
11:00 am Toronto / 8:00 am California – Introduction by Bev Collins
11:05 am Toronto / 8:05 am California – 12:05 am Japan – James Corbett: “The Financial Aspects and Cover-up of 9/11”
11:45 am Toronto / 8:45 am California – Kevin Ryan: “The Importance of the 9/11 Myth to Solving the 9/11 Crimes”
Part 2
4:00 pm Toronto / 1:00 pm California – Introduction by Bev Collins
4:05 pm Toronto / 1:05 pm California – Cynthia McKinney: “9/11, the Deep State, and the need for a Global Movement”
4:45 pm Toronto / 1:45 pm California – David Johnson: “The Vision for the 15th Anniversary of 9/11”
5:25 pm Toronto / 2:25 pm California – Closing remarks by Bev Collins

As the 14th anniversary of the events of September 11, 2001, approaches, a group of notable researchers will be presenting important information on Friday and Saturday, September 11th and 12th, 2015, about 9/11 and its relation to recent "terrorist" events in North America, and what the 9/11 Commission did not tell us. The events of 9/11 have caused many to raise considerable questions about what happened on that fateful day and how the events were used to justify wars of aggression that continue to destabilize the world.

The broadcast can be viewed on RethinkSeptember11.com from anywhere around the world and we encourage viewers to submit questions and comments in real-time using social media. The broadcast will feature personalities such as Kevin Ryan, Cynthia McKinney, Graeme MacQueen, Daniele Ganser, David Johnson, and James Corbett.

The RethinkSeptember11 team is requesting all concerned citizens to spread the word and to view the broadcast. Your support is appreciated!

https://rethinkseptember11.wordpress.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Jason]

bump...in memory of the day!

[Army Of Truth]

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/fourteen ... 911_092015" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

Great list! #8 and #9 are the smoking guns that no 9/11 "gov't story theorist" can ever answer.

[freedomforall]

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/fourteen ... 911_092015

Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

Great list! #8 and #9 are the smoking guns that no 9/11 "gov't story theorist" can ever answer.

Check it out. Building WTC 7 is still standing. The Solomon Building is WTC 7

Jane Standley speaks

The fall in slow motion

Ed Asner speaks out:

[LoveIsTruth]

This is Cute!

[larsenb]

Below is a video of the plenary session of the Nation of Islam conference called "The War on Islam: 9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed", at the Cobo Center in Detroit on February 18, 2017. The live-stream of this event was watched by more than 60,000 viewers.

It features 3 speakers: Dr. Kevin Barrett, an Islamic Studies scholar and author, RIchard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and Christopher Bollyn, a longstanding investigative journalist into 9/11 issues.

One point of interest of this presentation is the juxtaposition of Richard Gage and Christopher Bollyn on the same podium. Bollyn is known primarily for identifying the Mossad/Zionist connections to the events of 9/11 and the ramp-up of the "war on terra". You doubt the connection? Listen to his presentation.

[LoveIsTruth]

[truefreedom]

THREAD BUMP

[DreamTheater1976]

Great collection of truths and evidence. You really made it brief and straight to the point. I always been beyond impressed with Joel Skousens World Affairs Brief analysis but it takes probably weeks to go over. It's huge!
I was an early truther. Nope I wasn't popular for it.
I saw some controlled demolition when I lived in SLC just a few years after 9-11. Steve Jones videos had me totally convinced. I have known a great deal about the NWO and Agenda 21 since Bush Sr. was president. My neighbors were Skousens. My grandfather was very well informed. I was extremely critical of having another Bush in the white house.
I guess I saw the NWO coming full throttle. Especially after the Patriot Act and getting into another illegal war. Ever since 9-11 happened I thought of it being a collaborated effort.
19 years later a lot of people have woken up to a lot of things. But not to the Covid hoax where a buttload of freedom has been taken from is in a matter of days. Thanks for this brilliant collection you took the time to put up.

[truefreedom]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk

[Obeone]

I like the "no plane" theory now. It makes sense:

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/john-brennan ... in-towers/

https://rumble.com/v2jg0ii-john-brennan ... es-in.html