Yes. Even if there were jet fuel (which there was not), still it would not explain the free fall of the building for over 100 feet. Free fall, (32 feet/sec*sec) that was observed, can only occur if there was EXACTLY ZERO resistance to the falling body. (Hence the name "Free Fall"). Objects cannot fall through hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and steel reinforced concrete, as easily and as quickly as through EMPTY AIR.David13 wrote:On Building 7 it is possible that those windows were not blown out, but were broken out due to distortion of the building resulting from the imminent collapse of the building. But why the building would collapse in a free fall cannot be explained due to jet fuel burning, as there was no jet fuel in the building to burn, as was the case in the tower 1 & 2.
dc
The fact that we witnessed FREE FALL, as finally admitted even by the NIST, and almost perfectly symmetrical FREE FALL, means that ALL structural supports of the building were removed COMPLETELY, and almost SIMULTANEOUSLY.
The only thing that accomplishes this is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, not RANDOM office fires that CANNOT melt steel. Yet large quantities of molten metal (and molten concrete!) were found in the ruins of all three towers. This is byproduct of thermite, thermate, and nano-thermate, which were found in the dust.
The case cannot be refuted. The truth is as unconquerable as God.
And those who lie for the "good" of the state, will receive their reward in the day of judgment, from which the devil, the father of all lies, cannot save them, because he cannot save even himself.