jbalm wrote:This forum is getting the full court press from the Romney campaign these days.
You mean as opposed to the "Ron Paul or none" crowd?
Post by HeirofNumenor »
jbalm wrote:This forum is getting the full court press from the Romney campaign these days.
Post by Original_Intent »
True enough, but I am sure you are not supporting boting for evil to expedite the Lord's return? (I have heard that some "Christians" support the war in the middle east because they see it as necessary to fulfilling the end times and hastening the second coming - 'fraid they will have some 'splaining to do...)Fielding wrote:I think a vote for Soetoro will expedite the return of the Savior and spare us a drawn out ordeal.
Mosiah 29
26 Now it is not common that the voice of the people desireth anything contrary to that which is right; but it is common for the lesser part of the people to desire that which is not right; therefore this shall ye observe and make it your law—to do your business by the voice of the people.
27 And if the time comes that the voice of the people doth choose iniquity, then is the time that the judgments of God will come upon you; yea, then is the time he will visit you with great destruction even as he has hitherto visited this land.
Post by freedomforall »
Those who are guilty of attempting to hasten the Lord's return don't understand one thing...the Lord expects, expects his people to wait upon Him. Additionally, the gospel must go to all people around the globe prior to His coming, and we're far from that being fulfilled.Original_Intent wrote:True enough, but I am sure you are not supporting boting for evil to expedite the Lord's return? (I have heard that some "Christians" support the war in the middle east because they see it as necessary to fulfilling the end times and hastening the second coming - 'fraid they will have some 'splaining to do...)Fielding wrote:I think a vote for Soetoro will expedite the return of the Savior and spare us a drawn out ordeal.
Mosiah 29
26 Now it is not common that the voice of the people desireth anything contrary to that which is right; but it is common for the lesser part of the people to desire that which is not right; therefore this shall ye observe and make it your law—to do your business by the voice of the people.
27 And if the time comes that the voice of the people doth choose iniquity, then is the time that the judgments of God will come upon you; yea, then is the time he will visit you with great destruction even as he has hitherto visited this land.
Post by freedomforall »
Our right to vote has lessened. See, we're being controlled by government. This tactic is termed as "steering" which is illegal. We're being maneuvered and guided into a course of action that brings about a different result than we want. By eliminating the option to vote other than those running, we're forced to vote for the lesser of the evils...if we vote at all. Then the option to not vote is enhanced, which is not good because if good people do not vote for righteousness...the people mourn.linj2fly wrote:If you are planning a write-in vote, consider checking this map first, FWIW...
http://imgur.com/EF2bM
And what happens when the vote becomes so dilluted, nobody wins? It makes sense to have a winner and a loser.freedomfighter wrote:Our right to vote has lessened. See, we're being controlled by government. This tactic is termed as "steering" which is illegal. We're being maneuvered and guided into a course of action that brings about a different result than we want. By eliminating the option to vote other than those running, we're forced to vote for the lesser of the evils...if we vote at all. Then the option to not vote is enhanced, which is not good because if good people do not vote for righteousness...the people mourn.linj2fly wrote:If you are planning a write-in vote, consider checking this map first, FWIW...
http://imgur.com/EF2bM
Make sense?
I completely agree, ff. My post was not meant to discourage anyone from doing a write-in, but to merely to add information to the decision making. In '08, if I had known Oregon had a sore loser law, I probably would've voted for Chuck Baldwin instead of writing in RP.freedomfighter wrote:Our right to vote has lessened. See, we're being controlled by government. This tactic is termed as "steering" which is illegal. We're being maneuvered and guided into a course of action that brings about a different result than we want. By eliminating the option to vote other than those running, we're forced to vote for the lesser of the evils...if we vote at all. Then the option to not vote is enhanced, which is not good because if good people do not vote for righteousness...the people mourn.linj2fly wrote:If you are planning a write-in vote, consider checking this map first, FWIW...
http://imgur.com/EF2bM
Make sense?
Also, http://cg2012.org/about/will-christensen/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;mes5464 wrote:I am considering Will Christensen.
http://cg2012.org/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In studying Goode vs Johnson, they both had some things with which I disagreed, but I liked Johnson better. I searched for someone better and found Will Christensen.DrJones wrote:Also, http://cg2012.org/about/will-christensen/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;mes5464 wrote:I am considering Will Christensen.
http://cg2012.org/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Is Will on the ballot in Utah, Idaho, other states? or is he a write-in?
I understand that if one wishes to vote for Ron Paul, it must be as a write-in; correct?
Between the Libertarian and Constitutional party candidates and others, which one (do you find) represents best a "good and wise" man?
D&C 98:10 Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men ye should observe to uphold;
Post by Original_Intent »
I think what was said was that Ron Paul was our best option. I have noticed you tend to put words in the mouths of those you disagree with, and then argue against this false position - straw man.Andrew52 wrote:And what happens when the vote becomes so dilluted, nobody wins? It makes sense to have a winner and a loser.freedomfighter wrote:Our right to vote has lessened. See, we're being controlled by government. This tactic is termed as "steering" which is illegal. We're being maneuvered and guided into a course of action that brings about a different result than we want. By eliminating the option to vote other than those running, we're forced to vote for the lesser of the evils...if we vote at all. Then the option to not vote is enhanced, which is not good because if good people do not vote for righteousness...the people mourn.linj2fly wrote:If you are planning a write-in vote, consider checking this map first, FWIW...
http://imgur.com/EF2bM
Make sense?
Ron Paul ran on the republican platform, and he didn't make it. What about getting a candidate who has a possibility of winning in the 2 party race? Then perhaps you can make some progress! Running for president 3 times, unsuccessfully, is counter-productive.
Ron Paul,it was said , was the only man who could save this nation and constitution. It has now changed to Virgil Goode or Gary Johnson. The whole thing starts losing credibility. IMHO
Post by freedomforall »
From my research, and if I understand correctly, in most states the "sore loser law" doesn't apply to presidential candidates.linj2fly wrote:If you are planning a write-in vote, consider checking this map first, FWIW...
http://imgur.com/EF2bM
Post by freedomforall »
Ours is the responsibility to vote for someone we feel would uphold and defend the constitution. It makes no difference what their face looks like, which party they're in, or the ethnic background they have, only that they must be a US citizen.Andrew52 wrote:
And what happens when the vote becomes so dilluted, nobody wins? It makes sense to have a winner and a loser.
Ron Paul ran on the republican platform, and he didn't make it. What about getting a candidate who has a possibility of winning in the 2 party race? Then perhaps you can make some progress! Running for president 3 times, unsuccessfully, is counter-productive.
Ron Paul,it was said , was the only man who could save this nation and constitution. It has now changed to Virgil Goode or Gary Johnson. The whole thing starts losing credibility. IMHO
Post by freedomforall »
Thanks. I posted it because Wilford is one of my auntsisters.pritchet1 wrote:Well, I voted, but since it is a mail in ballot, it won't get counted until after the election. And no matter who I voted for, my state will go Obama with the Electoral College. Sad, isn't it?
BTW, I heard that if/when/perhaps Romney is voted in, that he will be in the same liberal Ward and High Priest Quorum that Harry Reid is the High Priest Group Leader of in WA DC. Isn't that a kick? =))
OH, and no matter who is "put in" as (puppet) President, their lives and family will be forfeit if they do not conform.
Oh, and Ron Paul lost the Primary in my state too. I still have my Constitution Course from Cleon Skousen, so Mitt hasn't asked for it from me yet either. Still hoping!
"Freedonfighter", Love your footer!
Post by jeanpierre »
But I really, really like his face. Thats counts, right?freedomfighter wrote:Ours is the responsibility to vote for someone we feel would uphold and defend the constitution. It makes no difference what their face looks like, which party they're in, or the ethnic background they have, only that they must be a US citizen.Andrew52 wrote:
And what happens when the vote becomes so dilluted, nobody wins? It makes sense to have a winner and a loser.
Ron Paul ran on the republican platform, and he didn't make it. What about getting a candidate who has a possibility of winning in the 2 party race? Then perhaps you can make some progress! Running for president 3 times, unsuccessfully, is counter-productive.
Ron Paul,it was said , was the only man who could save this nation and constitution. It has now changed to Virgil Goode or Gary Johnson. The whole thing starts losing credibility. IMHO
Post by freedomforall »
We can't discount the fact that he, Romney, could be directed by the Holy Ghost if called upon enough. I doubt BHO would have this opportunity so available to the true followers of Christ. If for no other reason MR could do some good in this country by seeking this guidance.pritchet1 wrote:Lucifer is also perceived as "handsome". More like "Gadianton the 2nd". I hope I'm wrong. I hope he reads and understands the Constitution - and upholds it. One can hope.
LDSFreedomForum.com and its admin / moderators do not necessarily agree with all content posted by users of this forum.
The views and content on this site reflect only the opinions and teachings of the authors of the respective content contained herein.