1 star should be appropriate for "History: Fiction or Science? "

This is the place where you can discuss things completely Off Topic.
Post Reply
sushi_chef
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3693
Location: tokyo, jpn

1 star should be appropriate for "History: Fiction or Science? "

Post by sushi_chef »

sushi_ guesstimates 1 star rate should be for the book "History: Fiction or Science? " ,

https://www.amazon.com/History-Fiction- ... 2913621058" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

its mentioned, "Expanding in our modern times on Prince Kropotkin’s and Sir Isaac Newton’s true timeline of human history, you should also know, is one of Russia’s most highly respected Doctor-Scientists, the globally acknowledge mathematical genius Anatoly Timofeyevich Fomenko, who with help from many others, including Garry Kimovich Kasparov (whom many consider to be the greatest chess player of all time), has written the astonishing 7-volume book series titled “History: Fiction or Science”—and that should anyone of you dare read it, will forever render you incapable of believing anyone in government, journalistic or religious authority ever again.
" http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2221.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

britain vs russia thing ===>> hegelian dialectic stuff
:-B

Matchmaker
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2266

Re: 1 star should be appropriate for "History: Fiction or Science? "

Post by Matchmaker »

sushi_chef wrote:sushi_ guesstimates 1 star rate should be for the book "History: Fiction or Science? " ,

https://www.amazon.com/History-Fiction- ... 2913621058" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

its mentioned, "Expanding in our modern times on Prince Kropotkin’s and Sir Isaac Newton’s true timeline of human history, you should also know, is one of Russia’s most highly respected Doctor-Scientists, the globally acknowledge mathematical genius Anatoly Timofeyevich Fomenko, who with help from many others, including Garry Kimovich Kasparov (whom many consider to be the greatest chess player of all time), has written the astonishing 7-volume book series titled “History: Fiction or Science”—and that should anyone of you dare read it, will forever render you incapable of believing anyone in government, journalistic or religious authority ever again.
" http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2221.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

britain vs russia thing ===>> hegelian dialectic stuff
:-B
Why did you rate it with only 1 star, Sushi? Isn't it as interesting and truthful as "The People's History of America" by Howard Zinn?

sushi_chef
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3693
Location: tokyo, jpn

Re: 1 star should be appropriate for "History: Fiction or Science? "

Post by sushi_chef »

urrrrrrrrr, the reason was one of the reviews(or other 1.0 star stuff) kinda alarmed sushi_, thought thats too much russian side propaganda,

"11 of 13 people found the following review helpful

1.0 out of 5 stars Pseudohistory at Its Worst, October 9, 2015 By Arch Stanton

This review is from: History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology, No. 1) (Paperback)

The only conspiracies here have to do with the number of insanely positive reviews. There are twenty(!) here where the reviewer only has one review to their name and it's a five-star review for this book. And more coming. Funny that. It's almost like somebody has set up multiple accounts and is trying to up the rating. Parallelism indeed. Two with no other reviews may be coincidence. But twenty? Very subtle. You might as....
"
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-revi ... 2913621058" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

as to zinns will/might check out the translation at local library....

https://search.yahoo.co.jp/search?ei=UT ... population" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:-B

Post Reply