When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Discuss political news items / current events.
Post Reply
msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

Can you identify the FBI agents involved in creating 911?


Why not?


http://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/f ... 14082.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Florida congressman denied access to censored pages from 9/11 report

12/29/2014 11:37 AM 12/29/2014
The U.S. House Intelligence Committee has denied a Florida congressman’s request for access to 28 classified pages from the 2002 report of Congress’ Joint Inquiry into the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Orlando, told BrowardBulldog.org he made his request at the suggestion of House colleagues who have read them as they consider whether to support a proposed resolution urging President Obama to open those long-censored pages to the public.

“Why was I denied? I have been instrumental in publicizing the Snowden revelations regarding pervasive domestic spying by the government and this is a petty means for the spying industrial complex to lash back,” Grayson said last week, referring to National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden.

Redacted on orders from then-President George W. Bush, the report says the 28 pages concern “specific sources of foreign support” for the 9/11 hijackers while they were in the U.S. Specifically, that is “the role of Saudi Arabia in funding 9/11,” according to former Florida Senator Bob Graham, who co-chaired the Joint Inquiry and helped write the 28 pages.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/f ... rylink=cpy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

taxpayer funded FBI agents are long overdue for their next
intermittent fear reenforcement terrorist event.

New Year's eve seems like a possible candidate
as FBI agents were happy with the live coverage
the Boston Marathon provided for their bomb blasts.

Did any smart criminal justice consumers pick up
on the shift from sophisticated explosions in
the 1993 1st World Trade Center bombing( amonuim nitrate truck bomb)
the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing( ammonium nitrate truck bomb
used as a diversion while satchel charges took down Murragh
Building)
the 911 Attack in 2001 where planes were used to distract
people from the controlled demolition of WTC Building 7 and the Twin Towers using nano theoretic explosives . a Drone took out the Pentagon
and the Anthrax was used to reenforce the fear level needed
to force Congress to pass the Patriot Act.
The Boston Marathon Bombing saw FBI agents depart
from their previous modus operandi using a crude pressure cooker
explosive.

many people like Dr Steven Jones saw through
the FBI Lie realizing when you are the law enforcement agency
creating -then investigating the terrorist even you created
allows for a terrorist event coverup.

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

see link for full story

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/arti ... aev-trial/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Truth Is Out There
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s trial is scheduled to begin in January in federal court—and could end with him being sentenced to death. Though Russ Baker believes the Tsarnaevs were involved in the marathon bombings, he has dire questions about the official narrative. Here are three of his toughest questions.




| January 2015

Did the FBI recruit or attempt to recruit Tamerlan as an informant or agent?

Baker’s evidence is far from conclusive, but he points out several suspicious and unexplained oddities. Officially, the FBI claims that it first investigated Tamerlan Tsarnaev after getting a tip from Russian intelligence that he was becoming radicalized. Yet, Baker notes, the New York Times has reported that Russian intelligence agents first contacted the U.S. government about Tamerlan in March 2011—and also that the FBI met with Tamerlan two months earlier, in January 2011. The reporter, veteran Times correspondent Eric Schmitt, told me he stands by the story and the timeline. Baker’s website asks: How did the FBI originally learn about the Tsarnaevs, if not from the Russians?

Baker also points out that, even though the FBI put Tamerlan on a watch list in 2011, he was allowed to travel to Dagestan and freely return to the United States in 2012. A flag placed on Tamerlan’s name by a U.S. customs official had expired by the time Tamerlan reentered the country.

Of course, Baker isn’t the only one asking the question. In October 2013, Senator Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican, wrote a letter to FBI Director James Comey—widely reported in the mainstream media—asking, “Other than Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s interview by [FBI] agents following the warning from Russia, has the FBI had any other contact with either of the brothers?” Comey’s response did not provide an answer. Grassley also asked Comey, “Did the FBI attempt to use the tactic of ‘recruitment’ or a sting operation with Tamerlan Tsarnaev? If not, why not?” Comey denied that the FBI had attempted to recruit Tamerlan, but did not elaborate.

Who killed MIT police officer Sean Collier?

A month after the bombings, under the headline “Boston MIT Cop Cover-up,” Baker compared Collier to J. D. Tippit, the Dallas police officer whose murder, just after the assassination of JFK, led to the arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald. “In both cases,” Baker wrote, “it was the killing of a police officer that turbocharged the police pursuit—and that, once the suspect was apprehended, convinced the public quickly that the police had their man.” Beyond that, similarities evaporate—yet the memory of Tippit haunts Baker’s theories on the Collier murder. Baker says the official motive given for the Tsarnaevs’ alleged killing of Collier—that they wanted his gun—doesn’t make sense, because no one took Collier’s gun. (The government claims the brothers tried to get the gun out of its holster but failed.) And Baker ascribes an ominous weight to evidence that the FBI was active around MIT’s campus before the chase for the Tsarnaev brothers began—including an October 2013 admission by the Massachusetts State Police and the Boston Police Department that “The Joint Terrorism Task Force was at M.I.T., located in Cambridge, MA, on April 18, 2013, on a matter unrelated to the Tsarnaev brothers.” Baker also cites three unnamed law enforcement officials who told the New York Times in April 2013 that surveillance-camera footage showed two people approaching Collier’s car from behind but did not show their faces. For Baker, these unexplained facts are enough to cast doubt on the official story that the Tsarnaevs killed Collier.

Why is the alleged carjacking victim, “Danny,” still anonymous?

“Danny” is the alias given to the anonymous Chinese immigrant who said the Tsarnaevs carjacked him. He also claimed that Tamerlan confessed to detonating the bombs and killing Collier.

Baker is critical of  Danny’s anonymity and his relationship to Northeastern University criminologist James Alan Fox, who has acted as an intermediary between Danny and the press. Baker calls Fox, who has publicly condemned the Tsarnaevs, “the least curious criminologist I remember encountering in a long time.” Fox, who regularly gives media interviews, tells me that he was asked to assume this role by Danny’s former academic adviser, a fellow Northeastern professor, who knew Fox by reputation. “It wasn’t because I was a criminologist,” he says. “It was because I have a good deal of experience dealing with the media.” Fox concedes that he is unaware of any other sensational case in which a key witness has remained anonymous, but says that question falls outside the scope of his expertise. He likens his role as Danny’s media gatekeeper to one that family members play in high-profile cases, adding that in this case, Danny’s family is in China. Throu

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

see link for full story


Government Admits It Was Only Behind Destruction Of North Tower
NEWS • Terrorism • Government • 911 • News • ISSUE 51•01 • Jan 6, 2015
http://www.theonion.com/articles/govern ... n-o,37699/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Newly declassified documents reveal plans by the Bush Administration and the Project for the New American Century to instill fear in Americans by “destroying the taller, more iconic tower” of the World Trade Center.

WASHINGTON—Saying they felt a duty to reveal what truly transpired on September 11, 2001, numerous high-ranking federal officials announced publicly Tuesday that the United States government was responsible for destroying just the North Tower of the World Trade Center.

Representatives from the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and half a dozen other government bureaus revealed at a morning press conference that they were responsible for the development, funding, and execution of a plan to take down 1 World Trade Center in New York’s Financial District. Describing their mission as an unqualified success, officials noted that the completion of their objective was followed 17 minutes later by a separate suicide attack on 2 World Trade Center by al-Qaeda operatives piloting a hijacked airliner.

“The American people deserve to know that, of the two towers that were brought down in Lower Manhattan on 9/11, only one was the target of the federal government,” said CIA spokesman Tom McLennan, emphasizing that their carefully guarded plot was a wholly independent event planned without any foreknowledge of the similar act of terrorism designed by al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden for the same day. “While we freely admit our culpability in striking the first building, let us be clear that we had no hand in destroying the other tower. In fact, that was just as shocking and devastating to us as it was to all American citizens.”

“Aside from our controlled implosion of Tower No. 1, we can assure the public that the September 11 attacks were carried out by Islamic radicals as part of their war against the West,” McLennan added.

According to recently declassified intelligence briefings and memos, FBI agents began making nighttime deliveries of thousands of pounds of RDX explosives to the World Trade Center in January 2001 as part of the first phase of what government officials dubbed Operation North Tower. Detailed schematics confirm that the charges were placed within Tower No. 1 according to an Army Corps of Engineers demolition plan designed to take down the 1,368-foot-tall skyscraper without damaging any of the surrounding structures, including the adjacent Tower No. 2.

In what they described as the most logical cover for their plan to bring down one of the Twin Towers, government officials then outlined their process of guiding a commercial airliner into the building via remote control. Military leaders assured American citizens that while they, in fact, had deployed a black-ops team to Boston’s Logan Airport the night of September 10, 2001 to plant the RC transponder on a single West Coast-bound flight, the aircraft that crashed into 2 World Trade Center the next morning was flown solely by jihadists about whom they had no prior knowledge.

The nation’s leaders also reiterated throughout the briefing that the Mossad agents who initially proposed the plan to the U.S. did not have any involvement in the attack on the South Tower either.

“By ordering NORAD to deactivate the nation’s air defenses on 9/11 we succeeded in clearing a path to Manhattan for our plane, but this apparently created a window of opportunity for five al-Qaeda operatives who, ostensibly, departed on another aircraft just a few minutes after our plane did,” said NSA officer Will Mason, adding that FAA leaders were instructed to delay reporting the radio-controlled airliner’s deviations from its flight path that morning, but immediately began panicking once they noticed the similar behavior of a second aircraft. “No one had any idea who was controlling that other plane. We were celebrating quite a bit after our successful strike, but when the second one hit it pretty much silenced the entire Pentagon Command Center.”

“Obviously, had we been aware that the South Tower was going to be hit, we would have given all Jewish workers advance notice to stay out of that building as well,” he added.

Officials then explained how, on that Tuesday morning, President George W. Bush was quietly informed by an aide during an elementary school appearance that the plan had been carried out with precision, only to be notified just minutes later that the United States was under attack.

“The scripts we had given every major news anchor were pretty much useless after that second impact,” said CIA agent Donald Macy, noting that the highly orchestrated misinformation campaign they had crafted over 10 months only made sense within the original context of one building being targeted. “After that point, any confusion was beyond our doing.”

“Overall, I would say the majority of the terror experienced by the nation that day was caused by somebody other than the U.S. government,” he continued. “We were only behind about half of that.”

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

msfreeh wrote:taxpayer funded FBI agents are long overdue for their next
intermittent fear reenforcement terrorist event.

New Year's eve seems like a possible candidate
as FBI agents were happy with the live coverage
the Boston Marathon provided for their bomb blasts.

Did any smart criminal justice consumers pick up
on the shift from sophisticated explosions in
the 1993 1st World Trade Center bombing( amonuim nitrate truck bomb)
the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing( ammonium nitrate truck bomb
used as a diversion while satchel charges took down Murragh
Building)
the 911 Attack in 2001 where planes were used to distract
people from the controlled demolition of WTC Building 7 and the Twin Towers using nano theoretic explosives . a Drone took out the Pentagon
and the Anthrax was used to reenforce the fear level needed
to force Congress to pass the Patriot Act.
The Boston Marathon Bombing saw FBI agents depart
from their previous modus operandi using a crude pressure cooker
explosive.

many people like Dr Steven Jones saw through
the FBI Lie realizing when you are the law enforcement agency
creating -then investigating the terrorist even you created
allows for a terrorist event coverup.


I was sharing the podium with Ross Gelbspan at the Boston
campus of the University of Massachusetts on April 19, 1995
discussing crimes committed by FBI agents when someone turned on
the television monitors showing live footage of the carnage of the
Oklahoma City bombing.
"Son of a bi**ch " I said to myself. I immediately sensed this was
a FBI False Flag Terrorist Event because several years ago I had read Committee of the States by Cheri Seymour.
The book detailed how incredibly easy it is for FBI agents to
organize a group of people to create a terrorist event.

Of course we now know that Timothy McVeigh
was the FBI decoy in the OKC bombing just like
the airliners flying into the twin towers during
911.

Since 911 investigative reporter Trevor Arronson
has written the sequel to Cheri Seymour's book.
Aaronson also shows how easy it is for FBI agents
to create false flag terrorist events.

You do know what to do?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/charlie-hebd ... d-cartoons" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Book | Trevor Aaronson
trevoraaronson.com/book/
The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI's Manufactured War on Terror shows how the FBI has, under the guise of engaging in counterterrorism since 9/11, built a ...


ISIS : A CIA Creation to Justify War Abroad and Repression at Home ...
vigilantcitizen.com/.../isis-cia-creation-justify-war-abroad-repression-home/
Oct 10, 2014 - Very soon afterwards, war against ISIS was declared, almost as if it had been planned for months. In an interview with USA Today, Ex-CIA ...
ImagesReport images
Image result for isis cia
Image result for isis cia
Image result for isis cia
More images for isis cia
Suspicions Run Deep in Iraq That CIA and the Islamic State Are United
http://www.nytimes.com/.../suspicions-r ... -islamic-s.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Sep 20, 2014 - Mr. Sadr publicly blamed the C.I.A. for creating the Islamic State in a ... The Islamic State, also known by the acronym ISIS, has conquered many ...
If you thought the Isis war couldn't get any worse, just wait for more ...
http://www.theguardian.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; › Opinion › CIA
Nov 17, 2014 - The Times cited the most well-known of CIA failures, including the ... and as the US airstrikes have reportedly led to Isis and al-Qaida reuniting, ...
​ISIS in Iraq stinks of CIA/NATO 'dirty war' op — RT Op-Edge - RT.com
rt.com/op-edge/168064-isis-terrorism-usa-cia-war/
Jun 24, 2014 - ISIS, as in the ancient Egyptian cult of the goddess of fertility and magic.
ISIS leader a confirmed CIA puppet - Hang The Bankers
http://www.hangthebankers.com/isis-lead ... ia-puppet/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Jul 21, 2014 - According a document recently released by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, now the Islamic ...
ISIS Domestic Terror Threat Created by CIA and U.S. Military Alex ...
http://www.infowars.com/isis-domestic-t ... u-s-milita.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Jun 19, 2014 - ISIS Domestic Terror Threat Created by CIA and U.S. Military. CIA facilitated 9/11 terrorist visa mill in Saudi Arabia. ISIS Domestic Terror Threat ...
Former CIA contractor: 'ISIS is a completely fabricated enemy and ...
topinfopost.com/.../isis-completely-fabricated-enemy-by-us-former-cia-con...
Sep 30, 2014 - Former CIA contractor Steven Kelley says that the ISIL terrorist group is a fabricated enemy and funded by the United States “This is a ...
MORE PROOF THAT ISIS IS CIA-MOSSAD - TomatoBubble.com
tomatobubble.com/id661.html
MORE PROOF THAT ISIS = CIA / MOSSAD. * If you haven't already done so, be sure to sign up for our FREE Report & FREE Up


Amazon.com: Committee of the States: Inside the Radical Right ...
http://www.amazon.com/Committee-States- ... 0962877204" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Rating: 3.3 - ‎4 reviews
A native Californian, born in Beverly Hills, California, Cheri Seymour has worked in advertising and journalism since 1964 when she went to work for the South ...
Committee of the States: inside the radical right Cheri Seymour ...
https://www.facebook.com/.../Committee. ... 9080812510.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Committee of the States: inside the radical right Cheri Seymour. 2 likes. Book.
Committee of the States: Inside the Radical Right by Cheri Seymour ...
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/committ ... 1000361054?.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Available in: Hardcover. FREE SHIPPING on orders of $25 or more. Committee of the States: Inside the Radical Right by Cheri Seymouon A

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

9/11 Congressional press conference tomorrow: Anthrax mailing suspect Adnan El-Shukrijumah, son of a salaried Saudi missionary, was at this Sarasota, FL home with his accomplice, 911 lead hijacker Mohammed Atta.

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 6, 2015

***

DXer says Adnan El-Shukrijumah

is the anthrax mailer

… on or about 9/13/2001, Adnan El-Shukrijumah phoned from KSM’s house to tell his mom he was coming to the US

Posted by Lew Weinstein on June 6, 2014

https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpr ... to-the-us/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Senate Torture Report: KSM wrote bin al-Shibh a letter referencing “Jafar the Pilot” and indicating that “Jafar” “ought to prepare himself” to smuggle himself from Mexico ; the letter was seized in September 2002
Posted by Lew Weinstein on December 10, 2014

https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpr ... r-was-sei/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In February 2003, the FBI announced that “Jafar the Pilot” (aka Adnan El-Shukrijumah) had entered the country sometime after September 1, 2001
Posted by Lew Weinstein on September 26, 2014

https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpr ... er-1-2001/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In Sarasota investigation, who was the person associated with the hijackers’ flight school who was discovered to have re-entered the country after 9/11?
Posted by Lew Weinstein on September 21, 2014

https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpr ... after-911/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Adnan El-Shukrijumah, Al Qaeda & anthrax, Mohammed Atta | 9 Comments »

* Senator Daschle in 2013 book: “To this day, authorities have not conclusively figured out who mailed those letters.”

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 5, 2015

daschle quote

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation | 10 Comments »

* “MONDAY PREVIEW: Mishap reports reveal lost and forgotten vials at Fort Detrick. Read the next part of the series in Tuesday’s Frederick News-Post.”

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 4, 2015

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

who will keep us safe from FBI agents

couple of reads


1.


FBI joins forces with other agencies to fight terrorism
In the wake of the attacks in Paris, the FBI is stepping up security across the country.

"Terrorism can occur anywhere. We've seen that self-ratification can bring the threat anywhere within the homeland or anywhere across the glove," Shane Utter, a Special Agent for the FBI said.

2.

TRENTADUE v. FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION - FindLaw
caselaw.findlaw.com › Caselaw › United States › US 10th Cir.
Jul 2, 2009 - In support of the motion, Mr. Trentadue submitted declarations by Nichols and Hammer. The court granted the motion over the FBI's objections.
Kenneth Michael Trentadue - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Michael_Trentadue
Trentadue's family maintains that he was murdered by the FBI themselves and that ... After being contacted by David Hammer, a convicted murderer who had ...
Ken Trentadue Murdered By Oklahoma
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_Trentadue.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Playlist: Jesse Trentadue on The Alex Jones Show"The OKC Cover Up"1-4 ... in Jesse Trentadue vs. the FBI, including Declarations by Nichols and Hammer
Oklahoma City Bombing - SpirituallySmart.Com Spiritually Smart
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/Oklahom ... mbing.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Apr 17, 2008 - OKC FBI Trentadue Release Informant Documents Marc. Trenatdue vs. ... Affidavit of David Paul Hammer FBI Involvement in OKC Bombing pdf.
Did the FBI Bury Oklahoma City Bombing Evidence? | Mother Jones
http://www.motherjones.com/.../trentadu ... g-evidence" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Jul 21, 2011 - It was then that Trentadue, a Salt Lake City lawyer, learned that his ... along with a federal inmate named David Paul Hammer, who said he had ...
Official Court Copies of Documents in Jesse Trentadue vs. the FBI ...
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/230 ... _docs.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Feb 23, 2007 - Official Court Copies of Documents in Jesse Trentadue vs. the FBI, including Declarations by Nichols and Hammer ...
Patrick Briley -- Three Military Provocateurs Used By FBI in OKC ...
newswithviews.com/Briley/Patrick34.htm
Nov 4, 2006 - In his new filing, Trentadue is now acting on behalf of Federal inmate Paul Hammer. Trentadue asserts in his filing that the FBI and Bureau of ...
ksl.com - Salt Lake Attorney Can Question Terry Nichols on Videotape
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=481&sid=1849765" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sep 22, 2007 - Trentadue is working a theory that Kenneth Trentadue was killed at the ... and Hammer could strengthen his legal demands for more FBI ...
PROOF OKC BOMBING WAS AN FBI/ATF BOMBING SPECIAL ...
beforeitsnews.com/.../proof-okc-bombing-was-an-fbiatf-bombing-special-o...
Jul 28, 2010 - OKC FBI Trentadue Release Informant Documents Marc. Trenatdue vs. ... Affidavit of David Paul Hammer FBI Involvement in OKC Bombing pdf.
Oklahoma City Bombing - Antiwar.com
antiwar.com/radio/category/oklahoma-city-bombing/feed/
He is currently working on a book about the FBI's infiltration of white supremacist ... Jesse Trentadue, attorney and brother of Kenneth Trentadue (who was ... and therefore didn't want an autopsy, Hammer's claim that FBI agents offered him a ...

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/N ... ICATES.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

TERRY NICHOLS IMPLICATES FBI INFORMANT IN BOMBING

Amazing New Evidence Emerges in Oklahoma Bombing


By Pat Shannan


A recent raid on the one-time home of Terry Nichols has uncovered more evidence implicating federal agents in the bombing of Oklahoma City’s Alfred P. Murrah Federal
Building on April 19, 1995.

A source has told AFP that bomb components discovered at the former home of the OKC bombing accomplice have been linked to a federal informant who investigators believe
lied during the trial of Timothy McVeigh, who was executed after his conviction in the bombing.

There are now serious allegations that the FBI, using an informer as a conduit, supplied McVeigh and Nichols with the blasting components the two used to construct explosive devices, one of which may have been employed in the tragic Oklahoma City bombing.

Although there was much recent media hoopla surrounding the March 31 FBI raid on Nichols’s vacant home in Herington, Kan., the entire story, which is not being told by the mainstream media, suggests evidence of federal government complicity in events leading up to the OKC tragedy.

While the media reported that previously undiscovered explosives were found on the raid at Nichols’s home, adding further fuel to widespread public belief that Nichols—and McVeigh—were solely responsible for the OKC bombing, there’s much more to the story than meets the eye.

In fact, AFP has learned that Nichols himself apparently leaked the information about the previously undiscovered cache in his Kansas home.

Why Nichols did so is the real story behind the story that the media seems to be keeping under wraps. Nichols’s apparent goal in sharing this information was to provide information not only to bust the man who allegedly supplied the material, an FBI informant named Roger Moore—Nichols being certain that Moore’s fingerprints would be on the material—but also to expose the FBI’s role in supplying Moore the material in
the first place.

Those familiar with the details of the case say Nichols has evidently come to conclude—as have many independent investigators—that he (Nichols) and McVeigh were being manipulated prior to the bombing by federal authorities in what was intended to be a “sting” the feds would use as “proof” of their skill in tackling domestic “terrorist threats” from “radical right wing extremists.”

However, it is believed, the sting went awry, possibly manipulated by others outside the loop, and the bombing occurred.

Now, in prison for life, Nichols evidently hopes to expose the role that Moore and his live-in girlfriend, Karen Anderson, played in the events.

Moore and Anderson gave testimony in the federal trial, helping to convict Nichols. But independent investigators have said all along—contradicting the FBI’s reliance on Moore and Anderson—that their testimony was obviously perjured.

The problem for Nichols, though, is that the record has shown that Moore was an admitted FBI informant as long as a decade ago and may be still protected.

Moore, a Royal, Ark. gun dealer, claimed to have been robbed by McVeigh and Nichols of some 66 guns, cash and gold coins in November 1994. The FBI and federal
prosecutors claimed that the proceeds were used to finance the OKC operation.

However, the defense team undermined that theory by producing a signed motel receipt proving McVeigh was in Akron, Ohio, on the date in question. This did not keep
either the prosecutors or the news media from repeating the robbery story. It is still widely believed.

Moore, who used the alias “Bob Miller,” according to Nichols, later changed his story and said that it definitely was not McVeigh and Nichols who had robbed him, but
he apparently was attempting to plant the opposite impression at the time. Townspeople remembered Moore going from barroom to barbershop the week of the alleged robbery, describing McVeigh and asking if anyone had seen him in the area.

At the time, Moore was a confidential informant for two FBI agents named Ross and Hayes, out of the Hot Springs office. The two were the same agents who discovered
the “stolen” guns in a sack behind the house trailer of Michael Fortier in Kingman, Ariz., a few days after the bombing.

Fortier was later implicated in the conspiracy and is serving a 20-year sentence.
AFP has learned that the FBI had the information as early as March 1. Agents had received this information purportedly from the mouth of Nichols through an oftused
informant named Gregory Scarpa, who is a convicted mobster serving a long stretch with Nichols in Florence, Colo.

At first, FBI officials scoffed at the idea, but then sent a polygraph expert to the prison on March 4. He concluded that Scarpa was lying.

Scarpa then called private investigators he had worked with in the past and, during a seven-hour meeting on March 10, showed a letter in Nichols’s handwriting attesting
to his claim.

Not trusting the FBI, the investigators worked through a contact, who had high-level Homeland Security connections.

Then, on March 11, Scarpa provided the authorities with the address of the house and detailed descriptions of the location of the explosives.

Nichols had allegedly told Scarpa that he hid this second cache 10 years ago to be used as a follow-up to the Oklahoma City blast.

On March 31, the FBI finally made its move—calling in the Topeka bomb squad, evacuating the immediate neighborhood, and cordoning off a three-block area.
They worked through the night and into the next day.

The FBI would not confirm that its agents found anything, but mainstream news organizations were told by Oklahoma City’s FBI office that explosive devices were
found. What little surfaced in a period of predictable news frenzy, was that the FBI was embarrassed for not having found this material 10 years ago.

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

Just retired very special FBI agent Dee McCown , a soldier in the Department of Justice Crime family calls out the Godfather Eric Holder. see

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/mu ... nistration" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Any good criminal justice consumer
will know Eric" bo jangles " Holder
as principal architect in the coverup of 911 and the Martin Luther King assassination.

see below

He earned his bones as an assistant
attorney general covering up the assassination of Martin Luther King by the FBI.

see
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mlks-family ... indicated/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


MLK's Family Feels Vindicated - CBS News
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mlks-family ... indicated/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Dec 8, 1999 - A cover-up following the assassination in Memphis in 1968 involved the ... Justice Department Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder says the ...


William Pepper Submits Legal Opinion in Support of Spanish ...
http://www.911truth.org/william-pepper- ... ort-of-spa.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
May 26, 2009 - 2004 Official Cover-Up Guide · 2007 911Truth.org Fact Sheet · July 2005 .... The lawyer of Martin Luther King's family contributes a thorough report to the ... A group of lawyers in the United States, led by William F. Pepper, the ... an ongoing investigation in the U.S. And the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, ...
Martin Luther King's Family: No Plans To Investigate Conspiracy
http://www.rense.com/politics5/king2.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Dec 10, 1999 - Martin Luther King Jr. was the victim of a murder conspiracy -- not a lone ... two weeks, Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder told a Washington news conference on Thursday. ... 'This was about money'; William Pepper, the Kings' lawyer, told ... Pepper, who also represented Ray for years, said a cover-up ...
December | 2008 | Radio Du Jour
https://radiodujour.wordpress.com/2008/12/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
... Obama's appointed attorney general Eric Holder in the coverup of Kenny's murder. ... family of Martin Luther King engaged an attorney and friend, Dr. William Pepper, ... William Pepper, attorney and friend of King, has conducted a thirty-year ...
MLK killer still at large thanks to Eric Holder - Rigorous Intuition
rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=31891&view...
Apr 26, 2011 - 1 post - ‎1 author
And that's what Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. — who has sometimes ... William F. Pepper, author of Orders to Kill: The Truth Behind the Murder of ... and government officials at every level helped perpetuate the cover-up.
King family finds justice in civil verdict | Online Athens
onlineathens.com/stories/121099/new_1210990025.shtml
Dec 10, 1999 - ATLANTA -- Three decades after Martin Luther King Jr. was struck down by an ... William Pepper, a lawyer who represented Ray and now represents the Kings, told ... Pepper asserted that a cover-up following the assassination involved ... Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder said the investigation is almost ...
Valerie Jarrett Key Player in Fast and Furious Cover-Up After Holder ...
http://www.judicialwatch.org/.../valeri ... cover-hold.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Oct 24, 2014 - Non-american types don't care about the Constitution or the bill of rights. ... Kind of ironic that you bring up Bush et. al. when it was Eric Holder's Justice ...... And MLK, Jr too, while Rep. Robert ...... Butter and pepper? or plain ?
A Conspiracy of Silence? - American Journalism Review
ajrarchive.org/Article.asp?id=246
Martin Luther King Jr. had been killed in a government plot--perhaps for good ... was going on," says King family attorney William F. Pepper, who had represented .... But Deputy Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said in an interview after the ...
William Pepper- An Act of State The Execution of MLK The Impious ...
impiousdigest.com/.../william-pepper-an-act-of-state-the-execution-of-mlk/
By Stew Webb Eric Holder leaves a vast legacy of failed opportunities. ... Dr. William F. Pepper details the actual events surrounding the assassination of Martin Luther King, ... RFK's Statement on the Assassination of Martin Luther King , Jr.
Memphis jury finds that a conspiracy led to Martin Luther King Jr.'s ...
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1999/12/king-d17.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Dec 17, 1999 - Attorney William Pepper, former lawyer of James Earl Ray, who was sentenced to ... Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder told the press that the

Search Results
9-11 Archive 2012 - Christopher Bollyn
http://www.bollyn.com/twin-failures-of- ... -and-the-t.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Aug 16, 2012 - ZIONIST AGENT AND U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL Eric H. Holder has ... were the most crucial (and prosecutable) parts of the 9-11 cover-up.
The Gatekeepers of Justice: Why 9-11 is Not Prosecuted
http://www.bollyn.com/the-gatekeepers-o ... rosecuted/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sep 21, 2013 - April 4, 2011 - U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder announces that the .... Chertoff was the key person in the 9-11 cover-up because he was ...
Outrageous coverup of 1995 OKC Bombing continues « Jon ...
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/.../ ... 1995-okc-b.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Jul 27, 2014 - 9/11 took that accusation to a whole new level: ... Eric Holder was involved in the planning and execution of OKC as he was in the fake Sandy ...
LiveLeak.com - Eric Holder and the FBI's 'Patriot Conspiracy ...
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=77e_1362753154" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Mar 8, 2013 - Eric Holder and the FBI's 'Patriot Conspiracy' (PATCON) Terror Program ... Tags: Oklahoma CIty bombing, FBI, Holder, coverup, inside job, Federal ... Is This 20- Year CIA Vet Crazy For Saying 9/11 Is a Probable Inside Job?
The Latest 9/11 NAZI Paperclip NSA Bush-Cheney-Clinton-Obama ...
http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/The ... lip-NSA-Bu.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Jun 2, 2014 - The Latest 9/11 NAZI Paperclip NSA Bush-Cheney-Clinton-Obama Cover ... along with Eric Holder, signed off on this transfer of VITAL 9/11 witnesses ... - Bush-Cheney-Clinton-Obama-Cover-Up-Continues_06-02-2014.html.
Daniel Bland's Open Letter to Eric Holder ... - 911Blogger.com
911blogger.com/.../daniel-bland’s-open-letter-eric-holder-america’s-attorne...
Oct 27, 2009 - Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States of America .... I appreciate your concern about the 9/11 crimes and coverup; I've offered this ...
Question: How 'Obama' together with the 'MSM' Cover-Up the ...
projectavalon.net › Forum › Project Avalon › News and Updates
Sep 26, 2014 - 8 posts - ‎4 authors
faint: Obama pays tribute to Eric Holder ... Gordon Duff has been releasing lately regarding 911 or even the recording Leo Wanta has of those 2 ...
COVER-UP! Obama Purges Staff To Prevent Investigations Into ...
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=12123" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nov 10, 2012 - The figure most linked with Fast and Furious, Eric Holder, will be gone. .... 7 Months On Obama Simply Ignores Benghazi 9/11/12 Muslim Terror ...
AG Eric Holder was responsible for 168 deaths in the 1995 ...
http://www.coachisright.com/ag-eric-hol ... s-in-1995-.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Dec 19, 2011 - To the chagrin of Eric Holder, the explosives were later discovered by ... http:// sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/12/eric-holders-cover-up-history.html ... Absolutely 9/11 MUST be looked in to, by independent citizens ...
Eric Holder Cancels Police Academy Speech After Protesters ...
http://www.tpnn.com/.../eric-holder-can ... r-proteste.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Apr 24, 2014 - Attorney General Eric Holder faces the House Judiciary committee ...... Aiding the cover up of 911 ... The Sandy Hook Black op and cover up.

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

Taxpayer funded FBI agents
take America off their intermittent fear
reenforcement schedule
with their Paris Terrorist attacks.

The floodgates are now open.
Expect increase in FBI directed terrorism in the USA.



This link opens up other links
website has changed from dot com. to dot org

http://whowhatwhy.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

On Monday: The Boston Bombing Trial Starts, But Answers Aren’t on the Docket (http://whowhatwhy.com/2015/01/05/boston ... nt-docket/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; by Russ Baker
The trial of accused Boston Marathon Bombing co-conspirator Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is starting, but answers about what really happened aren’t likely to be on the docket.

Also on Monday: Our Boston Marathon Bombing Trial News Feed (http://whowhatwhy.com/2015/01/05/whowha ... news-feed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; by The WhoWhatWhy Team
Stay updated with the latest from the trial of Boston Marathon Bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, reported by WhoWhatWhy’s team in and out of the courtroom.

On Tuesday: Why the Boston Marathon Bombing Suspect Is Silent (http://whowhatwhy.com/2015/01/06/boston ... ct-silent/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; by Lara Turner
If Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were imprisoned in any other country, he’d be described as being held incommunicado. But since he’s a terrorism suspect in America, he’s incarcerated under “Special Administrative Measures.” Here’s why that’s a much bigger threat to the truth than it sounds.

On Wednesday: The Latest from the Boston Bombing Trial: Our News Feed (http://owhatwhy.com/2015/01/07/whowhatw ... news-feed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; by the WhoWhatWhy Team
The first part of jury selection is finished in the trial of accused Boston Marathon Bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. Read on for Editor-in-Chief Russ Baker's commentary and analysis from his trip to Boston, as well as for courtroom updates from reporter Andy Thibault. It's your one-stop shop for news from what's shaping up to be the trial of the year.

On Thursday: Paris and Boston: That Other, Missing, Comparison (http://whowhatwhy.com/2015/01/08/paris- ... omparison/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; by Russ Baker
The attack on a Paris magazine by apparent Islamists prompted some in the media to compare it with the Boston Marathon Bombing. Russ Baker looks at a crucial similarity between the cases that’s missing from other accounts: the fact the security apparatus knew the alleged perpetrators very well.

On Friday: Boston Marathon Bombing Suspect's Alleged Boat Confession May Not Float (http://whowhatwhy.com/2015/01/09/boston ... not-float/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; by Lara Turner
Law enforcement leaks say accused Boston Marathon Bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev confessed to his role in the attack on two occasions. An open-and-shut case, right? Here’s why neither purported confession is likely to be part of the evidence against him in his ongoing trial.

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

FBI agents still not potty trained.

Leaking fear into the minds of dumb criminal justice
consumers, eh?

2. reads


1.

FBI reveals imam who inspired Charlie Hebdo terrorists was busted multiple times for soliciting prostitutes
Anwar al-Awlaki used prostitutes at least seven times in Washington D.C
The agency watched his movements between November 2001 and 2002
He met brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi while they trained in Yemen
Is believed to have spent in excess of $2,000 on hookers in the capital


12 January 2015

The radical American-born Muslim cleric who inspired the terrorists behind the Charlie Hebdo attacks spent thousands of dollars on prostitutes while travelling the United States.
Anwar al-Awlak used prostitutes at least seven times in the Washington D.C. area between November 2001 and February 2002, according to leaked FBI documents.
He met brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi as they trained in the deserts o


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z3OeXda46T" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

2.

FBI Agent Accused Of Paying For Potentially Underage Prostitutes
talkingpointsmemo.com/.../fbi-agent-accused-of-paying-for-potentially-un...
Sep 25, 2012 - An undercover FBI agent has been accused of using taxpayer money to pay for prostitutes in the Philippines for himself and the subjects of a ...
U.S. and the World - FBI Accused of Hiring Underage Prostitutes to ...
http://www.allgov.com/.../fbi-accused-o ... o-trap-gun.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Sep 25, 2012 - While pursuing gun traffickers in the Philippines, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used underage prostitutes to ensnare ...
Undercover FBI agent's conduct denounced at arms trafficking hearing
articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/17/local/la-me-fbi-misconduct-20130118
Jan 17, 2013 - An FBI agent is accused of using public funds to pay for prostitutes, ... was later raided by Filipino authorities for employing 19 underage girls.
FBI agent spent taxpayer funds on prostitutes, lawyer alleges - Los ...
articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/.../la-me-fbi-misconduct-complaint-2012092...
Sep 25, 2012 - An undercover FBI agent investigating weapons smuggling was ... at a club in the Philippines suspected of hiring underage sex workers.
Sergio Santiago Syjuco, FBI Agent, Accused Of Using Tax Dollars ...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.../sergi ... _n_1910821.." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Sep 24, 2012 - LOS ANGELES — An undercover FBI agent has been accused in court ... U.S. taxpayer dollars on prostitutes in the Philippines for himself and ... of sex trafficking were rescued, some of whom were underage girls, Littrell said.
FBI agent denies sex allegations in arms-smuggling probe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2944398/posts" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Oct 10, 2012 - An undercover FBI agent on a case of weapons smuggling from the ... was later raided by local authorities for employing underage prostitutes, alleging that ... FBI agent investigating weapon smuggling in the Philippines spent ...

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

-----------------------------------------------------------
http://us5.campaign-archive1.com/?u=84a ... 3ac8799/11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and Other Deep State Crimes Teleconference


** wtc7 pentagon
------------------------------------------------------------


** Draft Agenda for 7/29/15 Teleconference
------------------------------------------------------------



8pm
(ET)/5pm (PT) Teleconference # 1-218-895-6835 Access code: 9112001#

Greetings all,

As the campaign to declassify the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Intelligence Committee Inqury's report on 9/11 continues to gain steam, so does skepticism that the use of this information, once made public, may not be what is anticipated by 9/11 truth advocates, but rather the incitement of public enmity towards Saudi Arabia. We'll thrash out this thorny question in our concluding discussion of "JFK-9/11," which included several pertinent passages on this subject.

In a related vein, Dan Hennen has put together a series of questions regarding the role of Huffman Aviation (and its Saudi connections) that have received little attention in 9/11 research. He'll give us a summary to launch our discussion of this topic.

Wayne Coste met with some 11th hour censorship of his effort to make a presentation at the European Society for Engineering Education. He'll be on hand to give us a full report.

We hope you'll join us Wednesday night to stay abreast of these 9/11 Truth developments!

Peace,
Ken Freeland

DRAFT AGENDA:

I Roll call/minutes approval/agenda approval (5 min)

II Focused discussion: "JFK - 9/11: FIfty years of Deep State" [Continued from last month] with a focus on Saudi Arabia and the wider controversy surrounding the "28 pages" campaign (30 min)

III Questions about Saudi and other Deep State connections to Huffman Aviation [Dan Hennen] (20-30 min) [For a concise summary of these points click here (http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; .]

IV Censorship by European Society for Engineering Education [Wayne Coste] (10-15 min)

V Announcements

VI Any updates on issues of ongoing concern:

* HR 14 campaign
* New articles, books, and films
* The 9/11 Crash Test
* Cass Sunstein and cognitive infiltration, official statements on “conspiracy theorists”
* The MSM treatment of 9/11 Truth
* The 9/11 Consensus Panel
* The High-Rise Safety Initiative
* The 9/11 Memorial and Museum/VIrtual Walking Tour
* William Pepper’s efforts with AE911Truth against NIST and the Dept. of Commerce
* Deep State crimes in the news

ADJOURNMENT no later than 9:30 p EST.

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

FBI terrorists among us: 1993 WTC bombing

http://www.prisonplanet.com/fbi-terrori ... mbing.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Jon Rappoport
Prison Planet.com
July 30, 2014

There seems to be a rule: if a terror attack takes place and the FBI investigates it, things are never what they seem.

Federal attorney Andrew C McCarthy prosecuted the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing case. A review of his book, Willful Blindness, states:

“For the first time, McCarthy intimately reveals the real story behind the FBI’s inability to stop the first World Trade Center bombing even though the bureau had an undercover informant in the operation — the jihadists’ supposed bombmaker.

“In the first sentence of his hard-hitting account, the author sums up the lawyerly — but staggeringly incomprehensive — reason why the FBI pulled its informant out of the terrorist group even as plans were coming to a head on a major attack:

“’Think of the liability!’

“The first rule for government attorneys in counterintelligence in the 1990s was, McCarthy tells us, ‘Avoid accountable failure.’ Thus, when the situation demanded action, the feds copped a CYA posture, the first refuge of the bureaucrat.”

That’s a titanic accusation, coming from a former federal prosecutor.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Yes, the FBI had an informant inside the group that was planning the 1993 WTC bombing that eventually, on February 26, killed 6 people and injured 1042.

His name is Emad Salem, a former Egyptian Army officer. Present whereabouts unknown. Yanking Salem out of the group planning the Bombing was a devastating criminal act on the part of the FBI.

But there is more to the story.

On October 28, 1993, Ralph Blumenthal wrote a piece about Emad Salem for the New York Times: “Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast.” It began:

“Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer [Emad Salem] said after the blast.”

Continuing: “The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad A. Salem, should be used, the informer [Emad] said.”

The FBI called the “plan” off, but left the planners to their own devices. No “harmless powder.” Instead, real explosives.

The Times article goes on: “The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape recordings Mr. Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as in a far better position than previously known to foil the Feb. 26 bombing of New York City’s tallest towers.”

This is a shockingly strong opening for an article in the NY Times. It focuses on the testimony of the informant; it seems to take his side.

Several years after reporter Blumenthal wrote the above piece, I spoke with him and expressed my amazement at the revelations about the FBI—and wondered whether the Times had continued to investigate the scandal.

Blumenthal wasn’t pleased, to say the least. He said I misunderstood the article.

I mentioned the fact that Emad Salem wasn’t called as a prosecution witness in the 1993 WTC Bombing trial.

Of course, why would the Dept. of Justice bring Salem to the stand? Would they want him to blame the FBI for letting/abetting the Bombing?

Again, Blumenthal told me I “didn’t understand.” He became angry and that was the end of the conversation.

I remember thinking: Is there anything under the sun the FBI can be held accountable for…because letting the bomb plot go forward…what else do you need for a criminal prosecution of the Bureau?

Here is an excerpt from one of those tapes Emad Salem made when he was secretly bugging his own FBI handlers. On this phone call, he talks to his Bureau friend John. Others have claimed this is an agent named John Anticev. The conversation is taking place at some point after the 1993 WTC Bombing. The main topic is Salem’s fees for services rendered as an informant. He apparently wants more money. He also wants to make sure the Bureau will pay him what they’ve agreed to. During the conversation, Salem suddenly talks about the bomb. His English is broken, but his meaning is clear enough. When he finishes, his Bureau handler John just moves on without directly responding.

Salem: “…we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the DA and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful great case!”

According to Salem, there was a bomb, it was built under FBI and “DA” supervision, Salem himself built it, and it exploded.

Questions remain. Did Salem literally mean he built the bomb? Or was he claiming he successfully convinced others to build it? As a provocative agent for the FBI, did Salem foment the whole idea of the WTC attack and entrap those who were eventually convicted of the Bombing? Without his presence, would they have planned and carried out the assault? Was the truck bomb set off under the North Tower the only weapon? Were there other bombs? If so, who planted them?

But the role of the FBI is clear enough. They aided and abetted, and at the very least, permitted the 1993 attack on the Trade Towers.

The 1993, 1995 (Oklahoma), and 2001 bombings in the US were used to expand and justify the coercive power of the State over the population.

Needless to say, we are living with that legacy.

As well, we are living with a government which claims that people who question official scenarios are themselves potential terrorists.

As further evidence that terror attacks which the FBI investigates are not what they seem, the only accused bomber who got away in 1993 was Abdul Rahman Yasin.

A May 31, 2002, CBS News article comments on the fact that one of its “60 Minutes” stars, Lesley Stahl, had just interviewed Yasin in an Iraqi “facility.”

The article states, “Yasin was picked up by the FBI a few days after the [1993 WTC] bombing in an apartment in Jersey City, N.J., that he was sharing with his mother. He was so helpful and cooperative, giving the FBI names and addresses, that they released him…Yasin says he was even driven back home in an FBI car.”

Yasin flew to Iraq, lived for a year without interference, but then was placed in one of Saddam Hussein’s prisons.

The FBI released Yasin outright in the wake of the devastating WTC attack because he was so helpful?

If so, quite possibly, like Emad Salem, he was already on their payroll.

Finally, to complete the surreal picture, consider that Ralph Blumenthal’s shocking 1993 article in the NY Times about Salem, harmless powder, real explosives, the FBI pulling Salem out of the bomb plot and thus allowing it go forward…none of this prompted any major news outlet in America to launch its own investigation of these matters.

They simply parroted Blumenthal’s findings for a brief day, stepped back, and forgot about the whole business.

They moved on to other stories, other headlines, other distractions.

They let the FBI off the hook.

And the Department of Justice? They prosecuted no one at the FBI.

Pressing forward with an investigation, the NY Times could have made Watergate, by comparison, seem like a Sunday Boy Scout picnic. Over a period of months, they could have pried dozens of rats out of hiding places and gotten them to talk.

They could have expanded the scandal to tsunami proportions, and in the process, sold hundreds of millions newspapers.

But success, in those terms, isn’t part of the Times’ equation, or the equation of any major press outlet. They would rather shrink and drown in a sea of red ink.

They’re on the government and corporate team. They’re playing that game. Ultimately, they’re the “us” and everyone else is the “them”.

In this case, they had to stop the exposure, after letting Blumenthal off his leash for a day or two. They had to pull back and pretend nothing had happened.

The FBI wasn’t really guilty. Of course not, because if they were, the whole federal colossus might start to unravel, disintegrate, and fall into the Potomac.

This post originally appeared at http://www.nomorefakenews.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 at 5:40 am

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

----------------------------------------------------------
http://us5.campaign-archive1.com/?u=84a ... 3ac8799/11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and Other Deep State Crimes Teleconference
Draft minutes for July 29, 2015 Teleconference

August 5, 2015
Craig McKee, Secretary 9/11 Monthly Teleconference Call

**********************

Draft minutes for the Wed., July 29, 2015 regular conference call

Present were:

Ken Freeland, Teleconference facilitator, Houston 9/11 Truth
Craig McKee, Teleconference secretary, Truth and Shadows
Cat McGuire, 9/11 Truth Outreach
Bill Wilt, Congressional candidate in Massachusetts
Ned Delaney, 9/11 Grassroots
James Hufferd, 9/11 Grassroots
Cheryl Curtiss, Connecticut 9/11 Truth
Wayne Coste, 9/11 Truth Outreach
Les Jamieson, AE911Truth
Dave Schlesinger, 9/11 activist
Dan Hennan, AE911Truth
Barry Kissin, 9/11 researcher and activist
Betty Jennings, Houston 9/11 Truth
Tim Michael, 9/11 Truth Outreach
Sander Hicks, Author and 9/11 activist

The minutes of the June 2015 conference call were APPROVED

The agenda was APPROVED.

* Discussion of Florida connection


Dan Hennan led a discussion about the possible connection between the accused 9/11 hijackers, several Florida flight schools and intelligence activities having nothing to do with 9/11.

* Censored at conference


Wayne Coste explained how a paper he had co-written on 9/11 had been accepted by the European Society for Engineering Education (French acronym, SEFI) conference in France only to be withdrawn just before the conference began. Coste says a “Twitter storm” will be unleashed as early as Saturday to raise awareness about this act of censorship. Coste is asking other 9/11 activists to follow up by retweeting. For more details, go to http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage1 ... 63ac879and" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.censoredbysefi.org(" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

* Part 2 of book discussion


Last month’s discussion of the book JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State was concluded with primary focus on the effort to declassify the 28 pages.

*Cheryl Curtiss announced that she is interested in forming a study group to discuss the Truth Movement’s response to the 28 pages. Anyone interested can contact her at chercurt@aol.com (mailto:chercurt@aol.com)

Several books were recommended during the discussion, including The Star and the Sword by Wayne Madsen, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why he Died and Why it Matters by James Douglass, and House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World’s Two Most Powerful Dynasties by Craig Unger.

* Announcements


1. Dave Schlesinger mentioned the new 9/11-themed book by Victoria Alexander called Locus Amoenus is now available.
2. Les Jamieson talked some of the activities planned for New York City on Sept. 11, including a 9/11 symposium, the screening of a film by Firefighters for 9/11 Truth and a press conference at Ground Zero.


Call began at 8 p.m. EST and adjourned at 9:50 p.m. EST/5 p.m. to 6:50 p.m. PST

Audio of the July call can be heard here: http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage1 ... 63ac879The" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; next monthly teleconference will take place on August 26 at 8 p.m. EST, 5 p.m. PST. Please email agenda items for next call to facilitator Ken Freeland (diogenesquest@gmail.com) by August 22. Please use subject line “Agenda item for 911 Truth Teleconference.”

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

http://digwithin.net/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11
Posted on August 8, 2015 by Kevin Ryan

bush-pockets_3387322bAs the 14th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, it’s
important to remind people that we still don’t know what happened that
day. What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts
that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream
media. Here are fourteen.

An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was
produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret
from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome
of the investigation.
The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report
that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the
crimes.
One person, Shayna Steiger, issued 12 visas to the alleged
hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without
interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the
embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert
repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of
top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous
leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate
occasions.
Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing
documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the
9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to
the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over
just as Berger was trying to steal them.
The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed
several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military
by saying that the military had lied many times about its response.
The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a
specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the
attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD
commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his
job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11
Commission account is true).
A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This
was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says
fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s
tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part
by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to
discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of
WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse
while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her
in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes
and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was
that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course,
one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact
building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse.
Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the
collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official
account for how that happened.
Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years
before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact,
when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the
government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on
building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard
for how the first one was destroyed, indicat

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

FBI Evidence Proves Innocence of Accused Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
August 17, 2015


FBI Evidence Proves Innocence of Accused Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/08 ... -tsarnaev/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I have been contacted by attorney John Remington Graham, a member in good standing of the bar of the Minnesota Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. He informs me that acting in behalf of Maret Tsanaeva, the aunt of the accused Tsamaev brothers and a citizen of the Kyrgyz Republic where she is qualified to practice law, he has assisted her in filing with the US District Court in Boston a pro se motion, including an argument of amicus curiae, and an affidavit of Maret Tsarnaeva. The presiding judge has ordered that these documents be included in the formal record of the case so they will be publicly accessible. The documents are reproduced below.

The documents argue that on the basis of the evidence provided by the FBI, there is no basis for the indictment of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. The FBI’s evidence clearly concludes that the bomb was in a black knapsack, but the photographs used to establish Dzhokhar’s presence at the marathon show him with a white knapsack. Moreover, the knapsack lacks the heavy bulging appearance that a knapsack containing a bomb would have.

As readers know, I have been suspicious of the Boston Marathon Bombing from the beginning. It seems obvious that both Tsamaev brothers were intended to be killed in the alleged firefight with police, like the alleged perpetrators of the Charlie Hebdo affair in Paris. Convenient deaths in firefights are accepted as indications of guilt and solve the problem of trying innocent patsies.

In Dzhokhar’s case, his guilt was established not by evidence but by accusations, by the betrayal of his government-appointed public defender Judy Clarke who declared Dzhokhar’s guilt in her opening statement of her “defense,” by an alleged confession, evidence of which was never provided, written by Dzhokhar on a boat under which the badly wounded youth lay dying until discovered by the boat owner and hospitalized in critical condition. Following his conviction by his defense attorney, Dzhokhar allegedly confessed again in jihadist terms. As legal scholars have known for centuries, confessions are worthless as indicators of guilt.

Dzhokhar was not convicted on the basis of evidence.

In my questioning of John Remington Graham, I concluded that despite 48 years of active experience with criminal justice, both as a prosecuting attorney and defense attorney, he was shocked to his core by the legal malfeasance of the Tsarnaev case. As Graham is nearing the end of his career, he is willing to speak out, but he could not find a single attorney in the state of Massachusetts who would sponsor his appearance before the Federal District Court in Boston.

This tells me that fear of retribution has now extended its reach into the justice (sic) system and that the America that we knew where law was a shield of the people no longer exists.

Here is the Affidavit of Maret Tsarnaeva:

AFFIDAVIT OF MARET TSARNAEVA CONCERNING THE PROSECUTION OF DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV

Mindful that this affidavit may be filed or displayed as an offer of proof with her authorization in public proceedings contemplated by the laws of the United States of America, and in reliance upon Title 28 of the United States Code, Section 1746, Maret Tsarnaeva deposes and says:

I am the paternal aunt of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev who has been prosecuted before the United States District Court for Massachusetts upon indictment of a federal grand jury returned on June 27, 2013, for causing one of two explosions on Boylston Street in Boston on April 15, 2013. In the count for conspiracy, certain other overt acts of wrongdoing are mentioned. As I understand the indictment, if Dzhokhar did not carry and detonate an improvised explosive device or pressure-cooker bomb as alleged, all thirty counts fail, although perhaps some lingering questions, about which I offer no comment here, might remain for resolution, subject to guarantees of due process of law, within the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I am currently living in Grozny, the capital of Chechnya which is a republic within the Russian Federation. My academic training included full-time studies in a five-year program of the Law Faculty at the Kyrgyz State University, and I also hold the degree of master of laws (LL. M.), with focus on securities laws, granted by the University of Manitoba while I lived in Canada. I am qualified to practice law in Kyrgyzstan. I am fluent in Russian, Chechen, and English, and am familiar with other languages. I am prepared to testify under oath in public proceedings in the United States, if my expenses are paid, and if my personal safety and right of return to my home in Chechnya are adequately assured in advance.

Aside from other anomalies and other aspects of the case on which I make no comment here, I am aware of several photo exhibits, upon which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) relied, or of evidence which their crime laboratory has produced, and certain other reports or material. Together, these plainly show that Dzhokhar was not carrying a large, nylon, black backpack, including a white-rectangle marking at the top, and containing a heavy pressure- cooker bomb, shortly before explosions in Boston on April 15, 2013, as claimed by the FBI and as alleged in the indictment for both explosions. On the contrary, these photo exhibits show unmistakably that Dzhokhar was carrying over his right shoulder a primarily white backpack which was light in weight, and was not bulging or sagging as would have been evident if it contained a heavy pressure-cooker bomb. The only reasonable conclusion is that Dzhokhar was not responsible for either of the explosions in question.

On or about June 20-21, 2013, during their first trip to Russia, which lasted about ten days more or less, Judy Clarke and William Fick, lawyers from the federal public defender’s office in Boston, visited my brother Anzor Tsarnaev, and his wife Zubeidat, respectively the father and mother of Dzhokhar. The meeting was at the home of Dzhokhar’s parents in Makhachka which is in the republic of Dagestan adjacent to the republic of Chechnya, and about three hours’ drive from Grozny. My mother, my sister Malkan, and I were present at this meeting. Zubeidat speaks acceptable English. Mr. Fick is fluent in Russian.

Laying aside other details of the conversation on June 20-21, 2013, I wish to note the following:

— The lawyers from Boston strongly advised that Anzor and Zubeidat refrain from saying in public that Dzhokhar and his brother Tamerlan were not guilty. They warned that, if their advice were not followed, Dzhokhar’s life in custody near Boston would be more difficult;

— Mme Clarke and Mr. Fick also requested of Anzor and Zubeidat that they assist in influencing Dzhokhar to accept the legal representation of the federal public defender’s office in Boston. Mr. Fick revealed that Dzhokhar was refusing the services of the federal public defender’s office in Boston, and sending lawyers and staff away when they visited him in custody. In reaction to the suggestion of Mr. Fick, lively discussion followed;

— As Dzhokhar’s family, we expressed our concern that the federal public defender’s office in Boston was untrustworthy, and might not defend Dzhokhar properly, since they were paid by the government of the United States which was prosecuting him, as many believe for political reasons. Dzhokhar’s parents expressed willingness to engage independent counsel, since Dzhokhar did not trust his government-appointed lawyers. Mr. Fick reacted by saying that the government agents and lawyers would obstruct independent counsel;

— I proposed that Dzhokhar’s family hire independent counsel to work with the federal public defender’s office in order to assure proper and effective representation of Dzhokhar. Mr. Fick replied that, if independent counsel were hired by the family, the federal public defender’s office in Boston would withdraw;

— Mr. Fick then assured Anzor and Zubeidat that the United States Department of Justice had allotted $5 million to Dzhokhar’s defense, and that the federal public defender’s office in Boston intended to defend Dzhokhar properly. Zubeidat then and there said little concerning assurances of Mr. Fick. But for my part, I never believed that the federal public defender’s office in Boston ever intended to defend Dzhokhar as promised. And my impressions from what happened during the trial lead me to believe that the federal public defender’s office in Boston did not defend Dzhokhar competently and ethically.

In any event, I am aware that, following the meeting on June 20-21, 2013, Mme Clarke and Mr. Fick continued to spend time with Anzor and Zubeidat, and eventually persuaded Zubeidat to sign a typed letter in Russian to Dzhokhar, urging him to cooperate wholeheartedly with the federal public defender’s office in Boston. I am informed by my sister Malkan, that Zubeidat gave the letter to the public defenders, shortly before their departure from Russia on or about June 29, 2013, for delivery to Dzhokhar.

During subsequent trips Mme Clarke and Mr. Fick to see Dzhokhar’s parents in Makhachkala, the strategy for defending Dzhokhar was explained, as I learned from my sister Malkan. The public defender’s office in Boston intended to contend at trial, as actually has happened since, that Tamerlan, now deceased, was the mastermind of the crime, and that Dzhokhar was merely following his big brother. I was firmly opposed to this strategy as morally and legally wrong, because Dzhokhar is not guilty, as FBI-generated evidence shows. Some ill- feeling has since developed between myself and Dzhokhar’s parents over their acquiescence.

On or about June 19, 2014, during their visit to Grozny over nearly two weeks, three staff members from the public defender’s office in Boston visited my mother and sisters in Grozny. I am told that they also visited Dzhokhar’s parents in Makhachkala.

The personnel visiting my mother and sisters in Grozny on or about June 19, 2014, included one Charlene, who introduced herself as an independent investigator, working in and with the federal public defender’s office in Boston; another by the name of Jane, a social worker who claimed to have spoken with Dzhokhar; and a third, by the name of Olga, who was a Russian- English interpreter from New Jersey. They did not leave business cards, but stayed at the main hotel in Grozny, hence I presume that their surnames can be ascertained.

I was not present at the meeting in Grozny on or about June 19, 2014, but my sister Malkan, who was present, called me by telephone immediately after the meeting concluded. She revealed to me then the details of the conversation at the meeting. Malkan and I have since spoken about the visit on several occasions.

Malkan speaks Russian and Chechen and is willing to testify under oath in public proceedings in the United States through an interpreter in Russian, if her expenses are paid, and if her personal safety and right of return to her home in Chechnya are adequately assured in advance. She relates, and has authorized me to state for her that, during the conversation on June 19, 2014, in Grozny, Charlene the independent investigator stated flatly that the federal public defender’s office in Boston knew that Dzhokhar was not guilty as charged, and that their office was under enormous pressure from law enforcement agencies and high levels of the government of the United States not to resist conviction. [Remember what happened to Lynne Stewart, the federally appointed public defender who actually served her client. She was sentenced to prison.]

This affidavit is executed outside of the United States, but the foregoing account is true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and subject to the pains and penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States of America.

Given on this 17th day of April 2015.

/s/ Maret Tsarnaeva

Here is the Argument of Amicus Curiae:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ARGUMENT OF AMICUS CURIAE No. 13-CR-10200-GAO

MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT:

1. Federal jurisdiction: The constitutional authority of the United States cannot be extended to the prosecution of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in light of the opinion of the court in United States v. Lopez, 514 U. S. 549 (1995), and views of Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist, Ns. 17, 22, and 34 [Clinton Rossiter (ed.), Mentor edition by New American Library, New York, 1961, pp. 118, 143-144, and 209]. Congress has broad power to regulate commerce, including trade and the incidents of trade, but domestic crimes and use of weapons are generally reserved to the States. If there is sufficient evidence to prosecute Dzhokhar for murder and mayhem, he should and can be prosecuted exclusively by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Accordingly, amicus urges that the indictment now pending should be dismissed, and the conviction of her nephew Dzhokhar Tsarnaev of charges under several acts of Congress should be vacated.

2. The actual innocence of the accused: Laying aside misgivings of amicus and many others about of the “official” scenario concerning this case, as broadcast to the world by the government and mainstream news media of the United States, evidence generated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), confirmed on the judicial record of this cause, and clarified by the indictment, or suitable for judicial notice under Rule 201(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, conclusively proves that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev cannot be guilty of the crimes charged in this prosecution.

The formal indictment against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was returned on June 27, 2013. The document is 74 pages long, and accuses Mr. Tsarnaev (hereinafter called Dzhokhar) of heinous crimes, including many counts punishable by death. The central event for which Dzhokhar is alleged to have been responsible, according to the indictment, took place, on Boylston Street, in front of the Forum Restaurant, near the finish line of the Boston marathon on April 15, 2013. The most important paragraphs of the indictment are numbered 6, 7, and 24 (including several other paragraphs repeating expressly or by implication the substance thereof). Paragraphs 6-7, read in themselves and in context, state that, acting in concert withhis (now deceased) brother, Dzhokhar set down on the sidewalk and detonated one of two “black backpacks” which contained “improvised explosive devices,” these “constructed from pressure cookers, low explosive power, shrapnel, adhesive, and other materials.” Paragraph 24 clarifies that the black backpack carried, and containing the pressure-cooker bomb allegedly detonated by Dzhokhar, was placed in front of the Forum Restaurant and was associated with the second explosion. The indictment says in paragraph 6 that both bombs exploded at about 2:49 in the afternoon (Eastern time), and that the bombs Dzhokhar and his brother placed and detonated each killed at least one person, and wounded scores of others.

On the morning after the explosions, i. e., on April 16, 2013, Richard DesLauriers, special agent in charge of the FBI in Boston, made a public statement at a press conference, which is published in printed form on the FBI website and in the news media concerning the facts later set forth in the indictment. Mr. DesLauriers said, as paragraphs 6-7 of the indictment substantially confirm,

“. . . this morning, it was determined that both of the explosives were placed in a dark-colored nylon bag or backpack. The bag would have been heavy, because of the components believed to be in it.

“. . . we are asking that the public remain alert, and to alert us to the following activity . . . someone who appeared to be carrying an unusually heavy bag yesterday around the time of the blasts and in the vicinity of the blasts.”

The FBI also published on April 16, 2013, a crime lab photo of a bomb fragment found after the explosions This photo is reproduced as Tsarnaeva exhibit 1 in the appendix hereof, and is believed proper for judicial notice.

From this bomb fragment, the FBI crime lab was able to reconstruct the size, shape, and type of pressure cookers, as was reported on information published by the FBI to the nation on ABC News Nightline on April 16, 2013. A still-frame, taken from (about 01:39-01:54) of this ABC television report, is reproduced as Tsarnaeva exhibit 2 in the appendix hereof, and is offered for judicial notice. A larger segment of this ABC Nightline News report (at about 01:31-02:14) elaborates facts set forth in paragraphs 6-7 of the indictment, including reference to three of the four exhibits reproduced in the appendix hereof. Each of the pressure cookers in question was a Fagor, 6-quart model, marketed in or near Boston and elsewhere in the United States by Macey’s. Its external dimensions are probably about 81⁄2 inches in height, including cover, and about 9 inches in diameter. Stripped of hard plastic handles and filled with nails, bee bees, and other such metal, then prepared as a bomb, it would cause a bag carrying it to be, as observed by the FBI chief in Boston during his press conference on April 16, 2013, “unusually heavy.”

Again on April 16, 2013, the FBI published a crime lab photo, here reproduced as Tsarnaeva exhibit 3 in the appendix hereof, and showing a blown- out backpack which is said to have contained one of the bombs, — a black nylon bag with a characteristic white rectangle marking about 3 by 11⁄2 inches more or less as it appeared following the explosions the day before. This photo pictures the “dark colored nylon bag or backpack” which Mr. DesLauriers described in his press conference on the day after the explosions when he described what was carried by the guilty parties. It was one of the “black backpacks” referenced in paragraph 7 of the indictment. It is pictured in prosecution exhibit 26 which was introduced on the second day of the trial in this cause (day 28 on the transcript, March 5, 2015), showing that the bag or backpack in question was found on the street near the post box in front of the Forum Restaurant on Boylston Street, and, as previously noted, was associated with the second explosion on April 15, 2013, which, in paragraph 24 of the indictment, Dzhokhar is alleged to have detonated. This general impression is confirmed by defense exhibit 3090, showing a backpack with black exterior or covering, and introduced on the sixteenth day of the trial (day 42 on the transcript, March 31, 2015). Tsarnaeva exhibit 3 is also suitable for judicial notice.

On April 18, 2013, the FBI published a 29-second street video claimed to have been taken from Whiskey’s Steak House on Boylston Street at about 02:37- 38 o’clock in the afternoon (Eastern time), only minutes before the explosions on April 15, 2013. It definitively settles the principal question raised by the indictment and the plea of not guilty interposed against it. Part of this video is tucked into prosecution exhibit 22 introduced on the third day of the trial in this cause (day 29 on the transcript, March 9, 2015). From this street video, three still-frame photos have been extracted. Two of these still-frame photos were published by the FBI on April 18, 2013, on posters which were used to identify suspects. All three photos were published by CNN and the Associated Press on April 19, 2013. The third still-frame photo from this video is most telling, and is reproduced as Tsarnaeva exhibit 4 in the appendix hereof. As already noted, the FBI and the indictment have together affirmed that the culprits who detonated these explosions were carrying large, unusually heavy, black backpacks concealing pressure-cooker bombs; but, the third still-frame photo from the Whiskey’s Steak House video reproduced as Tsarnaeva exhibit 4, and drawn from a street video already used by the FBI to identify the suspects and acknowledged by the government in this prosecution, shows unmistakably that, shortly before the explosions, Dzhokhar was carrying a small-size, white* backpack over his right shoulder the same light in weight, not heavy laden, and displaying no sagging or bulging as would normally be evident if the bag identified contained a pressure-cooker bomb of the size and weight which the FBI has described.

(*For all practical purposes and to the naked eye, the color is white, although technical computer analysis suggests a very whitish shade of gray.)

Dzhokhar is not guilty of carrying and detonating a pressure-cooker bomb, as charged in the indictment, as is literally as obvious as the difference between black and white. There were and remain other suspects whose identities have been credibly suggested. See, e. g., Toni Cartalucci, Land Destroyer Report, April 19, 2013 (illustrated commentary entitled “‘Contractors’ Stood Near Bomb, Left Before Detonation.”). But here it is enough to reflect on the comment of Lord Acton that “historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility.” — J. Rufus Fears, Selected Writings of Lord Acton, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1985, Vol. 2, p. 383 (Letter to Mandell Creighton, April 5, 1887). Whatever is done in judicial proceedings, history will judge this case, as surely as history has judged other significant cases.

3. The grievance of amicus: It is impossible that federal prosecutors and counsel for the accused did not know of the exculpatory evidence which has just been identified and illustrated. Yet federal prosecutors went head without probable cause, as if decisive evidence of actual innocence, impossible to ignore in a diligent study of this case, did not exist, as is wholly unacceptable in light of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 at 86-87 (1963).

Moreover, in her opening statement at trial on March 4, 2015, as reflected in the fourth paragraph of the transcript of her comments, court-appointed counsel for the accused forcefully insisted that Dzhokhar was guilty of capital felonies, as is positively disproved by evidence generated by the FBI, reinforced by the indictment itself. She said,

“The government and the defense will agree about many things that happened during the week of April 15th, 2013. On Marathon Monday, Tamerlan Tsarnaev walked down Boylston Street with a backpack on his back, carrying a pressure cooker bomb, and put it down in front of Marathon Sports near the finish line of the Marathon. Jahar [i. e., Dzhokhar] Tsarnaev walked down Boylston Street with a backpack on his back carrying a pressure cooker bomb and placed it next to a tree in front of the Forum Restaurant. The explosions extinguished three lives.”

And in her summation to the jury on April 6, 2015, as the transcript shows, court-appointed counsel for the accused said nothing of the exculpatory evidence in this case. She did not even ask for a verdict of not guilty. She could hardly have done more to promote a conviction and the severest sentence possible, even though the third still-frame photo from the video at Whiskey’s Steak House, reproduced as Tsarnaeva exhibit 4, showed Dzhokhar carrying a white backpack, as alone was enough to defeat the indictment insofar as paragraph 7 thereof averred that the accused and his brother committed the principal acts of wrongdoing by carrying and setting down black backpacks. Such misconduct is altogether unacceptable in light of Strickland v. Washington, 446 U. S. 668 at 687- 688 (1984).

The misconduct of which amicus complains served to conceal decisive exculpatory evidence by legerdemain. Amicus urges not only that the death penalty may not be imposed in this case, for all three opinions in Herrera v. Collins, 506 U. S. 390 (1993), allow that the death penalty may not be constitutionally imposed where the accused is demonstrably innocent, but that sua sponte this court order a new trial with directions that new counsel for the accused be appointed, motivated to provide an authentic defense for Dzhokhar.

4. The corpus delicti: Paragraph 10 of the indictment recites a statement in the nature of a confession by Dzhokhar written on the inner walls of a boat in Watertown. But with respect to any and all evidence offered or treated as suggesting an extrajudicial admission of guilt in this case, amicus cites the penetrating observation by Sir William Blackstone in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, Edward Christian, London, 1765, Book IV, p. 357: “[E]ven in cases of felony at common law, [confessions] are the weakest and most suspicious of all testimony, ever liable to be obtained by artifice, false hopes, promises of favour, or menaces, seldom remembered accurately, or reported with due precision, and incapable in their nature of being disproved by other negative evidence.” Amicus and countless others suspect that the alleged confession in the boat was staged as artifice to suit the government’s case, and not authentic. But she stands on ancient wisdom which casts doubt on all extrajudicial confessions without adequate safeguards, including the rule that an extrajudicial confession is insufficient to convict, unless the corpus delicti be sufficiently proved up. The rule is defined with various degrees of rigor from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In federal courts, in any event, the corroboration required to sustain a confession or statement in the nature of a confession need only be independent, substantial, and reveal the words in question to be reasonably trustworthy, as appears, e. g., in Opper v. United States, 348 U. S. 84 (1954).

If such be the law here applicable, the required corroboration in this case must include evidence showing that Dzhokhar actually carried a large, heavy, black backpack on Boylston Street before the explosions on the afternoon on April 15, 2013, as claimed by the FBI and alleged in the indictment. Tsarnaeva exhibit 4, a product of investigation by the FBI, shows plainly that Dzhokhar did no such thing, hence no required corroboration has been established

5. Closing remarks: The views here expressed are not unique, but shared by good Americans, and others the world over. The undersigned and her sister Malkan are prepared to testify as expressed in the affidavit filed in support of the motion for leave to file a submission as amicus curiae. This argument is

Respectfully submitted,

May 15, 2015 /s/ Maret Tsarnaeva

Zhigulevskaya Str. 7, Apt. 4
364000 Grozny, Chechen Republic, RF Telephone: 011-7-938-899-1671

E-mail: marettsar@gmail.com 10

Of counsel:

John Remington Graham of the Minnesota Bar (#3664X) 180 Haut de la Paroisse
St-Agapit, Quebec G0S 1Z0 Canada
Telephone: 418-888-5049

E-mail: jrgraham@novicomfusion.com

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned certifies that this submission is consistent with the rules of this Court, that it is prepared in 14-point Times New Roman font, and that the bare text thereof consists of 2,331 words.

May 15, 2015 /s/ Maret Tsarnaeva

APPENDIX TSARNAEVA EXHIBIT 1

Appendix Tsarnaeva Exhibit 1

APPENDIX TSARNAEVA EXHIBIT 2

Appendix Tsarnaeva Exhibit 2

APPENDIX TSARNAEVA EXHIBIT 3

Appendix Tsarnaeva Exhibit 3

APPENDIX TSARNAEVA EXHIBIT 4

Appendix Tsarnaeva Exhibit 4

This is the communication I received from attorney John Remington Graham:

TO DR. PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS, GREETING :

Dear Sir, — By way of introduction. I have practiced criminal law for nearly forty-eight years, both prosecuting and defending, and served as a founding professor in an accredited law school in my native Minnesota. I have appeared as counsel before courts of record in sixteen jurisdictions, and have a background in forensic science and medicine. I can provide a résumé on request.

On March 25, 2015, while the trial was underway, I wrote and distributed a short opinion on the prosecution of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, accused of capital felonies in Boston on April 15, 2013 in United States v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, No. 13-CR-10200-GAO on the docket of the United States District Court for Massachusetts, commonly known as the “Boston marathon case”, or “the Boston bomber case”. I used eight photo exhibits to explain my conclusions that, as a matter of law, there was no probable cause to support the indictment, and that Mr. Tsanaev was plainly not guilty as charged. These views were shared by others reporting on the internet, but my opinion was meant to provide professional assurance to fellow citizens that, legally speaking, something was radically wrong with the prosecution. In fact there were then and still are a great many anomalies with the case.

The substance of the Boston marathon case, as I then saw it, and as I still see it, is that, on the day after the explosions on Boylston Street in Boston, the FBI crime lab determined from fragments at the crime scene, the FBI chief in Boston announced, and the indictment itself later confirmed that, shortly before the explosions, the culprits were carrying large, heavy-laden, black backpacks containing pressure cooker bombs. Two days later, the FBI chief in Boston stated publicly that the suspects were identified by a certain street surveillance video, which for some days was later displayed for public viewing on the FBI website. The video had been taken from Whiskey’s Steak House, and was used to create still-frame photos of Tamerlan Tsarnaev (the big brother, now deceased), and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (the little brother, later accused) as they walked up Boylson Street toward the finish line of the Boston marathon, shortly before the bombs went off. These two still frames were featured on posters distributed by the FBI in soliciting cooperation from the general public. But there is a third still-frame photo, taken from the same video, which shows unmistakably that Dzhokhar was carrying a small, light-weight, white backpack. The backpack carried by Dzhokhar was flat, and did not sag or bulge as would have been apparent if it contained a pressure cooker bomb filled with shrapnel as described in the indictment. This third still-frame photo was published by the major news media of the United States. I retrieved my first copy of this third still-frame photo from an internet report of CNN on April 19, 2015.

The bottom line is that the FBI’s own evidence eliminates Dzhokhar as a suspect, and conclusively proves he is not guilty as charged. This reality is literally as clear as the difference between black and white. The establishment press knew about it, and I cannot imagine how the federal prosecutors and counsel for the accused could not have known about it. So obvious was the actual innocence of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev that there was no need for a trial at all, because a good criminal defense lawyer could have taken the FBI information published the day after the explosions, the text of the indictment, and the third still-frame photo from the street surveillance video used by the FBI to identify suspects, and employed those items to support a pre-trial motion for dismissal of the indictment. I have on many occasions made such motions or seen such motions made by colleagues in federal courts, based on facts revealed by disclosures which prosecutors must and routinely do make available to counsel for the accused under a famous decision of the United States Supreme Court. And I have seen such motions granted on not a few occasions. Such practice is not uncommon, as I know from my own experience.

What was going on in Dzhokhar’s case? Why was there no motion to dismiss the indictment based on indisputable facts? Why was there a trial at all? Why did Judy Clarke, a big-time death-penalty lawyer appointed to defend Dzhokhar, admit to the jury in her opening statement that her client was guilty? She had decisive evidence that her client was not guilty. Why did she not use it, bring the case to an end, and thereby save her client’s life? In her final summation to the jury, Mme Clarke did not even ask for a verdict of not guilty. She made no mention of the exculpatory evidence generated by the FBI and mentioned in the indictment. Available were widely published photographs of possible paramilitary agents near the crime scene in Boston about the time of the explosions, carrying large, heavy-laden, black backpacks with characteristic markings which the FBI crime lab material revealed. But these persons with black backpacks were never investigated by the FBI. Why not?

I contacted Maret Tsarnaeva, the paternal aunt of Dzhokhar living in Chechnya which is part of the Russian Federation, a lawyer trained in the old Russian school of law in the Kyrgyz Republic which was once part of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, but has been independent since the conclusion of the former Cold War. A very bright and interesting woman Maret turned out to be, and, from the beginning, she maintained that her nephew was not guilty. My conversations with her over Skype led me to conclude that Judy Clarke and her colleagues in the federal public defender’s office in Boston could not stand up to the political pressure and thus threw the case instead of defending Dzhokhar.

Mme Tsarnaeva executed an affidavit on April 17, 2015, which explains events when representatives of the federal public defender’s office in Boston met with Dzhokhar’s family in Russia. For those interested in details, I attach a copy of her affidavit exactly as sent to me by Maret from Russia and later filed with the federal district court in Boston, except that the affidavit filed in the federal district court includes Maret’s original signature in Russian script which I can verify with my business records.

Maret hoped to call exculpatory evidence to the attention of the presiding judge, because Dzhokhar’s lawyers were not defending the accused and federal prosecutors were acting without probable cause. After diligent research on options was made, Maret decided to attempt an appearance before the federal district court in Boston as a friend of the court. She had to apply to the presiding judge for permission to appear in this capacity, and to make a motion asking the court to appointment me as her personal counsel for this purpose on special occasion. Normally, to be admitted to practice before the court on special occasion, I would need a motion from a member of the local bar. My paralegal assistant and I contacted many lawyers in Massachusetts. Some were sympathetic, but none dared to participate, lest their reputations be harmed. I had practiced before the federal district court in Boston some years previously, and then had no difficulty in securing the routine courtesy of a member of the local bar in sponsoring my appearance on special occasion. But not even the American Civil Liberties Union in Massachusetts dared to assist Maret or myself. I had to assist Maret in making an intervention pro se, representing herself, while she listed me as “of counsel” so as to signal that she was guided by a lawyer, and asked the presiding judge to admit me on special occasion without sponsoring motion of a member of the local bar, due to unusual circumstances. On instructions of court personnel, we could not proceed on the electronic record, and Maret’s pro se motion with supporting documents was served upon the federal district attorney and the federal public defender in paper and by registered mail, and the papers had to be filed with the office of the clerk of the federal district court, again in paper and regular postal service. But our task was accomplished by May 29, 2015.

For your convenience, I attach herewith the formal argument made by Maret Tsarnaeva acting pro se with my guidance, exactly as filed in the federal district court in Boston, except that the copy served and filed included the signature of Maret Tsarnaeva in Russian script, as I can demonstrate from my business records. We showed by text and exhibits, and by reference to the trial record and FBI-generated evidence that Dzhokhar cannot be guilty, because the FBI determined and the indictment alleged that the culprits carried black backpacks, but the FBI’s evidence showed that Dzhokhar was carrying a white backpack.

Maret expressed her grievances against the unethical misconduct of the federal prosecutors in proceeding when they knew they had no probable cause, and the unethical misconduct of court-appointed counsel in not defending in earnest. We enclosed the four most critical photo exhibits, including the results of the FBI crime lab investigation and the exculpatory third still-frame photo from the video used by the FBI to identify the culprits.

I am aware that many incredulous citizens cannot accept that the government of the United States would stage a show trial in Boston to convict an innocent young man and sentence him to death. But such events are not unusual in history. Judicial murder spoils the history of many nations. These incredulous citizens point to Dzhokhar’s alleged confession statements inside the boat in Watertown and at the time of sentencing. But contrary to the beliefs of the uninitiated, it has been clear from ancient times that confession statements are the weakest and most suspicious of all testimony, as is stated by legal scholars going back many centuries. Maret’s pro se argument cited Sir William Blackstone, from whom the founding fathers of the United States learned the law, for this truth. False confessions are very common, and result from fabrication, artifice, duress, unfounded hopes, attempts to curry favor, even brainwashing. Hence, going back centuries the law has struggled to develop safeguards against false confessions.

The intervention by Maret Tsarnaeva in behalf of her nephew in the Boston marathon case is significant because, although denying her motion to appear as a friend of the court, the presiding judge entered an order, which appears on the electronic record, is numbered 1469, and directs that her filings be maintained by the office of the clerk of the federal district court in Boston. These documents should be accessible to those wishing to see and read them. Therefore, it is a matter of public record, not merely a matter of internet protest or gossip, that the federal prosecutors, the court-appointed lawyers for the accused, and the presiding judge are all aware of the FBI’s own evidence which excludes Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as a suspect, and proves his actual innocence. It is also clear that the major news media of the United States, which orchestrated a false appearance that Dzhokhar was guilty of heinous crimes, and called for his execution, were aware that he was not guilty. They knew, as the report of CNN four days after marathon Monday makes plain, that Dzhokhar was in fact carrying a small, light-weight, white backpack, and that the government’s own evidence shows that the culprits, whoever they were, carried large, heavy-laden, black backpacks.

John Remington Graham of the Minnesota Bar (#3664X)

37

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West and How America Was Lost.
Newsletter Notifications Signup Form

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

Note the revised agenda for Wednesday night tele conference
Starts at 8 pm

Revised Draft Agenda for 8/26/15 Teleconference

8pm (ET)/5pm (PT) Teleconference # 1-218-895-6835 Access code: 9112001#

Greetings all,

I’m excited to report that thanks to a last-minute effort by Larry Zanino we’ll be joined on our teleconference this Wednesday evening by attorney John Remington (Jack) Graham, who will give us a brief overview of and update on the “Boston Bombing” legal case in which he is acting as counsel, assisting Maret Tsarnaeva, Russian aunt of the accused, in showing that the FBI’s own evidence, concealed by the court, counsel for both sides and the major media, shows decisively that the accused is not guilty! Most in the Truth community have come to regard that Boston event as a false flag operation, and even those who haven’t recognize the miscarriage of justice represented by the prosecution of this case thus far. After Jack’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions (which many of us are likely to have, as mainstream media reporting of this trial has been skewed and spotty, to say the least!). Jack Graham, of course, is no stranger to the 9/11 truth movement — he provided invaluable assistance to AE911Truth’s earlier appeal to the Manhattan D.A. to launch a grand jury investigation of 9/11. We hope you’ll join us to help welcome our distinguished guest!

And speaking of false flag operations, we are Charlie Hebdo — NOT! says Kevin Barrett, fresh off his book tour for his latest tome We are Not Charlie Hebdo. Kevin will join us Wednesday night to offer an overview of the Hebdo operation, helping to expand our awareness of the ubiquity of Deep State operations in current events. Why does the book cover pictured at right read “banned in Canada?” Presumably he’ll explain that too!

In other news

Boing Boing
FBi kept files on Ray Bradbury: “Definitely slanted against the United States”

By Cory Doctorow at 6:16 am Mon, Aug 24, 2015

https://boingboing.net/2015/08/24/fbi-k ... dbury.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Michael from Muckrock writes, “The FBI followed Ray Bradbury’s career very closely, in part because an informant warned them that his writing was not enjoyable fantasy, but rather tantamount to psychological warfare.”

“The general aim of these science fiction writers is to frighten the people into a state of paralysis or psychological incompetence

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

http://tns.thenews.com.pk/the-plot-thic ... eNswxrD9Dt" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://prisonwatchnetwork.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


http://www.vindy.com/news/2015/aug/27/v ... ks-ohio-c/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bonus story
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/08 ... nton-data/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

MI6 Spy Found Dead in Bag in Bath Had Hacked Clinton Data

... been the subject of investigation by the U.S. Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI). ... And a rival agent may also have broken into
the flat to destroy or remove ...



http://www.knoxnews.com/news/local-news ... e_87077414" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Oak Ridge counterintelligence officer on leave pending death probe
Frank Munger
6:35 PM, Aug 26, 2015

A counterintelligence officer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory has
been placed on administrative leave while authorities investigate the
Aug. 2 violent death of his Irish son-in-law in Davidson County, N.C.

David Keim, communications director at ORNL, confirmed that Thomas
Martens is on leave with pay "while this investigation continues."

Martens, a former FBI agent, was present at the Wallburg, N.C., home
when 39-year-old Jason Corbett — husband of Martens' daughter, Molly
Martens Corbett — was fatally beaten with a baseball bat.

David Freedman, a Winston-Salem attorney representing

1.

http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Lawy ... 467880.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Lawyer: Feds spent lavishly wining and dining ‘Shrimp Boy’ Chow

Wednesday, August 26, 2015




Investigators say Chow is the
leader and the dragonhead of one of the most powerful Asian gangs in
North America. Chow's gang is said to have lured state Sen. Leland Yee
into its clutches through money and campaign contributions in exchange
for legislative help, as Yee sought to build his campaign coffers to
run for California secretary of state. Born in Hong Kong in 1960, Chow
came to the United States at 16 and was reportedly nicknamed "Shrimp
Boy" by his grandmother, in part due to his small stature


Wednesday Mar. 26, 2014. The FBI raids State Sen.
Leland Yee's office in Sacramento and other locations were searched by
the FBI in San Francisco. He was reportedly arrested on public
corruption charges Wednesday morning amid raids of his office in
Sacramento and searches by the FBI in San Francisco.

Federal agents spent over $1 million during their investigation of
alleged racketeering by an organization in San Francisco’s Chinatown,
much of it plying their suspects with food and drink at fancy hotels
and restaurants, a defense lawyer said in a court filing Wednesday.
The expenses were disclosed in evidence provided by prosecutors in the
case against Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow and two dozen others charged
after a five-year undercover investigation, said an attorney for
defendant Leslie Yun, an Oakland woman charged with racketeering,
money laundering and drug dealing.
A “large percentage”’ of the out-of-pocket costs, tabulated by the FBI
at $1.088 million as of June, was devoted to “undercover agents
staying in luxury accommodations and taking Chow and others to
expensive restaurants where the government agents wined and dined
their ... guests on the public trough,” said defense lawyer Dennis
Riordan.
The lead agent in the investigation, Riordan said, took Chow and his
colleagues to the Fairmont, Four Seasons and Ritz Carlton hotels and
to Morton’s Steakhouse, the 5A5 Steakhouse, the Ozumo Restaurant and
the Starlight Room in San Francisco, and to the Wynn Hotel in Las
Vegas, among other places. Counting personnel costs and other
expenses, Riordan said, the government’s costs would be “multiple
times larger” than $1 million.
Such expenditures do not prove prosecution wrongdoing or undermine the
charges against Chow and Yun. But Riordan said they help to show that
the alleged crimes were manufactured by the government.




2.




AP sues over FBI ploy involving fake news story



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08 ... ews-story/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



In a November opinion piece in the New York Times, FBI Director James
Comey revealed that an undercover FBI agent had also impersonated an
AP reporter, ...




3.



http://m.citizensvoice.com/news/fbi-exp ... -1.1932708" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



FBI expert: Donahue’s prints on gun

Published: August 26, 2015
WILKES-BARRE — A fingerprint belonging to convicted fraudster Joseph
Donahue showed up during tests on the gun federal agents found in his
getaway car, but so did an FBI agent’s fingerprint, according to
testimony during his latest trial Wednesday.

FBI fingerprint expert Shelley Sine’s testimony bolstered the
prosecution case against Donahue, who is on trial in federal court on
charges of illegally transporting the gun, a .40-caliber Glock 27,
across state lines and fleeing when his prison report date on his
fraud conviction arrived.

Sine said she found Donahue’s fingerprint on the gun’s slide, which
wraps around the barrel, but she also found a left thumb print from
FBI agent Daniel Sarkozy, who helped process the gun into evidence
after it was found. That could play into a defense theory that a
federal agent planted the gun in the car.

Under cross-examination by defense attorney William Ruzzo, Sine agreed
Sarkozy was careless.

“He should have been wearing gloves,” Sine testified.

Sarkozy testified his fingerprint on the gun was an honest mistake.

“It’s possible that I was wearing a glove on one hand, not wearing two
gloves,” he said.

Under direct questioning by Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd K. Hinkley,
Sarkozy denied planting the gun and said he never heard of Donahue
before now. He also said he doesn’t know Assistant U.S. Attorney
Gordon Zubrod or FBI agents Michael Baumgartner or April Phillips.
Ruzzo has suggested Zubrod bears an “ill will and bias” and implied
someone planted the gun or an ammunition clip in Donahue’s car. Part
of the alleged bias stems from Donahue’s exposure of an embarrassing
federal courthouse episode involving Baumgartner. Phillips helped
assembled the case against Donahue after he was caught Jan. 20, 2011,
in Las Cruces, New Mexico, 16 days after failing to report to begin
his prison sentence. Donahue was sentenced to 10 years and one month
in prison a month


4.

http://humanevents.com/2015/08/27/bombs ... ick-renzi/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Bombshell: New Evidence Reveals Prosecutor Corruption in Trial Against
Imprisoned Former Congressman Rick Renzi
Rachel Alexander | Thursday Aug 27, 2015 8:22 AM



Prosecutors in the U.S. Department of Justice are finally being called
out for singling out Republican politicians and others they dislike.
One of the victims of gross over prosecution was former Congressman
Rick Renzi. As a Republican representing a swing district in Arizona,
he was a juicy target to take down. A scandal was concocted to tarnish
him and hence Republicans, paving the way for a Democrat to replace
him, which happened. The DOJ prosecuted Renzi over a “land swap,”
language that sounds vaguely unethical but there was nothing remotely
unethical or illegal about the particular deal even had he gone
through with it, and he would not have received any financial profit,
as I explained in my previous article. The exchange of land merely
benefited the government and the neighboring Fort Huachuca military
base.

Renzi began serving a three-year prison sentence in February, but new
evidence has recently emerged that will likely exonerate him. His
attorneys were just informed that two FBI agents advised the
prosecution’s key witness Philip Aries “on numerous occasions” that he
would receive a monetary award for testifying at trial against Renzi.
Since the trial, Aries has twice asked the government about collecting
his reward. Aries was in financial trouble in 2007 and filed
bankruptcy in 2010 — clearly someone with a strong financial incentive
to testify against Renzi. Aries has even admitted that he “always
tried to be helpful” to the government.


The government never bothered to disclose any of this to Renzi until
April of this year, well after the trial had ended and Renzi had tried
to appeal. In fact, the prosecution solicited testimony during trial
from Aries indicating the opposite, that he had no financial stake in
the trial. Not disclosing evidence favorable to the defendant
constitutes a Brady violation, a requirement made into law in the 1963
case Brady v. Maryland.

Aries was one of two buyers interested in purchasing some land that
desperately needed to be bought out, an alfalfa farm that was
overusing water on land located in an area suffering from a water
shortage. Aries secretly recorded himself for the government and
called Renzi, where he is heard admitting that he suggested the
purchase, not Renzi. Additionally, newly produced FBI interview notes
establish now that Aries originally told the FBI it was a woman named
Joanne Keene, not Renzi, who first suggested adding certain property
to his land-exchange proposal. Shortly after Aries learned he would be
eligib

5.


News > Latin America
'Latin America's Bin Laden' Hospitalized in Miami Car Accident

Luis Posada Carriles has reportedly sustained serious injuries from a
car accident. | Photo: Archive
Previous
Next
Published 30 August 2015 (6 hours 26 minutes ago)
Trained by the U.S. Army at Ft. Benning, Posada Carriles has been
directly linked a number of terrorist bombing attacks in declassified
CIA documents.
Luis Posada Carriles, a notorious opponent of the Cuban government who
has been linked with various terrorist attacks, was seriously injured
in a car accident last Thursday in Miami.
Posada Carriles, 87, was hospitalizaed after suffering a broken
clavicle along with three fractured ribs, according to local media
reports.
The Cuban national served as a former police officer under the
dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista who became a CIA agent,
participating in the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. Posada Carriles, who
was trained by the U.S. Army at Ft. Benning in the 1960’s, has been
directly linked to the bombing attack in declassified CIA and FBI
documents.
He is currently wanted on extradition charges by Cuban officials for
his role in the 1976 Cuban airliner bombing, which killed 73 people
including Cuba’s fencing team.
The 1976 bombing, which represented the first act of air terrorism to
occur on the American continent, also involved members from the Cuban
exile organization, the Coordination of United Revolutionary
Organizations, which the FBI categorized as a “terrorist”
organization.
The U.S. government also possess sufficient evidence to charge Posada
with a 1997 hotel bombings in Havana that killed an Italian tourist,
Fabio di Celmo.
During an 1998 interview with the New York Times, Posada Carriles
boasted that he had committed the greatest number of terrorist acts
against Cuba, and clai

This content was originally published by teleSUR at the following
address:
"http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/L ... -0006.html".
If you intend to use it, please cite the source and provide a link to
the original article. http://www.teleSURtv.net/english" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:ymcowboy:

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

http://farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/Myst ... rgets.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

see link for full story

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/ ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Florida prosecutor says FBI agent’s troubled past doesn’t change shooting findings





SEPTEMBER 04, 2015
A Florida prosecutor who cleared a Boston FBI agent in the fatal shooting of a friend of Tamerlan Tsarnaev has ruled that the agent’s troubled past does not change his 2014 finding that the homicide was justified.

Prosecutor Jeffrey L. Ashton has admitted that he did not know about prior allegations of misconduct against FBI agent Aaron McFarlane while he was investigating the 2013 shooting of Ibragim Todashev in Orlando. After the Globe reported the allegations last year, the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Florida demanded that Ashton reopen the probe.


In a May 18 letter, which was released Thursday, Ashton said he dispatched his chief investigator, Eric Edwards, to Washington and Boston last year to examine the disciplinary records of McFarlane and the two Massachusetts State Police troopers who interrogated Todashev that night in May 2013, just weeks after the Boston Marathon bombings. He said he also examined the records the FBI used to hire McFarlane.

“I concur in his assessment that there is nothing contained in those disciplinary files which would change my previous assessment that the agent(s) involved used lawful deadly force in their encounter with” Todashev, Ashton said in the letter.

Ashton concluded in March 2014 that McFarlane shot Todashev in self-defense after the 27-year-old mixed martial-arts fighter attacked him and a state trooper after hours of interrogations in Todashev’s apartment. His report said Todashev had confessed to being involved with Tsarnaev in a 2011 triple homicide in Waltham.

FBI and State Police investigators had contacted Todashev after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings that killed three people and injured over 260 others.

His friend Tamerlan Tsarnaev died during a police firefight days after the bombings, but in April a federal jury convicted Dzhokhar Tsarnaev of carrying out th

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

see link for photos of dead corpse

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/05 ... blows.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

JAMES FETZER
EXPOSING FALSEHOODS AND REVEALING TRUTHS

TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2015

THEY DIDN'T DO IT! Maret Tsarnaev blows apart the Boston Show Trial
by Jim Fetzer (with Maret Tsarnaeva)

As a retired university professor, former Marine Corps officer and journalist for veteranstoday.com, I have published several articles about the Boston bombing. Given my understanding that defense attorneys have an ethical obligation to provide clients with a vigorous defense, I have been stunned that Judy Clarke, the attorney of record for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, has said that Dzhokhar did it, when there is a superabundance of evidence that this was a drill and that neither he nor his brother were involved.



Here is an update of the evidence in the case, including police on bullhorns announcing, "This is a drill! This is a drill!", tweets from The Boston Globe explaining that a demonstration bomb will be set of as part of bomb squad activities and a second announcing one will be set off in one minute in front of the library (where it goes of as predicted), an absence of blood which only shows up on a delayed basis (and is not real blood but Hollywood blood) and much more. But I have learned from Maret Tsarnaeva, Dzhokhar and Tamerlan's aunt, that even the footage from the scene of the crime, the Boston marathon footage, was faked: Tamerlan had a beard before and after, but is shown clean shaven in those videos.



The proof she adduced is compelling: We have photos of Tamerlan lying in bed with his cat, where his beard is apparent. We have footage of Tamerlan and Dzhokhar working out at the Wai Kru gym on April 12th, three days before the event, where he has a well-trimmed beard. We have what purport to be photos of him at the Marathon on April 15th, where he is clean shaven. We have photos of him on April 18th, where he again has a beard. Even the photos of his arrest and of his body after he has been killed show that he was still sporting the well-trimmed beard. The corruption of local, state and federal officials in this case is overwhelming: everyone knows they are innocent except the American public!
The Arrest of Tamerlan
Maret has sent me a video she saved on my computer, which shows Tamerlan being arrested alive at 1:04ish a.m. on April 19, 2013 on Mt Auburn Street (at the intersection with Adams Street). Tamerlan is on the ground handcuffed, surrounded by Boston police agents. No gun, or explosives are seen taken from him, while the police searched him. After his pockets have been emptied, a policeman takes his wallet from his pocket, reviews it using a flashlight, then announces, "Tt's him". From the reaction of police agents on the scene, it looks as if they had been searching for Tamerlan in Watertown, but they had no description, where the fact that the police had to review his document to identify him confirms her suspicion, that the police were looking exactly for Tamerlan Tsarnaev, under orders from the FBI, but they (the police) had no independent description of Tamerlan to use in their search of the city:




Maret comments on that video: "This guy lives here, but he doesn't know who he is." These words are said by the policeman, who checked the other guy, who is laying on the ground, next to Tamerlan on his right, also handcuffed, but awfully quiet all the time. And nobody is searching him or the pockets of that other guy. After the policeman is heard saying, "This guy lives here, but he doesn't know who he (referring to Tamerlan) is", and from the distance is heard a shout (whom Merat believes is Dzhokhar) "We didn't do it!", and Tamerlan shouts back, "Podstava!", in Russian, which means, "It is a set up!"
Maret's analysis (in her own words)
Anzor [who is their father] and I believed from the first moment we saw and heard that video (that showed up on youtube in May of 2013), that Tamerlan was shouting "podstava" in Russian (it's a set up" out of frustration and anger, when realised, that he and Dzhokhar were lured out from their home to Watertown at that night under some kind of disguise by that person (must be Russian speaking person), who is laying on the ground handcuffed next to Tamerlan's right. Tamerlan realised that that man, who brought them there, to Mt Auburn Street (intersection with Adams Street) by him, to set Tsarnaev brothers in a plot, organised by the LE and the FBI.

That is exactly why, we, the family, believe, that Tamerlan shouted out "podstava" (Russian speakers use of "podstava" in case, when someone uses you in some criminal deed, without your knowledge, to put blame and suspicion on you, as if you committed a wrongful deed or a crime), that is why Tamerlan is out of rage, anger and frustration (as we read it in his voice) shouted "it is a set up" in Russian, to let that guy, who had Tamerlan's trust for some reason, brought the brothers to Watertown, know that Tamerlan just realised that "that man, next to him" betrayed him and set him and Dzhokhar up. Otherwise, why would Tamerlan shout "podstava" in Russian, if there are only English speaking police man around him.

Then, after that, Tamerlan is heard shouting in English directing his requests to police officers: "Officer, can I call my wife?" None, other than Tamerlan would have known that there is only his wife, that Tamerlan can call to seek for assistance in the situation he is in (as seen and heard on that video). Tamerlan knows that there are no parents around; he knows that Dzhokhar was with him, when they both got arrested right there on Mt Auburn and Adams Streets. Tamerlan is shouting then "Officer, read me my rights", "you have to read me my rights officer". "Nope" is heard from one policeman. "Yes", Tamerlan is shouting back to him. Then, Tamerlan shouts, lifting his heavy upper body, while handcuffed to one side, addressing a bunch of officers surrounding him, demanding for his legal rights to be observed: "officers, why aren't you calling me my rights".

Tamerlan wants to know, what he is suspected of, what he is accused of. While Tamerlan is shouting, demanding for his rights to be read to him, it is seen on that video, how one of the police man, standing behind the tree, on the left from Tamerlan, by putting his boot on the left upper body, pushing Tamerlan's body to the ground, to stop him from shouting. Then, at the very end of that short video, when, Tamerlan realised, that his legal rights are not going to be read or observed by any of those police agents around him, feeling very concerned for his younger brother, he shouts with all his might in his body, while his body pushed face down to the ground, Tamerlan shouts out for his little brother's name "Dzhokhaaaar".

There is a shout heard back on that same video "Tamerlan" (we, the family, believe this is Dzhokhar calling his older brother's name, while he is also in custody at the police hands, not far from where Tamerlan is held on the ground on Mt Auburn). Then, again, Tamerlan's voice is heard even harder "Dzhokhaaar". We know that it is Tamerlan's voice, we recognise his voice, we have no doubts it is his voice. We know, how Tamerlan sounds, when he speaks in Russian. We know, how Tamerlan sounds, when he speaks in English. We know, how Tamerlan's voice sounds, when he is angry, frustrated, and here worried for the safety of his younger brother, Dzhokhar.
More on the arrest video
The time of the events, documented on this video had taken place, as derived from the transcripts of the police scanner and correlated with the events of recorded video, to be at 1:04ish on April 19, 2013. The place of Tamerlan, recorded on this video, to be arrested is on the corner of Mt Auburn and Adams Street. Tamerlan on that video is seen wearing light-colored pens, and dark colored shoes. Later, recorded by the same author ("Bigheadphones", as the name of the author of the video on YouTube), there is a black cruiser, surrounded by 8 or 9 LE agents, and inside that police cruiser is seen a person, stripped off his clothes, which is Tamerlan, taken from the ground, stripped off his clothes, and put in that cruiser. It is not known from that video what the LE agents did to Dzhokhar, even though, we believe, it was Dzhokhar's voice shouting "we didn't do it" and then, at the end of that video calling for the name of his older brother "Tamerlan".



If Dzhokhar was not there with Tamerlan, at the time, when they both were arrested in Watertown, at Mt Auburn and Adams Street (Tamerlan), and Dzhokhar was somewhere, not far from the place, where Tamerlan was on the ground, WHY ELSE WOULD TAMERLAN BE SHOUTING OUT DZHOKHAR'S NAME, UNLESS HE KNEW THEY BOTH WERE TOGETHER, WHEN THEY WERE ARRESTED AND THEN SEPARATED AT THE SPOT. Tamerlan, handcuffed, stripped off his clothes, led by the police to place him in police cruiser, was seen on CNN video afterwards. As the CNN reporter commented, Tamerlan was later "very intensively questioned by the FBI for 10-15 minutes", and after that all we have seen of Tamerlan is his dead corpse. Here is a photograph:





These events, and recordings (police scanner) have a direct relation to Dzhokhar's case, since they all prove beyond reasonable doubt that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar were not shooting at the police or throwing improvised explosives on Laurel and Dexter Streets, in Watertown; that Dzhokhar did not flee from the police, after that so-called shoot out, which the brothers never been part of; that the brothers did not kill anybody at that night. Dzhokhar was in the hands of LE forces all along, since 1:04ish April 19, 2013, as this video proves, as Tamerlan shouts for his name, and Dzhokhar shouts back for Tamerlan's name. There was no manhunt after "fled from the police" Dzhokhar. It has been fabricated by people in power. While, the false manhunt was on the way, army of 9,000 was trying marshall law on American residents. The Tsarnaev brothers are not guilty of any crimes. They are innocent.
Three proofs "They didn't do it!"
Let me close by pointing out three blatant demonstrations that the brothers were innocent and that Maret, who is herself a lawyer, is right when she asserts, "They didn't do it!" The they included that the footage of the boys at the marathon was faked, that Tamerlan was killed in police custody, and that the backpacks they were wearing (in the faked footage) were not the backpacks that exploded in Boston:
Proof 1: The footage at the marathon was faked

If you return to the second of the videos I present above, you will see that, while Tamerlan is shown as clean shaven in the marathon footage, he had been sporting a beard, which can be seen in the photos of him lying with his cat, working out at the gym, and even in the arrest video and (most stunning of all) in the photograph of his corpse! Here is a comparison of Tamerlan with his cat and in the fake footage:



Proof 2: Tamerlan was killed while in police custody

Notice that Tamerlan's death occurs after he has been taken into police custody. There is a witness who reported observing the police drive over him repeatedly in an SUV, which was probably his own car. He was not killed by Dzhokhar but was murdered after he had been arrested. Bear in mind: his brother Dzhokhar cannot have killed him while he was in police custody! Yet Tamerlan was killed!



Proof 3: The brothers were wearing the wrong backpacks

Not only is Maret Tsaraev herself is a lawyer, but I had previously solicited the opinion of another attorney at law, John Remington Graham, who made the astute observation that the backpacks are not the backpacks that exploded. In the FBI report and the formal indictment, the backpacks are described as made of black nylon. But neither Tamerlan nor Dzhokar is shown wearing black nylon backpacks:




As Jack Graham observes, because the backpacks do not match, there was not even sufficient evidence to establish probably cause for an arrest and indictment, much less a conviction. Yet the defense team for Dzhokhar has ignored all the proof of his innocence and the jury is now deliberating whether or not to sentence him for a crime that he did not commit. This is American justice on display in Boston today.
APPENDIX: Formal Legal Opinion of John Remington Graham, Minnesota Bar (#3664)


I write to express my views while the trial in Boston is underway. Federal jurisdiction cannot be extended to the prosecution of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in light of United States v. Lopez, 514 U. S. 549 (1995), and views of Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist. Congress has broad power to regulate commerce, but domestic crimes and use of weapons are generally reserved to the States. If there is sufficient evidence to prosecute Dzhokhar for murder and mayhem, he should and can be prosecuted exclusively by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. But lay this point of law aside. Available evidence against Dzhokhar is insufficient in reason or law to prove that he committed the offenses charged. Such evidence actually proves that Dzhokhar is not guilty.

The formal indictment against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (No. 13-CR-10200-GAO on the docket of the United States District Court for Massachusetts) was returned on June 27, 2013. The document is 74 pages long, and accuses Mr. Tsarnaev of heinous crimes, including many counts carrying the death penalty, on Boylston Street, in front of the Forum Restaurant, near the finish line of the Boston marathon on April 15, 2013. The most important portions of the indictment are paragraphs 6 and 7 which, read in themselves and in context, positively and unequivocally state that, acting in concert with his (now deceased) brother, Dzhokhar set down on the sidewalk one of two “black backpacks” which contained “improvised explosive devices,” these “constructed from pressure cookers, low explosive power, shrapnel, adhesive, and other materials.” The indictment goes on to say that, after distancing himself, Dzhokhar detonated one of two bombs at about 2:49 in the afternoon, and that the bombs he and his brother placed and detonated each killed at least one person, and wounded scores of others.

Facts impossible for any informed and diligent observer to overlook show that this accusation, as framed with required specificity, cannot be true. I refer to what public surveillance videos recorded on the day of these crimes, what crime lab photos on the FBI website revealed shortly after these crimes were committed, what was disseminated by a key television report on the day after the event, and what was announced by the FBI chief in Boston shortly after the event. I am not here discussing material which has been hidden from anybody or is subject to genuine dispute. I point to facts which the government and the mainstream news media of the United States have passed over in stony silence. The mainstream media have aided this prosecution by misleading omission of material facts and slanted reporting.

Public surveillance videos show Dzhokhar and his brother walking eastward on Boylston Street in the early afternoon on April 15, 2013. They are shown carrying backsacks typical of what American high school or college students use for carrying books and clothing. There are no unusual bulging, heaviness, or protrusions apparent. Dzhokhar’s brother is shown with straps over both shoulders. Dzhokhar is shown with a strap only over his right shoulder. Dzhokhar’s backsack is fairly flat, not heavy laden, and light colored. Neither backsack carried by the Tsarnaev brothers is pictured as carrying a “black backpack” mentioned in the indictment. These public surveillance videos and still frames taken from them have been used by the FBI in order to identify the suspects in these crimes.

The FBI also published two crime lab photos of critical importance:







One shows a bomb fragment after the explosions at around 2:49 in the afternoon on April 15, 2013.








The other shows a blown out backpack which was said to have contained one of the bombs, -- a black nylon bag with a characteristic white rectangle marking which is not even remotely similar to the backsacks carried by the Tsarnaev brothers as identified by the FBI in film from the public surveillance videos or still frames taken from them. This is the “dark colored bag or backpack” which the FBI chief in Boston described in his press conference on the day after the explosions when he described what was carried by the guilty parties.

From public surveillance videos used by the FBI to identify suspects, it is obvious that the backsacks carried by Dzhokhar and his brother shortly before the explosions could not have contained pressure-cooker bombs of this size. And, if such a device would have been squeezed into either backsack, it would have caused bulging or protrusions not observed in public surveillance videos which were used by the FBI to identify the suspects.

This much, without more, shows as conclusively as circumstantial evidence can prove anything in criminal litigation that the accused could not have placed and detonated a pressure-cooker bomb as alleged in the indictment.

There are also available and known public surveillance videos and still frames made from such videos, these widely published, showing that paramilitary agents in uniforms of Craft International, near the crime scene and at the time of the explosions, were carrying large black backpacks including characteristic white rectangle marking, and plainly large enough to carry pressure-cooker bombs which the FBI identified as having exploded and caused injury and death at the Boston marathon. Pubic authority has not investigated these obvious suspects. From the foregoing we may infer:

That there is no probable cause to support the indictment. From my knowledge of the evidence of this case, and from my general learning and experience, I am unable to understand how federal prosecutors could not be aware of this want of probable cause.

And that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is not guilty as charged in the indictment. From my knowledge of the evidence of this case, and from my general learning and experience, I am unable to understand how counsel for the accused could not be aware of the innocence of Mr. Tsarnaev. -- John Remington Graham of the Minnesota Bar (#3664X), March 25, 2015.


john remington graham
counselor at law

B. A. in philosophy 1963, LL. B. 1966, University of Minnesota; admitted to the Bar of the Minnesota Supreme Court, 1967; admitted to the Bar of the United States Supreme Court, 1971; Public Defender, United States District Court for Minnesota, 1969-1973; Founding professor, teaching common law pleading, judicial writs and remedies, American constitutional law, admiralty, copyrights, legal writing, conflict of laws, legal history, and modern civil procedure, and serving as chairman of the admissions committee, Hamline University School of Law, 1972-1980; Advisor on questions concerning constitutional law and equitable remedies to the Minnesota State Board of Bar Examiners, 1974-1978; Special Counsel for the City of Brainerd, 1974-1980; Crow Wing County Public Defender, 1981-1984; Crow Wing County Attorney, 1991-1995; Occasional lecturer in comparative British, American, and Canadian constitutional law at Laval University, 1989-1991, 1997, and 2000, and in public international law, 2003; and Advisor on British constitutional law and history to the court-appointed Amicus Curiae for Quebec before the Supreme Court of Canada in Reference on certain Questions concerning the Secession of Quebec from Canada, [1998] 2 S. C. R. 217.

Share this on del.icio.us
Digg this!
Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon
Share this on Reddit
Add this to Google Bookmarks
Tweet This!
Share this on Facebook
Share this on Mixx
Subscribe
Buzz up!
Share this on Linkedin
Submit this to DesignFloat
Share this on Technorati
Submit this to Script & Style
Post this to MySpace
Share this on Blinklist
Share this on FriendFeed
Seed this on Newsvine
POSTED BY JIM FETZER AT 8:32 AM
REACTIONS:
18 COMMENTS:


Nadia SindiMay 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM
https://www.facebook.com/groups/justice4nadiasindi" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.davefrohnmayer.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Please sign petition.

https://www.change.org/petitions/a-g-er ... ment#share" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reply
Replies

Frank JahodaMay 13, 2015 at 3:05 PM
The BOMB blows off limbs hehe but the bag still servivess?




Reply

William St. GeorgeMay 5, 2015 at 11:11 AM
We need to be aware that there are desperate people who would be willing to be shot or even killed in a "drill" if they were guaranteed that their families would receive a large sum of money. People who have an emotional make-up like those who are willing to strap a bomb on and go to a crowded area and detonate the device. The suicide bombers. So if these hyper reality presentations keep getting picked apart, so that many persons become aware that they are false flags, we might expect more realistic presentations in the future. I am not sure how these people could be located but I am sure it can be done. In fact such events may already have been done. Perhaps police were told their guns had blanks when that was not the truth. And then afterwards these police would be assured that it was not their fault. But to keep it to themselves! Once these mad men and women are set loose who knows what they might not try.

Reply
Replies

AnonymousJune 4, 2015 at 12:15 PM
They can't get more realistic because anyone stupid enough to commit treason against their own country is incompetent.

Reply

William St. GeorgeMay 5, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Unless as you have suggested the whole thing is rigged and the brother is still alive and the other one will be released after this game is over, unless something of that sort is the case, or even if it is not, it looks like an appeal ought to made. This is such a travesty of justice and sets a sort of precedent for future kangaroo courts of deception. Have you considered sending around to law schools a synopsis? Would any law professor dare look into it seriously?

Reply

David HowardMay 5, 2015 at 3:12 PM
Google "The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects"

Reply

AnonymousMay 5, 2015 at 3:30 PM
I guess I would be asking who was that in the boat that got shot up, or was Dzhokhar put into the boat by police after he was cuffed in the 'Tamerlan Tsarnaev Arrested alive' video above?

Reply

James FetzerMay 5, 2015 at 4:31 PM
Track down "Boston Show Trial: The 'bloody confession' of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev", where I observe that his "confession" was a series of perfectly straight lines, which were evenly spaced, which would be impossible on the curved surface of a boat. It was also made of fiberglass, where it takes a special writing implement to write on fiberglass. How much fraud does it take to prove that this is a fabricated event that has been concocted to promote a political agenda? Unreal!

Reply

Tom FontaineMay 5, 2015 at 5:04 PM
Black ops did it https://sites.google.com/site/thefactso ... ops-did-it" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reply

AnonymousMay 6, 2015 at 3:04 AM
This is sad.

Reply

Donald T. GrahnMay 15, 2015 at 11:16 PM
Don't miss Prof Fetzer's expose on Truth vs. NEW$, Inc.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfWnQys07IA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reply

Parliamen tof the CommonwealthMay 18, 2015 at 3:55 PM
This is really awesome work.

Reply

Tom FontaineMay 31, 2015 at 7:28 AM
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is Innocent. He was set up by the Feds. https://sites.google.com/site/thefactso ... ops-did-it" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reply

Diane RansomMay 31, 2015 at 7:59 AM
Again I say the crime was written around the Patriot Act concerning Terrorism less public transportation. Odd Carmen Ortiz was involved in the search.

Reply

Diane RansomMay 31, 2015 at 8:06 AM
I keep putting in reply and yet I am not finding it published. I say the crime was written around the Patriot Act under Terrorism less public transportation. I wonder why Carmen Ortiz was part of the investigation.

Reply

Tom FontaineMay 31, 2015 at 8:21 AM
The bombs were real and the victims were real
https://sites.google.com/site/thefactso ... mb-victims" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reply
Replies

Jim FetzerJuly 30, 2015 at 9:55 PM
Not a chance. Check out my latest interview with Alan Powell on the Boston bombing on "The Real Deal", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qphY3NwX9c0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reply

AnonymousJune 4, 2015 at 12:30 AM
thank you James Fetzer! can you please sign this petition and share it around?

https://www.change.org/p/start-an-indep ... ef=Default" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reply

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:


FOLLOWERS


ABOUT ME


JIM FETZER
McKnight Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Minnesota Duluth; Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth; Editor, Assassination Science; Co-Editor, Assassination Research
VIEW MY COMPLETE PROFILE
BLOG ARCHIVE

▼ 2015 (55)
► September (4)
► August (11)
► July (12)
► June (11)
▼ May (11)
► May 27 (1)
► May 23 (1)
► May 21 (1)
► May 20 (1)
► May 14 (1)
► May 11 (1)
► May 10 (1)
► May 08 (1)
▼ May 05 (1)
THEY DIDN'T DO IT! Maret Tsarnaev blows apart the ...
► May 03 (1)
► May 01 (1)
► April (6)
► 2013 (30)
► 2012 (24)
► 2011 (50)
► 2010 (79)
► 2009 (18)
SUPPORT US WITH YOUR PURCHASE


GOOGLE VIDEOS




JFKAssasssination ZapruderFakery TheMenWhoKilledKennedy LeeHarveyOswald Falseflags WarOnTerror JamesFetzer 9/11 WTC-7 TwinTowers Pentagon SouthTower NorthTower Guantanamo Bagram Afghanistan Cageprisoners AafiaSiddiqui
upload your own video

DESIGN BY:BLOGGER LAYOUTS
SPONSORED BY:SUV

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

* FBI not only is concealing evidence exculpatory of Ivins (according to former lead investigator Lambert), but it took key lab notebooks from USAMRIID that it has refused to give back!

Posted by Lew Weinstein on September 14, 2015



Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments »

* The FBI will release “the 2006 whistle blower report of former Head of the Amerithrax investigation Richard Lambert” if Mr. Lambert consents — does he?

Posted by Lew Weinstein on September 14, 2015



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, irradiated Ames anthrax, Lambert, usamriid & anthrax, whistleblower | 2 Comments »

* Bruce Ivins February 28, 2000 email on multi-agent vaccine study

Posted by Lew Weinstein on September 11, 2015



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, irradiated Ames anthrax, usamriid & anthrax | 7 Comments »

* FBI fights release of exculpatory information regarding 2001 anthrax attacks

Posted by Lew Weinstein on September 10, 2015


Richard Lambert
***

In this FOX News interview, former agent Lambert claims the FBI is concealing evidence in anthrax case. It is a powerful statement …

http://video.foxnews.com/v/418490938500 ... show-clips" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In this interview, the former lead Amerithrax investigator says there’s been no means of vetting the FBI’s representations — none of the exculpatory evidence was produced. Former Agent Lambert says that the FBI’s claims were highly selective and that a “staggering” amount of clearly exculpatory evidence was not disclosed.

On the other hand, FBI’s Dave Hardy claims that there nothing was withheld and that there is no public interest in disclosure. Mr. Hardy could not be more wrong.

Former lead Amerithrax investigator Lambert says the Amerithrax case was most certainly not “solved.”

***

This year, Kenneth Dillon requested a copy of the 2000 page “Interim Major Case Summary.” The FBI refused, on friviolous grounds, the requested waiver of fees — ignoring the historic importance of the Amerithrax investigation. Here is the rejection letter …

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

Call the principal and have them fire the teacher



MacArthur High School
High school in Irving, Texas
Website
Directions
MacArthur High School is a public high school in Irving, Texas. It is named for the American General of the Army Douglas MacArthur. In 2009, the school was rated "Academically Acceptable" by the Texas Education Agency. Wikipedia
Address: 3700 N MacArthur Blvd, Irving, TX 75062
District: Irving Independent School District
Phone: (972) 600-7200
Mascot: Cardinals




Sudanese-American boy handcuffed for bringing homemade clock to school
Ahmed Mohamed was handcuffed after his school called police over the digital clock which ‘looked like a bomb’ to a teacher

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2 ... ock-school" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Wednesday 16 September 2015 06.14 EDT
Police and school authorities in Irving, Texas are under fire after arresting a 14-year-old boy for bringing a homemade clock into school.

Ahmed Mohamed, an engineering hobbyist, made the timepiece and brought it to school in the hope of impressing teachers and fellow students in his first few weeks at MacArthur High School. But when he showed it to an English teacher after it beeped during her lesson, she told him it looked like a bomb.

Later in the day, the school’s principal and a police officer came to pull him out of class, and again the principal told Ahmed that “it looks like a movie bomb to me”. Throughout, the student says, he told everyone who would listen that the device was a clock, but police still led him out of school at 3pm, according to local reports, “his hands cuffed behind his back and an officer on each arm”.

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

Couple of stories

1.



FBI Hosts 16th Annual International Bomb Data Center Working Group Conference

http://www.imperialvalleynews.com/index ... rence.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Published: 15 September 2015
Atlanta, Georgia - On September 14-18, 2015, the Federal Bureau of Investigation will host the Annual International Bomb Data Center Working Group (IBDCWG) Conference in Atlanta, Georgia.

The IBDCWG is a collaborative body of bomb data centers and recognized government agencies focused on the efficient and effective sharing of technical intelligence on explosives, as well as other information related to the unlawful use of explosives.

The IBDCWG was formed in 2005 by bomb data centers from 12 countries, including the United States. Since then, the group has more than doubled and today includes bomb data centers from 40 member nations, with 12 other countries participating with observer status. According to protocols adopted by the group, the roles and functions of international bomb data centers vary considerably. However, all members must be legitimate government agencies responsible for the management of technical intelligence and information related to the unlawful use of explosives.

The annual conference will include separate presentations from member nations regarding major incidents, emerging trends, and other topics of interest. A range day is scheduled where new tools and techniques will be demonstrated, followed later in the week by focused discussions with governmental and business entities in order to learn their best practices which bomb data centers may employ in any future attack where explosives are used.

The FBI serves as the secretary on the IBDCWG board and as a co-chair for the Americas.


2.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/doc ... 20Fulltext" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)&edition=&startpage=21&desc=Paper%20Says%20FBI%20Blocked%20Plan%20to%20Foil%20N.Y.%20Blast


Paper Says FBI Blocked Plan to Foil N.Y. Blast

Los Angeles Times (pre-1997 Fulltext) - Los Angeles, Calif.
Date: Oct 28, 1993

Abstract (Document Summary)
Tape recordings secretly made by an FBI informer reveal that authorities were in a far better position than previously known to foil the Feb. 26 bombing of New York's tallest towers, the New York Times reported.

The New York Times published conversations the informer, a 43-year-old former Egyptian army officer, Emad Ali Salem, taped with his FBI handlers.


3.
Emad Salem's website
Emad Salem: The Man Who Risked His Life for America by Peter Lance, 2003
"Tapes in Bombing Plot Show Informer and F.B.I. at Odds," Ralph Blumenthal, The New York Times, October 27, 1993, Section A; Page 1; Column 4
"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast," Ralph Blumenthal, The New York Times, October 28, 1993, Section A; Page 1; Column 4
"Paper Says FBI Blocked Plan to Foil N.Y. Blast," Reuters, Los Angeles Times, October 28, 1993, Page 21; Section Part-A; National Desk
CBS News report about FBI foreknowledge of the World Trade Center bombing, Windows Media Video: video clip
"Bomb Informer's Tapes Give Rare Glimpse of F.B.I. Dealings," Richard Bernstein with Ralph Blumenthal, The New York Times, October 31, 1993
"FBI's Tipster Said He Built N.Y. Bomb," Chicago Tribune, December 15, 1993, Page 7; Section NEWS
"Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed," Paul DeRienzo, Frank Morales and Chris Flash, The Shadow, October 1994/January 1995 Issue
WBAI Radio broadcast in the city of New York which aired part of a taped conversation between FBI undercover agent Emad A. Salem and FBI Special Agent John Anticev, MP3: short clip, longer clip
Profile: Emad Salem, History Commons
"Tracing terror's roots: How the first World Trade Center plot sowed the seeds for 9/11," Chitra Ragavan, U.S. News & World Report, February 16, 2003
"FBI Blunders and the First World Trade Center Bombing," James Bovard, Freedom Daily, August 2004


4.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcldy9GT8p4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Rare TV NEWS Dan Rather reports on WTC bombing FBI ... - YouTube
Video for dan rather emad salem fbi anti cav la times▶ 2:11
YouTube app
Jan 14, 2013 - Uploaded by kevin chambers
In the course of the trial it was revealed that the FBI had an informant, a former Egyptian army ...
Missing: anti ‎cav ‎la
‎Open on youtube.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXBmmf9F4rw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Evidence FBI Involvement in 1993 World Trade Center Bombing ...
Video for dan rather emad salem fbi anti cav la times▶ 2:11
YouTube app
Sep 27, 2008 - Uploaded by Michael Latham
Dan Rather gives evidence that the FBI was involved in the World Trade Center Bombing. Of ...
Missing: anti ‎cav ‎la
‎Open on youtube.com

msfreeh
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7691

Re: When will FBI agents create their next Terrorist Event.

Post by msfreeh »

Next
------------------------------------------------------------
http://us5.campaign-archive1.com/?u=84a ... 3ac8799/11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and Other Deep State Crimes Teleconference


** wtc7 pentagon
------------------------------------------------------------


** Draft minutes for August 26, 2015
------------------------------------------------------------



September 22, 2015
Craig McKee, Secretary 9/11 Monthly Teleconference Call

**********************

Draft minutes for the Wed., August 26, 2015 regular conference call

Present were:

Ken Freeland, Teleconference facilitator, Houston 9/11 Truth
Craig McKee, Teleconference secretary, Truth and Shadows
Cat McGuire, 9/11 Truth Outreach
Ned Delaney, 9/11 Grassroots
James Hufferd, 9/11 Grassroots
Cheryl Curtiss, Connecticut 9/11 Truth
Dave Schlesinger, 9/11 activist
Dan Hennan, AE911Truth
Betty Jennings, Houston 9/11 Truth
Paul Zarembka, The Hidden History of 9-11
Greg Longo, 9/11 activist
Rich Aucoin, Worchester, Mass. 9/11 activist
Nita Renfrew, New York 9/11 activist
Jack Graham, lawyer in Dzhokhar Tsarnaev case
Sue Serpa, Worchester 9/11 Truth
Frank Tolopko, Berkshire 9/11 Truth
Barbara Honegger, 9/11 researcher
Barton Bruce, Boston 9/11 Truth
Mark McKertich, 9/11 activist
Lynn Bradbury, 9/11 activist
Susan McLucas, 9/11 activist
Barrie Zwicker, Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11
Dwain Deets, 9/11 researcher
Kevin Barrett, We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11

The minutes of the July 2015 conference call were APPROVED

The agenda was APPROVED.

* Pursuing the case of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev


Lawyer Jack Graham, acting on behalf of the aunt of supposed Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, provided an update on legal attempts to get Tsarnaev a new trial. Graham points out that the very evidence used by the state to convict Tsarnaev, a video that shows him at the scene, actually exonerates him because his backpack does not match the color described in the indictment.

Graham says he is looking for help raising funds for the court action. Anyone interested in helping or in getting copies of documents in the case can contact Graham by email at jrgraham@novicomfusion.com (mailto:jrgraham@novicomfusion.com) .

* Concern over hr14.orgweb site


Cheryl Curtiss described the efforts of a number of truthers to get changes to the web site http://www.hr14.org(http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=84a2c6cbe080c5515da932a5d&id=19828b114a&e=91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; on the grounds that it accepts too many elements of the 9/11 official story. Included below is a letter by the group to Les Jamieson, the main organizer behind the hr14.orgsite.

Dear Les,

We, your undersigned colleagues in the search for truth, support all efforts to release all information, classified or not, relating to the events of September 11, 2001. While we do not oppose the declassification of the 28 pages from the 2002 Joint Congressional Inquiry, we have serious concerns about the hr14.org(http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage1 ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; website and its omission of any facts documented by the 9/11 Truth Movement over the last 14 years.

While all of us support in principle the efforts to obtain the release of the 28 redacted pages contained in the Joint Inquiry report, we do not know what information of substance, if any, will be revealed with their release. We believe that it is misleading, at best, to imply that it will lead to an investigation and the ultimate disclosure of the real 9/11 perpetrators and their activities.

We are concerned that the message displayed on the HR14 campaign website does not support the facts as the 9/11 Truth Movement has come to understand them. Instead, it assumes the official story is true, with the slight twist that the Saudis were culpable because they financed the putative hijackers. In addition, the site ignores all the hard evidence that debunks the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT). To cite just two examples: a number of alleged hijackers, Saudi or otherwise, have been located and were well and alive when contacted subsequent to the events of 9/11; and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has made an incontrovertible case that three World Trade Center buildings were destroyed as the result of controlled demolitions.

As you know from past correspondence, published and recognized leaders of the 9/11 truth movement, such as Kevin Ryan and Michel Chossudovsky, have raised serious questions about the purpose and intent of the 28-pages release campaign. Moreover, the Joint Inquiry Report was a flawed, incomplete, cover-up investigation in the first place. In addition, there is no guarantee that if and when the 28 pages are released, they will be the authentic, full and unredacted 28 pages, and that they will not have been written specifically for the purpose of deflecting blame away from the actual perpetrators.

By way of analogy, ...

PrevNext
suppose someone claimed that certain classified documents could prove that known patsy Lee Harvey Oswald was secretly financed by the Soviet Union, and that this would conclusively reveal who was truly behind JFK’s assassination. Would anyone among the serious researchers uncritically accept this information? Would they not label such a claim a red herring, which undermines the fruit of years of painstaking research?

By the same logic, whereas we all agree it is critical to expose the real 9/11 perpetrators, since the 9/11 Truth Movement has forcefully established that 19 alleged hijackers could not have been responsible for the complete destruction of 3 of New York’s tallest skyscrapers (not to mention the Pentagon event), why should the question of who financially supported these known (by definition, falsely blamed) patsies be considered so momentous?

Do we not then have good reason to question the purpose of the website’s message which falsely assumes that revealing Saudi financial support will finally, conclusively, reveal who perpetrated 9/11? It flies in the face of everything the 9/11 Truth community has struggled for years to publicly demonstrate!

We do not make such serious assertions lightly. Several of us have carefully scrutinized the hr14.orgwebsite and have unexceptionally discovered what can only be called a regurgitation of the OCT. (Our detailed analysis is available upon your request.) We therefore regard hr14.orgas, at best, a hindrance to the aims of the 9/11 Truth Movement, which, on the basis of hard evidence, has solidly debunked the false narrative that your website appears to openly advocate.

We would also like to ask you how the statements of people with clear but undisclosed conflicts of interest can be featured on your website as though they were somehow heroic? Porter Goss and Bob Graham have well established CIA connections, and litigants in a lawsuit against Saudi Arabia, such as Terry Strada (whose case and opportunity for financial award hinges on essential confirmation of the OCT), can hardly be considered disinterested on this question either!

The current popularity of the 28 pages issue provides a unique opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement to educate our Congress and the public about the evidence we have gathered over the last fourteen years. We are dismayed that you have ignored this research on your website, and instead have included only content which actively and uncritically promulgates the OCT.

We are requesting some specific changes to the website as a sign of good faith: the inclusion of additional facts such as those mentioned below, and the removal of all statements by parties with known conflicts of interest (such as the three mentioned above). The specific evidence (with relevant url links for each point which we would be happy to provide) we request be added to the website includes the following:

* That a number of alleged hijackers were alive after 9/11.
* Saudi involvement, no matter the scale, has already been documented.
* The Joint Inquiry and 9/11 Commission Report have many omissions and distortions.(http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
* There is at least as much need to release other withheld information, such as NIST’s refusal to provide the raw data they used to reach their flawed conclusions, and all Pentagon and surrounding videos including those still withheld from the Pentagon Sheraton.
* There are many 9/11 family members that do not support the OCT, evidenced by their statements in the following videos: ‘9/11 Press for Truth’ http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage1 ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and ‘In Their Own Words’ http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
* Include links to research sites that have established their 9/11 truth bona fides over the years, such as: ae911truth.org(http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; , consensus911.org(http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage1 ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; , http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage2 ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;‘9/11 Museum Virtual WalkingTour,’ http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage2 ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage1 ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;‘Behind the Smoke Curtain,’ http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879*" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Removal of all statements that reinforce the OCT.


We look forward to a positive respon

rom you to these specific requests. If we have not received your e-mailed commitment by Tuesday, 25 August to act by a date certain on these
specific requests, we will honor our moral obligation to bring these concerns to the larger 9/11 truth community.

Please ‘Reply All’ with your response.

Gregory Longo, Ken Freeland, Nita Renfrew, Dick Atlee, Lynn Ertell, Lynn Bradbury, Bill Wilt, Lou Wolf, Tim Michel, Frank Tolopko, Cheryl Curtiss

* Kevin Barrett on Charlie Hebdo


Radio host Kevin Barrett gave a presentation on his recent book We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11.


Call began at 8 p.m. EST and adjourned at 9:50 p.m. EST/5 p.m. to 6:50 p.m. PST

Audio of the August call can be heard here: http://houston911truth.us5.list-manage. ... 91763ac879" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; The next monthly teleconference will take place on September 30 at 8 p.m. EST, 5 p.m. PST. Please email agenda items for next call to facilitator Ken Freeland (diogenesquest@gmail.com) by September 26. Please use subject line “Agenda item for 911 Truth Teleconference.”

Post Reply