How about just plain crap?
You take your pills, and I'll take mine, sweetie.
Post by buffalo_girl »
How about just plain crap?
buffalo_girl wrote:You CANNOT wait until there are 'readings' to begin taking potassium iodide. Radioactive iodine will 'fill' your thyroid thus making it impossible to protect it with the harmless potassium iodide.
If you have Lugol's Solution or potassium iodide pills I would recommend beginning your preventative therapy NOW! Children are especially vulnerable to radioactive iodine exposure.
My understanding is that radioactive contamination will arrive on the North American Continent in 36 hours from release in Japan.
If you aren't able to find the potassium iodide pills - which are very expensive in my opinion as you will need between 60-90 days supply of 130 mg per day per person - here is a suggestion for alternative protection:
http://nutritionalhealthandwellness.blo ... llout.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/ki.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here is a map source for the northern hemisphere jet stream activity:
http://virga.sfsu.edu/pub/jetstream/jetstream/big/1103/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm not saying the world is safe. But these kind of reactionary statements are what make the world unsafe. They lead people to make improper judgments, to say wrong things themselves, to have unjustified fears. This is not what the Lord intends of us. What I am suggesting is that people would be wise to research the possibilities and then seek out the Lord's judgment through personal revelation. Someone sitting 7000 miles away making a blanket statement for all within the sound of their voice to take pills and eat seaweed is just plain irresponsible. After spending weeks reading these forums I can easily see they are infested with these kinds of people and someone needs to counter the irrational with the rational.Songbird wrote:Personally, I do not trust those who say it's safe in the world right now and there is no serious danger. Kelp is a natural product. According to one of the links that BG posted, Iodine is an essential nutrient and Americans are low in it. It also stated that it is better to get the Iodine level up and in the thyroid before the alarm bells sound because they will probably sound too late. I certainly don't mind taking it.edzachary wrote:How about just plain crap?buffalo_girl wrote: Perhaps not so much 'reactionary' as prophylactic.
Ed, you want to see sensational... then hook into Randy's comments...note he has not made himself known once he spread his sensationalistic "crap" around. Just because you don't agree does not mean you have to be so vehement about it.
Post by buffalo_girl »
BG what is Lugol's solution? What about "painting" iodine on your skin, does that work?
Wow, you must be a rocket scientist!edzachary wrote:These pills are not a cure all.
Toto wrote:Wow, you must be a rocket scientist!edzachary wrote:These pills are not a cure all.
Hey Ed.....
Someone said it’s better to shut your mouth and look like an idiot than to open it and prove it, and frankly, I don’t listen to anyone who gets their education from faux news sources.
But do come back after you pull you head out of the sand and find something of value to contribute to the discussion.
March 13th, 2011
To top it off, The New York Times is reporting that the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagen has passed through a RADIOACTIVE cloud in Japan and that military helicopters 60 miles away from the Fukushima nuclear power plant were coated with particulate radiation.
This clearly shows that the wind is picking up radiation and spreading it at least 60 miles north of the power plant.
Post by buffalo_girl »
Our own disasters loom and we should instead be thinking first of how to help our brothers and sisters in Japan -- and how to best prepare here.
Post by Istand4truth »
Odds of us getting a good dose of radiation are pretty slim......and 99% of Japan would be toast prior.Rincon wrote:What will happen to me if I get radiated and do nothing about it? Maybe this is a good option.
This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on this topic. It
does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public.
An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
The effectiveness of KI as a specific blocker of thyroid radioiodine uptake is well established
(Il’in LA, et al., 1972) as are the doses necessary for blocking uptake. As such, it is reasonable
to conclude that KI will likewise be effective in reducing the risk of thyroid cancer in individuals
or populations at risk for inhalation or ingestion of radioiodines.
Short-term administration of KI at thyroid blocking doses is safe and, in general, more so in
children than adults. The risks of stable iodine administration include sialadenitis (an
inflammation of the salivary gland, of which no cases were reported in Poland among users after
the Chernobyl accident), gastrointestinal disturbances, allergic reactions and minor rashes. In
addition, persons with known iodine sensitivity should avoid KI, as should individuals with
dermatitis herpetiformis and hypocomplementemic vasculitis, extremely rare conditions
associated with an increased risk of iodine hypersensitivity.
Thyroidal side effects of stable iodine include iodine-induced thyrotoxicosis, which is more
common in older people and in iodine deficient areas but usually requires repeated doses of
stable iodine. In addition, iodide goiter and hypothyroidism are potential side effects more
common in iodine sufficient areas, but they require chronic high doses of stable iodine (Rubery
1990). In light of the preceding, individuals with multinodular goiter, Graves’ disease, and
autoimmune thyroiditis should be treated with caution, especially if dosing extends beyond a few
days. The vast majority of such individuals will be adults.
across populations at risk for
radioiodine exposure, the overall benefits of KI far exceed the risks of overdosing, especially
in children, though we continue to emphasize particular attention to dose in infants.
Post by Col. Flagg »
If the nuclear plants that are currently experiencing phase 1 of a meltdown do melt down and release quantities of radiation, trade winds will carry the fallout to the west coast of the U.S. and eventually over the western portion of the country. The only question is how much radiation would we get and how dangerous will it be for us? Well, these charts should help clear some things up a little:Mummy wrote:Odds of us getting a good dose of radiation are pretty slim......and 99% of Japan would be toast prior.Rincon wrote:What will happen to me if I get radiated and do nothing about it? Maybe this is a good option.
Post by Col. Flagg »
Japan's nightmare gets even WORSE: All THREE damaged nuclear reactors now in 'meltdown' at tsunami-hit power station
Fuel rods appear to be melting inside three over-heating reactors
- Experts class development as 'partial meltdown'
- Japan calls for U.S. help cooling the reactor
- The Japanese nuclear reactor hit by the tsunami went into 'meltdown' today, as officials admitted that fuel rods appear to be melting inside three damaged reactors.
There is a risk that molten nuclear fuel can melt through the reactor's safety barriers and cause a serious radiation leak.
There have already been explosions inside two over-heating reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, and the fuel rods inside a third were partially exposed as engineers desperately fight to keep them cool after the tsunami knocked out systems.
If you believe their assumptions....Col. Flagg wrote:If the nuclear plants that are currently experiencing phase 1 of a meltdown do melt down and release quantities of radiation, trade winds will carry the fallout to the west coast of the U.S. and eventually over the western portion of the country. The only question is how much radiation would we get and how dangerous will it be for us? Well, these charts should help clear some things up a little:Mummy wrote:Odds of us getting a good dose of radiation are pretty slim......and 99% of Japan would be toast prior.Rincon wrote:What will happen to me if I get radiated and do nothing about it? Maybe this is a good option.
Post by buffalo_girl »
....sorry - oil, gas, and minerals. Got out of the cancer detection business due to the company having cancer....that it has yet to get cured of and is very close to demise!buffalo_girl wrote:Since we are probably ALL iodine deficient anyway, why all the opposition to taking iodine? Seems kind of curious.
Are some of you in the medical/pharmaceutical industry? Hoping for a future bloom of cancer patients?
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/does-r ... -or-higher" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Does The "Ring Of Fire" Guarantee At Least One Magnitude 8 Aftershock, And Ten Of Magnitude 7 Or Higher?
For Japan, it's nowhere near over, at least if the Pasadena Jet Propulsion Laboratory (creator of such brainiac things as the Mars rovers) is correct. While Japan has experienced numerous magnitude 5 and 6 aftershocks (405 in total to be precise), the big ones are still to come: "Japan's largest quake on record, which hurled a 7-meter (23-foot) wave landward after one plate slid beneath another off the coast of Sendai, had an 8.9 magnitude. The aftershocks will likely include at least one measuring 8 and 10 of magnitude 7, JPL geophysicist Andrea Donnellan said. All are many times larger than the 6.3-level New Zealand quake in February that leveled the Christchurch business district and killed 160." Should we get more 8+ earthquakes, the likelihood of further tsunamis unfortunately jumps exponentially. And while scientists have long been expecting "the Big One" to hit Los Angeles so far without success, unfortunately carrying over that logic to Japan is more than naive.
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/gamma- ... ove-normal" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Gamma Radiation In Fukushima-Downwind Ibaraki Disclosed, 30 Times Above Normal
For all who have been looking for realtime radiation data from Japan, you are in luck. Or maybe not, as the data unfortunately indicates nothing good. The System for Prediction of Environment Emergency Dose Information (SPEEDI) releases gamma radiation data online. The site is jittery and apparently not suited for major traffic which is why we represent several screen captures of the data. While it is not surprising that according to the website both Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures are entirely "Under Survey" as it makes sense that the government does not want to generate panic, SPEEDI has disclosed some tell-tale data about cities in Ibaraki prefecture, which is just a hundred or so miles north of Tokyo, and is just south of the ill-fated Fukushima prefecture. And the data is stunning: based on a N, NE and NNE wind direction (where it originates), meaning all coming from Fukushima, with a normal reading in the 80 nGy/h range, the city of Kounosu Naka is at 3,024, Kadobe Naka is at 2,416, Isobe Hitachioota is at 1,213 and many others are in the mid to upper triple digit range! Again, this is based on wind coming out of Fukushima and ultimately headed toward the capital. Indicatively, normal terrestrial plus cosmic gamma radiation is about 80 nGy/h.
Below we present screencaptures as of moments ago, as apparently the Japanese government seems to believe that abnormal gamma radiation levels are perfectly notmal:
A map of all prefectures, showing maximum gamma radation readings. Note Ibaraki at 3,024 nGy/h, and Kanagawa right below it (and downwind) at 224 nGy/h compared to low double digts for all other prefecture.
LDSFreedomForum.com and its admin / moderators do not necessarily agree with all content posted by users of this forum.
The views and content on this site reflect only the opinions and teachings of the authors of the respective content contained herein.