USA STRIKES SYRIA

[LdsMarco]

The Illuminati (through Obama, the CIA, the Mossad and the Israeli army) did EVERYTHING they could possibly think of to get the United States militarily involved in Syria.

On the verge of a peace treaty, that would end the Syrian conflict, they trigger a false-flag operation – to blame Bashir al-Assad.
And the man who can't let a TWEET go by without an over-emotional ranting response shoots a barrage of Tomahawk missiles – to do what the Obama Administration and the Israelis could NOT do for the last 4 years...

Get the United States involved in Syria, to trigger WWIII, and to fulfill the 17th chapter of Isaiah – which will then COMPLETELY remove God's divine protection over this land, 'the fortress of Ephraim', which follows after the promise made to Lehi over this land. (So long as the people in this land are righteous):

(Isaiah 17:1-5)

1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.

2 The cities of Aroer are forsaken: they shall be for flocks, which shall lie down, and none shall make them afraid.

3 The fortress also shall cease from Ephraim, and the kingdom from Damascus, and the remnant of Syria: they shall be as the glory of the children of Israel, saith the Lord of hosts.

4 And in that day it shall come to pass, that the glory of Jacob shall be made thin, and the fatness of his flesh shall wax lean.

5 And it shall be as when the harvestman gathereth the corn, and reapeth the ears with his arm; and it shall be as he that gathereth ears in the valley of Rephaim.

(2 Nephi 1:5-12)

5 But, said he, notwithstanding our afflictions, we have obtained a land of promise, a land which is choice above all other lands; a land which the Lord God hath covenanted with me should be a land for the inheritance of my seed. Yea, the Lord hath covenanted this land unto me, and to my children forever, and also all those who should be led out of other countries by the hand of the Lord.

6 Wherefore, I, Lehi, prophesy according to the workings of the Spirit which is in me, that there shall none come into this land save they shall be brought by the hand of the Lord.

7 Wherefore, this land is consecrated unto him whom he shall bring. And if it so be that they shall serve him according to the commandments which he hath given, it shall be a land of liberty unto them; wherefore, they shall never be brought down into captivity; if so, it shall be because of iniquity; for if iniquity shall abound cursed shall be the land for their sakes, but unto the righteous it shall be blessed forever.

8 And behold, it is wisdom that this land should be kept as yet from the knowledge of other nations; for behold, many nations would overrun the land, that there would be no place for an inheritance.

9 Wherefore, I, Lehi, have obtained a promise, that inasmuch as those whom the Lord God shall bring out of the land of Jerusalem shall keep his commandments, they shall prosper upon the face of this land; and they shall be kept from all other nations, that they may possess this land unto themselves. And if it so be that they shall keep his commandments they shall be blessed upon the face of this land, and there shall be none to molest them, nor to take away the land of their inheritance; and they shall dwell safely forever.

10 But behold, when the time cometh that they shall dwindle in unbelief, after they have received so great blessings from the hand of the Lord--having a knowledge of the creation of the earth, and all men, knowing the great and marvelous works of the Lord from the creation of the world; having power given them to do all things by faith; having all the commandments from the beginning, and having been brought by his infinite goodness into this precious land of promise--behold, I say, if the day shall come that they will reject the Holy One of Israel, the true Messiah, their Redeemer and their God, behold, the judgments of him that is just shall rest upon them.

11 Yea, he will bring other nations unto them, and he will give unto them power, and he will take away from them the lands of their possessions, and he will cause them to be scattered and smitten.

12 Yea, as one generation passeth to another there shall be bloodsheds, and great visitations among them; wherefore, my sons, I would that ye would remember; yea, I would that ye would hearken unto my words.

[Matchmaker]

Let's pray this is the end of things and that Assad will surrender, and not the beginning of a long drawn out fight that will surely take the lives of more innocent people.

[Spaced_Out]

Let's pray this is the end of things and that Assad will surrender, and not the beginning of a long drawn out fight that will surely take the lives of more innocent people.

It is a very long shot if you think Assad and allies (Russians, Iran and Hezbollah just surrender).

Not sure what Trump's plan is maybe just a punishment for using chem weapons and there is no further escalation. The issues has caused all reaming trust between the USA and Russia to be lost. There is talk that Russia lost some military personal in the attack. This has very grave consequences.

Interesting article.

"Nuclear War Much More Likely" Paul Craig Roberts: In Dangerous World, Putin Will Not Trust America
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-0 ... -not-trust

[Silver]

Let's pray this is the end of things and that Assad will surrender, and not the beginning of a long drawn out fight that will surely take the lives of more innocent people.

I simply do not understand how you pray for Assad to surrender. How's that going to work out? Syria is a sovereign nation. It doesn't belong to the US or NATO or the United Nations. It is not under attack by its neighbors except the the warmongering Zionists to the south and Turkey which is run by the egomaniacal tyrant Erdogan. Syria is half a world away from the United States and we would have nothing to worry about if we just left her alone.

You must not have heard that the Qataris have a lot of natural gas that they want to pipe up to Europe. The pipeline needs to go through Syria, but the Syrian people rejected that plan as is their right. Ever since then, the Qataris (and Saudis) have financed terror in Syria with the US providing the arms to the radicals. Haven't you noticed how many times the son of the Devil, John McCain, has been to Syria to fulfill his bloodlust?

If we and several other countries left Syria alone, there would be no ISIS there to disrupt what was a relatively peaceful land. Perhaps you'll counter that Christians are being killed there. However, you would be overlooking the point that if the Assad regime, which started in the 1970's with Bashar's father, was so nasty, why would there even be any Christians left in Syria to kill. The relatively large Christian

Is Assad a perfect gentleman? I doubt it. Is he as magnanimous as George Washington? Certainly not. Is he trying to maintain his family's hold on power? Most certainly, but he was only thrust into power when his older brother died in a car accident and he had to leave an ophthalmology school in London . However, even if Assad were a horrible guy, why do you think removing him will result in something better after the examples of US meddling in Iraq and Egypt and Libya?

The Saudis cut off the heads of women who claim they were raped. If you're praying for regime change, why don't you start there?

[Z2100]

WWIII already (I know it hasn't started yet)? I guess the Second Coming is going to be in 2050...

[Matchmaker]

Let's pray this is the end of things and that Assad will surrender, and not the beginning of a long drawn out fight that will surely take the lives of more innocent people.

I simply do not understand how you pray for Assad to surrender. How's that going to work out? Syria is a sovereign nation. It doesn't belong to the US or NATO or the United Nations. It is not under attack by its neighbors except the the warmongering Zionists to the south and Turkey which is run by the egomaniacal tyrant Erdogan. Syria is half a world away from the United States and we would have nothing to worry about if we just left her alone.

You must not have heard that the Qataris have a lot of natural gas that they want to pipe up to Europe. The pipeline needs to go through Syria, but the Syrian people rejected that plan as is their right. Ever since then, the Qataris (and Saudis) have financed terror in Syria with the US providing the arms to the radicals. Haven't you noticed how many times the son of the Devil, John McCain, has been to Syria to fulfill his bloodlust?

If we and several other countries left Syria alone, there would be no ISIS there to disrupt what was a relatively peaceful land. Perhaps you'll counter that Christians are being killed there. However, you would be overlooking the point that if the Assad regime, which started in the 1970's with Bashar's father, was so nasty, why would there even be any Christians left in Syria to kill. The relatively large Christian

Is Assad a perfect gentleman? I doubt it. Is he as magnanimous as George Washington? Certainly not. Is he trying to maintain his family's hold on power? Most certainly, but he was only thrust into power when his older brother died in a car accident and he had to leave an ophthalmology school in London . However, even if Assad were a horrible guy, why do you think removing him will result in something better after the examples of US meddling in Iraq and Egypt and Libya?

The Saudis cut off the heads of women who claim they were raped. If you're praying for regime change, why don't you start there?

I think you are misunderstanding what I am trying to say. Assad is no match for the forces that are against him, and he does have a nasty history of gas attacks against his own people. He's going to go down and out one way or the other. If he stays in power and continues his futile fight, he will die, as will many more of his own people in the fight. Why doesn't he just retire from power with his beautiful wife and kids while he still can? With all his money, I'm sure he can find somewhere safer to go and live out the rest of his years than Syria. He can't last long against Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey, and the USA, etc.

[eddie]

—John Cassidy

Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, must be stunned. For years, his military has been carrying out mass atrocities against Syrian civilians at will: bombing hospitals; dropping barrels filled with oil, shrapnel, and high explosives; and, most gruesomely, shelling civilians with chemical weapons. All this time, he never paid the slightest price. Again and again, Assad’s confederates carried out their gruesome work in defiance of the world, save for his allies in Iran, Russia, and southern Lebanon. And always, Assad got away with it, denying any wrongdoing even in the face of overwhelming eyewitness testimony and physical evidence. Most notoriously, in 2013, the Assad regime shelled the Damascus suburb of East Ghouta with poison gas, killing at least fourteen hundred people and maiming thousands. At the time, instead of taking military action against Assad, President Obama demanded that Syria turn over its chemical-weapons stockpile—an agreement that seemed shaky from the start. Since then, the regime has shelled civilians with chlorine gas on numerous occasions, giving the lie to the deal.

Now, for the first time, Assad is paying a price for the crimes of his regime. Thursday’s missile strike does not appear to be intended to overthrow the Syrian government so much as simply to punish it. The overarching aim of Trump and his advisers appears to be to reëstablish a deterrent against the use of the most terrible of weapons. Whether the strike will have its intended effect won’t be clear for some time.

[harakim]

Let's pray this is the end of things and that Assad will surrender, and not the beginning of a long drawn out fight that will surely take the lives of more innocent people.

I simply do not understand how you pray for Assad to surrender. How's that going to work out? Syria is a sovereign nation. It doesn't belong to the US or NATO or the United Nations. It is not under attack by its neighbors except the the warmongering Zionists to the south and Turkey which is run by the egomaniacal tyrant Erdogan. Syria is half a world away from the United States and we would have nothing to worry about if we just left her alone.

You must not have heard that the Qataris have a lot of natural gas that they want to pipe up to Europe. The pipeline needs to go through Syria, but the Syrian people rejected that plan as is their right. Ever since then, the Qataris (and Saudis) have financed terror in Syria with the US providing the arms to the radicals. Haven't you noticed how many times the son of the Devil, John McCain, has been to Syria to fulfill his bloodlust?

If we and several other countries left Syria alone, there would be no ISIS there to disrupt what was a relatively peaceful land. Perhaps you'll counter that Christians are being killed there. However, you would be overlooking the point that if the Assad regime, which started in the 1970's with Bashar's father, was so nasty, why would there even be any Christians left in Syria to kill. The relatively large Christian

Is Assad a perfect gentleman? I doubt it. Is he as magnanimous as George Washington? Certainly not. Is he trying to maintain his family's hold on power? Most certainly, but he was only thrust into power when his older brother died in a car accident and he had to leave an ophthalmology school in London . However, even if Assad were a horrible guy, why do you think removing him will result in something better after the examples of US meddling in Iraq and Egypt and Libya?

The Saudis cut off the heads of women who claim they were raped. If you're praying for regime change, why don't you start there?

I think you are misunderstanding what I am trying to say. Assad is no match for the forces that are against him, and he does have a nasty history of gas attacks against his own people. He's going to go down and out one way or the other. If he stays in power and continues his futile fight, he will die, as will many more of his own people in the fight. Why doesn't he just retire from power with his beautiful wife and kids while he still can? With all his money, I'm sure he can find somewhere safer to go and live out the rest of his years than Syria. He can't last long against Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey, and the USA, etc.

The weapons of mass destruction Sadaam was going to use.... maybe they're in Syria!?!? Let's go to war again, but a bigger one this time.

[harakim]

—John Cassidy

Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, must be stunned. For years, his military has been carrying out mass atrocities against Syrian civilians at will: bombing hospitals; dropping barrels filled with oil, shrapnel, and high explosives; and, most gruesomely, shelling civilians with chemical weapons. All this time, he never paid the slightest price. Again and again, Assad’s confederates carried out their gruesome work in defiance of the world, save for his allies in Iran, Russia, and southern Lebanon. And always, Assad got away with it, denying any wrongdoing even in the face of overwhelming eyewitness testimony and physical evidence. Most notoriously, in 2013, the Assad regime shelled the Damascus suburb of East Ghouta with poison gas, killing at least fourteen hundred people and maiming thousands. At the time, instead of taking military action against Assad, President Obama demanded that Syria turn over its chemical-weapons stockpile—an agreement that seemed shaky from the start. Since then, the regime has shelled civilians with chlorine gas on numerous occasions, giving the lie to the deal.

Now, for the first time, Assad is paying a price for the crimes of his regime. Thursday’s missile strike does not appear to be intended to overthrow the Syrian government so much as simply to punish it. The overarching aim of Trump and his advisers appears to be to reëstablish a deterrent against the use of the most terrible of weapons. Whether the strike will have its intended effect won’t be clear for some time.

No investigation has found Assad culpable in chemical weapon use, but we do have opposition groups admitting they used chemical weapons. And bombing hospitals? Maybe you're actually remembering the US bombing hospitals? I can't think of another country that has killed more people in the 21st century. So for us to go make the world a better place by instigating more killing seems absurd. Let's lead by not killing instead of by trying to outkill everyone.

[harakim]

US president Donald Trump has expressed skepticism about the quality of the US’s own intelligence, particularly when it comes to chemical weapons. The officials in the briefing were career civil servants and included some holdovers from the previous administration. But they have Trump’s full confidence, a national security official appointed by Trump told Quartz.

I couldn't help it. Could it be any more obvious?

[Matchmaker]

Let's pray this is the end of things and that Assad will surrender, and not the beginning of a long drawn out fight that will surely take the lives of more innocent people.

I simply do not understand how you pray for Assad to surrender. How's that going to work out? Syria is a sovereign nation. It doesn't belong to the US or NATO or the United Nations. It is not under attack by its neighbors except the the warmongering Zionists to the south and Turkey which is run by the egomaniacal tyrant Erdogan. Syria is half a world away from the United States and we would have nothing to worry about if we just left her alone.

You must not have heard that the Qataris have a lot of natural gas that they want to pipe up to Europe. The pipeline needs to go through Syria, but the Syrian people rejected that plan as is their right. Ever since then, the Qataris (and Saudis) have financed terror in Syria with the US providing the arms to the radicals. Haven't you noticed how many times the son of the Devil, John McCain, has been to Syria to fulfill his bloodlust?

If we and several other countries left Syria alone, there would be no ISIS there to disrupt what was a relatively peaceful land. Perhaps you'll counter that Christians are being killed there. However, you would be overlooking the point that if the Assad regime, which started in the 1970's with Bashar's father, was so nasty, why would there even be any Christians left in Syria to kill. The relatively large Christian

Is Assad a perfect gentleman? I doubt it. Is he as magnanimous as George Washington? Certainly not. Is he trying to maintain his family's hold on power? Most certainly, but he was only thrust into power when his older brother died in a car accident and he had to leave an ophthalmology school in London . However, even if Assad were a horrible guy, why do you think removing him will result in something better after the examples of US meddling in Iraq and Egypt and Libya?

The Saudis cut off the heads of women who claim they were raped. If you're praying for regime change, why don't you start there?

I think you are misunderstanding what I am trying to say. Assad is no match for the forces that are against him, and he does have a nasty history of gas attacks against his own people. He's going to go down and out one way or the other. If he stays in power and continues his futile fight, he will die, as will many more of his own people in the fight. Why doesn't he just retire from power with his beautiful wife and kids while he still can? With all his money, I'm sure he can find somewhere safer to go and live out the rest of his years than Syria. He can't last long against Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey, and the USA, etc.

The weapons of mass destruction Sadaam was going to use.... maybe they're in Syria!?!? Let's go to war again, but a bigger one this time.

All my life there has been a war. I was born during the Korean war, and there has been nothing but conflict in the world from that time forward. Since it seems like Assad has so many powerful enemies in the world, I was just hoping that he would quietly step down and not give the PTB another excuse for another World War. I'm so sick of war. The little guy and his family always pays the price.

[Robin Hood]

On the verge of a peace treaty, that would end the Syrian conflict,.........

This is incorrect. They were on the verge of talks, just like the talks that have taken place, and failed, in the past.
There was no peace treaty.

[Mark]

This from blogger Jim Kunstler. I think he is probably as accurate as anybody else out there in dissecting whats really going on in Syria..

"There are times in the course of events when a society cannot tell what the @#!@ is going on, or what to do about it, and this is one of those moments in history here in the USA. The quandaries of life on the home front — how to make a living, how to care for ourselves and loved ones — get shoved aside by misadventures in foreign lands with their own quandaries. One delusion leads to another until you enter a zero gravity of the mind. Case in point du jour: Syria.

The persistent hyperRussomania of the US Dem-Prog alliance and its sob-sisters in the media seeks to make a bad situation worse in Syria and probably for the worst reasons. How many Americans have even the dimmest idea what’s going on in Syria, who the cast of characters there represent, and where the USA fits into all of it?

There is the head of government, one Bashar al Assad (son of the previous president, Hafez al Assad). The Assads had run Syria as a mostly secular Arab state until the civil war within Islam, Sunni against Shia, spilled out of Iraq. The Assads belonged to the tiny Alawite sect of the Shia. They comprise only 13 percent of the Syrian population, which has a Sunni majority. Under the Assads, Syria has tilted toward Iran, the Shia home state, and away from the Sunni Arabs elsewhere in the neighborhood. Russia has cultivated Iran and support its “friends,” the Assads.

A mash-up of Sunni jihad armies fights the Assad government in Syria’s civil war. These are Isis, al Qaeda, and Jabhat al Nusra. The US government had made official noise about supporting the more “moderate rebels” in the Syrian conflict. Who are they exactly? Do you have a clue? Which army among those three rebel groups are “moderates?” And what is their moderate goal under jihad? To topple Assad. And then what? To set up a new theocratic government perhaps? How is it in America’s interests to promote Islamic jihadi theocracy?

One hypothesis is that the struggle is over who gets to run gas and oil pipelines through Syria to get easier access to the Mediterranean Sea and the European energy market. Iran would very badly like to do that. But they are in competition with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the little giant emirate of natural gas. So, you have the Iran/Shia gang on one side and the KSA/Qatar/Sunni on the other side. Anybody who had scanned the news since 1979 can probably tell whose side the US is on. By the way, this hypothesis has had no airing among the mainstream media triumvirate: The New York Times, CNN, and The WashPo. These news orgs won’t even entertain that angle of the story… but as I said, it’s only a hypothesis.

It was not so many weeks ago that President Trump met with the crown prince of KSA at the White House to give assurances of American friendship and support. KSA is supposedly America’s chief ally against Isis in Syria. Yet, KSA and the USA are dedicated to getting rid of the Assad government as well as Isis. That is, we are against both sides in the Syrian civil war. Still wondering why the American public is confused by all this? Do you know who our choice is to replace Assad? Can you name an opposition figure? Of course you can’t. There is nobody. What the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department, and the NSA seem to have in mind is the familiar failed state policy that has worked so well in the past (not).

Which brings us to the curious case of Bashar Assad’s recent supposed poison gas bombing of civilians in Khan Sheikhoun. The media triumvirate was avid to play along with the story. I don’t know about you, but I have to ask myself: what would Assad’s strategic goal be in gas bombing women and children? To gin up worldwide positive PR? To get the Syrian people on his side against Isis and other jihadis? What advantage could Assad possibly gain? In warfare generally, the tacticians strike against military targets. There’s a hypothesis that Assad’s air force sought to strike a rebel arms depot in Idlib province — a military target. The hypothesis goes further, saying that the depot contained phosgene and chlorine gas, but not Sarin. The wind carried these released gases among civilian homes and streets in Khan Sheikhoun. People suffered and died. Evidence for the absence of Sarin gas is that the gassing victims were handled manually by doctors and aid workers in street clothes. Sarin can kill on skin contact and doctors have to treat it in protective gear. So, maybe the gas wasn’t Sarin and maybe it wasn’t dropped in bombs from Assad’s planes. But, like the pipeline angle of the story, this hypothesis is missing in the media triumvirate’s pages.

President Trump was lauded mostly for the missile strike against the Syrian air force base that followed. The Dem/Progs and The New York Times gave him brownie points, if only for it being a swipe against Russia. It seemed so clever, what with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Mar-a-Lago dinner table where, presumably, the subject of the maniac in North Korea came up. Days later, a US aircraft carrier group steamed to the waters off Kim Jong Un’s fortress state. Which brings forth another hypothesis: that the Syria missile strike was solely a demonstration of US military will vis-a-vis the more ominous threat over in Asia — an attempt to get Xi to do something about the Kim Jong Un before we do.

It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out. The big fear is that in the event of a rumble, Kim will turn Seoul into an ashtray. The South Korean capital is only a few miles from the DMZ between the two states. The US couldn’t find a jucier enemy than Kim Jong Un, a character so improbable he might have been dreamed up in a Batman comic. Hence, he’s comprehensible to an American public that more and more looks like the ever-present crowd of perplexed bystanders in a Batman movie."

*

[DesertWonderer]

The Illuminati (through Obama, the CIA, the Mossad and the Israeli army) did EVERYTHING they could possibly think of to get the United States militarily involved in Syria.

On the verge of a peace treaty, that would end the Syrian conflict, they trigger a false-flag operation – to blame Bashir al-Assad.

False-flag? That's cute, The vid of fired missiles was cool though but RT as your source??? LOL