This article was picked up and ran by Yahoo also.
A similar article is here at the guardian:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... presidencyDonald Trump slams 'archaic' US constitution that is 'really bad' for the country
Republican claims the checks and balances on power woven into the US system is to blame for his problems
Donald Trump blames constitution for chaos of his first 100 days
He blamed the constitutional checks and balances built in to US governance. “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”
So, is this a good example of extreme editing, spin, twist and misapplication of words, or is there a real threat to the U.S. Constitution?
I understand that people not exposed much to the U.S. Constitution may lump all government rules together as the constitution, especially foriegners, but isn't these past 100 days a fair example of the constitution actually working?