Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
ajax
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8002
Location: Pf, Texas

Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by ajax »

In April 2015, L Tom approvingly quoted David Brooks of the NY Times:

“People are not better off when they are given maximum personal freedom to do what they want. They’re better off when they are enshrouded in commitments that transcend personal choice—commitments to family, God, craft and country.”

-"People are not better off when they are given maximum personal freedom to do what they want"?
Who is the one giving here? Isn't this inherent human right? Or is this a call to paternalism?

-Doesn't this ignore the fact that it is maximum personal freedom that allows a person to enter into said commitments in the first place?

-And even if said commitments are made, maximum personal freedom is still retained and not abrogated in any way, leaving the decision makers still free to follow through on commitments or not.

User avatar
jockeybox
captain of 100
Posts: 620
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by jockeybox »

There is this economic idea of "choice paralysis". Intrinsically people assume; more options = more better. They think it allows one to get exactly what they are looking for.

However, that too many choices (or options) can cause one to mentally freeze or shut down.

For example, when I'm picking out toothpaste, it's a damn challenge. Do I want white teeth, strong teeth, fresh teeth, enamel rebuilding, healthy gums, etc. There are simply too many options and we are seldom satisfied. Always wondering if they should have selected a different one.

This doesn't address being "enshrouded in commitments that transcend personal choice". This one doesn't compute.
C'mon Perry, give it to me straight. Whatcha really sayin'!

User avatar
jbalm
The Third Comforter
Posts: 5348

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by jbalm »

Sometimes, ya just gotta TAKE your personal freedom, when those who deign to GIVE it get stingy.

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by shadow »

The context, which is often times overlooked when critiquing apostles, is not what is being presented.

Before I was married I never told anyone where I was going or what I was having for dinner. When I wanted to buy something I bought it. When I wanted a truck I went out and bought it. That freedom was lost when I got married.
My weekend mountain biking trips went bye bye when I started having kids. It was too expensive as a college kid to do what I wanted AND buy diapers etc. Same with snowmobiling. I no longer had the freedom to leave Saturday mornings and not come home until night because I had kids and a wife at home.
Where much is given (spouse and kids), much is required (time etc). That's the loss of freedom L Tom was referring to.

kennyhs
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1537

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by kennyhs »

What is maximum personal freedom?

Is freedom a life without restraint, is freedom being addicted, is freedom doing whatever you want whenever you want, regardless of the
consequences? Or is that selfish? God's commandments are meant to make you free and keep you free.

User avatar
ajax
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 8002
Location: Pf, Texas

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by ajax »

shadow wrote:Before I was married I never told anyone where I was going or what I was having for dinner. When I wanted to buy something I bought it. When I wanted a truck I went out and bought it. That freedom was lost when I got married.
I would suggest you didn't lose anything.

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by shadow »

ajax wrote:
shadow wrote:Before I was married I never told anyone where I was going or what I was having for dinner. When I wanted to buy something I bought it. When I wanted a truck I went out and bought it. That freedom was lost when I got married.
I would suggest you didn't lose anything.
Sure I did. Every good spouse loses something. They also gain something, but some freedom is lost, at least in a successful marriage. Some Indidvidualality is lost for the good of the family. That's not always a bad thing, as L Tom was saying.

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by shadow »

image.jpeg
image.jpeg (32.71 KiB) Viewed 1737 times

User avatar
David13
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7080
Location: Utah

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by David13 »

shadow wrote:
image.jpeg
Shadow
I have certain tests as to what kind of woman I would want to have anything to do with. There is a failure on one of my most basic tests right there.
dc

kennyhs
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1537

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by kennyhs »

David13 wrote:
shadow wrote:
image.jpeg
Shadow
I have certain tests as to what kind of woman I would want to have anything to do with. There is a failure on one of my most basic tests right there.
dc
LOL, you might just remain single.

Zathura
Follow the Prophet
Posts: 8801

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Zathura »

shadow wrote:
image.jpeg
Story of my life. I swear.

"we can go where you want tonight, okay baby? In n out no.. cafe rio no, costa vida no, supersonic nah, village inn isn't good, Ihop is expensive, I don't want to go somewhere that I haven't eaten before"


@-)

User avatar
David13
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7080
Location: Utah

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by David13 »

kennyhs wrote:
David13 wrote:
shadow wrote:
image.jpeg
Shadow
I have certain tests as to what kind of woman I would want to have anything to do with. There is a failure on one of my most basic tests right there.
dc
LOL, you might just remain single.
LOL
Ain't no bother to me. I been single for quite a while now. Ain't bothered me at all.
It's one of those simple little tests that saves me a sore arm from filling out their application. You know,, the 15 pages, including background check and references.
Not that I can't pass the background check, nor that I don't have the references, it's just that I don't approach the situation like that.
Long ago a lady told me, "you better get married again real soon, otherwise you will get used to be single so much that you will never get married again."
At the time she said that, that, basically had already happened.
So, ...
However, you never know what might happen.
dc

Vision
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2324
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Vision »

shadow wrote:
ajax wrote:
shadow wrote:Before I was married I never told anyone where I was going or what I was having for dinner. When I wanted to buy something I bought it. When I wanted a truck I went out and bought it. That freedom was lost when I got married.
I would suggest you didn't lose anything.
Sure I did. Every good spouse loses something. They also gain something, but some freedom is lost, at least in a successful marriage. Some Indidvidualality is lost for the good of the family. That's not always a bad thing, as L Tom was saying.

Lose is the wrong word to use. You willing chose to exchange past priorities for present/future priorities.

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by shadow »

Vision wrote:
shadow wrote:
ajax wrote:
shadow wrote:Before I was married I never told anyone where I was going or what I was having for dinner. When I wanted to buy something I bought it. When I wanted a truck I went out and bought it. That freedom was lost when I got married.
I would suggest you didn't lose anything.
Sure I did. Every good spouse loses something. They also gain something, but some freedom is lost, at least in a successful marriage. Some Indidvidualality is lost for the good of the family. That's not always a bad thing, as L Tom was saying.

Lose is the wrong word to use. You willing chose to exchange past priorities for present/future priorities.
Same diff.

User avatar
Separatist
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1150

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Separatist »

Not really.

User avatar
David13
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7080
Location: Utah

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by David13 »

Not really, too.
I never understand when these guys see my motorcycle and say "oh, I'd like a motorcycle like that but my wife wouldn't let me have one."
What kind of wife is that? Who would want a wife like that? I mean, what does a guy want, a mother? Or a wife? A boss?
Or a partner?
And what kind of man is it that can say that?

There is another type of female that I need to shed quickly, not after getting involved. That is what I call the 'clinging vine'. The one who cannot stand to be away from the man for one night, or one weekend or whatever, and gets all whiney and sappy at the prospect.

Yes, when I get married again, it will be the right one, not the good looking one. Or the super sexy one. I don't need to make that mistake again. But, i do not mean like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NF5XU-k2Vk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
dc

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by shadow »

David13 wrote:Not really, too.
I never understand when these guys see my motorcycle and say "oh, I'd like a motorcycle like that but my wife wouldn't let me have one."
What kind of wife is that? Who would want a wife like that? I mean, what does a guy want, a mother? Or a wife? A boss?
Or a partner?
And what kind of man is it that can say that?

There is another type of female that I need to shed quickly, not after getting involved. That is what I call the 'clinging vine'. The one who cannot stand to be away from the man for one night, or one weekend or whatever, and gets all whiney and sappy at the prospect.

Yes, when I get married again, it will be the right one, not the good looking one. Or the super sexy one. I don't need to make that mistake again. But, i do not mean like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NF5XU-k2Vk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
dc
What kind of husband would buy a motorcycle when his wife doesn't want him to have one? Maybe she's worried? Maybe they can't afford one? Maybe it doesn't have enough room to haul a family around? That's my point. You give up some choices in favor of others because now you're a couple, a family. Now it's not just about you. But some husbands do whatever they want anyway. Magic Johnson (since you're a California man) , while married, slept around and got AIDS. A good husband, the kind L Tom was referring to, would give up his wild oats and be faithful.

Really.

User avatar
Separatist
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1150

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Separatist »

You never lose the choice, the option is still available. You simply choose otherwise. Therefore, "maximum personal freedom" is still preserved and is essential to developing good judgement / stewardship and responsibility as a free agent.

User avatar
Separatist
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1150

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Separatist »

Unless your spouse has your nuts tenders in a vise grip. :((

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by shadow »

Separatist wrote:You never lose the choice, the option is still available. You simply choose otherwise. Therefore, "maximum personal freedom" is still preserved and is essential to developing good judgement / stewardship and responsibility as a free agent.
That's why my first post in this thread mentioned context.

User avatar
David13
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7080
Location: Utah

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by David13 »

shadow wrote:
David13 wrote:Not really, too.
I never understand when these guys see my motorcycle and say "oh, I'd like a motorcycle like that but my wife wouldn't let me have one."
What kind of wife is that? Who would want a wife like that? I mean, what does a guy want, a mother? Or a wife? A boss?
Or a partner?
And what kind of man is it that can say that?

There is another type of female that I need to shed quickly, not after getting involved. That is what I call the 'clinging vine'. The one who cannot stand to be away from the man for one night, or one weekend or whatever, and gets all whiney and sappy at the prospect.

Yes, when I get married again, it will be the right one, not the good looking one. Or the super sexy one. I don't need to make that mistake again. But, i do not mean like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NF5XU-k2Vk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
dc
What kind of husband would buy a motorcycle when his wife doesn't want him to have one? Maybe she's worried? Maybe they can't afford one? Maybe it doesn't have enough room to haul a family around? That's my point. You give up some choices in favor of others because now you're a couple, a family. Now it's not just about you. But some husbands do whatever they want anyway. Magic Johnson (since you're a California man) , while married, slept around and got AIDS. A good husband, the kind L Tom was referring to, would give up his wild oats and be faithful.

Really.
Who is Magic Johnson? Wait, no I don't want to know. I may be "in" California, but let me assure you I am not "of" California nor the "popular" agenda and particularly not the "aids world". Thank you very much.

I am not talking about buying a motorcycle without the advice and consent of the spouse. I am talking about what man would want a woman who would want him to delete an essential part of who he is? I have no children. I never had any.
But let's say you were a baseball player, a pro. Would you want to marry a woman who would want you to quit baseball?
Why?
Why would a man want to marry a woman and then "change" her in a similar fashion? No good reason as I see it.
You know, a lot of women are attracted to men who do things like ride a motorcycle. Those are the women who tend to like to do things themselves. Maybe parachuting.
The idea is to get a woman right and suited for you. And if you and she would never do anything risky (within reason) or dangerous, fine. But otherwise ...
I'm way beyond child producing age, and any woman I marry would be also.
dc

User avatar
Obrien
Up, up and away.
Posts: 4951

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Obrien »

ajax wrote:
shadow wrote:Before I was married I never told anyone where I was going or what I was having for dinner. When I wanted to buy something I bought it. When I wanted a truck I went out and bought it. That freedom was lost when I got married.
I would suggest you didn't lose anything.
Maybe SHE did... ;)

Vision
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2324
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Vision »

David13 wrote: Magic Johnson? dc

I sluffed school one day to go watch the Lakers practice. Magic shook our hands it was cool.

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by shadow »

Vision wrote:
David13 wrote: Magic Johnson? dc

I sluffed school one day to go watch the Lakers practice. Magic shook our hands it was cool.
I was a big fan in middle and high school. I was disappointed when it came out he had AIDS and admitted to liberally using his freedom by cheating on his wife... a lot. I hoped married people would no longer choose to be free to date and have relations with others...

User avatar
Separatist
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1150

Re: Maximum Personal Freedom: Good For You? Or Maybe Not So Much

Post by Separatist »

I would hope so too, but free to chose they are, nonetheless.

Post Reply