Does that mean you fail to agree that these are prime constitutional intent as derived from the framing documents of America?freedomforall wrote:ChristopherABrown wrote:I really fail to see why this is such a big deal to you. Whether I agree or disagree makes no difference to the final outcome. Many Americans have chosen evil over good, have elected socialistic officials into office and allowed Satan to blanket moral decay around the nation. The only hope we have at this point is when the Elders of Israel step up and help true adherents to the Constitutions save it from complete destruction.ChristopherABrown wrote:That is simply digging deeper into the problem.freedomforall wrote: You can start by finding out how it is that sheriff Ward has been made out to be a hero and why the media has blatantly lied about the whole incident in and around Burns.
Implementation of the solution is what I'm working on. Allowing redundant definition of the problem to dominate cannot be allowed to distract from acting on solution.
I cannot say you have ever outright stated you agree and accept these definitions of prime constitutional intent.
Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?
Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?
Can you at least explain why you refuse to agree and accept the framers intended the ultimate purpose of free speech to enable the unity by which the people might effectively alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?
I, at least, appreciate your fervor in saving our rights. It's much better than saying the Constitution is so flawed that it needs to be changed before it should be saved.I really fail to see why this is such a big deal to you. Whether I agree or disagree makes no difference to the final outcome.
Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?
Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?
Americans can only defend their rights by first agreeing upon what are. That Americans agree upon prime constitutional is the only thing that really matters, if enforcement actually matters.
By agreeing you demonstrate that enforcement of constitutional rights actually matters to you.