Our Work
We wish to work together. In the division of labor of this world there is something that each of us can do that will benefit the others.
The people of the earth generally recognize the benefit of the division of labor. The constant issue among those among whom the labor is divided is, who shall have the “power.” There has to be direction to the labor. “Who shall direct it?” This “power” comes out as the word, “force.”
To quickly see how “force” works among us, let’s take the case of a typical business. If the business gets a patent, copyright, or some contract, that it plans to operate upon, it can go to the courts of the land to get injunctions or restraining orders against trespasses of these patents, copyrights and contracts.
The people executing the order, the police, are armed. They are directed by the court to enforce compliance with the court order. If the police don’t have enough force the court can call out the national guard or even the militia (all able-bodied males). That has always been sufficient “force.”
This “power” of which we speak is “the right to force people.”
In the eyes of the part of mankind experienced in work, it is an impossibility for people to work together without “power” ― “the right to force people.”
“But, people who are forced to work are SLAVES!”
With one exception.
“What is that?”
That is if, in our work together, I force me and you force you.
That is what, as we shall now see, has been “Law” for as far back as we have record of it. It is an immediately attractive concept at first glance. It becomes more so as it is investigated. However, as we will also now see, you and I will be called upon to each force ourselves, all by ourselves, if we wish to “open up the way” to the enjoyment of its benefits.
(Work Together by the Law, Bruce Wydner pp. 2-3)
A main purpose of the Scriptures of the lost tribes of Israel is to reestablish Law and bring back True Freedom. We need to get this right otherwise we get the Cleansing from the Lord.Force
This is a delicate issue so please bear with me.
Historically, if the Wardens’ Court, made up of the 12 wardens, who judged the gildsmen of a specific gild, found a man “gilty,” of deserting his oath, they therefore found him, to that extent, an “out-law.”
Once found “guilty,” and therefore an outlaw, there were three increasingly severe punishments that the Alderman of that man’s gild could impose upon him:
1. The first had to do with restrictions upon the future practice of one’s craft, in his gild.
2. In the Hansa of the First Millennium, it was the 12 man jury who imposed restrictions as to one’s future freedom or activity in the “Key-reich” or Church of all Northern Europe.
3. The last and most drastic had to do with future activity as a human being. When Erik the Red was found guilty, by his jury, of manslaughter, he was given three days to quit the country of Iceland for his exile of some years. On the fourth day, as an “outlaw,” he could be terminated by anyone with impunity, as if he were no longer human. He would then merit the full wrath of the Law’s force upon him, for his defiance of its punishment for the life he took.
...
“Why did Karl Marx say that all revolution comes from America?” He meant all “unwholesome revolution.” It was because of the shattering impact of the idea, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” upon the sensibilities of Europe. “Why did that statement so shatter Europe?”
Because “Congress” or “the Commons” or “The States General” ARE “the Christian State.” “Aren’t they?” “I mean, way back wasn’t it ‘Congress’ that had a representative from each ‘commune’ to deliberate problems arising out of the ‘communion law’ or ‘the law of the English Church’ or Oh, I don’t know what I mean,” say the sensitivities of the European.
The answers to that are: “Yes, the sensitivities that you inherited from your racially Nordic forefathers are true; and, no, the logic about things that you got from Roman Statecraft is not.”
So, since that day, with all unwholesome revolution rushing the thinking of Mankind pell-mell in the direction of “the separation of Church and State,” we get thinking of recent vintage to the effect that, “the State is everything, therefore the doctrine of the separation of Church and State means the separation of the Church OUT of everything.” That is approaching: “All right, Church, listen; if you can levitate yourself off of the ground, up in the air, you can continue to exist; but just need to obey the law of gravity, for a while, and touch earth, and you are going to be destroyed by us.”
“What is ‘LAW,’ that Congress may make no ___ of, respecting an establishment of religion?”
“LAW” is a place name, a geographical LOCATION in Scandinavia. Scandinavians have always known, for the last 2,000 years, and as Snorri Sturlusson has told them, in his writings, for over the last 700, that Law is where God came, commanded a mountain to be removed into the sea — to become “Sea Land” or Old Zealand — and the water that formed in that hole became, Lake LAW.
“Why call the rules of the Nordic Race, ‘Law’?” Because at the temple, built at that Lake Law, God gave the Nordic Race, the “same Law that he had given to his people in Asialand,” that thereafter has been their RELIGION.
LAW IS THE RELIGION of the Nordic Race.
(Work by the Law, Bruce Wydner pp. 74-76)
God Bless,
Darren
