No Forced Judicial Monopoly Constitutional Amendment (NJM)

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

No Forced Judicial Monopoly Constitutional Amendment (NJM)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

  • No Forced Judicial Monopoly
    Constitutional Amendment (NJM)
  • The right of individual to just self-defense, including but not limited to, the right to contract with any third party, including but not limited to, any private courts or private justice enforcement, to carry out such just self-defense, shall not be abridged.

    Just self-defense is defined as the use of equal force to offset or neutralize the aggression against one’s property.

    This means that state forced justice enforcement monopoly violates private property and the right of the contract of individual, and is therefore unjust by definition, and is strictly forbidden.
---
State forced justice enforcement monopoly is unjust by definition, and is the reason why justice is trampled by our judicial system every day, and why it costs so much, and delivers so little. Free Market, i.e. voluntary associations among people, are, in principle, the ONLY just way to deliver justice enforcement, not to mention the fact that this justice will be much more cost effective and of infinitely better quality, than the unjust by definition government forced monopoly.

For more information please read Hans-Hermann Hoppe's State or Private-Law Society.

=====================================
This amendment is a part of 7 amendments that were designed to bring the Constitution into harmony with the Fundamental Principles of Liberty, without which Liberty cannot exist:
  1. Justice Constitutional Amendment (JCA)
  2. The Fundamental Law Constitutional Amendment
  3. Honest Money Constitutional Amendment
  4. Constitutional Amendment Abolishing Taxation
  5. No Forced Judicial Monopoly Constitutional Amendment (NJM)
  6. Nullification - Constitutional Amendment
  7. Constitutional Amendment: Abolishing Copyrights and Patents

Post Reply