LivingHistory: Mormonism’s ‘9/11 mosque moment’ came in 1903

[pritchet1]

.

[Hyrcanus]

So do Muslims who live in the US deny what is written in the Qur'an?

We've already seen what happens to those who convert to Christianity here in the US, who are female. And we've seen the beheadings of those who live outside the US.

I do not wish to live under Sharia Law.

They don't deny the Qur'an, but their interpretation might differ from yours. Just as our interpretations of the Bible, BoM, D&C and PoGP differ from our critics who read all sorts of ridiculous things that aren't actually being said.

You keep referencing the extremities some members of Islam will go to, many Christians and/or Mormons have done some equally terrible things.

You're equivocating living under Sharia Law to the building of this Mosque. They aren't the same thing. I'd fight living under Sharia Law as well, but that isn't what is being discussed here. You're falling into the trap of using logical fallacies to justify your position.

[pritchet1]

.

[Mosby]

We didn't make plans for destroying the US;

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/PDF/GovtExM.pdf

This also may be of interest - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Islam

And this - http://newstime.co.nz/apostates-from-is ... khari.html

And even this - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran ... ostasy.htm

Pritchet- I have always loved your post's and your insights here- but posting sources of "Islamic world domination" from HomelandSSecurity is a but much.

Maybe we would take your "research" more seriously if you posted some facts about Islam from a more respected source like Sean Hannity, Mark Levin - or Laura Ingram

Please tell me that linking to HomelandSSecurity was a joke right?

[pritchet1]

I had to scroll down to read the English translation.

[Hyrcanus]

The mosque in question (which would probably make it #101 as to mosques in NYC) is a false flag situation, because we know that 9/11 was also a false flag. I am not against building buildings, but I don't care for what that particular building will symbolically represent. (For that matter, I do not like what Wall Street represents.)

I'd also like to see the victory mosques on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem removed, so the new temple in Jerusalem can be built.

I'm just not too hip on Islam and what is written to be "gospel" in the sacred writings of Muhammad.

At least we have a temple in NYC, after it was rejected to being built in White Plains.

So why are you advocating the government stomping on freedom of religion in order to enforce your personal preference in religion?

[pritchet1]

The "gubmint" is not stalling the building from being built. On the contrary, the POTUS is using his influence and using taxpayer money to promote its being built.

That is just not correct. But he hasn't done anything that has been correct.

[singyourwayhome]

That's a great question. I'm not sure enough of myself right now to have a good answer. After reading Connor's blog entry, I stand corrected. I think he's right.
It might still be a KIND idea for the Imam to not build there... but I think he does have the right to do it.

[SmallFarm]

That's a great question. I'm not sure enough of myself right now to have a good answer. After reading Connor's blog entry, I stand corrected. I think he's right.
It might still be a KIND idea for the Imam to not build there... but I think he does have the right to do it.

I'm completely sure that the Imam is trying to be directly provocative. The point is we are greater fools to be offended when that is the intent.

[pritchet1]

The Center for Security Policy has a number of links discussing Stealth Sharia -
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/index.xml

See also Jihad Watch - http://www.jihadwatch.org/

[Mosby]

For those who haven't let fear cloud their eyes, here's an interesting article:

http://mormonism.suite101.com/article.c ... connection

[pritchet1]

American Grand Jury Discussion continues;

http://americangrandjury.org/the-brothe ... -the-guard

[pritchet1]

Why Muslims do what they do;

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/27092

[pritchet1]

The POTUS' Fatwa;

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/27070

[InfoWarrior82]

There needs to be more of a drive to investigate this shady Imam otherwise you're going to have a hard time battling the constitution to prevent the mosque from being built.

[SmallFarm]

There needs to be more of a drive to investigate this shady Imam otherwise you're going to have a hard time battling the constitution to prevent the mosque from being built.

But why battle it being built in the first place? I mean, the Imam is probably trying to be provacative, like the bully that stands three inches in front of your face and screams "Hit me I dare you." But what is the most appropriate response? Like that bully, the Imam is trying to start a fight and make it look like we started it. My response would be to ignore the whole mess.

[pritchet1]

Actually, the other player in the game that owns half the property and owes taxes on it, may be instrumental in it not being built.