Nullification - Constitutional Amendment

[freedomforall]

You've not even tried to question those reasonably.

To your satisfaction you mean?

I'm satisfied with common reason. Can you show with reason that these are NOT the definitions of prime constitutional intent the framers designed?

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

Can you prove as to why pure air is invisible?
Does the earth have gravity or does it merely suck?
Can you understand English or do I need to type slower when I ask you to quit bugging me? Now you're baiting, flaming, spamming and trolling.
Did you agree to these rules?

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1800" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Especially these: No Trolling, flaming, spamming, baiting.

[ChristopherABrown]

You've not even tried to question those reasonably.

To your satisfaction you mean?

I'm satisfied with common reason. Can you show with reason that these are NOT the definitions of prime constitutional intent the framers designed?

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

Can you prove as to why pure air is invisible?
Does the earth have gravity or does it merely suck?
Can you understand English or do I need to type slower when I ask you to quit bugging me? Now you're baiting, flaming, spamming and trolling.
Did you agree to these rules?

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1800" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Especially these: No Trolling, flaming, spamming, baiting.

I know the standard forum rules well, and I have notified Brian of what I'm doing.

This is a matter of the forums integrity towards the constitution of our republic. These are trying times, challenging times. Rising to the challenge requires some testing of the forums admin as members are tested for their fidelity.

As long as I am civil and refrain from direct accusations and use reasonable tests upon you, I do not think it is a violation of the rules.

You might not like it, but eventually you may understand that it must be this way in this anonymous environment if sincere Americans are going to avoid being mislead by covert agents exploiting the nature of the forum.

Seriously, examine the documentation I have found for cognitive infiltration.


http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014 ... ipulation/

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/net-ne ... turf-group" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/secti ... cument.pdf

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSB ... 1?irpc=932
For decades, the NSA and GCHQ have worked as close partners, sharing intelligence under an arrangement known as the UKUSA agreement. They also collaborate with eavesdropping agencies in Canada, Australia and New Zealand under an arrangement known as the "Five Eyes" alliance.

The questions I am asking you are questions a covert agent cannot answer in the affirmative. Doing so is perfectly counter to their agenda. They cannot participate in creating functional, law based unity amongst the American people.

I've been dealing with covert agents for over 15 years, and read between the lines very well. It has taken years and years of testing theories, in depth critical thinking about what an agent can and cannot do in service to their masters to develop this technique, so if you are sincere, just go along with it and agree.

And if you do not agree, and refuse to present a reason that makes sense, well, that's not good.