"I Fought For You"
- Mr. Tissue Box
- captain of 100
- Posts: 106
- Location: Southern California
Re: "I Fought For You"
That's right little children... Clap for the pawns who ignorantly dove into this illegal war.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
- Mr. Tissue Box
- captain of 100
- Posts: 106
- Location: Southern California
Re: "I Fought For You"
Well, at least in WWII, we fought against a legitimate enemy that posed as a danger to the world (even though the Nazis were funded by Western banks, we had to clean up their mess...)pritchet1 wrote:Are there any wars that are "legal"?
But this war is all for geopolitical reasons and such. So, in my view it's much more of an illegal war, than say WWII.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
Re: "I Fought For You"
So the premise is false in "I Fought for You", instead of "I fought to protect freedom and liberty" or for what was written on the flag by Captain Moroni, correct?
But as propaganda, did it not bring a tear to your eye? Maybe the kids should have kept the earphones plugged in after all. They may already have figured out that the wars today, are fought for corporate interests and not for freedom-based ideals.
But as propaganda, did it not bring a tear to your eye? Maybe the kids should have kept the earphones plugged in after all. They may already have figured out that the wars today, are fought for corporate interests and not for freedom-based ideals.
- Mr. Tissue Box
- captain of 100
- Posts: 106
- Location: Southern California
Re: "I Fought For You"
I certainly felt the patriotism and whatnot with the video in defending freedom, but when soldiers fighting today's war came in, it just brought in a corporate stink.pritchet1 wrote:So the premise is false in "I Fought for You", instead of "I fought to protect freedom and liberty" or for what was written on the flag by Captain Moroni, correct?
But as propaganda, did it not bring a tear to your eye? Maybe the kids should have kept the earphones plugged in after all. They may already have figured out that the wars today, are fought for corporate interests and not for freedom-based ideals.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
- Mr. Tissue Box
- captain of 100
- Posts: 106
- Location: Southern California
Re: "I Fought For You"
Yeah, I've looked at Oathkeepers some over the past, and it looks pretty good.
Soldiers who won't obey orders that defy the constitution, etc. Good in my book.
- Mosby
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1197
- Location: Mosby's Confederacy in the deep South of the People's Republic of Utah
Re: "I Fought For You"
I got a warm fuzzy feeling when I watched that, kind like this:
http://files.puritanhead.com/uploaded_i ... 778741.jpg
Of course we should support the troops without question, I mean aren't they the ones who keep us free...........
I never thought I would say this, but those kids would be far better off listening to "Justin Bieber" than that propaganda piece.
You are right Pritchet- we need our country back.
http://files.puritanhead.com/uploaded_i ... 778741.jpg
Of course we should support the troops without question, I mean aren't they the ones who keep us free...........
I never thought I would say this, but those kids would be far better off listening to "Justin Bieber" than that propaganda piece.
You are right Pritchet- we need our country back.
-
- the Sunbeam
- Posts: 1242
Re: "I Fought For You"
Two books that enlightened me a wee bit:
1) We were soldiers once
2) Sergeant Nibley, PhD.
While not the overall point of the books, they both mentioned sections of their respective locales that were off-limits to both sides of the war. In Vietnam, there was a tea plantation that neither the North or the South were allowed to enter. Any destruction to said property would have resulted in a bill being sent to the offending party. In Holland, there was a private estate that neither the Allies nor the Germans were allowed to enter. As Nibley describes it, there were signs to that effect in both English and German.
Now, explain that to me. How does one play both sides of a war? If it were truly a matter of global hegemony on Germany's part, or a matter of ridding the world of tyranny on our part, why the pass given to this individual? It's like Switzerland claiming neutrality, how does that work? Wave a white flag as the Panzers arrive at your border and they'll turn around? I bet Poland wanted to hop on that gravy train.
1) We were soldiers once
2) Sergeant Nibley, PhD.
While not the overall point of the books, they both mentioned sections of their respective locales that were off-limits to both sides of the war. In Vietnam, there was a tea plantation that neither the North or the South were allowed to enter. Any destruction to said property would have resulted in a bill being sent to the offending party. In Holland, there was a private estate that neither the Allies nor the Germans were allowed to enter. As Nibley describes it, there were signs to that effect in both English and German.
Now, explain that to me. How does one play both sides of a war? If it were truly a matter of global hegemony on Germany's part, or a matter of ridding the world of tyranny on our part, why the pass given to this individual? It's like Switzerland claiming neutrality, how does that work? Wave a white flag as the Panzers arrive at your border and they'll turn around? I bet Poland wanted to hop on that gravy train.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
Re: "I Fought For You"
This Justin Bieber?
http://www.justinbiebermusic.com/
On my site, http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/index.htm
I also posted "Uncelebrating the 4th of July" http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/201 ... g-the-4th/,
the video "Ragged Old Flag" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whmVGRSgAe8,
"Oath Keepers" http://oathkeepers.org/oath/,
the online Constitution http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
and LA Times article on the 4th of July "Required Reading" http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... -text.html
as well as the video of Amiana singing the National Anthem
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWk0dZAyDTA.
http://www.justinbiebermusic.com/
On my site, http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/index.htm
I also posted "Uncelebrating the 4th of July" http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/201 ... g-the-4th/,
the video "Ragged Old Flag" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whmVGRSgAe8,
"Oath Keepers" http://oathkeepers.org/oath/,
the online Constitution http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
and LA Times article on the 4th of July "Required Reading" http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... -text.html
as well as the video of Amiana singing the National Anthem
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWk0dZAyDTA.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
Re: "I Fought For You"
Answer to Rob:
It is how the International banking system and judicial systems are run and operated and how these individuals "showed their papers".
They knew the game and how to play it.
BTW, we are still "the Colonies" in the eyes of Great Britain. I never understood that until I read about the story behind the story of the War of 1812.
It is how the International banking system and judicial systems are run and operated and how these individuals "showed their papers".
They knew the game and how to play it.
BTW, we are still "the Colonies" in the eyes of Great Britain. I never understood that until I read about the story behind the story of the War of 1812.
- Mosby
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1197
- Location: Mosby's Confederacy in the deep South of the People's Republic of Utah
Re: "I Fought For You"
Wow, just today I realized that I knew next to nothing about the war of 1812, so I read a brief history of it- do you have a good resource for the "story behind the story"I never understood that until I read about the story behind the story of the War of 1812.
Thanks!
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
Re: "I Fought For You"
This might be a fun read too...
"Authorized Ways to Celebrate the 4th of July";
http://targetfreedom.com/books/governme ... h-of-july/
"Authorized Ways to Celebrate the 4th of July";
http://targetfreedom.com/books/governme ... h-of-july/
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3600
Re: "I Fought For You"
If the oath keepers would following their oath they would not be fighting in other countries. They would resign since a Marxist is the Commander-in-Chief. We had a Fascist before him. It is like king-men in the king-men army trying to change the king-men by fighting for them instead of quitting and joining with Captain Moroni.Mr. Tissue Box wrote:Yeah, I've looked at Oathkeepers some over the past, and it looks pretty good.
Soldiers who won't obey orders that defy the constitution, etc. Good in my book.
It all the same ole' garbage. When it get's worse THEN we will act.
Puke!
Too little; too late.
Re: "I Fought For You"
WWII was won by the Fascists and the bankers.
American got Withholding taxes, non voluntary Socialism, and Federal Reserve Notes printed at will out the War.
The losers are obvious as were the winners.
Freedom lost.
Bankers won.
American got Withholding taxes, non voluntary Socialism, and Federal Reserve Notes printed at will out the War.
The losers are obvious as were the winners.
Freedom lost.
Bankers won.
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 163