Your home for discussing politics, the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and the principles of liberty.
Alpine wrote:
What would you do if your husband wanted something you were opposed to and you could not come to an agreement?
I ask these questions of my single sisters all the time. I am always stunned at the answers I get.

Elder Richard G. Scott, Gen. Conf. Apr 2009
http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2009/04/temple-worship-the-source-of-strength-and-power-in-times-of-need?lang=eng
Fourteen years ago the Lord decided it was not necessary for my wife to live any longer on the earth, and He took her to the other side of the veil. I confess that there are times when it is difficult not to be able to turn and talk to her, but I do not complain. The Lord has allowed me, at important moments in my life, to feel her influence through the veil.
What I am trying to teach is that when we keep the temple covenants we have made and when we live righteously in order to maintain the blessings promised by those ordinances, then come what may, we have no reason to worry or to feel despondent.
I know that I will have the privilege of being with that beautiful wife, whom I love with all my heart, and with those children who are with her on the other side of the veil because of the ordinances that are performed in the temple. What a blessing to have once again on the earth the sealing authority, not only for this mortal life but for the eternities. I am grateful that the Lord has restored His gospel in its fulness, including the ordinances that are required for us to be happy in the world and to live everlastingly happy lives in the hereafter.
Alpine wrote: Todays woman is more like a man than a woman. It takes more than a dress and makeup to make a woman.
All this talk of equality and I think women have abandoned the nature that should be ours. We are not sweet, kind, temperate, lovely, hardworking, generous, nurturers. We are instead haughty, disdainful, manipulative, disrespectful, callous, greedy, gossipy, loud, selfish, whiny and we are fully bitchy. We boss men around like they still need mommies, take over situations that would be better served by the men, we work outside the home and abandon our husbands and children, we are worldly and vain.
I am not interested in starting a shallow topic about how men are the cause of all the problems in the world. I think it is us sisters that have caused this problem and us sisters that must fix it. I do not think that we are doing ourselves any good by pretending to a virtue we do not posses. If we are to do our part to fix the world we need to stop spouting the worldly nonsense that we are the victims of men and start getting ourselves back on track.
So the question remains....what are we supposed to be?
.
.Stella Solaris wrote:The "guide", if you will, that I've always liked to look at as a goal of what a truly Godly woman is like is found mostly in Proverbs 31 -
Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies...
Alpine wrote:WOW! ask and ye shall receive! The responses are wonderfully overwhelming and I am working on digesting them. I have a few questions in the mean time.
What is "Ruach haQodesh"? Is there a connection with " Ha Qadowsh Kowl"? It seems to be Hebrew but I am not getting any helpful hits on google. Lots of help with pronunciation, nothing explanatory.
And for KoZ where does this guide come from? It generally seems like good advice and if you are in a monogamous relationship then substitute women outside the home and you have a similar effect. That is, women tend to gossip to friends and wardmates etc.
Stella Solaris, that is a great list and I am still looking up all those scriptures! I liked #6 especially because I often wish I had someone to consult with. I get carried away and mess up the finances all the time!![]()
reese, you said "I think roles are important. I think satan tries very hard to get us to fight our roles. I do not think that a man is more important in any way than a woman." I totally agree. Both that no one is more important and that we were encouraged to fight our roles. of course at this point in history I am not even sure what my role IS. lol. I do think it is more like the things posted here and less like the world tells us. Right now I have to play both parts in my world so it is hard not to get confused and harder to let go of ideas I should not have incorporated in my life in the first place.
I had a thought this morning, the phrase "neither marry, nor are given in marriage" is more popular than I would have expected. It popped into my head and I wonder if "marry" vs "given in marriage" depends on the point of view or if that is a gender distinction?

Alpine wrote:Well I keep coming back here to post something but I reread what has been said and get to thinking.... then before I know it I have no time left! So here is another question. How do you implement these things? I mean lets say you were raised with a bad example and you are not married so there is no mirroring of any kind. Any practical ideas about figuring out how you come across and how to fix it?


Deborah000 wrote:I think happiness in marriage comes from putting the other person's needs first.

I have so many thoughts on this topic, but I'll restrain myself to sharing only one. Do we really think about what it means for a woman to be given to a man in marriage?
First of all, who gives the woman to the man? The Lord does. Does the Lord ever force anyone to do something against their will? Is not freedom of choice the ideal that the Lord and all His followers fought for in our former lives? Then how can the Lord give the woman to the man? He cannot force her to give herself to her husband.
The Lord can only give the woman to the man if the woman has first given herself to the Lord.
We are married and sealed here on earth, but this means nothing in heaven until our marriages are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise. Do you think the Lord is going to give one of His precious daughters eternally to a man who does not understand her worth or who is not qualified to live a Celestial life? We should not take lightly the idea of the woman being given to the man. He must qualify to have her as his wife.
The truth is always backwards from what we naturally believe. We have a tendency to believe that because woman is given to man, she belongs to him and he is the ruler over her. But this is not true. The Lord says the leader must be the servant. The person who loses his life gains it. Therefore, it would seem to me that the man who gives himself to his wife and makes himself the servant of his wife is the one who will gain her, who will qualify for the Lord to give her to him. So he who has given himself to his wife is the one who will be given her. Therefore, there will be no inequality in marriage and the wife will enjoy the same privileges as her husband.
I believe that in order to do so, both the woman and the man have to overcome what are perhaps the most basic natural tendencies that they have. This is only possible to obtain through the changes available to us through the atonement of Christ. Without Christ, there can be no marriage.
Called to Serve wrote:Thanks, Heir, it came from the Lord. He taught me as I wrote. It was awesome. I finally understand the concept of "giving" in marriage.
Called to Serve wrote:I have so many thoughts on this topic, but I'll restrain myself to sharing only one. Do we really think about what it means for a woman to be given to a man in marriage?
First of all, who gives the woman to the man? The Lord does. Does the Lord ever force anyone to do something against their will? Is not freedom of choice the ideal that the Lord and all His followers fought for in our former lives? Then how can the Lord give the woman to the man? He cannot force her to give herself to her husband.
The Lord can only give the woman to the man if the woman has first given herself to the Lord.
We are married and sealed here on earth, but this means nothing in heaven until our marriages are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise. Do you think the Lord is going to give one of His precious daughters eternally to a man who does not understand her worth or who is not qualified to live a Celestial life? We should not take lightly the idea of the woman being given to the man. He must qualify to have her as his wife.
The truth is always backwards from what we naturally believe. We have a tendency to believe that because woman is given to man, she belongs to him and he is the ruler over her. But this is not true. The Lord says the leader must be the servant. The person who loses his life gains it. Therefore, it would seem to me that the man who gives himself to his wife and makes himself the servant of his wife is the one who will gain her, who will qualify for the Lord to give her to him. So he who has given himself to his wife is the one who will be given her. Therefore, there will be no inequality in marriage and the wife will enjoy the same privileges as her husband.
I believe that in order to do so, both the woman and the man have to overcome what are perhaps the most basic natural tendencies that they have. This is only possible to obtain through the changes available to us through the atonement of Christ. Without Christ, there can be no marriage.

Called to Serve wrote:I have so many thoughts on this topic, but I'll restrain myself to sharing only one. Do we really think about what it means for a woman to be given to a man in marriage?
First of all, who gives the woman to the man? The Lord does. Does the Lord ever force anyone to do something against their will? Is not freedom of choice the ideal that the Lord and all His followers fought for in our former lives? Then how can the Lord give the woman to the man? He cannot force her to give herself to her husband.
The Lord can only give the woman to the man if the woman has first given herself to the Lord.
We are married and sealed here on earth, but this means nothing in heaven until our marriages are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise. Do you think the Lord is going to give one of His precious daughters eternally to a man who does not understand her worth or who is not qualified to live a Celestial life? We should not take lightly the idea of the woman being given to the man. He must qualify to have her as his wife.
The truth is always backwards from what we naturally believe. We have a tendency to believe that because woman is given to man, she belongs to him and he is the ruler over her. But this is not true. The Lord says the leader must be the servant. The person who loses his life gains it. Therefore, it would seem to me that the man who gives himself to his wife and makes himself the servant of his wife is the one who will gain her, who will qualify for the Lord to give her to him. So he who has given himself to his wife is the one who will be given her. Therefore, there will be no inequality in marriage and the wife will enjoy the same privileges as her husband.
I believe that in order to do so, both the woman and the man have to overcome what are perhaps the most basic natural tendencies that they have. This is only possible to obtain through the changes available to us through the atonement of Christ. Without Christ, there can be no marriage.

Called to Serve wrote:
The truth is so clear and plain that it is amazing that not every person on earth can see it and yet they don't. The man's job as provider is to support the woman and the children. Did you get that? I'll repeat it just in case. The man's role as provider of the family is a role of servitude and support toward the wife and children. One more time, because it is really, really important. The man makes money and provides for his family because he is their servant. That is the physical portion of his job to bring to pass the eternal life and immortality of man.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests