Here is the quote from the LOF...There is a lot of LDS Doctrine, not only in the mainstream LDS Church but also in the Remnant Movement, which relies upon what is taught about the nature of God in D&C 130:22. Does everyone realize how much scripture that one verse contradicts? Did anyone realize that Joseph Smith actually sought to correct the individual who originally taught what was in that verse?
I saw this information written in another blog post and thought I would share it here and get some thoughts as to why Joseph Smith sought to correct the person who taught it and ultimately was responsible for adding it to the D&C over 30 years after Joseph died?
Elder Orson Pratt and Elder Orson Hyde added it to the Doctrine and Covenants in 1876. It came from a series of talks that Orson Hyde gave in the presence of Joseph Smith in 1842. Some of the items that Orson Hyde spoke on were not accurate, such that it required a private correction by Joseph Smith. Joseph Smith Papers, Journals, Volume 2 page 324, on April 2, 1842, Joseph recorded:
“Elder Hyde I am going to offer some corrections to you. Elder Hyde replied – they shall be thankfully received. – When he (Christ) shall appear we shall see him as he is. We shall see that he (Christ) is a man like ourselves. – (Parenthesis added).
This is consistent with the Lectures on Faith. The Son (Christ) is a man, a ‘tabernacle of clay’. Just like us. However, later on, Joseph records the following on page 326:
“There is a law irrevocably decreed in heaven. Before the foundation of the world upon which all blessings are predicted and when we obtain a blessing it is by obedience to the law upon which that blessing is predicated. Again reverted to Elder Hyde’s mistake. &c the Father has a body of flesh & bones as tangible as mans the son also, but the Holy Ghost is a personage of spirit. – and a person cannot have the personage . It may descend upon him but not to tarry with him.— (Bold and Italics added)
“So the clincher here, the way Joseph Wrote in his Journal is he elaborated on “Elder Hyde’s mistake”, by writing. “&c”. I had to look this up, but &c is another way to write Etc. Normally we would write this after the sentence. However, Joseph Used it before the sentence, in fact it starts the sentence, listing Elder Hyde’s mistake. What was Elder Hydes mistake? Amongst other things (&c): the Father having a body of flesh and bones as tangible as mans the son also and the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit. I assert that Joseph was trying to lay out to Elder Hyde, that to know God, you must know correctly about God. Then preceded to correct his errors, which errors, he listed for us in his Journal.”
“In Lectures on Faith, Joseph Smith Clearly states that God is a SPIRIT OF GLORY AND POWER, and further that the HOLY SPIRIT IS THE MIND OF GOD.”
The Joseph Smith Papers captures this incident with Joseph correcting Elder Hyde on the Godhead: http://www.josephsmithpapers.org/…/jour ... r-1842…/50
Section 130:22 was one of the things at odds with those brethren on the committee that decided to remove the Lectures on Faith from the D&C in 1921 without a vote. They felt that the description Joseph gave of the Father in lecture on Faith chapter 5 (?) was at odds with what was in section 130:22, which apparently was added to the D&C sometime after Joseph and Hyrum were slain.
Now, as to what Scriptures that D&C 130:22 contradict:
Alma 34: 34-38
2 Nephi 4: 12
John 14:10, 16-17, 19-20, 23
Acts 7: 48
1 Cor 3:16-17
1 Cor 12: 11-14
2 Cor 6: 14-16
Eph 3: 17, 19
D&C 93: 17, 35
D&C 88: 47-50, 66
2 Tim 1:14
1 John 4: 12-16
Heb 10: 19-20
2 Cor 3: 12-18
Helaman 4: 24
Jonah 2: 4, 7
Psalms 18: 6
Mosiah 15: 1-5
Other supporting verses:"The Father being a personage of spirit, glory, and power, possessing all perfection and fullness. The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, a person-age of tabernacle, made or fashioned like unto man, or being in the form and likeness of man—or rather, man was formed after his likeness and in his image.
This line of thinking is very interesting...3 Nephi chapter 1:14 Behold, I come unto my own, to fulfil all things which I have made known unto the children of men from the foundation of the world, and to do the will, both of the Father and of the Son—of the Father because of me, and of the Son because of my flesh. And behold, the time is at hand, and this night shall the sign be given.
John 14:7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
What are your thoughts? How do you interpret all the scriptures that seem to contradict D&C130:22?John 16: 7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away [Jesus or The Father in His physical form manifested in the Telestial World]: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
Why?
Moses 5:9 And in that day the Holy Ghost fell upon Adam, which beareth record of the Father and the Son, saying: I am the Only Begotten of the Father from the beginning, henceforth and forever, that as thou hast fallen thou mayest be redeemed, and all mankind, even as many as will.
Is God a spirit?
Peace,
Amonhi