Welcome, Vicki. That was a very well written and thought provoking first post. It almost left me feeling guilty over having eaten a bacon cheeseburger so I could know that two animals died to satisfy me.Vicki wrote: ↑March 7th, 2017, 8:20 pm Someone on this site wrote,
"What do you think the verse above means if you make the following change?
"Yea flesh also of beasts and of the fowls of the air, I, the Lord have ordained for the use of man with thanksgiving; nevertheless they are to be used sparingly; and it is pleasing unto me that they should not be used only in times of winter, or of cold, or famine." (D&C 89:12-13)
Remove the comma between used and only. How different does the verse read?
This comma was not in the original version of the revelation and, as best as I can tell, was added in the 1920's. Some say it was added in as a mistake, but never corrected or taken out."
Me,
The interpretation is always meant to be read with a comma or pause, to distinguish the interpretation. Even if there was no comma back when originally written, Joseph knew how it was meant to be read.
Here, is the back up to vs. 13 which supports why the comma is in fact, needed. Looking at 89 vs.15 the Savior included, to make no mistake of interpretation. Vs. 15. "And these hath God made for the use of man only in times of famine and excess of hunger."
THESE in vs. 15, is referring back to meat consumption; only in times of famine..... The footnote of THESE, in vs. 15, refers to vs. 13 which is referring to flesh consumption, which means that "THESE" is referring to in times of famine.
Also, another footnote to THESE is 49:18, "And whoso forbiddeth to abstain from meats, that man should not eat the same, is not ordained of God." This has to be stating that meat is ordained to save your life if you need it. In other words, if meat is what you have to eat, then eat it rather than starve. But it should be used in emergency, famine or winter.
This is why the comma was always meant to be there, because the interpretation is only in times of cold, winter or famine. Or, to save your life. NOT to always consume it.
Also, note verse 12 is also a witness to vs. 13, Because it says SPARINGLY, like when you use your spare tire, in an emergency. This supports "used, only in times of winter, or of cold, or famine."
The Doctrine & Covenants gives - three verses (12,13,15) - to sustain, why the comma is included for interpretation.
Seriously, I think that if you look at D&C 89:15 you need to look at the preceding verse. I think "wild animals" from verse 14 are what are being referred to in verse 15. In verse 12 we are told that meat is ordained for the use of man, but to use meat sparingly. Verse 13 says it's pleasing that we don't eat meet except when really needed, but I see nothing to suggest that it is a sin to eat meat outside of famine (note that I am excluding cold because, with modern shipping from around the world, we have fresh produce year round).
And when I look at D&C 49:18, which you quoted above, I find a footnote to the ford forbiddeth that reads: "I.E. biddeth to abstain." As you will note in the section heading, this revelation was received in response to some converts holding on to Shaker beliefs. One of those beliefs was forbidding people from eating meat. The D&C student manual, as well as the heading to this section, state that this section shows that the eating of meat is approved.
As I read verses 12-15 of the Word of Wisdom I make three conclusions:
1) We are permitted to eat meat.
2) We are expected to eat meat sparingly.
3) It is better, but not required, that we only eat meat when other foods are scarce.
Go ahead and have steak and lobster or turducken. Just do so infrequently, or better yet order the vegetarian option. But if you abstain from eating meat, don't direct others to do so.