A lesson you may not get in Relief Society

[Fiannan]

So maybe you should share this with young women in your life, or show it to them in Family Home Evening if they are still at home. And also show it to young men. Sometimes the red pill is not served in our LDS circles anymore.

[MMbelieve]

Too political, there would be zero interest in young men's and young womens. We can speak of good and righteous things without being so political or negatively bashing the "liberals".

The video is very long but skimmed through it just a little, not sure what the entire idea was but did catch the part of being a caregiver and a mother to your own child. That children need THEIR parents and we are not interchangable.

Maybe a short synopsis would be helpful Fiannan.

[Fiannan]

Too political, there would be zero interest in young men's and young womens. We can speak of good and righteous things without being so political or negatively bashing the "liberals".

The video is very long but skimmed through it just a little, not sure what the entire idea was but did catch the part of being a caregiver and a mother to your own child. That children need THEIR parents and we are not interchangable.

Maybe a short synopsis would be helpful Fiannan.

Sorry, no Reader's Digest condensed version. Sometimes one needs details for proper analysis -- such as her story as to why she rejected feminism, or why modern liberalism is anti-family.

You know, one cannot be a liberal and be following the Gospel -- and that is just the way it is. Maybe our young people need to be exposed to something other than the Disney gospel and then we would not be seeing our membership hemorrhaging.

[MMbelieve]

Too political, there would be zero interest in young men's and young womens. We can speak of good and righteous things without being so political or negatively bashing the "liberals".

The video is very long but skimmed through it just a little, not sure what the entire idea was but did catch the part of being a caregiver and a mother to your own child. That children need THEIR parents and we are not interchangable.

Maybe a short synopsis would be helpful Fiannan.

Sorry, no Reader's Digest condensed version. Sometimes one needs details for proper analysis -- such as her story as to why she rejected feminism, or why modern liberalism is anti-family.

You know, one cannot be a liberal and be following the Gospel -- and that is just the way it is. Maybe our young people need to be exposed to something other than the Disney gospel and then we would not be seeing our membership hemorrhaging.

Lol, what the heck is "Disney gospel"?

What gospel do you suggest they get exposed to? Hell fire and brimstone? Lol

If your going to be soft then your soft on everyone. If your clear and consist without the fluff or feel goods for the youth then you must be the same with adults and primary too.

I just don't get the Disney gospel thing for one group and not the other. If we change how we teach the youth, do you know how many adults would get injured? If we're teaching Disney gospel, lol whatever that means, then there is likely a reason. Changing that fact by how or what is taught likely won't result in anything but hemorrhaging.

[Fiannan]

Lol, what the heck is "Disney gospel"?

Maybe this...

Which leads to this (I am not a fan of Perry, and I suspect there are double meanings here)