It might be an eye opening experience for you to look at some of your husband's posts on this forum, and maybe you'll be able to see why he was banned.Kitkat wrote:Suggestion. :ymblushing:BrianM wrote:As I mentioned above, I appreciate having a diversity of thoughts being expressed here, I don't think we all need to agree with each other, but it at least needs to be done within the scope of the forum rules. If you don't agree with the forum rules you're welcome to discuss that with me and offer suggestions, and sometimes the rules might change but please follow whatever rules are currently in place.
Adhere to your own forum rules when it comes to potentially banning members. ;)
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1800" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Joseph Smith said: "I did not like the old man being called up for erring in doctrine. It looks too much like the Methodist, and not like the Latter-day Saints. Methodists have creeds which a man must believe or be asked out of their church. I want the liberty of thinking and believing as I please. It feels so good not to be trammeled. It does not prove that a man is not a good man because he errs in doctrine." (DHC 5: 340.)
We understand from D&C 121 that "Influence can or ought to be maintained by... persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned; by kindness, and pure knowledge, which shall greatly enlarge the soul without hypocrisy, and without guile..."
Again, discussion of almost all topics is welcome, we're not all always going to agree with each other on every point of doctrine/belief, but there is a difference between discussing opinions, beliefs, doctrine, etc and coming here with an agenda to promote ideas and doctrine that are anti-mormon, apostate, and/or contrary to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. If you are here to learn - great!
I realize some of the rules are subjective to the personal opinions of the site administrator and moderator's; we will do our best to judge such matters according to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Also keep in mind that not everything that someone might label "speaking evil of the lord's anointed" is actually evil speaking. I think some people tend to misapply it. Discussing something that concerns you is not necessarily evil speaking. Also, the "truth" cannot ever be "evil."
viewtopic.php?f=57&t=42814
viewtopic.php?f=57&t=43300&p=738263#p738263
I think it shows clearly that the forum did not bring out his best side, he became very trollish in his responses and seemed to obsess about certain posters.
Kitkat, if you want to help him, then help him be honest with himself and admit that Brian's decision was right. BofM was unraveling before our eyes--these two posts I linked to show it clearly, and if you want to see more, just look at his posting record. Posting inflammatory things designed to stir up a hornet's nest is clearly not what the forum is for. If he enjoyed this type of participation, then I think it's obvious this isn't the right kind of forum for him. Also, his participation was often disruptive and he would steer threads into a tangent where he would become the focus of the discussion.