Its the innuendo, IWS. That is my point. Otherwise, any similarity between maybe some of Trump tactics with a few of Alinsky's is a non issue, and I have no interest proving it, one way or another.iWriteStuff wrote:Funny, I don't harbor "dislike/hatred/revulsion" of Trump at all. I disagree with him and do not support him, same as I did six months ago. Perhaps you're too defensive of Trump to understand the difference between disagreement and hatred, but there's a world of difference and reasonable discussion is only possible when you understand it.larsenb wrote:Additionally, tough for me to take someone serious who had voted Republican the last several elections, but this time around voted for Darrel Castle, knowing full well that this was effectively increasing Hillary's proportion of the total vote, vs. Trump.iWriteStuff wrote:Explain?kenedy wrote:I am not agree with Trump's decision here.He's totally wrong about that...
This is an indication to me that your dislike/hatred/revulsion of Trump is so great that the above fact never bothered you. So, you and I are simply on different wave length regarding Trump.
Please, re-read any post of mine and you'll see that I've never falsely accused him of aligning with Alinsky's policy goals. I accurately pointed out that his methods are the same. And now both you and the rest of his supporters agree with that statement and call it "common sense". Seems I haven't changed my opinion; you have.
Safe space? Seriously? I'm no liberal, I haven't complained/protested/rioted about the outcome of the election, and I've been watching very carefully to see how serious he is about achieving his central promises. So far, the "end the globalist", anti-Goldman Sachs narrative has been completely debunked. Goldman is closer to him than his own wife at this point, including the Soros disciple Mnuchin he put in at Treasury. He's even considering more Goldman guys to fill positions at Treasury. As per Globalists in general...
Wilbur Ross, Commerce Secretary, spent his career sending jobs to Mexico and China.
Rick Perry, Energy Secretary, is a well known "RINO globalist".
Rex Tillerson, "the very definition of a globalist" (Bill Kristol)
http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/ ... lobalists/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.therightscoop.com/rex-tiller ... l-kristol/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Who is hiding in a bunker denying reality now? And please don't give me that "he hires globalists to fight globalists" garbage. It's pure nonsense.
Final thought: whatever happened to "LOCK HER UP"? Big campaign promise failure, and sadly the one I would have gladly welcomed.
I think Trump did us a wonderful favor by thrusting the globalist topic into the public forum in the first place. Making it part of the public dialogue. Hardly anything true globalists would want to see done. And I've seen no MSM article or news story dissecting or even mentioning this phenomenon. It's still taboo with them, outside of tagging it simply as global trade.
Bill and Irving Kristol are themselves major players in the neocon wing of this globalist onslaught. So its a mystery to me why Bill would want to hang this tag on Tillerson, except to undermine Trump . . . Kind of like associating Trump with Saul Alinsky. Probably the same type of thing.
As for the rest of those you mention, I'll be waiting to see how they perform . . . whether they follow Trump's anti-globalist stance or further the globalist agenda. If the latter, and if Trump doesn't reign them in or fire them, bad on Trump, and his approval rating with me and most of his constituents will begin to seriously plummet.
My take on politicos, is that they first have to say most of the right things. Trump has been doing this for me. And I try to avoid being trapped by negative models until more data comes in. Guilt by association is a weak argument with me. It's a concern, yes. But I'm willing to see what they actually do. You folks apparently take a different stance.