What sinners are you talking about, the ones who don't pay their tithing?Obrien wrote:The majority are also sinners, does that justify your sin?
Majorities are a sucker's game...who cares what the herd is doing?
( Oh hell, sorry Obrien)
Post by Bee Prepared »
What sinners are you talking about, the ones who don't pay their tithing?Obrien wrote:The majority are also sinners, does that justify your sin?
Majorities are a sucker's game...who cares what the herd is doing?
No, I wasn't thinking of "the ones who don't pay their tithing". I was thinking in general terms.Bee Prepared wrote:What sinners are you talking about, the ones who don't pay their tithing?Obrien wrote:The majority are also sinners, does that justify your sin?
Majorities are a sucker's game...who cares what the herd is doing?
( Oh hell, sorry Obrien)
Post by Robert Sinclair »
I think you meant Poelman hole. :ymdevil:Obrien wrote:Just a bump for my favorite post. I'm curious to see how it fares in the new, more judgmental Mainstream Mormon forum. Who knows, perhaps it will be locked and disappear into the memory hole... time will tell.
Clever clever... but I did not wear the clothes today as the day that I wrote this post, so technically speaking, it wouldn't be a Poelman hole. THAT requires everything but the words (and the presence of the choir) to be precisely the same the second time around!caddis wrote:I think you meant Poelman hole. :ymdevil:Obrien wrote:Just a bump for my favorite post. I'm curious to see how it fares in the new, more judgmental Mainstream Mormon forum. Who knows, perhaps it will be locked and disappear into the memory hole... time will tell.
Well then, clearly you don't have what it takes to work in the Church Office Building. No soup stipend for you!!!Obrien wrote:Clever clever... but I did not wear the clothes today as the day that I wrote this post, so technically speaking, it wouldn't be a Poelman hole. THAT requires everything but the words (and the presence of the choir) to be precisely the same the second time around!caddis wrote:I think you meant Poelman hole. :ymdevil:Obrien wrote:Just a bump for my favorite post. I'm curious to see how it fares in the new, more judgmental Mainstream Mormon forum. Who knows, perhaps it will be locked and disappear into the memory hole... time will tell.
like me :))Obrien wrote:Just a bump for my favorite post. I'm curious to see how it fares in the new, more judgmental Mainstream Mormon forum. Who knows, perhaps it will be locked and disappear into the memory hole... time will tell.
Post by Robert Sinclair »
If you ever contributed to the them financially, then sure. If you didn't put nuthin' on their table, its none of your businesswompus wrote:
I'll sign that petition as soon as everyone here who signed that petition posts all their financial info online... that means the last 7 years of your bank statements, credit card statements, balance sheets, income statements and tax returns... and then I get to judge whether or not you can have a temple recommend based on if you've paid a full tithe and see how much you actually are donating to charity other than the LDS church!
Harakim - or, why not ask for a scripturally based change (common consent) to allow the people who provide the offering to know how the offering is used? There's no requirement that church finance be a secret from the church members. Peace to you, harakim.harakim wrote:Here's an idea. If you don't trust the Church, get outYeah, I'll trust them with my eternal salvation, but the few dollars I give them..???
Has the church ever practiced financial disclosure? Like in Joseph Smith's time?Obrien wrote:Harakim - or, why not ask for a scripturally based change (common consent) to allow the people who provide the offering to know how the offering is used? There's no requirement that church finance be a secret from the church members. Peace to you, harakim.harakim wrote:Here's an idea. If you don't trust the Church, get outYeah, I'll trust them with my eternal salvation, but the few dollars I give them..???
In direct answer to your question above, I'd have to say the only time I am aware of was during Peter's time, when Ananias and his wife were not transparent with their offerings. In more modern times, seeharakim wrote:Has the church ever practiced financial disclosure? Like in Joseph Smith's time?Obrien wrote:Harakim - or, why not ask for a scripturally based change (common consent) to allow the people who provide the offering to know how the offering is used? There's no requirement that church finance be a secret from the church members. Peace to you, harakim.harakim wrote:Here's an idea. If you don't trust the Church, get outYeah, I'll trust them with my eternal salvation, but the few dollars I give them..???
Sorry for the bad info. When I checked the pdf this morning I see it starts around page 120.harakim wrote:I was unable to find the financial information in that document. If you could look at it and tell me more specifically where it is, I would appreciate that. If they did report it until the 1960s, it is a little weird they stopped, but I personally am confident they have good reason to have done so.
Page 120 is where I lookedObrien wrote:Sorry for the bad info. When I checked the pdf this morning I see it starts around page 120.harakim wrote:I was unable to find the financial information in that document. If you could look at it and tell me more specifically where it is, I would appreciate that. If they did report it until the 1960s, it is a little weird they stopped, but I personally am confident they have good reason to have done so.
I'm sure there were several compelling reasons to stop reporting such info. I think some of those issues are addressed by boo earlier in this thread.
I checked the link and printed out the sheets this morning. Page 120 is titled at the top "1947 Financial and Statistical Report" in large, bold letters. The following 6 pages show a fair amount of financial information. If you cannot find it, I don't know what to say...harakim wrote:Page 120 is where I lookedObrien wrote:Sorry for the bad info. When I checked the pdf this morning I see it starts around page 120.harakim wrote:I was unable to find the financial information in that document. If you could look at it and tell me more specifically where it is, I would appreciate that. If they did report it until the 1960s, it is a little weird they stopped, but I personally am confident they have good reason to have done so.
I'm sure there were several compelling reasons to stop reporting such info. I think some of those issues are addressed by boo earlier in this thread.
EDIT: I actually looked through the entire thing, but I specifically looked at page 120 in slow and agonizing detail.
LDSFreedomForum.com and its admin / moderators do not necessarily agree with all content posted by users of this forum.
The views and content on this site reflect only the opinions and teachings of the authors of the respective content contained herein.