Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by freedomforall »

Trump Just Did What Barack Obama Said Was Impossible

While the polls show a tight race that could go either way, what is apparent this election cycle is Trump has defied all predictions of the professional political class and media.

He wrapped up the nomination in convincing fashion after the so-called experts said it couldn’t be done.

Will Trump take the win in the general election – the feat these same pundits and politicians believe he will lose?

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... nal-parks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Progressives are now insisting that each person’s feelings about “gender identity” is more important in law than the anatomical sex of Americans’ bodies. So they’re pushing government to undermine public support for the “gender binary” — the reality of distinct and complementary male and female sexes – and to promote the idea of fluid “gender identity,” even though cross-dressers comprise only about 1 in every 2,400 Americans.
National Park Service spokesman Jeremy K. Barnum insisted the Interior Department won’t discriminate against people who want to use bathrooms reserved for the other sex.
We welcome all visitors regardless of their race, sex, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity to visit public lands and waters in their back yard and beyond. … We remain committed to appropriately representing our nation’s diversity on our public lands, and continue to work alongside local communities and leaders to find meaningful ways to preserve and tell the stories that reflect the narrative of all Americans.
Barnum also said that the policy “is not new” and that visitors to America’s federally-operated parks and museums could always choose whatever bathroom they feel like using.
The administration’s gender-over-sex, binary-hating, anti-sex policy mean that the national parks’ focus on nature, evolution and science must now also embrace the newly created political idea of “gender identity.”
The rule matches Obama’s decree in May which declares that all of the nation’s public schools must implement transgender-friendly policies, so that boys pretending to be girls, or girls pretending to be boys, must be made welcome in the other sex’s bathrooms and showers, regardless of science or the wishes of normal kids and teenagers or their parents.
In his May decree, Obama banned single-sex bathrooms and single-sex locker rooms, so takin sexual privacy from almost 55 million American school kids in some 100,000 K-12 public schools.
As soon as Obama’s Departments of Justice and Education issued the decree, though, several lawsuits were filed. One was filed by a group of Illinois parents who opposed plans of a local school to enforce Obama’s policies. Another was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton who announced on May 25 that the Lone Star State was suing the Obama administration to put an end to the administration’s plans to force every school in the country to implement a pro-transgender policy. Ten other states joined Texas in its suit.
The state of Kansas also began to look for ways to sue the Obama administration over the school bathroom policy.
A recent poll showed that roughly two out of three Americans prefer that bathroom policies be set by state or local officials, not by the central government. Other polls show the public strongly opposes the removal of single-sex bathrooms for K-12 schools. A study of the 2010 census showed that only one out of every 2,400 adults have changed their names to the opposite sex.
In general, the transgender ideology says government should push every American to validate every person’s choice of created “gender identity,” even though a man who wants to be a woman is still a man by every known scientific measure of evolutionary life. For example, an Oregon law recently allowed a jury to award $60,00 t0 a transgender teacher because other teachers declined to use the teacher’s preferred pronoun, which is “they” rather than “him” or “her.” New York City has also establish similar forced-speech rules.
The ideology’s claim that the government must enforce a new right to “gender identity” also means that the governments must ignore and often dismantle many civic rules that evolved to help the two distinct sexes — men and boys, women and girls — meet their legally equal, but different and complementary, needs. For example, the transgender ideological demand means that single-sex bathrooms and locker rooms must opened up to people of the opposite sex, regardless of age, and without any verification of created “gender identity.”
As a result, it is now an offense in Washington State to ask a man in a woman’s bathroom if he thinks he is male or female. Similarly, Obama and gay advocacy groups have slammed a popular North Carolina law, dubbed HB2, because it requires people to undergo medical procedures before they can use a bathroom reserved for the opposite sex. Teenage boys who say they are girls are also allowed to compete against girl athletes — and bump them off the winner’s podium. Also, the White House now demands that soldiers salute, trust and fight alongside people who think they are the other sex."

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by freedomforall »

Many cans of worms have now been opened. What's next, out in the open sex acts and pedophilia by anyone claiming to be anything other than straight across America? Is being straight now a sin to be reckoned with in a harsh way?

2 Nephi 15:20
20 Wo unto them that call evil good, and good evil, that put darkness for light, and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

Isaiah 5:20
20 ¶Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiTQLHOXQZ8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


What 1 British Politician Just Said Has the World LAUGHING @ Barack Obama, George Obama and Kenya #2


freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by freedomforall »

Obama Mentions Staying In Office For 3rd Term Yet Again!

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

"Thank you Barack Hussein Obama for setting race relations back over fifty years. The country has never been in more dire need of real leadership than it is at this very moment. Watch as they call for blood and black domination in the video below. Warning the language can get a little foul.
A Milwaukee protester tells police, “We want blood…We cannot co-habitate with white people, one of us have to go, black or white.”
“We do not want justice or peace anymore,” the protester says. “We done with that s**t. We want blood. We want blood. We want the same s**t ya’ll want. Eye for an eye. No more peace. F–k all that. Ain’t no more peace. Ain’t no more peace. We done. We cannot co-habitate with white people, one of us have to go, black or white. All ya’ll have to go!”
http://conservativevideos.com/watch-mil ... ant-blood/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://conservativefiringline.com/milwa ... e-anymore/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

"As Europeans continue to be inundated by wildly rising crime, increased incidents of rape, and one terror attack after another at the hands of the Muslim “refugees” flowing like water across their borders, President Barack Obama is proud to be celebrating the arrival of his ten thousandth Syrian refugee into the U.S.

One of the first mentions of the Obama Administration reaching its goal of importing 10,000 Syrian “refugees” into the country comes from U.S. ambassador to Jordan Alice Wells who announced that the United States will be importing its ten thousandth Syrian refugee into the U.S.A. this month."
http://constitution.com/europe-suffers- ... fugee-u-s/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://minutemennews.com/26211-2/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Amid an illegal plot to “ratify” a United Nations treaty on “climate change” without the constitutionally required advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, Obama is behaving more and more like a tinpot dictator looting what remains of a collapsing banana republic. As part of the effort to defend the unconstitutional scheme to bypass Congress and “ratify” the UN climate regime, however, the White House and its globalist allies are twisting themselves into legalistic and rhetorical pretzels — and setting up the UN scheme for failure. The formal announcement ahead of the upcoming Communist Chinese-led G20 confirms what The New American first reported over two years ago."

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/co ... l-citizens" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Flying completely under the radar of the vast majority of Americans, federal Indian policies of the Obama administration are subverting our constitutional order and successfully transferring vast land holdings and natural resources to corrupt, federally controlled tribal governments. This stealth agenda is replacing the authority and obligations of the various state governments to protect the lives, rights, property, and natural resources of their citizens by illegally and immorally transferring that authority to select tribal governments. This is being done with the full support of state governors, attorneys general, and state legislators, in blatant violation of their oaths of office. Many of these officials are going along with this agenda either because they are receiving sizable donations from tribe-related entities (“bribes from the tribes”), or because they fear being labeled “racist” or “anti-Indian” by the Indian activists and their “progressive” allies in the controlled major media.

The Obama administration is intentionally reversing history and unsettling the West, using Indian reservations and tribal governments as launch pads. It is doing this with the full support of a majority of state executive and legislative representatives, regardless of their political party affiliations. The horrendous consequences of this political path are alarming, to say the least, not only for Americans living in the 39 states directly affected, but for our entire country. While farmers, ranchers, and other rural citizens and small towns are the frontline targets of this stealth agenda, it will dramatically impact all Americans. Urban Americans should also be alarmed by this agenda because it confronts us all with a steadily escalating tax burden, and most particularly because it threatens our nation’s water and food supplies, by placing them in a stranglehold held by dozens of federal agencies (EPA, BLM, USFS, etc.) and tribal governments that have already demonstrated their hostility to liberty and constitutionally limited government. "

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://ipatriot.com/obamas-1-7-billion- ... haria-law/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

" $400 Million dollars paid to the county of Iran is now a Total of $1.7 Billion dollars-with additional payments thru the State Dept. with 13 separate payments of one penny below $100 Million dollars thru a judgement fund! So-our President has made a $1.7 Billion dollar donation to jihad/holy war and Sharia law-how special!

I guess this latest ACTION by President Obama is part of his Hope & Change agenda to fundamentally change America.

Where are you Woodward & Bernstein? Where have all the investigative journalists gone in America? Why is the general media not reporting this donation-payoff to an enemy-a country that is a known supporter of terrorism throughout the world? Why the silence-?

I am not to surprised by this payoff to Iran-a known supporter of terrorist groups Hamas-Hezbollah-ISIS Etc. Our current Presidents friends have influenced him from his youth Saul Alinsky – and his spiritual advisor the Rev Jeremiah Wright and his close personal friend and Muslim brotherhood supporter Valerie Jarret who is by his side in the White House – have all shaped – influenced Barak Hussein Obama the Harvard educated lawyer-Community Organizer!

This $1.7 Billion dollar payment is unconstitutional-illegal-immoral and unethical and treasonous and our elected public officials in Congress and the Supreme Court should investigate and prosecute the lawbreakers and hold accountable any government employee who helped in this illegal payoff to a foreign country that supports terrorism and declares death to America and its allies e.g Israel etc.

Richard Nixon was up for impeachment for 16 minutes of missing tapes that He would not turn over! The action of donating $1.7 Billion American taxpayer dollars to a known enemy to the United States-is a Impeachable/treasonous offense and those involved in the transfer of this money should be arrested-prosecuted (jailed) and sent to Federal prison for a minimum of 25 years or longer!"

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://conservativebyte.com/2016/09/phi ... f-a-whore/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/ar ... whore.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte called Barack Obama a "son of a whore" on Monday as he vowed not to be lectured by the US leader on human rights when they meet in Laos.
The acid-tongued Duterte bristled at warnings he would face questioning by the US president over a war against drugs in the Philippines that has claimed more than 2,400 lives in just over two months.
"You must be respectful. Do not just throw away questions and statements. Son of a whore, I will curse you in that forum," Duterte told a news conference shortly before flying to Laos to attend a summit.
"We will be wallowing in the mud like pigs if you do that to me."
Duterte was due to hold a bilateral meeting with Obama on Tuesday afternoon on the sidelines of a gathering of global leaders hosted by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in Vientiane, the Lao capital.
But shortly after Duterte spoke, Obama appeared to cast doubt on whether such a meeting could take place.
Calling Duterte "a colourful guy", the US president said was asking his staff to find out whether a meeting would be useful.
"I always want to make sure if I'm having a meeting that it's actually productive and we're getting something done," he told reporters.
Duterte, 71, was elected in May after a promise to wage an unprecedented war on illegal drugs that would see tens of thousands of suspects killed.
Official figures released Sunday show that, since he took office on June 30, over 2,400 people have been killed in police anti-drug operations and by suspected vigilantes.
Speaking on the sidelines of the G20 summit in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, Obama said Washington recognised that drugs were a significant problem for the Philippines. But he insisted that he would not shy away from raising concerns about the way the issue was being handled under the new administration.
"The issue of how we approach fighting crime and drug trafficking is a serious one for all of us. We've got to do it the right way," he said.
"Undoubtedly, if and when we have a meeting, this is something that's going to be brought up. And my expectation, my hope is that it could be dealt with constructively."
Duterte has angrily rejected criticism from the Catholic Church, human rights groups, legislators and the United Nations.
And he vowed Monday the bloodbath would continue as he pursued his goal of eradicating illegal narcotics in the Philippines.
"More people will be killed, plenty will be killed until the last pusher is out of the streets. Until the (last) drug manufacturer is killed, we will continue and I will continue," he said."

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://www.lifenews.com/2016/09/06/admi ... arenthood/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Pro-abortion President Barack Obama has proposed a new rule that would essentially prohibit states from defunding the Planned Parenthood abortion business and a leading pro-life member of Congress is not happy about it.
The proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) could prevent states from blocking Title X funding (federal dollars for family planning services) to abortion companies like Planned Parenthood.
“This latest stunt from President Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services should surprise absolutely no one,” Rep. Diane Black told LifeNews.com
“We’ve known all along that the Obama Administration will go to untold lengths to protect its friends in the big abortion industry. After all, this Administration has previously used backdoor maneuvers to line Planned Parenthood’s pockets with Obamacare navigator grants and praised the abortion provider’s ‘high ethical standard’ even after it was caught trafficking in baby body parts,” Black said.
She continued: “Now, they have taken the unprecedented step of thwarting states’ rights with a shady proposed rule change that prevents states from funding the providers who will best serve their citizens. In the coming days, I intend to lead a letter expressing the deep concerns of Members of Congress on this proposal, but we won’t stop there. We must use the full force of Congress and the grassroots strength of the national pro-life movement to defeat this absurd rule and prevent the Obama Administration from acting unilaterally to carry out political favors and prop up a scandal-ridden abortion provider.”
Under current state law, the state of Tennessee doles out Title X funding provided by HHS to county health departments, who then determine appropriate sub-grantees. All 95 counties have identified community health centers and other providers aside from Planned Parenthood who meet all Title X eligibility criteria to receive this funding, effectively cutting off Planned Parenthood’s access to Title X funds in the state of Tennessee.
The proposed rule from HHS cites other examples of states such as Florida and Texas enacting or attempting to enact similar measures. The rule would attempt to undermine such state laws, explaining that it “precludes project recipients [states] from using criteria in their selection of subrecipients that are unrelated to the ability to deliver services to program beneficiaries in an effective manner.”

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

"President Barack Obama wrapped up his final G20 meetings Monday confronting two of his prickly global counterparts, saying his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin was “candid, blunt and businesslike” and that bombastic comments from his Philippine counterpart could lead to a planned meeting this week being scrubbed.

Obama said his talks with Putin included a direct message about cyber war, seen as a warning to Russia.
“We’re moving into a new era here where a number of countries have significant capacities,” Obama said at a news conference at the conclusion of the summit. “Frankly, both offensively and defensively, we have more capacity.”
Obama, who had just come from a 90-minute session with Putin on the sidelines of the summit, also pointedly noted, “We’ve had problems with cyber intrusions from Russia and other countries in the past.”
http://teapartyupdate.com/obama-has-blu ... ia-remain/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/obamas-1st-m ... di-regime/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"President Obama has appointed the first Muslim federal judge, a Pakistani immigrant who has practiced law in the United States for 10 years and was educated at American universities, but it’s his ties to Islamists, including those in the Saudi Arabian government, that could prove troubling for senators being asked to approve his nomination.
While Abid Qureshi has never been a judge and thus has no clear record to inspect, his private practice defending Muslim civil rights and the celebration of his appointment by Islamist organizations give reason for concern, say experts in Islam.
Qureshi has defended two Muslim filmmakers in their quest to get pro-Islamic “anti-Islamophobia” advertisements placed in the New York subway system, and he also represented the Saudi Arabian government in a dispute involving a Shariah-compliant Islamic school in the U.S.
His appointment to serve on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which requires Senate approval, was hailed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Islamic Society of North America.
CAIR and ISNA are offshoots of the extremist Muslim Brotherhood and have links to the Hamas terrorist organization as documented by the FBI during the Holy Land Foundation trial in 2007.
CAIR celebrated Qureshi’s appointment on its Facebook page Wednesday.
“The nomination of Abid Qureshi to fill a seat on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia sends a message of inclusion that is welcomed by the American Muslim community and by all Americans who value diversity and mutual respect at a time when some seek division and discord,” Nihad Awad, national executive director of CAIR, said in a statement.
Qureshi has since 2012 headed up the pro bono (charity) division of Latham and Watkins, a major Washington, D.C., law firm.
Going to bat for hard-line Saudi Islamic school in U.S.
His pro bono clients have included prisoners, foreign-educated physical therapists and the National Organization of Concerned Black Men, according to the National Law Journal.
Most troubling for those concerned that Qureshi’s allegiance to Islamic law may influence his view of the U.S. Constitution is his work representing a private school with ties to the hard-line Saudi Arabian government in a case before the National Labor Relations Board.
Abid Qureshi and his team represented the Islamic Saudi Academy, a K-12 private school with the backing of the Saudi government. “The school is on a mission of providing education ‘rooted in the Islamic faith’ to young people of Saudi Arabia residing in the U.S., especially children of government officials and Saudi diplomats,” according to National Law Journal.
The dispute centered on whether the board had jurisdiction over the school’s decision to fire a teacher. Qureshi cleverly cast the case as a matter of religious freedom – and he won the case for the Saudi government school.
“In October, the regional director of the NLRB’s Baltimore office dismissed the claims, embracing [Qureshi’s] argument that any attempt by the NLRB to assert jurisdiction over the academy’s firing of a teacher would encroach on religious freedom,” the National Law Journal reported.
A win for Muslim filmmakers who blast ‘Islamophobes’
In another case, Qureshi represented two Muslim filmmakers in their quest to advertise a pro-Islam documentary called “The Muslims Are Coming!” in the New York public-transit system.
The purpose of the film is to “combat Islamophobia” and counter the anti-Shariah ads that had previously been posted in the New York subway system by anti-Shariah activist Pamela Geller.
The Metropolitan Transit Authority denied the ads, as it did Geller’s, saying they did not conform to its new rules against ads that are “political in nature.” The filmmakers hired Qureshi, who filed suit against the MTA, obtaining a favorable ruling last October, Newsweek reported.
“I wonder how this Muslim judge would rule in my First Amendment cases before the federal court,” Geller told WND in an email. “Would he stand firmly with the freedom of speech enshrined in the First Amendment, or would he defer to his belief system and rule in accordance with the Shariah? His activity in regard to ‘The Muslims Are Coming!’ strongly suggest the latter.”
According to the documentary’s Facebook page, “The Muslims Are Coming! is a comedy documentary which follows a band of Muslim-American comedians as they visit big cities, small towns, rural villages, and everything in between to combat Islamophobia!”
The whole idea of “Islamophobia” is based on the premise that Islam is above reproach and cannot be criticized the way other religions routinely get lampooned and mocked by journalists, Hollywood movies and entertainers, on social media and throughout pop culture. This “above reproach” mentality, where anyone who dares to criticize Islam gets labeled as a racist or bigot, is seen as a form of voluntary Shariah by activists and watchdogs such as Geller and Robert Spencer. There is no comparable “Christphobia,” they argue, for those who criticize Christianity.

Comedy icons appearing in the film include Jon Stewart, David Cross, Janeane Garofalo, Colin Quinn, Lewis Black and Aasif Mandvi. Also appearing are media personalities Rachel Maddow, Russell Simmons, Soledad O’Brien and Ali Velshi. The nation’s first Muslim congressman, Keith Ellison, D-Minn., also appears in the film to “comment on the power of comedy and the political scope of bigotry.”
In the opening seconds, the film takes aim at televangelist Pat Robertson, GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and comedian Bill Maher and singles them out as examples of “Islamophobes.”
Maher, an atheist, criticizes all religious activity by all religions, but the film is only concerned about his criticism of Islam.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/04/daniel-akbari-2.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Daniel Akbari, a certified Shariah lawyer and Islamic expert for the Supreme Court of Iran who defected to America and now lives in Texas as a Christian, said the U.S. media has watered down the term “Muslim” to include anyone from the Middle East who is not a Christian, a Jew or any other religion.
Muslims come in several forms, including cultural “Muslims” who are basically atheist or agnostic and do not practice their faith.
But an “Islamist” is anyone who “practices Islam,” Akbari said, and follows the teachings of Muhammad.
“The Islamic scholars have a term for that. It’s someone who ‘believes’ and who practices Islam. And in the West, we would say that’s radical,” he said. “Coming from the Middle East, we call them a Muslim. But are they agnostic or atheist Muslims, or are they a believing Muslim? Someone who goes to mosque regularly is an Islamist. Unfortunately in the U.S., they have changed the perception.
“If they are a practicing Muslim and not just a cultural Muslim, that is not your harmless neighbor.”
While all Islamists are not terrorists, they do believe in Shariah as being superior to any Western form of law.
“An Islamist is one that has an orthodox understanding of Islam. CAIR, ISNA, all have an orthodox understanding of the authoritative Islamic sources. If you have that, then you believe orthodox rules must rule a person’s life,” Akbari said. “If you are pro- even one law of Shariah, you are an Islamist. If you are someone coming from the Middle East and say, ‘I don’t give a damn about Muhammad and about Islam, but I’m a Muslim,’ then you are not a problem. But if you are talking about someone with an orthodox understanding of Islam, then we should have a problem with you being a judge.”
“So we don’t know if Mr. Qureshi is an Islamist or just a Muslim. But since I’m seeing on Twitter that CAIR and ISNA and all those activists for Shariah are supporting him, I’m suspicious he is an Islamist.”
“CAIR and ISNA supporting this person is just super suspicious and gives some credibility to the idea that he is an Islamist.”
Liberals have “hijacked” the word Muslim and made it apply to any person who is from the Middle East and not a Christian or a Jew, Akbari said.
“But more than 70 percent of Iranians don’t believe in the Quran, don’t believe in Shariah, and I’m telling you they are atheist,” he said.
Islamist is a “super holy term” in the Quran that is reserved for those who follow all the teachings of Muhammad.
“Quran says if you are Muslim, you are just immune from attack, but you don’t go to paradise,” he said. “If you are going to paradise, you have to fight against infidels and practice Shariah. So if someone is pro-Shariah, that person is, as the Quran says, part of the ‘momin’ or a ‘believer,’ not just someone who prays and does the five pillars, because that five pillars goes nowhere in paradise. The Quran says you must go further, meaning practice Shariah.”
Spencer, who blogs at JihadWatch.com, told WND that even if Qureshi’s record is unblemished by any connections to terror-stained groups or persons, the appointment is an ominous sign about the future of American politics.
“Even if this judge’s background is spotless and patriotism unquestionable, this appointment bodes ill for the future. The Obama administration, and Hillary Clinton, deny that jihad terror has anything to do with Islam,” Spencer told WND in an email. “They have assiduously courted, supported and collaborated with the Muslim Brotherhood. How will they be able to vet potential judicial appointees who are Muslim for sympathies to a jihad they don’t admit exists, much less Shariah supremacism and more?”
Born in Pakistan, Qureshi received a bachelor of arts degree in 1993 from Cornell University and a juris doctor in 1997 from Harvard. He has been a partner since 2006 in the D.C. offices of Latham & Watkins. He has served since 2012 as the global chairman of the firm’s pro bono practice.
The fact that CAIR is hailing the appointment is also not a good sign, Spencer said.
“It suggests that they know he is in line with their agenda – they don’t hail Muslims who aren’t,” he said."

http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/obamas-1st-m ... 6BFYXki.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-enviro ... on-climate" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"President Obama is hoping to complete two more international agreements to fight global warming in the coming months, shoring up his climate change legacy.
His landmark Paris agreement is certain to go down as one of the most consequential — and controversial — global pacts of Obama’s presidency. Now, he's also pushing world leaders to agree to cut down on greenhouse gases from refrigeration and from commercial aircraft.
That would help seal Obama’s legacy of securing sweeping agreements with world leaders to fight climate change as part of his second-term global warming agenda.
But the deals to reduce hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and aircraft emissions also add to Obama’s reputation for making major policy decisions through unilateral action, and are sparking new anger from Republican critics.
Like the Paris agreement, both climate actions are being negotiated under existing treaties, and would not likely require the two-thirds votes in the Senate that the Constitution mandates for treaties.
The HFC and aircraft agreements target specific sources of earth-warming greenhouse gases, but each deal could put a significant dent into climate change in its own way.
“The Paris agreement establishes a durable framework for country actions addressing climate change in a comprehensive fashion, whereas these other two agreements deal with discrete slices of the problem,” said Elliot Diringer, executive vice president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.
“The president has significant powers to fashion agreements with other countries, and has used those vigorously to strengthen the international response to climate change."
Obama previewed the cooperative agreements in 2013, when he rolled out his Climate Action Plan to guide his second-term climate agenda. International pacts were a key piece of the agenda.
To environmentalists and Obama’s supporters, significant progress on HFCs and aircraft emissions would wrap up a strong climate legacy.
“He really has made climate change one of the top policy priorities of his second term, and he has accomplished a remarkable amount,” said Paul Bledsoe, a consultant and former climate change aide in President Clinton’s White House. “I think Obama will be looked at as the key turning point figure in American climate protection.”
HFCs are used in refrigeration and air conditioning, and came into use over the last two decades to replace ozone-depleting substances following the Montreal Protocol ozone treaty.
But HFCs are potent greenhouse gases, and now world leaders are planning to amend the treaty at an October meeting in Kigali, Rwanda, and phase down their use.
A 2013 study estimated that a successful reducing HFCs could avoid 0.5 degrees Celsius of global warming by 2100. That would be a significant chunk of the 2-degree warming limit scientists believe would stop the most catastrophic effects of climate change."

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

"Traveling abroad seems to encourage President Obama to unload all manner of grievances on the United States. For whatever reason, traveling abroad appears to help crystallize everything wrong he sees in America. During his recent trip to Cuba and Argentina, for example, we counted 18 separate times he talked down his employer, the United States of America.
His just-concluded trip to Asia was no different.
Here are 18 separate attacks he unloaded while in China and Laos:"

http://constitution.com/watch-obama-tra ... ip-abroad/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

"A recent report showed Obama’s golf outings actually caused a botched hostage rescue.
U.S. special operations forces mounted an unsuccessful mission to rescue two American University of Afghanistan professors kidnapped in Kabul last month — after an earlier mission was aborted when the White House withheld its approval — defense officials with knowledge of the incident told Fox News.
Fox News is told the operation, which took place a few days after their Aug. 7 kidnapping, killed seven enemy fighters. But when the firefight ended, there was no sign of the hostages.
One of the hostages is American; the other is Australian.
It was not the first attempt by the U.S. military to rescue the two professors.
The first mission was aborted when the American rescue force could not obtain White House approval for the mission amid concerns about the intelligence, according to three defense officials. They were in the air heading to the target area at the time and had to return to their base in Afghanistan.
When approval was granted by President Obama the next day, the American assault force headed back to the area where they believed the two hostages were being held and engaged an enemy force at a compound believed to contain the hostages.
“It didn’t go the way it was supposed to go,” said one official.
That’s not the first time Obama’s golfing disrupted a person’s life.
Remember that time when he descended a golf course and ended up causing a couple getting married to have to leave their ceremony?
Yeah, that’s USA President. The guy who’d rather get a few strokes in rather than do real work."
http://teapartyjournal.com/botched-host ... s-golfing/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://eaglerising.com/36785/media-outr ... fugee-ban/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


"The BBC tells us that about 10% of all Syrians are Christian.
President Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, and pretty much anyone paying attention to the chaos in the Middle East tell us that the most persecuted group in the world today are Christians living in the Muslim world (particularly in ISIS dominated Syria).
The media has long been complaining about Donald Trump’s idea that perhaps we should put a temporary halt on importing Muslim refugees until we can properly vet them.
Now let’s analyze one fact that is apparently not common knowledge.

Of the almost 11,000 Syrians that the Obama administration has brought into the country this year… less than ½ of 1% have been Christian.
How is this possible? If Christians are the group being most persecuted by the forces of violence in Syria, shouldn’t they be the ones pressing the hardest to leave the war-torn nation? If, as the Obama administration has finally admitted, ISIS is enacting genocide against Christians, shouldn’t they be the people that the administration is most interested in saving from the terror? Instead, it seems that Elliot Abrams is right: the Obama administration has enacted a ban on receiving Christian refugees, and the media has remained silent.

when you have been running a refugee program for years, and you have accepted 10,612 Sunni refugees and 56 Christians, and it is obvious why and obvious how to fix it, and nothing is done to fix it, well, the results speak more loudly than speeches, laws, intentions, or excuses. In effect we make it almost impossible for Christian refugees to get here.

So I’ll stick with that title. And I agree with Nina Shea: “This is de facto discrimination and a gross injustice.”

The Reverend Franklin Graham decried the injustice of the Obama administration’s policy in a recent post to his social media.

Did you know that 10,801 Syrian refugees were admitted to the U.S. in the last year? And reports state that only 56 of them are Christians—yes, 56! “It’s disappointingly disproportional,” attorney Matthew Clark told reporters. He said, “The Obama administration has not prioritized Christians and it appears they have actually deprioritized them, put them back of the line and made them an afterthought.” Tragically, it’s estimated that between 500,000 and 1 million Christians have fled Syria, while many have been targeted and slaughtered by the Islamic State. Join me in praying for the Christians who are trying against all odds to survive."

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

2007 CHRIS MATTHEWS VIDEO: SAYs OBAMA WAS ‘BORN’ IN INDONESIA.


http://conservativevideos.com/2007-hard ... indonesia/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Comment:
"Indonesian roots. His father was Subud of the Subud Muslim cult. He is a dead ringer for how Subud looked when Subud was young. His mother worked with Subud in Indonesia then in Hawaii then in Chicago where Subud's headquarters were. Subud worked with the CIA and also was in the United Nations - little wonder that Obama vies to be the next head of the UN or that the CIA ignored Obama's past. The CIA nicknamed Obama when he became president -"Renegade". A renegade Indian was on the war path out to conquer and destroy the enemy. He was/is out of control and you better not disagree with him or get in his way."

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

"A Superior Court judge in Arizona has adopted the position that “gay” rights outweigh the First Amendment’s protection for the “free exercise of religion” in a key case that could add printers and a wide range of other service providers to the cake bakers, photographers and venues already being ordered to provide homosexual wedding services even if it violates the owners’ faith.
The preliminary decision comes from Karen Mullins in a fight over a Phoenix ordinance that specifies that businesses cannot make decisions based on their Christian faith when it comes to homosexual wedding services.WND has documented the multitude of similar cases involving those other businesses, Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado, Melissa’s Sweetcakes in Oregon and the like.
WND also reported just days ago that the Obama administration long has been forcing Christians and others of faith to violate their beliefs to accommodate “nondiscrimination” laws that give special privileges to homosexuals and transgendered persons, and now a federal commission has proposed codifying the practice.
It was in a new report from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that said state and federal laws should be changed to provide that “gay” rights trump the religious rights protected in the Constitution.
It even pointed out that the Constitution was hindering what the government wants to impose on religious people.
The agency’s recent report, “Peaceful Coexistence: Reconciling Nondiscrimination Principles with Civil Liberties,” gets immediately to the point.
Religion ‘infringes’ on civil rights
On the first of 306 pages, the “letter of transmittal” to Barack Obama states, “Religious exemptions to the protections of civil rights based upon classifications such as race, color, national origin, sex, disability status, sexual orientation, and gender identity, when they are permissible, significantly infringe upon these civil rights.”
It says the fault lies with the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which “constricts the ability of government actors to curtail private citizens’ rights to the protections of nondiscrimination laws and policies.”
“Although the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act … limit the ability of government actors to impede individuals from practicing their religious beliefs, religious exemptions from nondiscrimination laws and policies must be weighed carefully and defined narrowly on a fact-specific basis,” states the letter.
The letter, based on hundreds of pages of arguments compiled for the past three years, says the commission believes “overly-broad religious exemptions unduly burden nondiscrimination laws and policies.”
“Federal and state courts, lawmakers, and policy-makers at every level must tailor religious exceptions to civil liberties and civil rights protections as narrowly as applicable law requires.”
Now in the Arizona case, in which two artists, at Brush & Nib Studio, are challenging a Phoenix ordinance mandating their participation artistically in “gay” weddings, the judge refused a preliminary injunction to halt enforcement of the ordinance, but also refused to dismiss the case.
Which leaves the decision preliminary, but still alarming.
Jonathan Scruggs, of the Alliance Defending Freedom, representing the artists, said, “Artists shouldn’t be threatened with jail time and other penalties simply for making art that is consistent with their beliefs. That’s why we asked the court to suspend enforcement of the Phoenix ordinance against our clients while their case goes forward. Because the city must allow artists the freedom to make personal decisions about what art they will and will not create, and because the ordinance’s additional requirement that artists stay quiet about their views is clearly unjust and unlawful, we intend to appeal the court’s decision.”
Mullins said of the artists’ concerns about being ordered to use their artistry to promote “gay” weddings, “The case here, however, does not involve religious activity as contemplated by the Free Exercise Clause. Thus the court need not examine whether the asserted state interest justifies the ‘burden’ imposed, because the plaintiffs in this case have failed to assert even an incidental burden on the exercise of their religion.”
The judge opined, “The requirement under the ordinance that plaintiffs transact business without regard to sexual orientation is not sufficient to create a Free Exercise Clause violation. … The sale of wedding invitations free of the names of same-sex couples clearly is not the exercise of religion, and certainly is not a burden on the free exercise of their religion.
“Nothing about the ordinance has prevented the plaintiffs from participating in the customs of their religious beliefs or has burdend the practice of their religion in any way.”
The nonprofit legal group Liberty Counsel earlier called the federal commission’s recommendations “a shocking example of the war against religious freedom in America.”
“The commission’s report is a shameful anti-American and anti-God document that trashes religious freedom,” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel.
Liberty Counsel chief Mathew Staver charge the commission’s chairman, Democrat Martin Castro, is “out of touch with reality and with our Constitution.”
“He and the other members of the commission who agree with him want to throw out the First Amendment and trash religious freedom whenever faith and practice collides with an intolerant LGBT agenda,” Staver said. “The report is a declaration of war against religious freedom. George Washington said anyone who works against the twin pillars of religion and morality cannot be called a ‘Patriot.’ This report is un-American.”
Commissioner Kirsanow, the panel’s lone Republican, said the problem is that people are enamored with “gay rights” and “transgender rights” and are inserting their own desires into the Constitution.
“The tension between nondiscrimination and religious liberty is based on the assumption that the rights in conflict are of equal weight, or even that nondiscrimination is of greater weight,” he said. “This assumption is erroneous. Religious liberty is an undisputed constitutional right. With the exception of racial nondiscrimination principles embedded in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenths Amendments, nondiscrimination principles are statutory or judicially created constructs.”
Kirsanow described the sharp differences on the commission as a “conflict between two worldviews.”
“The first, which is secularism, holds an individual’s unfettered sexual self-expression as a preeminent concern because it is an aspect of their self-creation,” he explained. “This interest in the individual is now construed as a positive responsibility to ensure that everyone has the ability to engage in sexual conduct without cost or consequence, whether in money, unwanted children, or hurt feelings.
“An individual’s sexual behavior is considered an act of self-creation and something that goes to the deepest level of their identity. Criticism of an individual’s behavior is considered an attack on the dignity of the person. Naturally, this worldview is at odds with many aspects of traditional morality grounded in sexual restraint.
“The second worldview holds that individuals are not their own judge, but rather are subject to divine law and divine judgment. The morality of a person’s conduct does not ultimately depend upon whether he thinks it is right, or whether it accords with his desires, but whether it conforms to divine law.”
He said the “rub” is that the first group does not recognize sin as sin, and the second group does.
The Obama administration’s move to make the standard “freedom of worship” dates back to early in his tenure.
Catholic Online and other media outlets reported what appeared to be a deliberate misdirection regarding what the Constitution requires.
Catholic Online noted that in President Obama’s June 2009 speech in Cairo, Egypt, he spoke of a Muslim America and the nation’s “freedom of religion,” but by the November 2009 memorial for the Fort Hood soldiers gunned down by a homicidal Muslim, he was terming it “freedom of worship.”
From that point, “freedom of worship” has become the term of choice, the report said.
Sarah Torre of the Heritage Foundation said the difference is significant. In practice, the “freedom to worship” seldom has been challenged or even questioned. But “freedom of religion” is under direct fire.Just ask the New York landowners who were fined by the state for following their Christian faith regarding sponsorship of same-sex ceremonies, or the Oregon bakery owners fined $135,000 for the same thing, or the Colorado baker who is fighting for his economic future against state officials suggesting that he go out of business because his faith forbids supporting same-sex marriage.
Then there was the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association, established in 1869, which houses one of the world’s 20 largest pipe organs. It’s been the site of traditional and contemporary worship programs featuring speakers such as Billy Graham, Billy Sunday, D. James Kennedy and Charles Stanley.
But it’s no longer is used for weddings, because a lesbian duo was denied permission to use it, and a state discrimination complaint was filed.
The Hitching Post Wedding Chapel is facing demands from the city of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, to perform “same-sex weddings” in violation of the owners’ Christian faith.
In Washington state, a state judge said the home, assets and savings of Arlene’s Flowers owner Barronelle Stutzman, 70, could be targeted in court by two homosexuals for whom she declined to provide wedding services.
Early in Obama’s administration, Catholic Online noted that Ashley Samelson of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty explained that to “anyone who closely follows prominent discussion of religious freedom in the diplomatic and political arena, this linguistic shift is troubling: The reason is simple. Any person of faith knows that religious exercise is about a lot more than freedom of worship.
“It’s about the right to dress according to one’s religious dictates, to preach openly, to evangelize, to engage in the public square. Everyone knows that religious Jews keep kosher, religious Quakers don’t go to war, and religious Muslim women wear headscarves – yet ‘freedom of worship’ would protect none of these acts of faith.”
Catholic Online said: “Let’s be clear … language matters when it comes to defining freedoms and limits. A shift from freedom of religion to freedom of worship moves the dialog from the world stage into the physical confines of a church, temple, synagogue or mosque. … It … could exclude our right to raise our children in our faith, the right to religious education, literature or media, the right to raise funds or organize charitable activities and the right to express religious beliefs in the normal discourse of life.”
WND earlier this year reported on two ominous court decisions regarding religious liberty.
The first was when the U.S. Supreme Court left standing a lower court decision that Washington state pharmacists who are Christian must violate their faith in order to practice their profession. The second decision came from a federal judge in Mississippi with a reputation for ruling against Christians who said county clerks in the state must violate their faith to hold office.
The Supreme Court’s move alarmed Justice Samuel Alito, who warned there was evidence that the “impetus for the adoption of the regulations was hostility to pharmacists whose religious beliefs regarding abortion and contraception are out of step with prevailing opinion in the state.”
In the Mississippi ruling from Judge Carlton Reeves, who once punished a school district for allowing a voluntary prayer at an optional awards ceremony, said clerks in the state cannot cite their religious beliefs to excuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses to homosexual duos.
It was the case involving the pharmacists that drew outrage from a minority on the Supreme Court. Washington state adopted rules forcing pharmacists to sell abortion pills to customers regardless of religious beliefs that consider abortion tantamount to murder.
The state provided no exception for religious beliefs and refused to allow an accommodation that would simply allow pharmacists with abortion objections to refer customers to another location.
After the Supreme Court refused to even review the case, Senior Counsel Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom said all Americans “should be free to peacefully live and work consistent with their faith without fear of unjust punishment, and no one should be forced to participate in the taking of human life.”
“We had hoped that the U.S. Supreme Court would take this opportunity to reaffirm these long-held principles,” she said.
Waggoner noted the state of Washington “allows pharmacists to refer customers for just about any reason – except reasons of conscience.”
“Singling out people of faith and denying them the same freedom to refer is a violation of federal law. All 49 other states allow conscience-based referrals, which are fully supported by the American Pharmacists Association, the Washington Pharmacy Association, and 36 other pharmacy associations. Not one customer in Washington has been denied timely access to any drug due to a religious objection. As the trial court found, the government designed its law for the ‘primary – if not sole – purpose’ of targeting religious health care providers.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/not-just-bak ... T2bJpeB.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

Comments: http://ipatriot.com/happening-left-choo ... her-issue/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Marc Jeric · UCLA
An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned
SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) received on or about March 1977.
Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, reserved for Connecticut residents.
Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever! Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.
Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals. The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore no questions were ever raised. The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for Obama. Just wait until Trump gets past the phony birth certificate and onto the issue of B. Hussein Obama's use of a stolen SSN You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of defending that impostor.
We do understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud. Let's all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists. If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world. (Found on Internet written by “pineapple”.)"

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by freedomforall »

Barak is in the bible!

https://www.lds.org/scriptures/search?l ... k&x=12&y=2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Elizabeth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 11796
Location: East Coast Australia

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by Elizabeth »

http://constitution.com/sheriff-obama-d ... nt-period/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Obama posted a forged document on the White House website. Will someone ask Donald Trump to produce an authentic birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah? Wouldn’t he have to produce a paper document to claim that he “obtained” the birth certificate? "

larsenb
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10812
Location: Between here and Standing Rock

Re: Barack Hussein Obama II / Barry Soetoro /Sobarkah

Post by larsenb »

Elizabeth wrote:http://constitution.com/sheriff-obama-d ... nt-period/

"Obama posted a forged document on the White House website. Will someone ask Donald Trump to produce an authentic birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah? Wouldn’t he have to produce a paper document to claim that he “obtained” the birth certificate? "
My understanding is that Trump just said: ~"Obama was born in the US, period". I'm not aware that Trump referred to any birth certificate he had seen, or even to the forged (photo shopped) birth certificate produced by the White House.

Post Reply