False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

When Disclosure Serves Secrecy

by Steven M. Greer M.D.
Copyright 1999

Ending the secrecy surrounding the UFO/ET subject is a laudable goal. It is long overdue. It would transform the world in ways both simple and profound.

And yet it is fraught with danger.

The covert projects which have been running UFO related programs for nearly 60 years are not interested in a disclosure which upsets their apple cart. They want such a disclosure to transform their apple cart into a freight train. And they potentially have the power and connections to do it.

There are multiple scenarios attending the disclosure of the UFO subject- and not all of them have the best interests of humanity at heart. Elsewhere, in the new book Extraterrestrial Contact: The Evidence and Implications I write about the kind of disclosure the world needs. An honest one. An open one. One which replaces secrecy with democracy. A disclosure which is peaceful, scientific and hopeful.

But then there is the disclosure the powers that be would like to see: Manipulated. Calculated to consolidate power and engender fear. Configured in such a way that chaos and a deepening need for Big Brother is carefully inculcated into the masses.

We have seen the plans and it is not a pretty picture.

I write this as a warning. A warning that the wolves in sheep clothes are very cunning indeed. And have almost limitless resources. Most who work with them do not even know they are wolves. Indeed, it is likely that many of the wolves have been convinced that they are sheep.

The UFO matter is not so much a mystery as a matter deliberately obfuscated and mystified. Confusion and a lack of clarity serves the larger covert goal of keeping it off the long-range radar of society while power and plans are consolidated quietly. And the one thing more dangerous to society than all this secrecy is a planned, contrived disclosure run by the keepers of the secrets.

For years such plans have been made – to be unfurled at just the right time. During a time of great expectation. Of social confusion. Perhaps of millennial madness?

I have personally met with a number of people who are very involved with such plans. I do not speculate here. Be aware: The disclosure of UFO reality is being planned very carefully. It will assiduously follow a scheme to spin the subject in just the right way – the only way which will further redound to the glory and power of the secret-keepers. It will be a false disclosure – one born out of the age-old bane of human existence: selfishness and greed. Greed for power. Greed for control. Greed for domination.

We must be mature and informed on such matters. Only a vigilant and informed public can see through such deceit – and correct it should such a plan be unfurled. Every citizen needs to know that great good can come from the truth being known. But the mature citizen must also recognize that the ‘truth’ can be spun and spun again – until the goals of those who crave secret and overt power are met.

Consider: One scenario for disclosure is that the UFO and Extraterrestrial subject is acknowledged in a way which is scientific and hopeful. Excessive secrecy which lacks executive branch and congressional oversight is ended. Humanity begins to entertain open contact with other civilizations, with peaceful engagement as the goal. Technologies which are currently suppressed are allowed to be disseminated: Pollution ends. An economy of abundance and social justice is firmly established. Global environmental destruction and mind-numbing world poverty become a faint memory. Zero-point based energy devices transform the world. Electro-gravitic devices permit above ground travel without paving over the world’s precious fertile farm land. As an ET once told Colonel Philip Corso, “Its a new world, if you can take it…”. This is the disclosure which we are working for.

But the disclosure envisioned above could have happened in 1950. It did not – Why? For such a disclosure would lead to the total transformation of the status quo. Centralized energy systems would be obsolete. Oil would be useful only for lubricants and synthetics. The geo-political order of today would be a thing forgotten: Every country and people on Earth would have such a high degree of progress and advancement that all nations would have a seat at the global table. Power would need to be shared. Peaceful acknowledgment of life from elsewhere would make the Earth seem like the very small, organic homeland which it is. The vast trillion dollar global military – industrial sector would be reigned in. And a universal spirituality might dawn…

But remember, there are hugely powerful interests who dread this scenario. For them, it is the end of the world as they know it. The end of centralized, elite power. The end of a controlled geo-political order which today leaves nearly 90% of the people of Earth barely one step out of the stone age. And they do not wish to share the power they wield.

Now, let me describe the ‘disclosure’ which would make these covert control programs happy. This is the false or contrived ‘disclosure’ which has only one clear goal: The further consolidation of their power and their paradigm. It has to do with fear, not love. With war, not peace. With division and conflict, not unity. It is the dominant paradigm – but it is slipping away slowly. And a carefully orchestrated disclosure of the ‘facts’ of the UFO and ET subject could secure their power. This is the disclosure which is to be dreaded. This is the disclosure to watch out for. This is the disclosure which is already occurring.

My meetings over the past 9 years with covert operatives who have worked on UFO related programs have introduced me to some characters right out of a spy novel – and then some. Whether in private high tech industry, at the Pentagon or at a midnight meeting in a private mansion, a theme has emerged. It is one of immense, though currently hidden, power. It transcends government as we know it (at this point the government of ‘We the people…’ has been made irrelevant on this issue). And the theme has two main strands – the eventual covert militarization of the ET subject and a weird covert religious strain which can only be viewed as bizarre.

Here, we find some very strange bed-fellows indeed. War mongers and militarists in cahoots with industrialists who share a certain bizarre eschatological bent: A dark view of the future, featuring an extraterrestrial Armageddon – or at least the threat of it. Such a theme supports retrograde and fanatical religious causes as well as deeply covert military-industrial plans to expand the arms race into space.

In fact, the big players in the so-called ‘civilian UFO community’ are tied into such beliefs and agendas. It strains credulity, I admit, but here is what we have found by penetrating these operations.

From a military-industrial perspective, the disclosure of choice is one which frames the UFO/ET issue in a threatening manner. If a threat from space can be established (as President Reagan liked to say) then the entire world can be united around the need to fight such a threat. This would ensure trillion dollar plus military – industrial spending well into the next century, and beyond. If you think the cold war was costly, wait until you see the price tag for this ‘protection’ from the ‘threats’ in space: The trillions spent on the cold war will look like a blue light special.

Retrograde and fanatical religious groups, similarly, have great vested interests in fulfilling the promise of Armageddon. An eschatological paradigm, well enshrined in the belief systems of those running covert UFO projects, is supported by the portrayal of a cosmic conflict in the heavens. Voila! We have the necessity of spinning the UFO/ET issue in the evil invading aliens (translates in religious terms as demons) direction. Indeed, this has already been accomplished, courtesy of the ‘civilian UFO community’ and the tabloid media (swhich at this point is virtually all media…).

Additionally, there is a subtext which can only be viewed as thinly veiled racism. You will note that part of the ‘new myth’ regarding UFOs involves the ‘good ETs’ , which invariably are described as ‘Pleidians’ who are ‘handsome’ white, blue-eyed Aryan appearing types. Naturally, those ‘evil, bad ETs’ are darker, shorter, look funny and smell funny. Please. Such clap-trap would have us trade age-old human racism for an extraterrestrial variety. This nonsense and propaganda could only make Hitler proud.

In one lengthy meeting with a multi-billionaire, I was told that he gave great support to UFO activities which propel the so-called ‘alien abduction’ subject into public awareness because he wanted humanity to unite around fighting this ‘alien threat’. Later, this very influential figure informed me that he believed these demonic ETs were the cause of every setback in human history since Adam and Eve. Sound familiar?

Military interests, which are heavily involved in covert projects which hoax ET events, such as human military- related abductions, have a shared goal of demonizing the UFO/ET phenomenon. Doing so lays the foundations for the fear and dread necessary for an organized opposition to all things ET. And this subserves the longterm need to provide a rationale for an expanding global military even should world peace emerge. In fact, under this scenario, ‘world peace’, or strictly speaking peace on Earth, could be secured by the world uniting, eventually, against the ‘threat from space’ referred to by resident Reagan. (By the way, personally I believe Reagan was the victim of disinformation specialists who surrounded him and who manipulated him into the statements he made on this subject.)

Under this scenario, currently being gamed and ‘disclosed’ courtesy of the trial balloon UFO ‘community’, we would get peace on Earth – in exchange for interplanetary conflict. One step forward, ten steps back. Wonderful.

Such a false and contrived ‘disclosure of the truth’ regarding UFOs and ETs would, then, subserve agendas held by powerful covert interests in both the military-industrial sector and those of a strange collection of religious fanatics, who pine for Armageddon — and the sooner the better.
Image
James Watt
Lest the reader think such a strange amalgam of militarists and cult-like religious interests are unlikely, remember the weird views of the Third Reich. Or more recently, the views of one US Department of the Interior cabinet secretary during the Reagan years named James Watt. It was he who, not knowing a microphone was still on and recording his comments, stated in the 1980s that we did not need to worry about all these environmental problems since Armageddon was coming soon and the world would be destroyed anyway…This bizarre view, held by a man who shaped and applied policy for the Interior Department of the US Government, was later reported in the general media. At the time a comical footnote perhaps. But what does it say about the degree to which such beliefs may be shaping covert UFO policy — and specifically disclosure plans? We have found that such views — bizarre as they may seem to most — are heavily represented in covert policy development on the UFO subject.

And most disconcerting of all: This strange mixture of military cosmic saber-rattling and bizarre religious beliefs are the dominant forces shaping both the ‘civilian UFO community’ and the planned eventual ‘spin’ on UFO disclosure. Let the buyer beware.

To the rational and intellectual, such views seem ridiculous. Why, you might ask, would anyone want a cosmic war in space, an Armageddon and the destruction of the Earth? To comprehend this, you have to get inside the head of people who hold such beliefs - people like James Watt. In his case, why worry about a little bit of deforestation, air pollution and areas of dead oceans if the entire world is going to be destroyed in a couple of years anyway?

But the thinking goes further than this. Because such fanatical thinking has within it the concept that as a result of the Armageddon we will see the return of Christ- and with it the good people’s salvation. Now, people are free to believe what they want. But what we have found is a deliberate influencing of covert policy on UFOs by such beliefs. Some of these people want Armageddon – and they want it ASAP.

Strictly speaking, the militarists and war-mongers, itching to ‘kick some alien butt’ as it was said in the movie Independence Day, may actually only want a pretext to justify their existence and get the world to eventually spend huge sums of money on a perceived (if contrived) threat from space.

But in some cases – high up on the food chain of the covert entity running UFO secrecy – the two views meet. A place where militarism and eschatology merge. Where Star Wars and Armageddon join.

In tracing the history of both the UFO civilian community and the covert policy-making group concerned with UFOs, we have found a growing penetration of the latter into the former. So much so that at this point there are projects which ostensibly are innocent civilian initiatives but which in reality are totally controlled and financed by ‘cut-outs’ from ultra-secret projects.

Moreover, our careful penetration of such projects yielded the disturbing finding that deep-cover black project operatives are working closely with alleged civilian researchers, journalists and UFO glitterati. CIA and military intelligence operatives are working with civilian ‘think tank’ heads, alongside very wealthy business people who are eschatologists, and being advised by ‘civilian’ technologists and scientists – who are themselves proponents of bizarre religious belief systems involving the end of the world and ETs…

Thus, the new ‘chosen ones’ have been assembled. They are planning your disclosure on the UFO/ET subject. They are owned by the money whores and power brokers doing the bidding of the secret entity which runs UFO projects to begin with. And it all looks like a civilian initiative. So innocent. So well-intended. So ‘scientific’. And by the way, the sky is falling courtesy of ET and we need your money and your souls to defend against it.

Do not be deceived. You need to be awake to the darker scenarios which some would like to thrust upon the world. And you need to know that there are alternatives. If a ‘disclosure’ is unleashed on the world which is xenophobic, militaristic and terrifying, know that it comes from the spinmeisters of secrecy- regardless of how respectable the person or group may appear to be.

And remember: Part of this disclosure plan involves the use of UFO look-alike devices made by humans in an attack on Earth or military assets of Earth. This would be a well-orchestrated use of advanced human technologies to hoax an ET attack- all for the purpose of disclosing the truth with the desired military-oriented spin. In such a scenario, most of humanity will be deceived into believing the threat from space has arrived – and that we must fight it at all costs. This is nothing more than long-term social security for the military-industrial complex. There must be people who can expose this fraud.

But why should we wait for these darker scenarios to be unleashed on an unsuspecting world?

Here is another idea: Why don’t ‘we the people’ unite and launch a disclosure which resembles the first one described above. An honest one. One which leads to peace, not war. To a sustainable and beautiful world, free of pollution and brimming with abundance, of all types. One which reaches out into the unknown, instead of firing particle beam weapons into the darkness of space.

Additionally, we welcome those who can come forward with first hand knowledge of the machinations referred to in this paper and who wish to expose such madness to contact us at http://www.cseti.org. The one thing the darkness of secrecy cannot tolerate is a spotlight shining right on it. And the more of us holding the light, the better.

Evil steps in when good people do nothing. This is a lesson taught through thousands of years of human history. We stand at the beginning of a new time, and a new world awaits us. But we must embrace it, and help create it. For if we are passive, others will have their way- at least in the short run.

Steven M. Greer M.D.



- See more at: http://siriusdisclosure.com/cseti-paper ... dvyek.dpuf



User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Heads up: "Never Trust a Photo Copier!"


User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Study: Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile


presstv.ir

July 13, 2013

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

...

But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones.


No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.


Read full article here: http://www.infowars.com/study-conspirac ... y-hostile/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

George Orwell and the Cold War: A Reconsideration

By Murray N. Rothbard
Mises.org
July 15, 2013

[From Reflections on America, 1984: An Orwell Symposium. Ed. Robert Mulvihill. Athens and London, University of Georgia Press, 1986.]

In a recent and well-known article, Norman Podhoretz has attempted to conscript George Orwell into the ranks of neoconservative enthusiasts for the newly revitalized cold war with the Soviet Union.[1] If Orwell were alive today, this truly “Orwellian” distortion would afford him considerable wry amusement. It is my contention that the cold war, as pursued by the three superpowers of Nineteen Eighty-Four, was the key to their successful imposition of a totalitarian regime upon their subjects. We all know thatNineteen Eighty-Four was a brilliant and mordant attack on totalitarian trends in modern society, and it is also clear that Orwell was strongly opposed to communism and to the regime of the Soviet Union. But the crucial role of a perpetual cold war in the entrenchment of totalitarianism in Orwell’s “nightmare vision” of the world has been relatively neglected by writers and scholars.

In Nineteen Eighty-Four there are three giant superstates or blocs of nations: Oceania (run by the United States, and including the British Empire and Latin America), Eurasia (the Eurasian continent), and Eastasia (China, southeast Asia, much of the Pacific). The superpowers are always at war, in shifting coalitions and alignments against each other. The war is kept, by agreement between the superpowers, safely on the periphery of the blocs, since war in their heartlands might actually blow up the world and their own rule along with it. The perpetual but basically phony war is kept alive by unremitting campaigns of hatred and fear against the shadowy foreign Enemy. The perpetual war system is then used by the ruling elite in each country to fasten totalitarian collectivist rule upon their subjects. As Harry Elmer Barnes wrote, this system “could only work if the masses are always kept at a fever heat of fear and excitement and are effectively prevented from learning that the wars are actually phony. To bring about this indispensable deception of the people requires a tremendous development of propaganda, thought-policing, regimentation, and mental terrorism.” And finally, “when it becomes impossible to keep the people any longer at a white heat in their hatred of one enemy group of nations, the war is shifted against another bloc and new, violent hate campaigns are planned and set in motion.”[2]

From Orwell’s time to the present day, the United States has fulfilled his analysis or prophecy by engaging in campaigns of unremitting hatred and fear of the Soviets, including such widely trumpeted themes (later quietly admitted to be incorrect) as “missile gap” and “windows of vulnerability.” What Garet Garrett perceptively called “a complex of vaunting and fear” has been the hallmark of the American as well as of previous empires:[3] the curious combination of vaunting and braggadocio that insists that a nation-state’s military might is second to none in any area, combined with repeated panic about the intentions and imminent actions of the “empire of evil” that is marked as the Enemy. It is the sort of fear and vaunting that makes Americans proud of their capacity to “overkill” the Russians many times and yet agree enthusiastically to virtually any and all increases in the military budget for mightier weapons of mass destruction. Senator Ralph Flanders (Republican, Vermont) pinpointed this process of rule through fear when he stated during the Korean War:
  • Fear is felt and spread by the Department of Defense in the Pentagon. In part, the spreading of it is purposeful. Faced with what seem to be enormous armed forces aimed against us, we can scarcely expect the Department of Defense to do other than keep the people in a state of fear so that they will be prepared without limit to furnish men and munitions.[4]
This applies not only to the Pentagon but to its civilian theoreticians, the men whom Marcus Raskin, once one of their number, has dubbed “the mega-death intellectuals.” Thus Raskin pointed out that
  • their most important function is to justify and extend the existence of their employers. … In order to justify the continued large-scale production of these [thermonuclear] bombs and missiles, military and industrial leaders needed some kind of theory to rationalize their use. … This became particularly urgent during the late 1950s, when economy-minded members of the Eisenhower Administration began to wonder why so much money, thought, and resources, were being spent on weapons if their use could not be justified. And so began a series of rationalizations by the “defense intellectuals” in and out of the Universities. … Military procurement will continue to flourish, and they will continue to demonstrate why it must. In this respect they are no different from the great majority of modern specialists who accept the assumptions of the organizations which employ them because of the rewards in money and power and prestige. … They know enough not to question their employers’ right to exist.[5]
In addition to the manufacture of fear and hatred against the primary Enemy, there have been numerous Orwellian shifts between the Good Guys and the Bad Guys. Our deadly enemies in World War II, Germany and Japan, are now considered prime Good Guys, the only problem being their unfortunate reluctance to take up arms against the former Good Guys, the Soviet Union. China, having been a much lauded Good Guy under Chiang Kai-shek when fighting Bad Guy Japan, became the worst of the Bad Guys under communism, and indeed the United States fought the Korean and Vietnamese wars largely for the sake of containing the expansionism of Communist China, which was supposed to be an even worse guy than the Soviet Union. But now all that is changed, and Communist China is now the virtual ally of the United States against the principal Enemy in the Kremlin.

Along with other institutions of the permanent cold war, Orwellian New-speak has developed richly. Every government, no matter how despotic, that is willing to join the anti-Soviet crusade is called a champion of the “free world.” Torture committed by “totalitarian” regimes is evil; torture undertaken by regimes that are merely “authoritarian” is almost benign. While the Department of War has not yet been transformed into the Department of Peace, it was changed early in the cold war to the Department of Defense, and President Reagan has almost completed the transformation by the neat Orwellian touch of calling the MX missile “the Peacemaker.”

More: http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/07/murr ... -cold-war/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, Hastings Was Murdered

"In March 2013, Attorney General, Eric Holder, answered a February 2013 inquiry from Senator Rand Paul as to whether Obama had any intentions of assassinating American citizens on American soil through the use of drones.Holder also stated that Obama “has no intention” of targeting American citizens with unmanned aerial vehicles, but would do so if facing “an extraordinary circumstance.”

I presume from the Attorney General’s characterization of Obama’s need to assassinate America citizens, but only under “an extraordinary circumstance” applies to journalists attempting to the tell the truth about the morally bankrupt Obama administration and their criminal enterprise operations which constitute a clear and present danger to the United States.

  • This is the first of a two part story which examines the three following questions:

    1. Was Michael Hastings murdered?
    2. If so, why was he murdered?
    3. How was the murder accomplished?
Part one of this series examines the evidence supporting a charge of murder in the death of investigative reporter Michael Hastings. Also, some the ground work is laid with regard to the second question on why Michael Hastings was murdered. Part two will fully develop the motives as to why Hastings was murdered as well as how the murder was accomplished. The cover story related to Hastings’ death will be examined as well as evidence which destroys the credibility of the “official account.” ...

"Michael Hastings was the ultimate reporter and a consummate whistle-blower. For example, Michael Hastings brought down the command of General McChrystal the senior commander in Afghanistan in which his insubordination and lack of respect for Obama was reported in Rolling Stone Magazine by Hastings and resulted in the General’s firing. ..."

"We know now, from Twitter, and various spokespeople from Wikileaks, that Hastings had contacted Wikileaks and said he was being investigated by the FBI. The following tweet is the first element in the notion that Hastings was murdered to cover up his potential release of volatile information which could result in the fall of the Obama empire."

...

"The forensics of his death makes no sense.The crime scene evidence contradicts the official account which claimed that Hastings lost

Image

control of his speeding car which crashed into a tree and the car subsequently burst into flames. I have looked at the video and still pictures of the crime scene and I have a very hard time believing the official story as a result. My heartfelt thanks goes out to Jim Stone and LoudLabs for publishing these crash scene pictures. Look at Hastings car, as it is fully engulfed in flames from an alleged head-on, high speed crash into a tree. Please notice the silhouette of the burning car, that the front end of the care is fully intact. The significance of this will become apparent in the following paragraphs.

Image

Notice the tree. It is not even bent after supposedly being impacted by Hastings car at 80 miles per hour.


Now, look at the adjacent picture of the tree taken following the accident. Does this tree look like it was the target of a high speed crash in which some say that Hastings would have been going in excess of 80 mph at the time of impact? The tree isn’t even bent! This is an ill conceived crime scene explanation which riv als the unbelievable “magic bullet” theory which was brought forth in the JFK assassination to explain how one bullet could strike two men and create five different wounds.

Image

Take note of the front end of the car, no impact damage is present. However, the rear of the car is a different story. If the front end of Hastings’ car had struck a tree, the hood would look like an accordion and would be pushed up into the front seat. This photo absolutely disproves the official account of what officials say happened to Hastings and his vehicle.

There there is the issue of the front end of the car. The above picture proves that the front end of the car struck nothing. However, the rear end of the car is damaged and appears to have been blown out. Unless Hastings was driving in reverse, it did not strike any tree. And since the tree was not struck by Hastings car, other outside explanations must be now be considered."


Read more: http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/07/2 ... -murdered/

User avatar
durangout
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2835
Location: Bugged out man, WAY out

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by durangout »

I looks to me like only nano thermite could've done all that damage. We should get some physicist to take some samples and analyze them.

I also heard that eyewitnesses said there was a loud explosion and someone saw molten steel coming from the tracks of that train that had an "accident" in Spain right before it went off the tracks.

User avatar
bobhenstra
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7236
Location: Central Utah

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by bobhenstra »

durangout wrote:I looks to me like only nano thermite could've done all that damage. We should get some physicist to take some samples and analyze them.

I also heard that eyewitnesses said there was a loud explosion and someone saw molten steel coming from the tracks of that train that had an "accident" in Spain right before it went off the tracks.
Lol :)) =)) :))

User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Ridicule is the standard operating procedure of paid liars, durangout. But the FACTS speak for themselves. Read the article.


User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Flashback: Yahoo Uncovered Syria Chemical Weapon False Flag in January


by Anthony Gucciardi
August 23rd, 2013

Bypassing all claims of ‘conspiracy theory’, it was actually Yahoo News that published an eerily psychic piece that warned of moves by the Obama administration to launch a chemical attack in Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime.

Image

Laying out what is now history in clear text, the mainstream Yahoo report sourcing ANI reads (I have archived a screenshot of the page in case it is removed):
  • “The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown. As per the scheme ‘Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to usechemical weapons,’ the Daily Mail reports.”
But maybe AIN and Yahoo News are conspiracy news organizations? After all, the very notion of a false flag is now considered treason in the mind of Obama drones. It is not politically correct to talk about how the Syrian rebels, who may have carried this out under Obama, are barbaric minions of Hell who revel in beheading all Christian families.

Predicted Months Before

There has much been talk of the recent chemical attack in Syria, yet there appears to be virtually no mention of this piece in the mainstream news. Instead, we look to the alternative news, which actually lit the proverbial pilot light behind this bombshell to begin with. Powerhouse journalists like Paul Joseph Watson have been covering the reality of a staged chemical attack for months, shouting from the rooftops that Assad will be blamed in order to begin a hot conflict.

Yet it seems the media is now blatantly corrupt and irrelevant enough to ignore this, and instead call for immediate actions against Assad. But what can they say when Yahoo, now the #1 largest website in the entire nation and the epitome of mainstream news, goes on record and warns about it being a false flag? Better yet, the piece even references Infowars in the text. But you ask, why would they do that? Why would they reference an alternative news site like that?

The simple answer is that the mainstream news is out of real content. They can only push sensational lies over the Trayvon Martin case and other shootings for so long before they literally have zero audience, and we already know their trust rankings are virtually dead. That’s why we see many mega media outlets actually starting to act as if they are on a crusade against the banksters and want justice. Think of it as a basic fight for survival on their end. They know that unless they somehow make themselves relevant, they will burn out very quickly in the face of alternative news.

...
Read more: http://www.storyleak.com/flashback-yaho ... z2dBJTg711

User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

US False Flags
(from Polk to Lincoln to Today)


By Thomas DiLorenzo
August 29, 2013

In his famous essay, “War is the Health of the State,” Randolph Bourne made an important distinction between country and state. One’s country is “an inescapable group into which we re born.” As such, “there is no more feeling of rivalry with other peoples than there is in our feeling for our family.” Country is “a concept of peace, of tolerance, of living and letting live,” wrote Bourne.

The state, on the other hand, “is essentially a concept of power, of competition.” Conflating the two concepts – country and state – sends one into a hopeless and very dangerous confusion. For the history of the American country is one of “conquest of the land, of the growth of wealth, of the enterprise of education, and the carrying out of spiritual ideals.”

The history of the American state, by contrast, is one of “making war, obstructing international trade, preventing itself from being split to pieces, punishing those citizens whom society agrees are offensive, and collecting money to pay for it all.

In peacetime the state “has almost no trappings to appeal to the common man’s emotions,” wrote Bourne. The average citizen largely ignores the state. For example, at the outset of the American “Civil War” the only connection the average citizen had with the federal government was though the post office and paying about $45/year in taxes. This of course is considered to be a disaster or a calamity by all statists.

“With the shock of war,” however, “the state comes into its own again.” War is the health of the state. It is the reason given for high taxes, internal revenue bureaucracies, pervasive spying, censorship, military conscription, the abolition of civil liberties, heavy debt, an explosive growth of government spending and borrowing, extensive excise taxation, nationalization of industries, socialist central planning, massive public indoctrination campaigns, the punishment and imprisonment of dissenters to the state’s rule, the shooting of deserters from its armies, the conquest of other countries, inflation of the currency, demonization of private enterprise and the civil society for being insufficiently “patriotic,” the growth of a military/industrial complex, a vast expansion of governmental pork barrel spending, the demonization of the ideas of freedom and individualism and those who espouse them, and a never-ending celebration, if not deification, of statism and militarism.

The average citizen has no interest in any of this. The average citizen of a militaristic empire is nothing more than a taxpayer/supplier of cannon fodder in the eyes of the state. Therein lies the state’s biggest conundrum: How to go about getting the masses to go along with their own self enslavement as taxpayers and cannon fodder and cheerleaders for war. The answer to this conundrum has always been the crafting of a series of lies about the “imperative” to wage war. For as Bourne also wrote: “[A]ll foreign policy, the diplomatic negotiations which produce or forestall war are . . . the private property of the Executive part of the Government, and are equally exposed to no check whatever from popular bodies, or the people voting as a mass themselves.”

Most people are “rationally ignorant” of almost all of what government does, and they are the most ignorant about foreign policy. This allows politicians to lie nations into war with impunity, for they have always understood that “the moment war is declared . . . the mass of the people through some spiritual alchemy, become convinced that they have willed and executed the deed [of starting a war] themselves (emphasis added).” At that point “the citizen throws off his contempt and indifference to Government, identifies himself with its purposes, revives all his military memories and symbols, and the state once more walks in august presence, through the imaginations of men.” Most destructively, “the patriot loses all sense of the distinction between state, nation, and government.”

LYING AMERICANS INTO WAR

As this is being written the U.S. government is spreading the tall tale that the Syrian government allegedly killed some 100 of its own citizens with poison gas. President Obama announced last year, quite conveniently, that that is what would cause him to “cross the line” and wage war on the Syrian government despite the fact that the Syrian government poses no threat of harm to any American. It is a replay of the last lie to start a war – the Bush administration’s lie that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq possessed “weapons of mass destruction” that somehow threatened Americans. That was quickly proven to be a lie, but it was too late. As Randolph Bourne wrote, once a war is started most Americans become slavishly obedient to the warfare state and tend to believe all of is lies, no matter how spectacular they may be. (The first Persian Gulf War of the early 1990s was partly “justified” by the lie that Iraqi soldiers were pulling the plugs in hospital nurseries where prematurely-born Kuwaiti babies were dying).

The War of 1812

Barely twenty years after the U.S. Constitution was ratified the “virus of imperialism” infected quite a few American politicians who believed it was their “manifest destiny” to invade and conquer Canada. One of the congressional leaders of the early nineteenth-century war party, Henry Clay, celebrated the declaration of war on June 4, 1812, by declaring that “Every patriot bosom must throb with anxious solicitude for the result. Every patriot arm will assist in making that result conducive to the glory of our beloved country” (David and Jeane Heidler, Henry Clay: The Essential American, p. 98).

Among the “official reasons” for the invasion of Canada in 1812 were the alleged “impressment” of American sailors by the British government, but that had been going on for decades, as Justin Raimondo has pointed out. The tall tale was also broadcast that the “evil” British were encouraging Indians to attack American settlers. The real reason for the war, however, was an impulse to grow the state with an imperialistic war of conquest. The result of the war was a disaster – the British burned down the White House, the Library of Congress, and much of Washington, D.C. Americans were saddled with a huge war debt that was used as an excuse to resurrect the corrupt and economically destabilizing Bank of the United States, a precursor of the Fed.

The Mexican-American War

When James K. Polk became president in 1845 he announced to his cabinet that one of his chief objectives was to acquire California, which was then a part of Mexico. As he wrote in his diary (online as “The Diary of James K. Polk”), “I stated to the cabinet that up to this time as they knew, we had heard of no open act of aggression by the Mexican army, but that the danger was imminent that such acts would be committed. I said that in my opinion we had ample cause of war.”

Thus, long before the presidency of George W. Bush, James K, Polk advocated the neocon notion of “pre-emptive war.” Polk recognized that the Mexican army had not committed any “act of aggression,” so set out to provoke one by sending American troops to the border of Mexico in territory that historians agree was “disputed territory” at the time because of a very dubious claim by the U.S. government. None other than Ulysses S. Grant wrote in his memoirs that, as a young soldier serving under the command of General Zachary Taylor during the 1846-1848 Mexican-American War, he understood that he had been sent there to provoke a fight:

“The presence of United States troops on the edge of the disputed territory furthest from the Mexican settlements, was not sufficient to provoke hostilities. We were sent to provoke a fight, but it was essential that Mexico should commence it. I was very doubtful whether Congress would declare war; but if Mexico should attack our troops, the Executive [President Polk] could announce, ‘Whereas war exist by the acts of, etc.’ and prosecute the contest with vigor.”

Polk’s gambit worked; he did provoke the Mexican army. In his war message to Congress he then declared that “Mexico has passed the boundary of the United States, has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. . . . As war exists . . . by the act of Mexico herself, we are called upon by every consideration of duty and patriotism to vindicate with decision the honor, the rights, and the interests of our country.” This con game of provoking a war by showing up on another nation’s border, heavily armed with weapons aimed at the hoped-for belligerent, would be repeated many times in subsequent generations, right up to today’s provocation of a war in Syria.

The invasion and conquest of Mexico enabled the U.S. government to acquire California and New Mexico at the cost of some 15,000 American lives and at least 25,000 Mexican casualties. It was an aggressive war of conquest and imperialism.

The American “Civil War”

In his first inaugural address on March 4, 1861, Abraham Lincoln threatened “invasion” and “bloodshed” (his exact words) in any state that refused to collect the federal tariff tax on imports, which had just been more than doubled two days earlier. At the time, tariffs accounted for more than 90 percent of all federal tax revenue, so this was a gigantic tax increase. This is how Lincoln threatened war in his first official oration:

“The power confided in me will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the government, and to collect the duties and imposts; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere.”

But of course the states of the lower South, having seceded, did not intend to “collect the duties and imposts” and send the money to Washington, D.C. Lincoln committed treason (as defined by Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution) by levying war upon the free and independent states, which he always considered to be a part of the American union. By his own admission (and his subsequent actions), he invaded his own country over tax collection.

The Republican Party of 1860 was the party of protectionism and high tariffs. The Confederate Constitution had outlawed protectionist tariffs altogether. The result would have been a massive diversion of world trade to the Southern ports which would have forced the U.S. government to reduce its desired 50 percent average tariff rate to competitive levels (10-15 percent), depriving Northern manufacturers of this veiled form of corporate welfare, and depriving the government of the revenue it needed to pursue its “manifest destiny” of a mercantilist empire complete with massive subsidies for railroad corporations (among others).

Lincoln’s dilemma was that he knew he would be condemned worldwide for waging a bloody war over tax collection. Another excuse for war had to be invented, so he invented the notion of the “mystical,” permanent, and non-voluntary union. He did not want to be seen as the aggressor in his war for tariff revenue, so he hatched a plot to trick Southerners into firing the first shot by sending American warships to Charleston Harbor while steadfastly refusing to meet with Confederate peace commissioners or discuss the purchase of federal property by the Confederate government. He understood that the Confederates would not tolerate a foreign fort on their property any more than George Washington would have tolerated a British fort in New York or Boston Harbors.

Quite a few Northern newspapers recognized the game Lincoln was playing. On April 16, 1861the Buffalo Daily Courier editorialized that “The affair at Fort Sumter . . has been planned as a means by which the war feeling at the North should be intensified” (Howard Cecil Perkis, Northern Editorials on Secession). The New York Evening Day Book wrote on April 17, 1861, that the event at Fort Sumter was “a cunningly devised scheme” contrived “to arouse, and, if possible, exasperate the northern people against the South.” “Look at the facts,” the Providence Daily Post wrote on April 13, 1861. “For three weeks the [Lincoln] administration newspapers have been assuring us that Ford Sumter would be abandoned,” but “Mr. Lincoln saw an opportunity to inaugurate civil war without appearing in the character of an aggressor.” The Jersey City American Standard editorialized that “there is a madness and ruthlessness” in Lincoln’s behavior, concluding that Lincolns sending of ships to Charleston Harbor was “a pretext for letting loose the horrors of war.”

After Fort Sumter, on May 1, 1861, Lincoln wrote to his naval commander, Captain Gustavus Fox, to say that “You and I both anticipated that the cause of the country [i.e., a civil war] would be advanced by making the attempt to provision Fort Sumter, even if it should fail; and it is no small consolation now to feel that our anticipation is justified by the result.” He was thanking Captain Fox for his role in duping the Confederates into firing upon Fort Sumter (where no one was either killed or wounded). He was thanking Captain Fox for his assistance in

starting the war. Lincoln responded with a full-scale invasion of all the Southern states and a four-year war that, according to the latest research, was responsible for as many as 850,000 American deaths with more than double that number maimed for life.

The Spanish-American War

Immediately after the “Civil War” the U.S. government waged a twenty-five-year war of genocide against the Plains Indians “to make way for the railroad corporations,” as General Sherman declared (See my Independent Review article, “Violence in the American West: Myth versus Reality”). Then by the late 1880s American imperialists wanted to kick the Spanish out of Cuba where American business interests had invested in sugar and tobacco plantations. An American warship, the U.S.S. Maine, was sent to Havana in January of 1898 to supposedly protect American business interests from an insurrection. On February 15, 1898, a mysterious explosion sunk the ship, killing 270 sailors. The Spanish were blamed for the explosion despite a lack of incriminating evidence. “You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war,” newspaperman William Randolph Hearst famously said to the artist Frederic Remington, implying that, armed with the artist’s illustrations, his newspapers would generate war propaganda. The U.S. government waged war with Spain occupied Cuba for the next four years, making the world safe for American sugar and tobacco corporations.

World War I

In 1915 a German submarine sunk the RMS Lusitania, a British ship that was supposedly a civilian cruise ship. About one-hundred Americans were on board, which enabled President Woodrow Wilson to copy Lincoln’s war tactic and use the sinking of the ship to argue for war. Before the sinking of the Lusitania Wilson knew that the ship was carrying arms but refused to issue warnings to American passengers that, since Britain and Germany were at war, it could be risky to be a passenger on the Lusitania. He used the sinking of the ship to excite anti-German hysteria and persuade the Congress to have the U.S enter the European war. In 2008 a diving expedition discovered that the Lusitania held more than four million rounds of rifle ammunition, much of which was packed away in boxes labeled “cheese” or “butter” or “oysters.”

The Pearl Harbor Deception

Robert Stinnett, author of Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor, is a World War II veteran who had a career as a journalist with the Oakland Tribune and BBC for several decades after the war. He researched his book upon discovering, in 1993, that the U.S. Naval Security Group Command had decided to place into public archives at the University of Maryland hundreds of thousands of Japanese military messages obtained by U.S. monitoring/spying stations prior to Pearl Harbor. These records had not been seen by anyone since 1941.

What Stinnett found was that, just as the vast majority of Northerners did not favor war on the eve of Fort Sumter in 1861, the vast majority of Americans eighty years later supported the America First non-interventionist movement led by Charles Lindbergh. Eighty percent of the American public was non-interventionist in 1940-1941. After Germany “made a strategic error” by signing a treaty with Japan,, a U.S. Lieutenant Commander Arthur McCollum of Naval Intelligence apparently saw an opportunity to counter the America First movement by provoking Japan into attacking the United States and getting the public behind war.

Using the government’s own sources, Stinnett found that President Franklin D. Roosevelt adopted an Office of Naval Intelligence plan to provoke Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor with an eight-point plan, the most important of which was keeping most of the U.S. fleet parked as sitting ducks at Pearl Harbor. When the commander of the U.S. fleet, Admiral James Richardson, objected to allowing his sailors to be slaughtered by the Japanese, FDR fired Richardson and replaced him with Rear Admiral Husband E. Kimmel.

FDR implemented the entire eight-point plan but kept Admiral Kimmel and General Walter Short, commander of U.S. Army troops in Hawaii, in the dark. Over 1,000 Japanese messages per day were intercepted by the U.S. Navy, which knew in advance everything the Japanese were doing in the Pacific on their way to Pearl Harbor. They knew in advance that the Japanese would attack Pearl Harbor on December 7 1941. Kimmel and Short were even given direct orders by FDR himself, Stinnett found, to “remain in a defensive posture” because “the United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act.”

On October 30, 2000, President Bill Clinton signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act that, among many other things, acknowledged that Kimmel and Short were denied crucial military intelligence about the Japanese fleet prior to the Pearl Harbor attack. Kimmel and Short were fired by FDR after the attack, but were exonerated fifty-nine years later.

The Gulf of Tonkin “Incidents”

Shortly before his assassination in November of 1963 President John F. Kennedy had begun recalling U.S. military “advisors” from Vietnam. His successor, Lyndon Johnson, was hell bent on waging total war in Vietnam. Once again the American public had little interest in a civil war thousands of miles away in Asia, but were easily duped into acquiescing in one. Once again the ruse involved mysterious occurrences involving battle ships in the middle of nowhere, where the only accounts of the incidents came from the U.S government.

The U.S. government began “covertly” supplying gunboats to the South Vietnamese army which were used to attack the coast of North Vietnam. This was acknowledged in 1964 by Defense Secretary Robert McNamara. In addition,

American warships hovered around North Vietnamese ports. This included the USS Maddox. Placing the ships in harm’s way was Johnson’s FDR-type strategy to provoke an attack by the North Vietnamese, and it succeeded.

Johnson falsely claimed that there was a second attack on the USS Maddox, but that is acknowledged to be a hoax. Naval sonar picked up American propeller noise, and radar showed images caused by bad weather, not North Vietnamese gunboats. Johnson nevertheless made a radio speech describing a second “attack” and called for military retaliation. Soon thereafter he ordered air strikes. In a 2003 television documentary entitled “The Fog of War” Robert McNamara admitted that the second attack on the Maddox “never happened.”

It may seem trite, but it is nevertheless true that those who fail to learn the lessons of history are bound to repeat its mistakes. Americans are about to repeat the same mistake of squandering their blood and treasure on another military adventure (in Syria) that has nothing whatsoever to do with defending American freedom – or anyone else’s.

To study imperialism and anti-imperialism more intensely, consider signing up for my new five-week online course on the subject through the Mises Academy beginning the evening of September 9.

ImageImageImageImageImage

Thomas J. DiLorenzo [ TDilo@aol.com]send him mail ] is professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the author of The Real Lincoln;;Lincoln Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe, How Capitalism Saved America, Hamilton’s Curse: How Jefferson’s Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution – And What It Means for America Today. His latest book is Organized Crime: The Unvarnished Truth About Government.

Copyright © 2013 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

Previous article by Thomas DiLorenzo: Young Entrepreneurs Start Wonderful Beach Business

User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Obama Supported Rebels Eat Human Flesh in Syria



Sadly, US government is officially financing, supporting and arming Al Qaeda (Al Cia dah), flesh eating rebels in Syria. The same rebels who ADMITTED to carrying out the chemical attacks, for which Obama falsely blames Syrian government as a pretext for war against Syria! It was Obama supported Al Qaeda that carried out the attacks! Can you say FALSE FLAG! The oldest trick in the book!

Our tax dollars at work!

It is George Orwell all over again!

All public taxation of private property is a blatant violation of JUSTICE and of Liberty. No wonder that the spoils of this legal plunder are used to support flesh eating criminals in Syria!

User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Next FALSE FLAG in the Works:
Syrian rebels plan chem attack on Israel from Assad-controlled territories


September 9, 2013

A chemical attack may be launched on Israel by Syrian rebels from government-controlled territories as a “major provocation,” multiple sources told ...

More: http://www.infowars.com/rt-sources-syri ... rritories/

User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

NUKE FALSE FLAG in South Carolina?



ImageImage Alex Jones and Anthony Gucciardi warn that a high-level military source told them that nuclear warheads are secretly being moved from Dyess Air Force base in Texas to South Carolina. [They are being moved without authorization, no signatures required, and no record established. That means they now can be categorized as "missing nukes". Curiously, at exactly the same time, Senator Lindsay Graham warned that, if the US does not attack Syria, Iran might set off nuclear bombs in South Carolina. Think about that. This has the earmarks of becoming the biggest false-flag attack since 9/11. Only 9% of the American people currently are in favor of a US attack on Syria. How many would change their minds if they were led to believe that Iranian and Syrian agents nuked South Carolina? Furthermore, anyone who suggests that the bombs were provided by the US military could be classified as a domestic terrorist or traitor and be indefinitely detained. Even though this information may turn out to be in error, we have decided to share it just in case it is accurate. It is better to err on the side of safety. If this information is accurate, disseminating it widely may actually cause the plan to be aborted. It would not have the desired impact on public opinion if large numbers of Americans were warned in advance. So, at the risk of appearing to be alarmists, we urge you to pass this information to as many people as you can – as quickly as you can. It just might save an untold number of lives and prevent the beginning of World War III.] StoryLeak 2013 Sep 5 (Cached)

http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html


If there ever a nuke set off in the US, with 98% certainty, it will be a false flag!
Why? Because ALL major terrorist attacks in the last 100 years or so, have been false flags.

Wake UP.


User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

Lew Rockwell: We’re Winning

2013, Lew tells Alex Jones, is the year that the world woke up.
They are talking False Flags, vs. Liberty.

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by freedomforall »

LoveIsTruth wrote:NUKE FALSE FLAG in South Carolina?


ImageImage Alex Jones and Anthony Gucciardi warn that a high-level military source told them that nuclear warheads are secretly being moved from Dyess Air Force base in Texas to South Carolina. [They are being moved without authorization, no signatures required, and no record established. That means they now can be categorized as "missing nukes". Curiously, at exactly the same time, Senator Lindsay Graham warned that, if the US does not attack Syria, Iran might set off nuclear bombs in South Carolina. Think about that. This has the earmarks of becoming the biggest false-flag attack since 9/11. Only 9% of the American people currently are in favor of a US attack on Syria. How many would change their minds if they were led to believe that Iranian and Syrian agents nuked South Carolina? Furthermore, anyone who suggests that the bombs were provided by the US military could be classified as a domestic terrorist or traitor and be indefinitely detained. Even though this information may turn out to be in error, we have decided to share it just in case it is accurate. It is better to err on the side of safety. If this information is accurate, disseminating it widely may actually cause the plan to be aborted. It would not have the desired impact on public opinion if large numbers of Americans were warned in advance. So, at the risk of appearing to be alarmists, we urge you to pass this information to as many people as you can – as quickly as you can. It just might save an untold number of lives and prevent the beginning of World War III.] StoryLeak 2013 Sep 5 (Cached)

http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html


If there ever a nuke set off in the US, with 98% certainty, it will be a false flag!
Why? Because ALL major terrorist attacks in the last 100 years or so, have been false flags.

Wake UP.
Is there anywhere in scripture that even suggests that America would ever be nuked? Did God not say this land was the land of promise, precious above all other lands? Would he allow such devastation in this country, especially if the Constitution is to be saved by righteous people as spoken of by Joseph Smith? Ezra Taft Benson said the Constitution would be saved but not in Washington.
There are suggestions that there would be fighting and some saints offered safety, but a nuke would destroy much of the nation because if one goes off others could easily follow, wiping everyone from off the face of the planet. Somehow I don't think there will ever be this type of weaponry used in this country. WWIII is going to happen no matter what if we read Book of Revelation, but most of the destruction will be around Israel, will it not?

Listen closely!

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by freedomforall »

John Boehner Pits Obamacare Against Shutdown, A Choice Dubbed Anarchy By Harry Reid

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) vowed Wednesday to push ahead with a bill to defund Obamacare or shut down the government -- an effort that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) panned as an "absurd" ploy inspired by tea party "anarchists."
With Congress facing a Sept. 30 deadline to figure out how to keep paying for the federal government, Boehner said in a Capitol Hill news conference that defunding President Barack Obama's health care reform was a key part of that effort.
"We're going to continue to do everything we can to repeal the president's failed health care law," Boehner said. "This week, the House will pass the CR [continuing resolution] that locks the sequester savings in and defunds Obamacare."

MORE HERE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... ref=topbar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by freedomforall »

Boehner's Government Shutdown Calculus: Let Calamity Be The Cure

The growing clamor around the Beltway is that everyone should batten down the hatches and get ready for the inevitable government shutdown. It's an outcome that House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has worked hard to avoid, for the sake of his party's reputation. But Boehner, short on time and tactics, may have no other choice now than to let calamity physics work its will.

For the past week, warnings over the possibility of a shutdown have rung out. Jonathan Chait advised just last week that "a government shutdown is more likely now" because the time in which to actually deal-make around it is quickly elapsing. Not that a deal seemed likely. As one source, positioned to suss out the state of negotiations, told Jonathan Cohn, "The breakdown is more extensive than you've heard ... There is no discussion going on at all at this point."

MORE HERE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... ref=topbar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Obama Warns GOP Against Creating "Economic Chaos"


User avatar
LoveIsTruth
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5497

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by LoveIsTruth »

freedomfighter wrote:
LoveIsTruth wrote:NUKE FALSE FLAG in South Carolina?


ImageImage Alex Jones and Anthony Gucciardi warn that a high-level military source told them that nuclear warheads are secretly being moved from Dyess Air Force base in Texas to South Carolina. [They are being moved without authorization, no signatures required, and no record established. That means they now can be categorized as "missing nukes". Curiously, at exactly the same time, Senator Lindsay Graham warned that, if the US does not attack Syria, Iran might set off nuclear bombs in South Carolina. Think about that. This has the earmarks of becoming the biggest false-flag attack since 9/11. Only 9% of the American people currently are in favor of a US attack on Syria. How many would change their minds if they were led to believe that Iranian and Syrian agents nuked South Carolina? Furthermore, anyone who suggests that the bombs were provided by the US military could be classified as a domestic terrorist or traitor and be indefinitely detained. Even though this information may turn out to be in error, we have decided to share it just in case it is accurate. It is better to err on the side of safety. If this information is accurate, disseminating it widely may actually cause the plan to be aborted. It would not have the desired impact on public opinion if large numbers of Americans were warned in advance. So, at the risk of appearing to be alarmists, we urge you to pass this information to as many people as you can – as quickly as you can. It just might save an untold number of lives and prevent the beginning of World War III.] StoryLeak 2013 Sep 5 (Cached)

http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html


If there ever a nuke set off in the US, with 98% certainty, it will be a false flag!
Why? Because ALL major terrorist attacks in the last 100 years or so, have been false flags.

Wake UP.
Is there anywhere in scripture that even suggests that America would ever be nuked? Did God not say this land was the land of promise, precious above all other lands? Would he allow such devastation in this country, especially if the Constitution is to be saved by righteous people as spoken of by Joseph Smith? Ezra Taft Benson said the Constitution would be saved but not in Washington.
There are suggestions that there would be fighting and some saints offered safety, but a nuke would destroy much of the nation because if one goes off others could easily follow, wiping everyone from off the face of the planet. Somehow I don't think there will ever be this type of weaponry used in this country. WWIII is going to happen no matter what if we read Book of Revelation, but most of the destruction will be around Israel, will it not?
You are clearly wrong.

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by freedomforall »

LoveIsTruth wrote:
freedomfighter wrote:
LoveIsTruth wrote:NUKE FALSE FLAG in South Carolina?


ImageImage Alex Jones and Anthony Gucciardi warn that a high-level military source told them that nuclear warheads are secretly being moved from Dyess Air Force base in Texas to South Carolina. [They are being moved without authorization, no signatures required, and no record established. That means they now can be categorized as "missing nukes". Curiously, at exactly the same time, Senator Lindsay Graham warned that, if the US does not attack Syria, Iran might set off nuclear bombs in South Carolina. Think about that. This has the earmarks of becoming the biggest false-flag attack since 9/11. Only 9% of the American people currently are in favor of a US attack on Syria. How many would change their minds if they were led to believe that Iranian and Syrian agents nuked South Carolina? Furthermore, anyone who suggests that the bombs were provided by the US military could be classified as a domestic terrorist or traitor and be indefinitely detained. Even though this information may turn out to be in error, we have decided to share it just in case it is accurate. It is better to err on the side of safety. If this information is accurate, disseminating it widely may actually cause the plan to be aborted. It would not have the desired impact on public opinion if large numbers of Americans were warned in advance. So, at the risk of appearing to be alarmists, we urge you to pass this information to as many people as you can – as quickly as you can. It just might save an untold number of lives and prevent the beginning of World War III.] StoryLeak 2013 Sep 5 (Cached)

http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html


If there ever a nuke set off in the US, with 98% certainty, it will be a false flag!
Why? Because ALL major terrorist attacks in the last 100 years or so, have been false flags.

Wake UP.
Is there anywhere in scripture that even suggests that America would ever be nuked? Did God not say this land was the land of promise, precious above all other lands? Would he allow such devastation in this country, especially if the Constitution is to be saved by righteous people as spoken of by Joseph Smith? Ezra Taft Benson said the Constitution would be saved but not in Washington.
There are suggestions that there would be fighting and some saints offered safety, but a nuke would destroy much of the nation because if one goes off others could easily follow, wiping everyone from off the face of the planet. Somehow I don't think there will ever be this type of weaponry used in this country. WWIII is going to happen no matter what if we read Book of Revelation, but most of the destruction will be around Israel, will it not?
You are clearly wrong.
I am clearly inquisitive. Here is something I found that may answer my questions. "May," I said. However, the message is strong.

http://www.chronicleofnations.com/Can-G ... ve-Us.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Part 7 – Will God Save Us?

The question of whether God has power to save us from nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction is an obvious rhetorical device. The answer is certain. God is omnipotent. Yes! God can save us from nuclear weapons, or from any other harm likely to befall us. For Him it is not a question of ability. The only question is whether we will allow Him to save us. We are free to align ourselves with Him and reality or we can wander in unknown paths and find captivity and darkness. As previously discussed in the last six articles, we, as a nation, have changed our principles relating to war. We have raised the sword in offence. We have built upon the sandy foundation. We must repent.

In my opinion, this nation will get nuked unless we repent. And if we do not repent we will face worse difficulties than just nuclear weapons. The calamities that have been prophesied are likely to occur. Are they certain? That is yet unknown. The hand of the Lord is stretched out to us still. But we will reap what we sow. It is my opinion that one can judge the likelihood of disaster here in our land based on the morality of the people and how humble and repentant that they are. This is the promised land. The prophets of the Book of Mormon do not mince words about our potential fate.

Ether 2:9 And now, we can behold the decrees of God concerning this land, that it is a land of promise; and whatsoever nation shall possess it shall serve God, or they shall be swept off when the fulness of his wrath shall come upon them. And the fulness of his wrath cometh upon them when they are ripened in iniquity.

10 For behold, this is a land which is choice above all other lands; wherefore he that doth possess it shall serve God or shall be swept off; for it is the everlasting decree of God. And it is not until the fulness of iniquity among the children of the land, that they are swept off.

11 And this cometh unto you, O ye Gentiles, that ye may know the decrees of God—that ye may repent, and not continue in your iniquities until the fulness come, that ye may not bring down the fulness of the wrath of God upon you as the inhabitants of the land have hitherto done.

12 Behold, this is a choice land, and whatsoever nation shall possess it shall be free from bondage, and from captivity, and from all other nations under heaven, if they will but serve the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ, who hath been manifested by the things which we have written.

Verse 11 ought to ring particularly loudly in our ears. The prophet Moroni saw our day. He was very clear about this. He had great concern for us. He said:

Mormon 8:35 Behold, I speak unto you as if ye were present, and yet ye are not. But behold, Jesus Christ hath shown you unto me, and I know your doing.

36 And I know that ye do walk in the pride of your hearts; and there are none save a few only who do not lift themselves up in the pride of their hearts…

If you believe in the Book of Mormon, these warnings should be unambiguous. They are very clear. Pride is the universal sin. It is our pride that we know better than everyone around the globe and that we are the chosen people and that we are worthy to interfere in their affairs that may ultimately be our undoing.

The first six articles in this series lay out the case for our need to repent. They explain the natural laws we’ve failed to follow as a nation. Not since WWII have we had a constitutionally declared war. Yet we have conjured up rationale to justify war action across the globe. The US military is involved in almost 150 countries around the world with over 900 bases globally. Many of these are minor presences but we are there nonetheless. We are antagonizing many nations in the Eastern Hemisphere. We have occupied much of the Middle East and are agitating Iran to the greatest extent possible to force them to abandon their quest for nuclear arms. These are weapons we deem ourselves worthy to possess. Some would have us invade Iran to stop them from gaining such weapons for fear that they MIGHT use them. Yet we are the only nation on earth that HAS used nuclear weapons against another. We are hypocrites.

God requires that we abandon our sins and turn to him. This is the meaning of repentance. We must change our hearts. We must turn and face God.

Bible Dictionary: Repentance. The Greek word of which this is the translation denotes a change of mind, i.e., a fresh view about God, about oneself, and about the world. Since we are born into conditions of mortality, repentance comes to mean a turning of the heart and will to God, and a renunciation of sin to which we are naturally inclined. Without this there can be no progress in the things of the soul’s salvation, for all accountable persons are stained by sin, and must be cleansed in order to enter the kingdom of heaven. Repentance is not optional for salvation; it is a commandment of God (D&C 18:9–22; 20:29; 133:16). The preaching of repentance by John the Baptist formed the preparation for the ministry of our Lord. See Matt. 3:2; 4:17; Mark 1:4, 15; 2:17; Luke 3:3, 8; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 8:22; Rom. 13:11–14; James 5:1–6; Rev. 2:5, 16; 3:3, 19; cf. Isa. 1:16–20; Jonah 3:5–10; Jer. 3–5; 26; Ezek. 18:19–31; 33:7–20; Hosea 6; 12; 14; Joel 1:8; 2; Zeph. 2; Zech. 1; Mal. 1–4.

In the case of the American nation, we could restate the above and say that repentance IS NOT optional for our temporal salvation. We have many examples of entire societies repenting we can look to for encouragement; to lift us up.

1 Nephi 19:22 Now it came to pass that I, Nephi, did teach my brethren these things; and it came to pass that I did read many things to them, which were engraven upon the plates of brass, that they might know concerning the doings of the Lord in other lands, among people of old.

23 And I did read many things unto them which were written in the books of Moses; but that I might more fully persuade them to believe in the Lord their Redeemer I did read unto them that which was written by the prophet Isaiah; for I did liken all scriptures unto us, that it might be for our profit and learning.

The story of the prophet Jonah is particularly relevant. Jonah was called to reclaim the people of Nineveh. It was to be destroyed after 40 days if they would not repent. Nineveh was so large it took three days journey to cross it. (Jonah 3:3-4) The city was known as the bloody city. It was known for its savage cruelty. (Nahum 3) Johan was understandably wary of going there to cry repentance. The familiar part of the story is that he fled from the Lord on a ship headed for Tarshish, and when the Lord sent a fierce storm to drive the ship back Jonah had the sailors toss him overboard. A large fish swallowed him and preserved him for three days and nights. Often we forget that Jonah was successful in his mission. He was incredibly successful. The people heard the call and repented. The Lord turned away his wrath and preserved them.

Jonah 3:5 So the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them.

6 For word came unto the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered him with sackcloth, and sat in ashes.

7 And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water:

8 But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.

9 Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not?

10 And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.

Another example where an entire society repented is that of the city of Salem as recounted by Alma to the people of Ammonihah.

Alma 13:17 Now this Melchizedek was a king over the land of Salem; and his people had waxed strong in iniquity and abomination; yea, they had all gone astray; they were full of all manner of wickedness;

18 But Melchizedek having exercised mighty faith, and received the office of the high priesthood according to the holy order of God, did preach repentance unto his people. And behold, they did repent; and Melchizedek did establish peace in the land in his days; therefore he was called the prince of peace, for he was the king of Salem; and he did reign under his father.

Alma 10 verse 22 explains that Ammonihah was on the verge of destruction. Alma recounted the story of Melchizedek to help the people of Ammonihah avoid this end. Unfortunately we know that they did not repent and they were in fact destroyed. (Alma 16)

I sincerely hope that this series of articles has pricked your heart and that you feel something. I hope that you will pray to God for guidance and ask Him to change your heart. God supports His children. We must truly act as His. We must teach each other of Jesus Christ, of true principles, and of what God has done throughout history.

Alma 31:5 And now, as the preaching of the word had a great tendency to lead the people to do that which was just—yea, it had had more powerful effect upon the minds of the people than the sword, or anything else, which had happened unto them—therefore Alma thought it was expedient that they should try the virtue of the word of God.

Please, let us try the virtue of the word of God.

Here is the link to all seven parts: http://www.mormonchronicle.com/can-god- ... rom-nukes/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
moonwhim
captain of 1,000
Posts: 4251

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by moonwhim »

Another scripture comes to mind: Ether 8-22-23........"whatsoever nation shall uphold such secret combinations, to get power and gain, until they shall spread over the nation, behold, they shall be destroyed......yea, even the work of destruction come upon you, to your overthrow and destruction if ye suffer these things to be."

freedomforall
Gnolaum ∞
Posts: 16479
Location: WEST OF THE NEW JERUSALEM

Re: False Flag Operations Central (False Flags R’Us)

Post by freedomforall »

moonwhim wrote:Another scripture comes to mind: Ether 8-22-23........"whatsoever nation shall uphold such secret combinations, to get power and gain, until they shall spread over the nation, behold, they shall be destroyed......yea, even the work of destruction come upon you, to your overthrow and destruction if ye suffer these things to be."
Thank you moonwhim. You gave me a scripture rather than coming across as arrogant and all knowing. It's a good scripture by the way. I think it all ties in with Americans breaking the covenant with God to serve him, for his protection in return. Soon we will be ripe for destruction, whatever it entails.

Post Reply