Your home for discussing politics, the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and the principles of liberty.
NamasteMama wrote:Sadly chemo is what will kill you faster than the cancer. I'll never understand why one would do that to the body. My dad is a doctor and has been curing cancer patients for years. Sometimes there is nothing he can do, but many time he is able to help people using pure and natural treatments. He dosen't have a fancy office, car, our home. He still makes house calls to his patients. I truely believe if there was ever a man called by God to heal, it is my dad. He's considered the best in his field, yet he is humble and often treats his patients for free. I love my daddy. I wish every one with cancer could see him.
In this documentary they do mention scenarios where cancer is so advanced that even if you removed it the patient would still die, because so much of the body was already damaged by it. Like if you remove a bullet the patient may still die for the same reason. But the point they make is that B17 (Laetrile) does destroy cancer cells with great efficiency while nourishing healthy cells. So, it WILL destroy the cancer, and even if the body is too deteriorated, it will as a side effect remove the pain.bobhenstra wrote:As one who lost his wife to cancer, this is old news. There are all kinds of magical cures for cancer, we tried laetriel or vitamin 17, didn't work. Some good friend or relative was always bringing us something that was the latest thing, trying to be helpful. Jo didn't last long after she decided to discontinue chemo treatments. They were the only thing keeping her alive. You can fight it, but eventually it'll get you.
Bob
LoveIsTruth wrote:In this documentary they do mention scenarios where cancer is so advanced that even if you removed it the patient would still die, because so much of the body was already damaged by it. Like if you remove a bullet the patient may still die for the same reason. But the point they make is that B17 (Laetrile) does destroy cancer cells with great efficiency while nourishing healthy cells. So, it WILL destroy the cancer, and even if the body is too deteriorated, it will as a side effect remove the pain.
NamasteMama wrote:Sadly chemo is what will kill you faster than the cancer. I'll never understand why one would do that to the body. My dad is a doctor and has been curing cancer patients for years. Sometimes there is nothing he can do, but many time he is able to help people using pure and natural treatments. He dosen't have a fancy office, car, our home. He still makes house calls to his patients. I truely believe if there was ever a man called by God to heal, it is my dad. He's considered the best in his field, yet he is humble and often treats his patients for free. I love my daddy. I wish every one with cancer could see him.
LoveIsTruth wrote:In this documentary they do mention scenarios where cancer is so advanced that even if you removed it the patient would still die, because so much of the body was already damaged by it. Like if you remove a bullet the patient may still die for the same reason. But the point they make is that B17 (Laetrile) does destroy cancer cells with great efficiency while nourishing healthy cells. So, it WILL destroy the cancer, and even if the body is too deteriorated, it will as a side effect remove the pain.bobhenstra wrote:As one who lost his wife to cancer, this is old news. There are all kinds of magical cures for cancer, we tried laetriel or vitamin 17, didn't work. Some good friend or relative was always bringing us something that was the latest thing, trying to be helpful. Jo didn't last long after she decided to discontinue chemo treatments. They were the only thing keeping her alive. You can fight it, but eventually it'll get you.
Bob
bobhenstra wrote:...the spirit testified to me she had made the right decision. Bob
446 cured out of 450 is impressive. Thanks for posting.LoveIsTruth wrote:Here is yet another cure!
http://www.youtube.com/v/wvzDHGLEUyw?version=3&hl=en_US

gruden wrote:There are also different types of cancers, so there's no one-size-fits-all cure. I know of at least of a dozen, and stumble across more from time-to-time, and while one might work for a given cancer patient, it might not work for another who needs a different approach. I believe there are natural remediations out there for everyone.
Great videoRob wrote:446 cured out of 450 is impressive. Thanks for posting.LoveIsTruth wrote:Here is yet another cure!
http://www.youtube.com/v/wvzDHGLEUyw?version=3&hl=en_US
EDIT: Apparently, the sound guy got bored... Watch out for the 4-second blast o' music at 0:36:51 to 0:36:54. I had the volume way up to hear the guy talking about MSG, and, man, that woke me up.
Cures exist. Cancer has been decisively cured decades ago. It's like saying, "people still die from colds." Yes they do, but it does not mean that a perfectly good cure is not available in general. Chemo "therapy" is worse than cancer itself. And if you did not have a cancer, chemo will give it to you, because it causes it!ChelC wrote:There are so many cures, the problem is knowing which one(s) to gamble on and then of course the question of whether or not it's your time to go.
It reminds me of infertility. Different things will work for different issues and for some people nothing will work. What's hard about it is that people can really push their ideas onto you and make you feel like you didn't put up the fight you should have.
Some people get lucky, some don't. Some treatments heal, some don't. Some cancers are receptive to treatment, some aren't.
LoveIsTruth wrote:Cures exist. Cancer has been decisively cured decades ago. It's like saying, "people still die from colds." Yes they do, but it does not mean that a perfectly good cure is not available in general. Chemo "therapy" is worse than cancer itself. And if you did not have a cancer, chemo will give it to you, because it causes it!
Correct me if I'm wrong, ChelC, but I don't see where anyone has made the assertion that everyone has been cured by any program mentioned here or in the fertility thread.ChelC wrote:I just don't believe that these cures are cures for everyone.
Where was that assumption made?ChelC wrote:Perhaps not, but I hate the assumption being made that people who choose conventional medicine are apathetic, or that all MDs are part of some pharmaceutical conspiracy.
Too bad it keeps him from something so much better in the eternities... (And no, I don't believe he does better than if because of the smoking.) Users browsing this forum: arizona84084, DrJones, Fairminded, gert, Google Adsense [Bot], kathedralegs, kgrigio, vaquero and 46 guests